The monocyte distribution width (MDW) has emerged as a promising biomarker for accurate and early identification of patients with potentially life-threatening infections. Here we tested the diagnostic performance of MDW in adult patients requiring hospital admission for community-acquired infections and sepsis, evaluated sources of heterogeneity in the estimates of diagnostic accuracy, and assessed the meaning of MDW in a patient population presenting to the emergency department (ED) for acute non-infectious conditions. 1925 consecutive patients were categorized into three groups: non-infection (n = 1507), infection (n = 316), and sepsis/septic shock (n = 102). Diagnostic performance for infection or sepsis of MDW alone or in combination with components of SOFA was tested using AUC of ROC curves, sensitivity, and specificity. The relationship between MDW and different pathogens as well as the impact of non-infectious conditions on MDW values were explored. For the prediction of infection, the AUC/ROC of MDW (0.84) was nearly overlapping that of procalcitonin (0.83), and C-reactive protein (0.89). Statistical optimal cut-off value for MDW was 21 for predicting infection (sensitivity 73%, specificity 82%) and 22 for predicting sepsis (sensitivity 79%, specificity 83%). The best threshold to rule out infection was MDW ≤ 17 (NPV 96.9, 95% CI 88.3-100.0), and ≤ 18 (NPV 99.5, 95% CI 98.3-100.0) to rule out sepsis. The combination of MDW with markers of organ dysfunction (creatinine, bilirubin, platelets) substantially improved the AUC (0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.97); specificity and sensitivity of 88% and 94%, respectively). In conclusion, MDW has a good diagnostic performance in diagnosing infection and sepsis in patients presenting in ED. Its use as an infection marker even increases when combined with other markers of organ dysfunction. Understanding the impact of interactions of non-infectious conditions and comorbidities on MDW and its diagnostic accuracy requires further elucidation.

1st Department of Internal Medicine Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Teaching Hospital Charles University Prague alej Svobody 80 323 00 Pilsen Czech Republic

Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Hematology Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Teaching Hospital Charles University Prague alej Svobody 80 323 00 Pilsen Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Fleischmann-Struzek C, Mikolajetz A, Schwarzkopf D, Cohen J, Hartog CS, Pletz M, et al. Challenges in assessing the burden of sepsis and understanding the inequalities of sepsis outcomes between National Health Systems: Secular trends in sepsis and infection incidence and mortality in Germany. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(11):1826–1835. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5377-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Agnello L, Giglio RV, Bivona G, Scazzone C, Gambino CM, Iacona A, et al. The value of a complete blood count (CBC) for sepsis diagnosis and prognosis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11(10):1881. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101881. PubMed DOI PMC

May JE, Marques MB, Reddy VVB, Gangaraju R. Three neglected numbers in the CBC: The RDW, MPV, and NRBC count. Cleve Clin. J. Med. 2019;86(3):167–172. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.86a.18072. PubMed DOI

Crouser ED, Parrillo JE, Seymour CW, Angus DC, Bicking K, Esguerra VG, et al. Monocyte distribution width: A novel indicator of sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 in high-risk emergency department patients. Crit. Care Med. 2019;47(8):1018–1025. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003799. PubMed DOI PMC

Crouser ED, Parrillo JE, Martin GS, Huang DT, Hausfater P, Grigorov I, et al. Monocyte distribution width enhances early sepsis detection in the emergency department beyond SIRS and qSOFA. J. Intensive Care. 2020 doi: 10.1186/s40560-020-00446-3. PubMed DOI PMC

Jo SJ, Kim SW, Choi J-H, Choi SP, Lee J, Lim J. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a useful indicator for early screening of sepsis and discriminating false positive blood cultures. PLoS One. 2022;17(12):e0279374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279374. PubMed DOI PMC

Piva E, Zuin J, Pelloso M, Tosato F, Fogar P, Plebani M. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) parameter as a sepsis indicator in intensive care units. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2021;59(7):1307–1314. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0192. PubMed DOI

Agnello L, Ciaccio AM, Vidali M, Cortegiani A, Biundo G, Gambino CM, et al. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) in sepsis. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2023;548:117511. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2023.117511. PubMed DOI

Çelik HT, Portakal O, Yiğit Ş, Hasçelik G, Korkmaz A, Yurdakök M. Efficacy of new leukocyte parameters versus serum C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and interleukin-6 in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Pediatr. Int. 2016;58(2):119–125. doi: 10.1111/ped.12754. PubMed DOI

Malinovska A, Hinson JS, Badaki-Makun O, Hernried B, Smith A, Debraine A, et al. Monocyte distribution width as part of a broad pragmatic sepsis screen in the emergency department. J. Am. Coll. Emerg. Physicians Open. 2022 doi: 10.1002/emp2.12679. PubMed DOI PMC

