Sexual Dimorphism: The Interrelation of Shape and Color
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
24-11735S
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
PubMed
38944665
PubMed Central
PMC11335828
DOI
10.1007/s10508-024-02918-1
PII: 10.1007/s10508-024-02918-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Facial contrast, Sex typicality, Sexual shape dimorphism, Skin color,
- MeSH
- charakteristické znaky pohlaví * MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- obličej * anatomie a histologie MeSH
- pigmentace kůže * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Vietnam MeSH
Sex-typicality displayed as sexual dimorphism of the human face is a key feature enabling sex recognition. It is also believed to be a cue for perceiving biological quality and it plays an important role in the perception of attractiveness. Sexual dimorphism of human faces has two main components: sexual shape dimorphism of various facial features and sexual color dimorphism, generally manifested as dimorphism of skin luminance, where men tend to be darker than women. However, very little is known about the mutual relationship of these two facets. We explored the interconnection between the dimorphism of face shape and dimorphism of face color in three visually distinct populations (Cameroonian, Czech, and Vietnamese). Our results indicated that populations which showed a significant dimorphism in skin luminance (Cameroon, Vietnam) had low levels of sexual shape dimorphism, while a population with higher levels of sexual shape dimorphism (Czech Republic) did not exhibit a significant dimorphism of skin luminance. These findings suggest a possible compensatory mechanism between various domains of sexual dimorphism in populations differing in the levels of shape and color dimorphism.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Adams, D. C., Collyer, M. L., & Kaliontzopoulou, A. (2019).
Adams, D. C., & Otárola-Castillo, E. (2013). geomorph: An R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. DOI
Brown, E., & Perrett, D. I. (1993). What gives a face its ethnicity? DOI
Bruce, V., Burton, A. M., Hanna, E., Healey, P., Mason, O., Coombes, A., Fright, R., & Linney, A. (1993). Sex discrimination: How do we tell the difference between male and female faces? PubMed DOI
Bruce, V., & Langton, S. (1994). The use of pigmentation and shading information in recognising the sex and identities of faces. PubMed DOI
Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. PubMed DOI
Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Dench, N. (1993). What’s the difference between men and women? Evidence from facial measurement. PubMed DOI
Carrier, D. R., & Morgan, M. H. (2015). Protective buttressing of the hominin face. PubMed DOI
Cellerino, A., Borghetti, D., & Sartucci, F. (2004). Sex differences in face gender recognition in humans. PubMed DOI
Claes, P., Liberton, D. K., Daniels, K., Rosana, K. M., Quillen, E. E., Pearson, L. N., McEvoy, B., Bauchet, M., Zaidi, A. A., Yao, W., Tang, H., Barsh, G. S., Absher, D. M., Puts, D. A., Rocha, J., Beleza, S., Pereira, R. W., Baynam, G., Suetens, P., … Shriver, M. D. (2014). Modeling 3D facial shape from DNA. PubMed PMC
Claes, P., Walters, M., Shriver, M. D., Puts, D., Gibson, G., Clement, J., Baynam, G., Verbeke, G., Vandermeulen, D., & Suetens, P. (2012). Sexual dimorphism in multiple aspects of 3D facial symmetry and asymmetry defined by spatially dense geometric morphometrics. PubMed DOI PMC
Coetzee, V., Greeff, J. M., Stephen, I. D., & Perrett, D. I. (2014). Cross-cultural agreement in facial attractiveness preferences: The role of ethnicity and gender. PubMed PMC
Daftary, K., Krishnam, N. S., & Kundu, R. V. (2023). Uncovering the roots of skin bleaching: Colorism and its detrimental effects. PubMed DOI PMC
Dupuis-Roy, N., Fortin, I., Fiset, D., & Gosselin, F. (2009). Uncovering gender discrimination cues in a realistic setting. PubMed DOI
Fiala, V., Tureček, P., Akoko, R. M., Pokorný, Š, & Kleisner, K. (2022). Africans and Europeans differ in their facial perception of dominance and sex-typicality: A multidimensional Bayesian approach. PubMed DOI PMC
Fink, B., Grammer, K., Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., Schaefer, K., Bookstein, F. L., & Manning, J. T. (2005). Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape. PubMed DOI PMC
Frost, P. (1990). Fair woman, dark men; The forgotten roots of color prejudice. DOI
Gonzalez-Santoyo, I., Wheatley, J. R., Welling, L. L. M., Cárdenas, R. A., Jimenez-Trejo, F., Dawood, K., & Puts, D. A. (2015). The face of female dominance: Women with dominant faces have lower cortisol. PubMed DOI
Hall, R. E. (2021).
