Older MRD vs. younger MUD in patients older than 50 years with AML in remission using post-transplant cyclophosphamide
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Comparative Study
PubMed
39048722
DOI
10.1038/s41375-024-02359-8
PII: 10.1038/s41375-024-02359-8
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute * therapy mortality drug therapy pathology MeSH
- Cyclophosphamide * therapeutic use administration & dosage MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Transplantation, Homologous MeSH
- Remission Induction * MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Graft vs Host Disease etiology MeSH
- Unrelated Donors MeSH
- Transplantation Conditioning * methods MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation * methods MeSH
- Age Factors MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Cyclophosphamide * MeSH
An increasing number of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are offered an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Normally, older patients have older matched related donors (MRD). Matched unrelated donors (MUD) are an important alternative, but it remains unclear whether a younger MUD is associated with better outcomes, especially in the context of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). We compared outcomes of patients older than 50 years with AML in first complete remission (CR1) and receiving a first HSCT from a 10/10 MUD aged younger than 40 years to those receiving a graft from a MRD aged older than 50 years, using PTCy and with well-known transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) score. A total of 345 consecutive patients were included and classified according to TCI score as low, intermediate, or high. On multivariable analysis in the TCI-intermediate/high group, MUD was associated with better graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival, lower non-relapse mortality and lower relapse incidence. For patients receiving a TCI-low regimen, outcomes are independent on the type of donor. In patients with AML in CR1, older than 50 years and receiving a TCI-intermediate/high conditioning regimen using PTCy, a MUD younger than 40 years is preferable over a MRD older than 50 years.
Bone Marrow Transplantation and Institute of Cell Therapy University of Patras Patras Greece
Department of Haematology Oncology Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN USA
Department of Hematology Amsterdam UMC location VU Amsterdam The Netherlands
Division of Hematology Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer Israel
EBMT Paris Office Hopital Saint Antoine Paris France
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS Roma Italy
Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital Milan Italy
Hematology Hospital Regional de Málaga Malaga Spain
Hôpital Saint Antoine Sorbonne University INSERM UMRs 938 Paris France
Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Prague Prague Czech Republic
Università Vita Salute San Raffaele Milan Italy
University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
See more in PubMed
Li X, Zeng X, Xu Y, Wang B, Zhao Y, Lai X, et al. Mechanisms and rejuvenation strategies for aged hematopoietic stem cells. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13:31. PubMed DOI PMC
Jaiswal S, Fontanillas P, Flannick J, Manning A, Grauman PV, Mar BG, et al. Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2488–98. PubMed DOI PMC
Kollman C, Spellman SR, Zhang MJ, Hassebroek A, Anasetti C, Antin JH, et al. The effect of donor characteristics on survival after unrelated donor transplantation for hematologic malignancy. Blood. 2016;127:260–7. PubMed DOI PMC
DeZern AE, Franklin C, Tsai HL, Imus PH, Cooke KR, Varadhan R, et al. Relationship of donor age and relationship to outcomes of haploidentical transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide. Blood Adv. 2021;5:1360–8. PubMed DOI PMC
Ambinder A, Jain T, Tsai HL, Horowitz MM, Jones RJ, Varadhan R. HLA-matching with PTCy: a reanalysis of a CIBMTR dataset with propensity score matching and donor age. Blood Adv. 2022;6:4335–46. PubMed DOI PMC
Wang Y, Wu DP, Liu QF, Xu LP, Liu KY, Zhang XH, et al. Donor and recipient age, gender and ABO incompatibility regardless of donor source: validated criteria for donor selection for haematopoietic transplants. Leukemia. 2018;32:492–8. PubMed DOI
Alousi AM, Le-Rademacher J, Saliba RM, Appelbaum FR, Artz A, Benjamin J, et al. Who is the better donor for older hematopoietic transplant recipients: an older-aged sibling or a young, matched unrelated volunteer? Blood. 2013;121:2567–73. PubMed DOI PMC
Peffault de Latour R, Labopin M, Cornelissen J, Vigouroux S, Craddock C, Blaise D, et al. In patients older than 55 years with AML in first CR, should we search for a matched unrelated donor when an old sibling donor is available? Bone Marrow Transpl. 2015;50:1411–5. DOI
Guru Murthy GS, Kim S, Hu ZH, Estrada-Merly N, Abid MB, Aljurf M, et al. Relapse and disease-free survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation using older matched sibling donors vs. younger matched unrelated donors. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:404–11. PubMed DOI PMC
Abid MB, Estrada-Merly N, Zhang MJ, Chen K, Allan D, Bredeson C, et al. Impact of donor age on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes in older adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Transpl Cell Ther. 2023;29:578.e1–578.e9. DOI
Ruggeri A, Labopin M, Ciceri F, Mohty M, Nagler A. Definition of GvHD-free, relapse-free survival for registry-based studies: an ALWP–EBMT analysis on patients with AML in remission. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2016;51:610–1. DOI
Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, et al. 1994 Consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transpl. 1995;15:825–8.
Lee SJ, Vogelsang G, Flowers MED. Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2003;9:215–33. DOI
Spyridonidis A, Labopin M, Savani BN, Niittyvuopio R, Blaise D, Craddock C, et al. Redefining and measuring transplant conditioning intensity in current era: a study in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2020;55:1114–25. DOI
Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–81. DOI
Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med. 1999;18:695–706. PubMed DOI
Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966;50:163–70. PubMed
Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94:496–509. DOI
Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, Baron F, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood. 2005;106:2912–9. PubMed DOI PMC
Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1972;34:187–220. DOI
D’Souza A, Fretham C, Lee SJ, Arora M, Brunner J, Chhabra S, et al. Current use of and trends in hematopoietic cell transplantation in the United States. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2020;26:e177–82. DOI
Montoro J, Piñana JL, Hernández-Boluda JC, Hernani R, Lorenzo I, Pérez A, et al. Uniform graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with posttransplant cyclophosphamide, sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from haploidentical, matched sibling and unrelated donors. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2020;55:2147–59. DOI
Sanz J, Galimard J-E, Labopin M, Afanasyev B, Angelucci E, Ciceri F, et al. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide after matched sibling, unrelated and haploidentical donor transplants in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a comparative study of the ALWP EBMT. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13:46. PubMed DOI PMC
Piemontese S, Lupo Stanghellini MT, Sora F, Sica S, Peccatori J, Marcatti M, et al. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide with Sirolimus or Cyclosporine for GvHD prophylaxis in matched related and unrelated transplantation: a two-center analysis on 213 consecutive patients. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2024;59:692–4. DOI
Bolaños-Meade J, Hamadani M, Wu J, Al Malki MM, Martens MJ, Runaas L, et al. Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:2338–48. PubMed DOI PMC
Spyridonidis A, Labopin M, Gedde-Dahl T, Ganser A, Stelljes M, Craddock C, et al. Validation of the transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) index for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2024;59:217–23. DOI
Abid MB, Estrada-Merly N, Zhang MJ, Chen K, Bredeson C, Allan D, et al. Younger matched unrelated donors confer decreased relapse risk compared to older sibling donors in older patients with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Transpl Cell Ther. 2023;29:611–8. DOI
Marcoux C, Marin D, Ramdial J, AlAtrash G, Alousi AM, Oran B, et al. Younger haploidentical donor versus older matched unrelated donor for patients with AML/MDS. Am J Hematol. 2023;98:712–9. PubMed DOI
Shaw BE, Logan BR, Spellman SR, Marsh SGE, Robinson J, Pidala J, et al. Development of an unrelated donor selection score predictive of survival after HCT: donor age matters most. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2018;24:1049–56. DOI