Using three-dimensional geometric morphometry for facial analysis in patients with the oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
39031119
DOI
10.1111/ocr.12834
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- facial soft tissue asymmetry, geometric morphometry, oculo‐auriculo‐vertebral spectrum, three‐dimensional scanning,
- MeSH
- Facial Asymmetry * diagnostic imaging pathology MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Goldenhar Syndrome * diagnostic imaging pathology MeSH
- Cephalometry methods MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Face anatomy & histology diagnostic imaging pathology MeSH
- Imaging, Three-Dimensional * methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
AIM: To utilize three-dimensional (3D) geometric morphometry for visualization of the level of facial asymmetry in patients with the oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum (OAVS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional facial scans of 25 Czech patients with OAVS were processed. The patients were divided into subgroups according to Pruzansky classification. For 13 of them, second 3D facial scans were obtained. The 3D facial scans were processed using geometric morphometry. Soft tissue facial asymmetry in the sagittal plane and its changes in two time spots were visualized using colour-coded maps with a thermometre-like scale. RESULTS: Individual facial asymmetry was visualized in all patients as well as the mean facial asymmetry for every Pruzansky subgroup. The mean colour-coded maps of type I and type IIA subgroups showed no differences in facial asymmetry, more pronounced asymmetry in the middle and the lower facial third was found between type IIA and type IIB (maximum 1.5 mm) and between type IIB and type III (maximum 2 mm). The degree of intensity facial asymmetry in affected middle and lower facial thirds did not change distinctly during the two time spots in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D geometric morphometry in OAVS patients could be a useful tool for objective facial asymmetry assessment in patients with OAVS. The calculated colour-coded maps are illustrative and useful for clinical evaluation.
See more in PubMed
Grabb WC. The first and second branchial arch syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965;36(5):485‐508.
Barisic I, Odak L, Loane M, et al. Prevalence, prenatal diagnosis and clinical features of oculo‐auriculo‐vertebral spectrum: a registry‐based study in Europe. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22(8):1026‐1033.
Tasse C, Böhringer S, Fischer S, et al. Oculo‐auriculo‐vertebral spectrum (OAVS): clinical evaluation and severity scoring of 53 patients and proposal for a new classification. Eur J Med Genet. 2005;48(4):397‐411.
Caron CJJM, Pluijmers BI, Wolvius EB, et al. Craniofacial and extracraniofacial anomalies in craniofacial macrosomia: a multicenter study of 755 patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;45(8):1302‐1310.
Cousley RRJ, Calvert ML. Current concepts in the understanding and management of hemifacial microsomia. Br J Plast Surg. 1997;50(7):536‐551.
Gorlin RJ, Cohen MM Jr, Hennekam RCM. Syndromes of the Head and Neck. Oxford University Press; 2010:879‐887.
Manara R, Schifano G, Brotto D, et al. Facial asymmetry quantitative evaluation in oculoauriculovertebral spectrum. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:219‐225.
Hofmann E, Schmid M, Steinhäuser‐Andresen S, Hirschfelder U. Three‐dimensional CT evaluation of oculoauriculovertebral spectrum patients use of Katsumata‘s asymmetry index. J Orofac Orthop. 2016;77(3):176‐184.
Cassi D, Battistoni G, Magni M, Di C, Pedrazzi G, Di A. Three‐dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with hemifacial microsomia using stereophotogrammetry. J Cranio‐Maxillofacial Surg. 2019;47(1):179‐184.
Kearns GJ, Padwa BL, Mulliken JB, Kaban LB. Progression of facial asymmetry in hemifacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(2):492‐498.
Shibazaki‐Yorozuya R, Yamada A, Nagata S, Ueda K, Miller AJ, Maki K. Three‐dimensional longitudinal changes in craniofacial growth in untreated hemifacial microsomia patients with cone‐beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;145(5):579‐594.
Solem RC, Ruellas A, Miller A, et al. Congenital and acquired mandibular asymmetry: mapping growth and remodeling in 3 dimensions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;150(2):238‐251.
Meazzini MC, Mazzoleni F, Bozzetti A, Brusati R. Comparison of mandibular vertical growth in hemifacial microsomia patients treated with early distraction or not treated: follow up till the completion of growth. J Cranio‐Maxillofacial Surg. 2012;40(2):105‐111.
Ongkosuwito EM, van Vooren J, van Neck JW, et al. Changes of mandibular ramal height, during growth in unilateral hemifacial microsomia patients and unaffected controls. J Cranio‐Maxillofacial Surg. 2013;41(2):92‐97.
Polley JW, Figueroa AA, Liou EJW, Cohen M. Longitunal analysis of mandibular asymmetry in hemifacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:328‐339.
Pruzansky S. Not all dwarfed mandibles are alike. Birth Defects. 1969;5(2):120‐129.
Kaban LB, Moses MH, Mulliken JB. Surgical correction of hemifacial microsomia in the growing child. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82(1):9‐19.
Dupej J, Krajicek V, Velemínská J, Pelikan J. Statistical Mesh Shape Analysis with Nonlandmark Nonrigid Registration. SGP Posters; 2014.
Dupej J, Krajíček V, Pelikán J. Low‐rank matrix approximations for coherent point drift. Pattern Recogn Lett. 2015;52:53‐58.
Hutton TJ, Buxton BR, Hammond P. Dense surface point distribution models of the human face. Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis (MMBIA 2001) 153–160.
Mawji A, Vollman AR, Hatfield J, McNeil DA, Sauvé R. The incidence of positional plagiocephaly: a cohort study. Pediatrics. 2013;132(2):298‐304.
Moslerová V, Dadáková M, Dupej J, et al. Three‐dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry in preschool patients with orofacial clefts after neonatal cheiloplasty. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;108:40‐45.
Bridges SJ, Chambers TL, Pople IK. Plagiocephaly and head binding. Arch Dis Child. 2002;86:144‐145.
Slovis TL, Rozelle AA, McAlister WH. Craniosynostosis, Selected Craniofacial Syndromes, and Other Abnormalities of the Skull, Caffey's Pediatr. Diagnostic Imaging. 12th ed. MD Philadelphia; 2013:188.
Švihlíková Poláčková P, Moslerová V, Koťová M. 3D morfometrie obličeje u pacientů s okulo‐aurikulo‐vertebrálním spektrem. Czech Stomatol Pract Dentistry/Ceská Stomatologie a Prakticke Zubni lékarstvi. 2019;119(2):48‐56.