Henderson, A. J., Holzleitner, I. J., Talamas, S. N., & Perrett, D. I. (2016). Perception of health from facial cues. PubMed DOI PMC
Hill, H., Bruce, V., & Akamatsu, S. (1995). Perceiving the sex and race of faces: The role of shape and colour. PubMed DOI
Hoss, R. A., Ramsey, J. L., Griffin, A. M., & Langlois, J. H. (2005). The role of facial attractiveness and facial masculinity/femininity in sex classification of faces. PubMed DOI PMC
Ito, S., & Wakamatsu, K. (2003). Quantitative analysis of eumelanin and pheomelanin in humans, mice, and other animals: A comparative review. PubMed DOI
Jablonski, N. G., & Chaplin, G. (2000). The evolution of human skin coloration. PubMed DOI
Jablonski, N. G., & Chaplin, G. (2010). Human skin pigmentation as an adaptation to UV radiation. PubMed DOI PMC
Jablonski, N. G., & Chaplin, G. (2013). Epidermal pigmentation in the human lineage is an adaptation to ultraviolet radiation. PubMed DOI
Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., & Grammer, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. DOI
Jones, B. C., Hahn, A. C., Fisher, C. I., Wang, H., Kandrik, M., Han, C., Fasolt, V., Morrison, D., Lee, A. J., Holzleitner, I. J., O’Shea, K. J., Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2018). No compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women’s hormonal status. PubMed DOI PMC
Jones, B. C., Holzleitner, I. J., & Shiramizu, V. (2021). Does facial attractiveness really signal immunocompetence? PubMed DOI
Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L., DeBruine, L. M., Feinberg, D. R., Law Smith, M. J., Cornwell, R. E., Moore, F. R., & Perrett, D. I. (2005). Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high. PubMed DOI
Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2004). When facial attractiveness is only skin deep. PubMed DOI
Jones, D., & Hill, K. (1993). Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. PubMed DOI
Kleisner, K., Kočnar, T., Rubešová, A., & Flegr, J. (2010). Eye color predicts but does not directly influence perceived dominance in men. DOI
Kleisner, K., Kočnar, T., Tureček, P., Stella, D., Akoko, R. M., Třebický, V., & Havlíček, J. (2017). African and European perception of African female attractiveness. DOI
Kleisner, K., Pokorný, Š., & Černý, V. (2024). Sexually dimorphic traits are associated with subsistence strategy in African faces from the Sahel/Savannah belt. PubMed DOI
Kleisner, K., Saribay, S. A., & Pokorný, Š. (2019). Towards a new approach to cross-cultural distinctiveness and typicality of human faces: The cross-group typicality/distinctiveness metric. PubMed DOI PMC
Kleisner, K., Tureček, P., Roberts, S. C., Havlíček, J., Valentova, J. V., Akoko, R. M., Leongómez, J. D., Apostol, S., Varella, M. A. C., & Saribay, S. A. (2021). How and why patterns of sexual dimorphism in human faces vary across the world. PubMed DOI PMC
Komori, M., Kawamura, S., & Ishihara, S. (2011). Multiple mechanisms in the perception of face gender: Effect of sex-irrelevant features. PubMed DOI
Lu, Y., Xiao, K., Yang, J., Pointer, M., Li, C., & Wuerger, S. (2022). Different colour predictions of facial preference by Caucasian and Chinese observers. PubMed PMC
Magid, K., Chatterton, R. T., Ahamed, F. U., & Bentley, G. R. (2018). Childhood ecology influences salivary testosterone, pubertal age and stature of Bangladeshi UK migrant men. PubMed DOI
Marcinkowska, U. M., Kaminski, G., Little, A. C., & Jasienska, G. (2018). Average ovarian hormone levels, rather than daily values and their fluctuations, are related to facial preferences among women. PubMed DOI
Marcinkowska, U. M., Rantala, M. J., Lee, A. J., Kozlov, M. V., Aavik, T., Cai, H., Contreras-Garduño, J., David, O. A., Kaminski, G., Li, N. P., Onyishi, I. E., Prasai, K., Pazhoohi, F., Prokop, P., Cardozo, S. L. R., Sydney, N., Taniguchi, H., Krams, I., & Dixson, B. J. W. (2019). Women’s preferences for men’s facial masculinity are strongest under favorable ecological conditions. PubMed DOI PMC
Martínez-Ramírez, J., Puts, D., Nieto, J., & G-Santoyo, I. (2023). Effects of facial skin pigmentation on social judgments in a Mexican population. PubMed DOI PMC
Mitteroecker, P., Windhager, S., Müller, G. B., & Schaefer, K. (2015). The morphometrics of “masculinity” in human faces. PubMed DOI PMC
Nakamura, K., & Watanabe, K. (2020). A new data-driven mathematical model dissociates attractiveness from sexual dimorphism of human faces. PubMed DOI PMC
Nestor, A., & Tarr, M. J. (2008). Gender recognition of human faces using color. PubMed DOI
O’Toole, A. J., Deffenbacher, K. A., Valentin, D., Mckee, K., Huff, D., Abdi, H., Bartlett, C., Edelman, S., Biilthoff, H. H., & Wolford, G. (1998). The perception of face gender: The role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification. PubMed DOI
Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2000). Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence. DOI
Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, S. P., Castles, D. L., & Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. PubMed DOI
Pokorný, Š., & Kleisner, K. (2021). Sexual dimorphism in facial contrast: A case from Central Africa. PubMed DOI
Porcheron, A., Mauger, E., Soppelsa, F., Liu, Y., Ge, L., Pascalis, O., Russell, R., & Morizot, F. (2017). Facial contrast is a cross-cultural cue for perceiving age. PubMed DOI PMC
Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. DOI
Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. PubMed DOI
Rhodes, G., Chan, J., Zebrowitz, L. A., & Simmons, L. W. (2003). Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health? PubMed DOI PMC
Roberts, T., & Bruce, V. (1988). Feature saliency in judging the sex and familiarity of faces. PubMed DOI
Rohlf, F. J. (2015). The TPS series of software.
