The bacterial anode of microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) is the limiting factor in a high hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). This study focused on improving biofilm attachment to a carbon-cloth anode using an alginate hydrogel. In addition, the modified bioanode was encapsulated by a filter bag that served as a physical barrier, to overcome its low mechanical strength and alginate degradation by certain bacterial species in wastewater. The MEC based on an encapsulated alginate bioanode (alginate bioanode encapsulated by a filter bag) was compared with three controls: an MEC based on a bare bioanode (non-immobilized bioanode), an alginate bioanode, and an encapsulated bioanode (bioanode encapsulated by a filter bag). At the beginning of the operation, the Rct value for the encapsulated alginate bioanode was 240.2 Ω, which decreased over time and dropped to 9.8 Ω after three weeks of operation when the Geobacter medium was used as the carbon source. When the MECs were fed with wastewater, the encapsulated alginate bioanode led to the highest current density of 9.21 ± 0.16 A·m-2 (at 0.4 V), which was 20%, 95%, and 180% higher, compared to the alginate bioanode, bare bioanode, and encapsulated bioanode, respectively. In addition, the encapsulated alginate bioanode led to the highest reduction currents of (4.14 A·m-2) and HER of 0.39 m3·m-3·d-1. The relative bacterial distribution of Geobacter was 79%. The COD removal by all the bioanodes was between 62% and 88%. The findings of this study demonstrate that the MEC based on the encapsulated alginate bioanode exhibited notably higher bio-electroactivity compared to both bare, alginate bioanode, and an encapsulated bioanode. We hypothesize that this improvement in electron transfer rate is attributed to the preservation and the biofilm on the anode material using alginate hydrogel which was inserted into a filter bag.

Department of Chemical Engineering Ariel University Ariel 40700 Israel

Department of Chemical Sciences Ariel University Ariel 40700 Israel

Department of Environmental Studies University of Delhi New Delhi 110007 India

Research and Development Centre for Renewable Energy New Technologies Research Centre University of West Bohemia 30100 Pilsen Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Molinos-Senante M., Maziotis A. Evaluation of Energy Efficiency of Wastewater Treatment Plants: The Influence of the Technology and Aging Factors. Appl. Energy. 2022;310:118535. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118535. DOI

Escapa A., Gil-Carrera L., García V., Morán A. Performance of a Continuous Flow Microbial Electrolysis Cell (MEC) Fed with Domestic Wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2012;117:55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.060. PubMed DOI

Schechter M., Schechter A., Rozenfeld S., Efrat E., Cahan R. Technology and Application of Microbial Fuel Cells. IntechOpen Limited; London, UK: 2014. Anode Biofilm. DOI

Rozenfeld S., Teller H., Schechter M., Farber R., Krichevski O., Schechter A., Cahan R. Exfoliated Molybdenum Di-Sulfide (MoS2) Electrode for Hydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cell. Bioelectrochemistry. 2018;123:201–210. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2018.05.007. PubMed DOI

Friman H., Schechter A., Ioffe Y., Nitzan Y., Cahan R. Current Production in a Microbial Fuel Cell Using a Pure Culture of Cupriavidus Basilensis Growing in Acetate or Phenol as a Carbon Source. Microb. Biotechnol. 2013;6:425–434. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12026. PubMed DOI PMC

Logan B.E. Microbial Fuel Cells. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2008. pp. 1–200. DOI

Kyazze G., Popov A., Dinsdale R., Esteves S., Hawkes F., Premier G., Guwy A. Influence of Catholyte PH and Temperature on Hydrogen Production from Acetate Using a Two Chamber Concentric Tubular Microbial Electrolysis Cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2010;35:7716–7722. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.036. DOI

Rousseau R., Etcheverry L., Roubaud E., Basséguy R., Délia M.L., Bergel A. Microbial Electrolysis Cell (MEC): Strengths, Weaknesses and Research Needs from Electrochemical Engineering Standpoint. Appl. Energy. 2020;257:113938. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113938. DOI

Merrill M.D., Logan B.E. Electrolyte Effects on Hydrogen Evolution and Solution Resistance in Microbial Electrolysis Cells. J. Power Sources. 2009;191:203–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.02.077. DOI

Gluhchev G., Ignatov I., Karadzhov S., Miloshev G., Ivanov N., Mosin O., Professor A., Professor A. Electrochemically Activited Water. Biophysical and Biological Effects of Anolyte and Catholyte as Types of Water. J. Med. Physiol. Biophys. 2015;10:1–17.

