Safety and Effectiveness of Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Heart Failure: A MANIFEST-PF Sub-analysis
Status Publisher Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
38869506
DOI
10.1016/j.jacep.2024.05.002
PII: S2405-500X(24)00351-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Atrial fibrillation, HFPEF, HFREF, heart failure, pulsed field ablation,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) coexist, increasing morbidity and mortality. Studies have demonstrated improved outcomes following AF ablation in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF). OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes of pulsed-field ablation (PFA) in HF. METHODS: MANIFEST-PF is a multicenter patient-level registry of consecutive patients undergoing PFA for paroxysmal (PAF) or persistent AF (PerAF). In this sub-study, patients were stratified as: no history of HF (no-HF), HF with preserved EF (HFPEF; LVEF≥50%) or HF with reduced/mildly-reduced EF (HFMR/REF; LVEF<50%). The primary effectiveness and safety endpoints were freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias lasting ≥30s and major adverse events (MAEs), respectively. RESULTS: Of the 1,381 patients, 85% (n=1,174) were no-HF, 6.2% (n=87) were HFPEF, and 8.6% (n=120) were HFMR/REF. No-HF patients had less PerAF than patients with HF (p<0.001), with no difference between HF subtypes (p=1.00). The 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia was significantly higher in no-HF than with HFPEF or HFMR/REF (79.9%, 71.3%, 67.5%, p<0.001), but similar between HFMR/REF and HFPEF (p=0.26). However, there was no significant difference in freedom from atrial arrhythmia among patients with no-HF vs HFPEF vs HFMR/REF for those with PAF (82.8%/82.4%/71.7%, p=0.09) and PerAF (73.3%, 64.2%, and 64.9%, p=0.14.MAE rates were similar between the no-HF, HFPEF and HFMR/REF groups (1.9%, 0%, and 2.5%, respectively). CONCLUSION: PFA appears to be potentially safe and effective in AF patients with HF. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia post-PFA was higher in patients without a history of HF, with no significant difference between HF subtypes.
Asklepios Hospital St Georg Hamburg Germany
Cardiology Department Na Homolce Hospital Homolka Hospital Prague Czechia
Department for Cardiovascular Diseases University Hospital Center Split Split Croatia
Department of Cardiology Herlev Gentofte University Hospital Hellerup Denmark
Department of Cardiology Jessa Hospitals Hasselt Belgium
Department of Cardiology Rouen Hospital Rouen France
Department of Cardiology University Hospital Rangueil Toulouse France
Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
Heart Center Bad Neustadt Rhoen Clinic Campus Bad Neustadt Bad Neustadt an der Saale Germany
Heart Center University Hospital of Cologne Department for Electrophysiology Cologne Germany
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
IHU LIRYC CHU Bordeaux University of Bordeaux Bordeaux France
IKEM Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
Inselspital Bern University Hospital University of Bern Bern Switzerland
MVZ CCB Frankfurt und Main Taunus GbR Frankfurt Germany
University Heart and Vascular Center University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org