This article is focused on the experimental study of flexural properties in different multi-layer carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites and correlations with the results of finite element method (FEM) simulations of mechanical properties. The comparison of the results shows the possibility of reducing the number of experimental specimens for testing. The experimental study of flexural properties for four types of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites with twill weaves (2 × 2) was carried out. As input materials, pre-impregnated carbon laminate GG 204 T and GG 630 T (prepreg) and two types of carbon fiber fabrics (GG 285 T and GG 300 T (fabric)) were used. Multi-layer samples were manufactured from two types of prepregs and two types of fabrics, which were hand-impregnated during sample preparation. The layers were stacked using same orientation. All specimens for flexural test were cut with the longer side in the weft direction. Pre-impregnated carbon laminates were further impregnated with resin DT 121H. Carbon fabrics were hand-impregnated with epoxy matrix LG 120 and hardener HG 700. To fulfill the aim of this research, finite element method (FEM)-based simulations of mechanical properties were performed. The FEM simulations and analysis were conducted in Hexagon's MSC Marc Mentat 2022.3 and Digimat 2022.4 software. This paper presents the results of actual experimental bending tests and the results of simulations of bending tests for different composite materials (mentioned previously). We created material models for simulations based on two methods-MF (Mean Field) and FE (Finite Element), and the comparative results show better agreement with the MF model. The composites (GG 285 T and GG 300 T) showed better flexural results than composites made from pre-impregnated carbon laminates (GG 204 T and GG 630 T). The difference in results for the hand-impregnated laminates was about 15% higher than for prepregs, but this is still within an acceptable tolerance as per the reported literature. The highest percentage difference of 14.25% between the simulation and the real experiment was found for the software tool Digimat FE 2022.4-GG 630 T composite. The lowest difference of 0.5% was found for the software tool Digimat MF 2022.4-GG 204 T composite. By comparing the results of the software tools with the results of the experimental measurements, it was found that the Digimat MF 2022.4 tool is closer to the results of the experimental measurements than the Digimat FE 2022.4 tool.

Department of Design and Machine Elements Faculty of Mechanical Engineering University of Žilina Univerzitná 8215 1 010 26 Žilina Slovakia

Department of Machine Parts and Mechanism Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Technical University of Liberec Studentská 1402 2 461 17 Liberec Czech Republic

Department of Material Science and Manufacturing Technology Faculty of Engineering Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamycka 129 165 00 Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Miracle D.B., Donaldson S.L. ASTM Handbook, Composites, 21. ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 2001.

Anzelotti G. Ph.D. Thesis. Univesity of Parma; Parma, Italy: 2010. Development of a Digital Image Correlation Software for Full—Field Strain Analysis of CFRP.

Grand View Research. [(accessed on 20 October 2023)]. Available online: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/us-filter-market-report.

Riva E., Nicoletto G. WIT Transactions on State-of-the-Art in Science and Engineering. Volume 21. WIT Press; Southampton, UK: 2005. [(accessed on 20 October 2023)]. Modeling and prediction of the mechanical properties of woven laminates by the finite element method. Available online: https://www.witpress.com/Secure/elibrary/papers/9781853126697/9781853126697005FU1.pdf.

Markovičová L., Zatkalíková V., Hanusová P. Carbon fiber polymer composites. In: Ulewicz R., Hadzima B., editors. Quality Production Improvement 2019. De Gruyter; Warsaw, Poland: 2019. [(accessed on 20 October 2023)]. pp. 276–280. Available online: http://www.qpij.pl/2019/files/QPI_2019_Monograph.pdf.

Vijayan D.S., Sivasuriyan A., Devarajan P., Stefańska A., Wodzyński Ł., Koda E. Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP). Composites in Civil Engineering Application—A Comprehensive Review. Buildings. 2023;13:1509. doi: 10.3390/buildings13061509. DOI

Mishra R.K., Behera B.K., Chandan V., Nazari S., Muller M. Modeling and simulation of mechanical performance in textile structural concrete composites reinforced with basalt fibers. Polymers. 2022;14:4108. doi: 10.3390/polym14194108. PubMed DOI PMC

Laurenzi S., Marchetti M. Composites and Their Properties. InTech; London, UK: 2012. Advanced Composite Materials by Resin Transfer Molding for Aerospace Applications. DOI

Liu Q., Lin Y., Zong Z., Su G., Li Q. Lightweight design of carbon twill weave fabric composite body structure for electric vehicle. Compos. Struct. 2013;97:231–238. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.052. DOI

Liu Y., Zwingmann B., Schlaich M. Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer for Cable Structures—A Review. Polymers. 2015;7:2078–2099. doi: 10.3390/polym7101501. DOI

Paris O., Loidl D., Peterlik H. Texture of PAN- and pitch-based carbon fibers. Carbon. 2002;40:551–555. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00139-7. DOI