Logan B.E. Exoelectrogenic Bacteria That Power Microbial Fuel Cells. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009;7:375–381. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2113. PubMed DOI

Kadier A., Simayi Y., Kalil M.S., Abdeshahian P., Hamid A.A. A Review of the Substrates Used in Microbial Electrolysis Cells (MECs) for Producing Sustainable and Clean Hydrogen Gas. Renew. Energy. 2014;71:466–472. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.052. DOI

Cheng S., Logan B.E. High Hydrogen Production Rate of Microbial Electrolysis Cell (MEC) with Reduced Electrode Spacing. Bioresour. Technol. 2011;102:3571–3574. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.025. PubMed DOI

Kadier A., Simayi Y., Abdeshahian P., Azman N.F., Chandrasekhar K., Kalil S. A Comprehensive Review of Microbial Electrolysis Cells (MEC) Reactor Designs and Configurations for Sustainable Hydrogen Gas Production. Alex. Eng. J. 2016;55:427–443. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2015.10.008. DOI

Truong D.H., Dam M.S., Bujna E., Rezessy-Szabo J., Farkas C., Vi V.N.H., Csernus O., Nguyen V.D., Gathergood N., Friedrich L., et al. In Situ Fabrication of Electrically Conducting Bacterial Cellulose-Polyaniline-Titanium-Dioxide Composites with the Immobilization of Shewanella Xiamenensis and Its Application as Bioanode in Microbial Fuel Cell. Fuel. 2021;285:119259. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119259. DOI

Yang P., Gao Y., He W., An J., Liu J., Li N., Feng Y. A Wood Pulp Sponge Cleaning Wipe as a High-Performance Bioanode Material in Microbial Electrochemical Systems for Its Vast Biomass Carrying Capacity, Large Capacitance, and Small Charge Transfer Resistance. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2024;181:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2023.08.065. DOI

De-Bashan L.E., Bashan Y. Immobilized Microalgae for Removing Pollutants: Review of Practical Aspects. Bioresour. Technol. 2010;101:1611–1627. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.043. PubMed DOI

Christwardana M., Handayani A.S., Yudianti R. Joelianingsih Cellulose—Carrageenan Coated Carbon Felt as Potential Anode Structure for Yeast Microbial Fuel Cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2021;46:6076–6086. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.265. DOI

Mohebrad B., Ghods G., Rezaee A. Dairy Wastewater Treatment Using Immobilized Bacteria on Calcium Alginate in a Microbial Electrochemical System. J. Water Process Eng. 2022;46:102609. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102609. DOI

Neethu B., Bhowmick G.D., Ghangrekar M.M. Improving Performance of Microbial Fuel Cell by Enhanced Bacterial-Anode Interaction Using Sludge Immobilized Beads with Activated Carbon. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2020;143:285–292. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.06.043. DOI

Rozenfeld S., Hirsch L.O., Gandu B., Farber R., Schechter A., Cahan R. Improvement of Microbial Electrolysis Cell Activity by Using Anode Based on Combined Plasma-Pretreated Carbon Cloth and Stainless Steel. Energies. 2019;12:1968. doi: 10.3390/en12101968. DOI

Bormashenko E., Chaniel G., Grynyov R. Towards Understanding Hydrophobic Recovery of Plasma Treated Polymers: Storing in High Polarity Liquids Suppresses Hydrophobic Recovery. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013;273:549–553. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.078. DOI

Logan B.E., Regan J.M. Electricity-Producing Bacterial Communities in Microbial Fuel Cells. Trends Microbiol. 2006;14:512–518. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2006.10.003. PubMed DOI

Gandu B., Rozenfeld S., Ouaknin Hirsch L., Schechter A., Cahan R. Immobilization of Bacterial Cells on Carbon-Cloth Anode Using Alginate for Hydrogen Generation in a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. J. Power Sources. 2020;455:227986. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227986. DOI

Hirsch L.O., Dubrovin I.A., Gandu B., Emanuel E., Kjellerup B.V., Ugur G.E., Schechter A., Cahan R. Anode Amendment with Kaolin and Activated Carbon Increases Electricity Generation in a Microbial Fuel Cell. Bioelectrochemistry. 2023;153:108486. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2023.108486. PubMed DOI

Dubrovin I.A., Hirsch L.O., Rozenfeld S., Gandu B., Menashe O., Schechter A., Cahan R. Hydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cells Based on Bacterial Anodes Encapsulated in a Small Bioreactor Platform. Microorganisms. 2022;10:1007. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10051007. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhong D., Liao X., Liu Y., Zhong N., Xu Y. Enhanced Electricity Generation Performance and Dye Wastewater Degradation of Microbial Fuel Cell by Using a Petaline NiO@ Polyaniline-Carbon Felt Anode. Bioresour. Technol. 2018;258:125–134. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.117. PubMed DOI

