Trends in incidence, prevalence, and survival of breast cancer in the United Kingdom from 2000 to 2021

. 2024 Aug 17 ; 14 (1) : 19069. [epub] 20240817

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid39153995

Grantová podpora
806968 Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 (IMI2) Joint Undertaking
806968 Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 (IMI2) Joint Undertaking
806968 Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 (IMI2) Joint Undertaking
101034347 OPTIMA
101034347 OPTIMA
101034347 OPTIMA

Odkazy

PubMed 39153995
PubMed Central PMC11330450
DOI 10.1038/s41598-024-69006-1
PII: 10.1038/s41598-024-69006-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in females globally. However, we know relatively little about trends in males. This study describes United Kingdom (UK) secular trends in breast cancer from 2000 to 2021 for both sexes. We describe a population-based cohort study using UK primary care Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD and Aurum databases. There were 5,848,436 eligible females and 5,539,681 males aged 18+ years, with ≥ one year of prior data availability in the study period. We estimated crude breast cancer incidence rates (IR), prevalence and survival probability at one-, five- and 10-years after diagnosis using the Kaplan-Meier method. Analyses were further stratified by age. Crude IR of breast cancer from 2000 to 2021 was 194.4 per 100,000 person-years for females and 1.16 for males. Crude prevalence in 2021 was 2.1% for females and 0.009% for males. Both sexes have seen around a 2.5-fold increase in prevalence across time. Incidence increased with age for both sexes, peaking in females aged 60-69 years and males 90+ . There was a drop in incidence for females aged 70-79 years. From 2003-2019, incidence increased > twofold in younger females (aged 18-29: IR 2.12 in 2003 vs. 4.58 in 2018); decreased in females aged 50-69 years; and further declined from 2015 onwards in females aged 70-89 years. Survival probability for females after one-, five-, and ten-years after diagnosis was 95.1%, 80.2%, and 68.4%, and for males 92.9%, 69.0%, and 51.3%. Survival probability at one-year increased by 2.08% points, and survival at five years increased by 5.39% from 2000-2004 to 2015-2019 for females, particularly those aged 50-70 years. For males, there were no clear time-trends for short-term and long-term survival probability. Changes in incidence of breast cancer in females largely reflect the success of screening programmes, as rates rise and fall in synchronicity with ages of eligibility for such programmes. Overall survival from breast cancer for females has improved from 2000 to 2021, again reflecting the success of screening programmes, early diagnosis, and improvements in treatments. Male breast cancer patients have worse survival outcomes compared to females, highlighting the need to develop male-specific diagnosis and treatment strategies to improve long-term survival in line with females.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Sung, H. et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J. Clin.71, 209–249 (2021).10.3322/caac.21660 PubMed DOI

Giordano, S. H. Breast cancer in men. N. Engl. J. Med.378, 2311–2320 (2018). 10.1056/NEJMra1707939 PubMed DOI

Cancer Research UK. Breast cancer incidence (invasive) statistics, https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/breast-cancer/incidence-invasive#heading-Zero (2021).

Speirs, V. & Shaaban, A. M. The rising incidence of male breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat.115, 429–430 (2009). 10.1007/s10549-008-0053-y PubMed DOI

Giordano, S. H., Cohen, D. S., Buzdar, A. U., Perkins, G. & Hortobagyi, G. N. Breast carcinoma in men: a population-based study. Cancer101, 51–57 (2004). 10.1002/cncr.20312 PubMed DOI

Brinton, L. A. et al. Prospective evaluation of risk factors for male breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.100, 1477–1481 (2008). 10.1093/jnci/djn329 PubMed DOI PMC

Ding, Y. C., Steele, L., Kuan, C.-J., Greilac, S. & Neuhausen, S. L. Mutations in BRCA2 and PALB2 in male breast cancer cases from the United States. Breast Cancer Res. Treat.126, 771–778 (2011). 10.1007/s10549-010-1195-2 PubMed DOI PMC

Brinton, L. A. et al. Prediagnostic sex steroid hormones in relation to male breast cancer risk. J. Clin. Oncol.33, 2041 (2015). 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.1602 PubMed DOI PMC

Macke, A. J. & Petrosyan, A. Alcohol and prostate cancer: Time to draw conclusions. Biomolecules12, 375 (2022). 10.3390/biom12030375 PubMed DOI PMC