Russell, R. (2003). Sex, beauty, and the relative luminance of facial features. PubMed DOI
Russell, R. (2009). A sex difference in facial contrast and its exaggeration by cosmetics. PubMed DOI
Schlager, S. (2017). Morpho and Rvcg–shape analysis in R: R-packages for geometric morphometrics, shape analysis and surface manipulations. In G. Zheng, S. Li, & G. Székely (Eds.),
Scott, I. M., Clark, A. P., Josephson, S. C., Boyette, A. H., Cuthill, I. C., Fried, R. L., Gibson, M. A., Hewlett, B. S., Jamieson, M., Jankowiak, W., Honey, P. L., Huang, Z., Liebert, M. A., Purzycki, B. G., Shaver, J. H., Snodgrass, J. J., Sosis, R., Sugiyama, L. S., Swami, V., … Penton-Voak, I. S. (2014). Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel. PubMed DOI PMC
Sheehan, M. J., & Nachman, M. W. (2014). Morphological and population genomic evidence that human faces have evolved to signal individual identity. PubMed DOI PMC
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. PubMed DOI
Stephen, I. D., Scott, I. M. L., Coetzee, V., Pound, N., Perrett, D. I., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2012). Cross-cultural effects of color, but not morphological masculinity, on perceived attractiveness of men’s faces. DOI
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. (1999). Facial attractiveness. PubMed DOI
Třebický, V., Fialová, J., Kleisner, K., & Havlicek, J. (2016). Focal length affects depicted shape and perception of facial images. PubMed DOI PMC
Třebický, V., Havlíček, J., Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., & Kleisner, K. (2013). Perceived aggressiveness predicts fighting performance in mixed-martial-arts fighters. PubMed DOI
Valenzano, D. R., Mennucci, A., Tartarelli, G., & Cellerino, A. (2006). Shape analysis of female facial attractiveness. PubMed DOI
van den Berghe, P. L., & Frost, P. (1986). Skin color preference, sexual dimorphism and sexual selection: A case of gene-culture co-evolution. DOI
Vera Cruz, G. (2018). The impact of face skin tone on perceived facial attractiveness: A study realized with an innovative methodology. PubMed DOI
Wee, A. G., Beatty, M. W., Gozalo-Diaz, D. J., Kim-Pusateri, S., & Marx, D. B. (2013). Proposed shade guide for human facial skin and lip: A pilot study. PubMed DOI
Wild, H. A., Barrett, S. E., Spence, M. J., O’Toole, A. J., Cheng, Y. D., & Brooke, J. (2000). Recognition and sex categorization of adults’ and children’s faces: Examining performance in the absence of sex-stereotyped cues. PubMed DOI
Yip, A. W., & Sinha, P. (2002). Contribution of color to face recognition. PubMed DOI
Zaidi, A. A., White, J. D., Mattern, B. C., Liebowitz, C. R., Puts, D. A., Claes, P., & Shriver, M. D. (2019). Facial masculinity does not appear to be a condition-dependent male ornament and does not reflect MHC heterozygosity in humans. PubMed DOI PMC
Zebrowitz, L. A., Wang, R., Bronstad, P. M., Eisenberg, D., Undurraga, E., Reyes-García, V., & Godoy, R. (2012). First impressions from faces among US and culturally isolated Tsimane’people in the Bolivian rainforest. DOI