Hou S-K, Lin H-A, Chen S-C, Lin C-F, Lin S-F. Monocyte distribution width, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio improves early prediction for sepsis at the emergency. J. Pers. Med. 2021;11(8):732. doi: 10.3390/jpm11080732. PubMed DOI PMC

Poz D, Crobu D, Sukhacheva E, Rocchi MBL, Anelli MC, Curcio F. Monocyte distribution width (MDW): A useful biomarker to improve sepsis management in Emergency Department. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2022;60(3):433–440. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0875. PubMed DOI

Polilli E, Di Iorio G, Silveri C, Angelini G, Anelli MC, Esposito JE, et al. Monocyte distribution width as a predictor of community acquired sepsis in patients prospectively enrolled at the emergency department. BMC Infect. Dis. 2022 doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07803-7. PubMed DOI PMC

Crouser ED, Parrillo JE, Seymour C, Angus DC, Bicking K, Tejidor L, et al. Improved early detection of sepsis in the ED with a novel monocyte distribution width biomarker. Chest. 2017;152(3):518–526. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.039. PubMed DOI PMC

Motawea KR, S. Rozan S, Elsayed Talat N, H. Elhalag R, Mohammed Reyad S, Chebl P, et al. Comparison of monocyte distribution width and Procalcitonin as diagnostic markers for sepsis: Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. PLoS One. 2023;18(8):e0288203. 10.1371/journal.pone.0288203. PubMed PMC

Meraj F, Shaikh S, Maqsood S, Kanani F, Khan H, Jamal S. Monocyte distribution width, a novel biomarker for early sepsis screening and comparison with procalcitonin and C-reactive protein. J. Lab. Physicians. 2023;15(02):294–299. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758666. PubMed DOI PMC

la Woo A, Oh DK, Park C-J, Hong S-B. Monocyte distribution width compared with C-reactive protein and procalcitonin for early sepsis detection in the emergency department. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0250101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250101. PubMed DOI PMC

Polilli E, Sozio F, Frattari A, Persichitti L, Sensi M, Posata R, et al. Comparison of monocyte distribution width (MDW) and procalcitonin for early recognition of sepsis. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0227300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227300. PubMed DOI PMC

Ognibene A, Lorubbio M, Montemerani S, Tacconi D, Saracini A, Fabbroni S, et al. Monocyte distribution width and the fighting action to neutralize sepsis (FANS) score for sepsis prediction in emergency department. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2022;534:65–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2022.07.007. PubMed DOI

Li C-H, Seak C-J, Chaou C-H, Su T-H, Gao S-Y, Chien C-Y, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of monocyte distribution width and procalcitonin in sepsis cases in the emergency department: A prospective cohort study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2022 doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06999-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Hausfater P, Robert Boter N, Morales Indiano C, Cancella de Abreu M, Marin AM, Pernet J, et al. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) performance as an early sepsis indicator in the emergency department: Comparison with CRP and procalcitonin in a multicenter international European prospective study. Crit. Care. 2021 doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03622-5. PubMed DOI PMC

Malinovska A, Hernried B, Lin A, Badaki-Makun O, Fenstermacher K, Ervin AM, et al. Monocyte distribution width as a diagnostic marker for infection. Chest. 2023;164(1):101–113. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.12.049. PubMed DOI

Huang Y-H, Chen C-J, Shao S-C, Li C, Hsiao C-H, Niu K-Y, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of monocyte distribution width, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein for sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Care Med. 2023;51(5):e106–e114. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005820. PubMed DOI PMC

Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315(8):801. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. PubMed DOI PMC

Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, Brunkhorst FM, Rea TD, Scherag A, et al. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: For the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315(8):762. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288. PubMed DOI PMC

Anand V, Zhang Z, Kadri SS, Klompas M, Rhee C. Epidemiology of quick sequential organ failure assessment criteria in undifferentiated patients and association with suspected infection and sepsis. Chest. 2019;156(2):289–297. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.03.032. PubMed DOI PMC

Han KH, Hong K-H, Park J-H, Ko J, Kang D-H, Choi K-J, et al. C-reactive protein promotes monocyte chemoattractant protein-1—mediated chemotaxis through upregulating CC chemokine receptor 2 expression in human monocytes. Circulation. 2004;109(21):2566–2571. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000131160.94926.6e. PubMed DOI

Hilgendorf I, Swirski FK. Making a difference: Monocyte heterogeneity in cardiovascular disease. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2012;14(5):450–459. doi: 10.1007/s11883-012-0274-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Considine RV. Activated monocytes: Yet another link between systemic inflammation and obesity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;99(7):2347–2349. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2095. PubMed DOI

Mellhammar L, Elén S, Ehrhard S, Bouma H, Ninck L, Muntjewerff E, et al. New, useful criteria for assessing the evidence of infection in sepsis research. Crit. Care Explor. 2022;4(5):e0697. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000697. PubMed DOI PMC