Shield, K. D., Soerjomataram, I. & Rehm, J. Alcohol use and breast cancer: a critical review. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.40, 1166–1181 (2016). 10.1111/acer.13071 PubMed DOI

Pati, S., Irfan, W., Jameel, A., Ahmed, S. & Shahid, R. K. Obesity and cancer: A current overview of epidemiology, pathogenesis, outcomes, and management. Cancers15, 485 (2023). 10.3390/cancers15020485 PubMed DOI PMC

Ron, E., Ikeda, T., Preston, D. L. & Tokuoka, S. Male breast cancer incidence among atomic bomb survivors. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.97, 603–605 (2005). 10.1093/jnci/dji097 PubMed DOI

Taylor, C. et al. Breast cancer mortality in 500 000 women with early invasive breast cancer in England, 1993–2015: Population based observational cohort study. BMJ381, 1 (2023). PubMed PMC

Pizzato, M. et al. Trends in male breast cancer mortality: A global overview. Eur. J. Cancer30, 472–479 (2021).10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000651 PubMed DOI

Eggemann, H. et al. Survival benefit of tamoxifen in male breast cancer: Prospective cohort analysis. Br. J. Cancer123, 33–37 (2020). 10.1038/s41416-020-0857-z PubMed DOI PMC

Sarfati, D., Blakely, T. & Pearce, N. Measuring cancer survival in populations: Relative survival vs cancer-specific survival. Int. J. Epidemiol.39, 598–610 (2010). 10.1093/ije/dyp392 PubMed DOI

Swerdlow, A. Cancer registration in England and Wales: Some aspects relevant to interpretation of the data. J. R. Stat. Soc.149, 146–160 (1986).

Cancer Research UK. Breast Screening, https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/breast-cancer/getting-diagnosed/screening-breast#:~:text=Who%20has%20breast%20screening%3F,are%2052%20or%2053%20years. (2023).

Woolcott, O. O. & Seuring, T. Temporal trends in obesity defined by the relative fat mass (RFM) index among adults in the United States from 1999 to 2020: A population-based study. BMJ open13, e071295 (2023). 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071295 PubMed DOI PMC

Malik, V. S., Willet, W. C. & Hu, F. B. Nearly a decade on—Trends, risk factors and policy implications in global obesity. Nature Reviews Endocrinology16, 615–616 (2020). 10.1038/s41574-020-00411-y PubMed DOI PMC

Bennett, R., Blanks, R. & Moss, S. Evaluation of extension of breast screening to women aged 65–70 in England using screening performance measures. Br. J. Cancer100, 1043–1047 (2009). 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604981 PubMed DOI PMC

Eckert-Lind, C. et al. Worldwide secular trends in age at pubertal onset assessed by breast development among girls: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediat.174, e195881–e195881 (2020).10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.5881 PubMed DOI PMC

Morris, D. H., Jones, M. E., Schoemaker, M. J., Ashworth, A. & Swerdlow, A. J. Secular trends in age at menarche in women in the UK born 1908–93: Results from the Breakthrough Generations Study. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol.25, 394–400 (2011). 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01202.x PubMed DOI

Fitzpatrick, D., Pirie, K., Reeves, G., Green, J. & Beral, V. Combined and progestagen-only hormonal contraceptives and breast cancer risk: A UK nested case–control study and meta-analysis. Plos Medicine20, e1004188 (2023). 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004188 PubMed DOI PMC

Public Health England. Public Health England launches nationwide breast cancer campaign, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/public-health-england-launches-nationwide-breast-cancer-campaign#:~:text=The%20Be%20Clear%20on%20Cancer%20campaign%20is%20part%20of%20the,us%20to%20improve%20cancer%20survival. (2015).

Arnold, M. et al. Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven high-income countries 1995–2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): A population-based study. Lancet Oncol20, 1493–1505 (2019). 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30456-5 PubMed DOI PMC

Cancer Research UK. Cancer mortality statistics, https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/mortality#heading-Zero (2023).

Benz, C. C. Impact of aging on the biology of breast cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol.66, 65–74 (2008). 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.09.001 PubMed DOI PMC

Liu, N., Johnson, K. J. & Ma, C. X. Male breast cancer: An updated surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data analysis. Clin. Breast Cancer18, e997–e1002 (2018). 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.06.013 PubMed DOI

Miao, H. et al. Incidence and outcome of male breast cancer: an international population-based study. J. Clin. Oncol.29, 4381–4386 (2011). 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.8902 PubMed DOI

Korde, L. A. et al. Multidisciplinary meeting on male breast cancer: summary and research recommendations. J. Clin. Oncol.28, 2114 (2010). 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.5729 PubMed DOI PMC

Cancer Research UK. Breast cancer survival statistics, https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/breast-cancer/survival#heading-Zero (2014).