Hirsch L.O., Gandu B., Chiliveru A., Amar Dubrovin I., Rozenfeld S., Schechter A., Cahan R. The Performance of a Modified Anode Using a Combination of Kaolin and Graphite Nanoparticles in Microbial Fuel Cells. Microorganisms. 2024;12:604. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12030604. PubMed DOI PMC

Szöllősi A., Hoschke Á., Rezessy-Szabó J.M., Bujna E., Kun S., Nguyen Q.D. Formation of Novel Hydrogel Bio-Anode by Immobilization of Biocatalyst in Alginate/Polyaniline/Titanium-Dioxide/Graphite Composites and Its Electrical Performance. Chemosphere. 2017;174:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.095. PubMed DOI

Zhao C., Chen H., Song Y., Zhu L., Ai T., Wang X., Liu Z., Wei X. Electricity Production Performance Enhancement of Microbial Fuel Cells with Double-Layer Sodium Alginate Hydrogel Bioanodes Driven by High-Salinity Waste Leachate. Water Res. 2023;242:120281. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120281. PubMed DOI

Wang Y., Wen Q., Chen Y., Zheng H., Wang S. Enhanced Performance of Microbial Fuel Cell with Polyaniline/Sodium Alginate/Carbon Brush Hydrogel Bioanode and Removal of COD. Energy. 2020;202:117780. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117780. DOI

Yong Y.C., Liao Z.H., Sun J.Z., Zheng T., Jiang R.R., Song H. Enhancement of Coulombic Efficiency and Salt Tolerance in Microbial Fuel Cells by Graphite/Alginate Granules Immobilization of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Process Biochem. 2013;48:1947–1951. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2013.09.008. DOI

Duarte J.C., Rodrigues J.A.R., Moran P.J.S., Valença G.P., Nunhez J.R. Effect of Immobilized Cells in Calcium Alginate Beads in Alcoholic Fermentation. AMB Express. 2013;3:1–8. doi: 10.1186/2191-0855-3-31. PubMed DOI PMC

Hubenova E., Mitov M., Hubenova Y. Electrochemical Performance of Paenibacillus Profundus YoMME Encapsulated in Alginate Polymer. Bioelectrochemistry. 2023;150:108354. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2022.108354. PubMed DOI

Kannaiah Goud R., Venkata Mohan S. Prolonged Applied Potential to Anode Facilitate Selective Enrichment of Bio-Electrochemically Active Proteobacteria for Mediating Electron Transfer: Microbial Dynamics and Bio-Catalytic Analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2013;137:160–170. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.059. PubMed DOI

Cao Y., Mu H., Liu W., Zhang R., Guo J., Xian M., Liu H. Electricigens in the Anode of Microbial Fuel Cells: Pure Cultures versus Mixed Communities. Microb. Cell Factories. 2019;18:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12934-019-1087-z. PubMed DOI PMC

Kumar S.S., Malyan S.K., Basu S., Bishnoi N.R. Syntrophic Association and Performance of Clostridium, Desulfovibrio, Aeromonas and Tetrathiobacter as Anodic Biocatalysts for Bioelectricity Generation in Dual Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017;24:16019–16030. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9112-4. PubMed DOI

Bond D.R., Lovley D.R. Electricity Production by Geobacter Sulfurreducens Attached to Electrodes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003;69:1548–1555. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1548-1555.2003. PubMed DOI PMC

Ochiai I., Harada T., Jomori S., Kouzuma A., Watanabe K. Bioaugmentation of Microbial Electrolysis Cells with Geobacter Sulfurreducens YM18 for Enhanced Hydrogen Production from Starch. Bioresour. Technol. 2023;386:129508. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129508. PubMed DOI

Siegert M., Li X.-F., Yates M.D., Logan B.E., Cui Z. The Presence of Hydrogenotrophic Methanogens in the Inoculum Improves Methane Gas Production in Microbial Electrolysis Cells. Front. Microbiol. 2015;5:778. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00778. PubMed DOI PMC

Villano M., Monaco G., Aulenta F., Majone M. Electrochemically Assisted Methane Production in a Biofilm Reactor. J. Power Sources. 2011;196:9467–9472. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.016. DOI

Hadiyanto H., Christwardana M., Pratiwi W.Z., Purwanto P., Sudarno S., Haryani K., Hoang A.T. Response Surface Optimization of Microalgae Microbial Fuel Cell (MMFC) Enhanced by Yeast Immobilization for Bioelectricity Production. Chemosphere. 2022;287:132275. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132275. PubMed DOI