INTRODUCTION: This simulation-based study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ventilation during paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provided by healthcare professionals (HCPs) and lay rescuers (LRs). The objective was to assess the number of effective breaths delivered during the initial sequence of CPR. Effective ventilation plays a critical role during paediatric CPR as most cardiac arrests are secondary to hypoxia in origin. The recommendations on initial resuscitation in unresponsive, non-breathing children differ worldwide. The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines recommend five breaths before starting the chest compressions. Yet, this recommendation was based on the expert consensus historically and has not changed since 2000 because of the lack of evidence. This research addresses the identified knowledge gap, with potential implications for improving resuscitation practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes. METHODS: HCPs and LRs performed 90 s of CPR involving two mannequins: 5-kg Baby and 20-kg Junior. Both groups (HCPs and LRs) performed the task before and after structured CPR training, and the efficacy of ventilation before and after the training was compared. The HCPs provided bag-mask ventilation; LR performed dispatcher-assisted CPR with mouth-to-mouth ventilation. RESULTS: The number of participants that reached the primary outcome before and after the training in Baby was 26 (65%) vs. 40 (100%) in HCPs and 28 (60.9%) vs. 45 (97.8%) in LRs (improvement in both p < 0.001), respectively. The number of participants that reached the primary outcome before and after the training in the Junior mannequin was 31 (77.5%) vs. 32 (82.1%) in HCPs (p = 0.77) and 32 (82.1%) vs. 37 (94.9%) in LRs (p = 0.005), respectively. DISCUSSION: This simulation-based study is the first to investigate ventilation efficacy during paediatric CPR provided by HCPs and LRs. Ventilation represents an important aspect of good-quality CPR in children. The concept of initiating paediatric CPR with initial breaths, as stated in ERC guidelines 2021, is justifiable. Trained HCPs and LRs providing dispatcher-assisted CPR could deliver effective ventilation to paediatric mannequins. These findings can contribute to future research in this area and address identified knowledge gaps concerning resuscitation guidelines, given the unique practical application of simulation as a research tool.

Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czechia

Department of Paediatrics University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czechia

Department of Simulation Medicine Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czechia

Paediatric Intensive Care Unit NH Hospital Inc Hořovice Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Van de Voorde P, Turner NM, Djakow J, de Lucas N, Martinez-Mejias A, Biarent D, et al. . European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: Paediatric life support. Resuscitation. (2021) 161:327–87. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.015, PMID: PubMed DOI

Goto Y, Maeda T, Goto Y. Impact of dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation on neurological outcomes in children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a prospective, Nationwide, population-based cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc. (2014) 3:e000499. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000499 PubMed DOI PMC

Topjian AA, Raymond TT, Atkins D, Chan M, Duff JP, Joyner BL, et al. . Part 4: pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. (2020) 142:S469–523. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000901 PubMed DOI

Scholz SS, Borgstedt R, Menzel LC, Rehberg S, Jansen G. Evolution and current state of global research on paediatric resuscitation: a systematic scientometric analysis. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med. Prosinec. (2020) 28:90. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00780-3 PubMed DOI PMC

Berg KM, Bray JE, Ng KC, Liley HG, Greif R, Carlson JN, et al. . 2023 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations: summary from the basic life support; advanced life support; pediatric life support; neonatal life support; education, implementation, and teams; and first aid task forces. Theatr Res Int. (2024) 195:109992. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109992 PubMed DOI

The ARC Guidelines (2022). Australian Resuscitation Council. Available at: https://resus.org.au/the-arc-guidelines/

Nolan JP, Maconochie I, Soar J, Olasveengen TM, Greif R, Wyckoff MH, et al. . Executive summary 2020 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation. (2020) 156:A1–A22. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.009, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Lott C, Truhlář A, Alfonzo A, Barelli A, González-Salvado V, Hinkelbein J, et al. . European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation. (2021) 161:152–219. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.011, PMID: PubMed DOI

Cheng A, Auerbach M, Hunt EA, Chang TP, Pusic M, Nadkarni V, et al. . Designing and conducting simulation-based research. Pediatrics. (2014) 133:1091–101. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3267 PubMed DOI

Kosinová M, Štourač P, Prokopová T, Vafková T, Vafek V, Barvík D, et al. . Feasibility of mouth-to-mouth ventilation through FFP2 respirator in BLS training during COVID-19 pandemic (MOVERESP study): simulation-based study. Children. (2022) 9:1751. doi: 10.3390/children9111751 PubMed DOI PMC

Andriessen P, Oetomo SB, Chen W, Feijs LM. Efficacy of feed forward and feedback signaling for inflations and chest compression pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a newborn mannequin. J Clin Med Res. (2012) 4:274–8. doi: 10.4021/jocmr865w PubMed DOI PMC

Aufderheide TP, Sigurdsson G, Pirrallo RG, Yannopoulos D, McKnite S, von Briesen C, et al. . Hyperventilation-induced hypotension during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation. (2004) 109:1960–5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000126594.79136.61 PubMed DOI

Greif R, Lockey A, Breckwoldt J, Carmona F, Conaghan P, Kuzovlev A, et al. . European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: education for resuscitation. Resuscitation. (2021) 161:388–407. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.016 PubMed DOI

Inott T, Kennedy BB. Assessing learning styles: practical tips for patient education. Nurs Clin North Am září. (2011) 46:313–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2011.05.006, PMID: PubMed DOI

Woollard M, Whitfield R, Smith A, Colquhoun M, Newcombe RG, Vetter N, et al. . Skill acquisition and retention in automated external defibrillator (AED) use and CPR by lay responders: a prospective study. Resuscitation. (2004) 60:17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2003.09.006, PMID: PubMed DOI

Wilson E, Brooks B, Tweed WA. CPR skills retention of lay basic rescuers. Ann Emerg Med srpen. (1983) 12:482–4. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(83)80643-X, PMID: PubMed DOI

González-Salvado V, Rodríguez-Ruiz E, Abelairas-Gómez C, Ruano-Raviña A, Peña-Gil C, González-Juanatey JR, et al. . Training adult laypeople in basic life support. a systematic review. Rev Esp Cardiol Engl. (2020) 73:53–68. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2018.11.013 PubMed DOI

Tanigawa K, Iwami T, Nishiyama C, Sinceogi H, Kawamura T. Are trained individuals more likely to perform bystander CPR? An observational study. Resuscitation. (2011) 82:523–8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.01.027 PubMed DOI