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_bop.pdf (2023). PubMed

Barclay, N. L. et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on incidence and short-term survival for common solid tumours in the United Kingdom: A cohort analysis. Clin. Epidemiol.1, 417–429 (2024).10.2147/CLEP.S463160 PubMed DOI PMC

Barclay, N. L. et al. Collateral effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on endocrine treatments for breast and prostate cancer in the UK: A cohort study. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol.16, 17588359241253116 (2024). 10.1177/17588359241253115 PubMed DOI PMC

Barclay, N. L. et al. The impact of the UK COVID-19 lockdown on the screening, diagnostics and incidence of breast, colorectal, lung and prostate cancer in the UK: A population-based cohort study. Front. Oncol.14, 1370862 (2024). 10.3389/fonc.2024.1370862 PubMed DOI PMC

Gallagher, A. M., Dedman, D., Padmanabhan, S., Leufkens, H. G. & de Vries, F. The accuracy of date of death recording in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database in England compared with the Office for National Statistics death registrations. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf.28, 563–569 (2019). 10.1002/pds.4747 PubMed DOI PMC

Strongman, H., Williams, R. & Bhaskaran, K. What are the implications of using individual and combined sources of routinely collected data to identify and characterise incident site-specific cancers? A concordance and validation study using linked English electronic health records data. BMJ Open10, e037719 (2020). 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037719 PubMed DOI PMC

Huszno, J., Kołosza, Z. & Grzybowska, E. BRCA1 mutation in breast cancer patients: Analysis of prognostic factors and survival. Oncol. Lett.17, 1986–1995 (2019). PubMed PMC

Denu, R. A. et al. Racial and socioeconomic disparities are more pronounced in inflammatory breast cancer than other breast cancers. J. Cancer Epidemiol.2017, 1 (2017).10.1155/2017/7574946 PubMed DOI PMC

Taheri, M., Tavakol, M., Akbari, M. E., Almasi-Hashiani, A. & Abbasi, M. Relationship of socio economic status, income, and education with the survival rate of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Iran. J. Public Health48, 1428 (2019). PubMed PMC

Dong, J.-Y. & Qin, L.-Q. Education level and breast cancer incidence: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Menopause27, 113–118 (2020). 10.1097/GME.0000000000001425 PubMed DOI

Herrett, E. et al. Data resource profile: clinical practice research datalink (CPRD). Int. J. Epidemiol.44, 827–836 (2015). 10.1093/ije/dyv098 PubMed DOI PMC

Wolf, A. et al. Data resource profile: Clinical practice research datalink (CPRD) aurum. Int. J. Epidemiol.48, 1740–1740g (2019). 10.1093/ije/dyz034 PubMed DOI PMC

Voss, E. A. et al. Feasibility and utility of applications of the common data model to multiple, disparate observational health databases. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.22, 553–564 (2015). 10.1093/jamia/ocu023 PubMed DOI PMC

Hripcsak, G. et al. Observational health data sciences and informatics (OHDSI): Opportunities for observational researchers. Stud. Health Technol. Inform.216, 574–578 (2015). PubMed PMC

Gilbert, J., Rao, G., Schuemie, M., Ryan, P. & Weaver, J. CohortDiagnostics: Diagnostics for OHDSI Cohorts, https://ohdsi.github.io/CohortDiagnostics, https://github.com/OHDSI/CohortDiagnostics (2023).

National Cancer Institute. Joinpoint Regression Program, Version 5.0.2. Statistical Methodology and Applications Branch, Surveillance Research Program (2023).

Goel, M. K., Khanna, P. & Kishore, J. Understanding survival analysis: Kaplan-Meier estimate. Int. J. Ayurveda Res.1, 274 (2010). 10.4103/0974-7788.76794 PubMed DOI PMC

Burn, E., Raventos, B., Catala, M., Du, M., Guo, Y., Black, A>, Inberg, G., Lopez, K. IncidencePrevalence: Estimate Incidence and Prevalence using the OMOP Common Data Model. R Package Verion 0.4.0, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/IncidencePrevalence/index.html (2023).

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...