Huang X. Fabrication and Properties of Carbon Fibers. Materials. 2009;2:2369–2403. doi: 10.3390/ma2042369. DOI

Petrů M., Novák O. Finite Element Method—Simulation, Numerical Analysis and Solution Techniques. InTech; London, UK: 2018. FEM Analysis of Mechanical and Structural Properties of Long Fiber-Reinforced Composites. DOI

Vandeurzen P., Ivens J., Verpoest I. A three-dimensional micromechanical analysis of woven-fabric composites: I. Geometric analysis. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1996;56:1303–1315. doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00092-9. DOI

Hadăr A., Baciu F., Voicu A.-D., Vlăsceanu D., Tudose D.-I., Adetu C. Mechanical characteristics evaluation of a single ply and multi-ply carbon fiber-reinforced plastic subjected to tensile and bending loads. Polymers. 2022;14:3213. doi: 10.3390/polym14153213. PubMed DOI PMC

Ng S.P., Tse P.C., Lau K.J. Numerical and experimental determination of in-plane elastic properties of 2/2 twill weave fabric composites. Compos. Part B-Eng. 1998;29:735–744. doi: 10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00025-0. DOI

Burgani T.d.S., Alaie S., Tehrani M. Modeling Flexural Failure in Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites. J. Compos. Sci. 2022;6:33. doi: 10.3390/jcs6020033. DOI

Wang Y., Gu Y., Liu J. A domain-decomposition generalized finite difference method for stress analysis in three-dimensional composite materials. Appl. Math. Lett. 2020;104:106226. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2020.106226. DOI

Kabir H., Aghdam M.M. A generalized 2D Bézier-based solution for stress analysis of nothed epoxy resin plates reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Thin-Walled Struct. 2021;169:108484. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.108484. DOI

Heydarpour Y., Aghdam M.M. A hybrid Bézier based multi-step method and differential quadrature for 3D transient response of variable stiffness composite plates. Compos. Struct. 2016;154:344–359. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.060. DOI

Bert C.W., Malik M. Differential quadrature: A powerful new technique for analysis of composite structures. Compos. Struct. 1997;39:179–189. doi: 10.1016/S0263-8223(97)00112-8. DOI

Marszałek J. Span length effect on flexural properties of composite laminate reinforced with a plain weave carbon fiber fabric in a polymer matrix. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2022;29:322–334. doi: 10.1515/secm-2022-0155. DOI

1:2011 Fibre-Reinforced Plastic Composites. Determination of Flexural Properties. ISO; Geneva, Switzerland: 1998.

GRM Systems Lamination Resin LG 120 + Hardeners G 700 F. Technical Sheet, Delivered on Request, Version 3.1, Date of Publishing 7 January 2004, Date of Revision 2 August 2023. [(accessed on 7 November 2022)]. Available online: http://www.grm-systems.cz/en/epoxy.

G.ANGELONI. [(accessed on 2 December 2022)]. Available online: https://www.g-angeloni.com/elenco-prodotti/?swoof=1&product_cat=carbon.

Xian G., Zhou P., Bai Y., Wang J., Li C., Dong S., Guo R., Li J., Du H., Zhong J. Desing, preparation and mechanical properties of novel glass fiber reinforced polypropylene bending bars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024;429:136455. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136455. DOI

Wu J., Li C., Hailatihan B., Mi L., Baheti Y., Yan Y. Effect of the addition of thermoplastic resin and composite on mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy resin. Polymers. 2022;14:1087. doi: 10.3390/polym14061087. PubMed DOI PMC

DELTA Preg. [(accessed on 7 November 2022)]. Available online: https://www.delta-preg.com/impregnated-fabrics/

Ekuase O.A., Anjum N., Eze V.O., Okoli O.I. A Review on the Out-of-Autoclave Process for Composite Manufacturing. J. Compos. Sci. 2022;6:172. doi: 10.3390/jcs6060172. DOI

R&D Mold Machining. [(accessed on 7 June 2023)]. Available online: https://www.radmold.sk/?page_id=395.

Elkington M., Ward C., Chatzimichali A., Potter K. Studying effects of preshearing on hand layup. Adv. Manuf. Polym. Compos. Sci. 2015;1:80–93. doi: 10.1179/2055035914Y.0000000007. DOI

Hexagon, e-Xtream. [(accessed on 7 September 2023)]. Available online: https://www.e-xstream.com/products/digimat/about-digimat.

Wolter N., Beber V.C., Sandinge A., Blomqvist P., Goethals F., van Hove M., Jubete E., Mayer B., Koschek K. Carbon, Glass and Basalt fiber reinforced polybenzoaxine: The effects of fiber reinforcement on mechanical, fire, smoke and toxicity properties. Polymers. 2020;12:2379. doi: 10.3390/polym12102379. PubMed DOI PMC