Blended learning in physical education: application and motivation

. 2024 ; 15 () : 1380041. [epub] 20240827

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid39257414

BACKGROUND: The aim of the research was to evaluate outdoor aerobic sport activities (OASA) in the physical education (PE) of university students using wearables and their potential to personalize the learning process and enhance motivation. METHODS: In total, 368 university students participated. The OASA structure and the key points of application in PE were described. Descriptive statistics of the training units (n = 3,680) were processed. The students recorded their training data in the Strava app (10 sessions per semester), and the data were shared in the online sport community created on the Strava platform. Motivation was evaluated using a questionnaire. The focus was both on intrinsic motivation and extrinsic "ICT" motivation, based on Strava app features and tools. RESULTS: The most preferred outdoor aerobic sport activities were running (58%), cycling (13%), and walking (16%). The results provided insight into motivation and performance analysis. Students' motivation to participate in OASA was mainly in health concerns, such as staying in shape (94%), staying healthy (90%), and psychological concerns, such as having fun (88%), improving state of mind (88%), or relieving stress (83%). In achievement concerns, the motivation was a personal challenge (72%), while competing with others was ranked lowest (32%). The Strava app was a motivating tool for students to record, monitor, and analyze their individual activities and feel "connectedness" to the online sport community. 70% of students were motivated by the non-competitive character of PE, which gave them a personalized opportunity to train without being compared to others. DISCUSSION: The OASA management, with the use of blended learning methods and the Strava app, uses a motivational approach to create, support, and maintain students' healthy habits of physical activity through PE lessons. The need for students to be motivated to exercise can be confirmed in the analysis of the statistical descriptive parameters of running, cycling, and walking. There was a tendency for students to complete only the minimum required distance/time (not more). On the other hand, students enjoyed the training, and 99% of students confirmed that they would enroll again. That fact underlined the importance of motivating students with an effective learning strategy and giving support and guidance.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Adamčák Š., Bartík P., Marko M. (2021). Role of smartphones in increasing physical activity in secondary school students. THE SKY Int. J. Phys. Educ. Sports Sci., 1–10. doi: 10.51846/the-sky.v0i0.2069 DOI

Ahmad N., Asim H. H., Juatan N., Hipni N. E., Ithnain N., Sanusi A., et al. . (2021). Contributing factors to decline in physical activity among adolescents: a scoping review. MJSSH 6, 447–463. doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v6i9.998 DOI

Ahmed M. D., Leung W. C. W. (2021). Using wearable devices to enhance quality of physical education for students. Strategies 34, 54–56. doi: 10.1080/08924562.2021.1867458 DOI

Alvarez M. G. A., Ramon F. O. R., Castuera R. J., Contreras K. M. D., Román M. L. (2022). Differential analysis of psychological variables related to the commitment to sport practice in university students during confinement by COVID-19. Sportis Sci. J. Phys. Educ. Psychomotricity 8, 370–395. doi: 10.17979/sportis.2022.8.3.8712 DOI

An H. Y., Chen W., Wang C. W., Yang H. F., Huang W. T., Fan S. Y. (2020). The relationships between physical activity and life satisfaction and happiness among young, middle-aged, and older adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17:4817. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134817 PubMed DOI PMC

Bardus M., Borgi C., El-Harakeh M., Gherbal T., Kharroubi S., Fares E. J. (2021). Exploring the use of mobile and wearable technology among university student athletes in Lebanon: a cross-sectional study. Sensors 21:4472. doi: 10.3390/s21134472 PubMed DOI PMC

Barfield P. A., Ridder K., Hughes J., Rice-McNeil K. (2021). Get outside! Promoting adolescent health through outdoor after-school activity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18:7223. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147223 PubMed DOI PMC

Bebeley S. J., Laggao S. A., Gendemeh C. (2018). Physical activity epidemiology of college students physical exercise self-efficacy: motivational drive for health education promotion. J. Phys. Educ. Res. 5, 33–40.

Berbeka J., Borodako K., Rudnicki M., Łapczyński M. (2023). The role of mobile fitness applications in student leisure activities. J. Leis. Res. 54, 519–538. doi: 10.1080/00222216.2023.2249892 DOI

Bertocchi L., Vecchio R., Sorbello S., Correale L., Gentile L., Buzzachera C., et al. . (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical activity among university students in Pavia, northern Italy. Acta Biomed 92:e2021443. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS6.12232 PubMed DOI PMC

Blocker D., Wahl-Alexander Z. (2018). Using sport education in a university physical activity course. J. Phys. Educ. Recreat. Dance 89, 56–61. doi: 10.1080/07303084.2017.1404512 DOI

Blond K., Jensen M. K., Rasmussen M. G., Overvad K., Tjønneland A., Østergaard L., et al. . (2016). Prospective study of bicycling and risk of coronary heart disease in Danish men and women. Circulation 134, 1409–1411. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024651 PubMed DOI

Chaloupský D., Chaloupská P., Hrušová D. (2020). Use of fitness trackers in a blended learning model to personalize fitness running lessons. Interact. Learn. Environ. 29, 213–230. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1799027 DOI

Chaloupský D., Hrušová D., Chaloupská P. (2019). “Use of fitness trackers in fitness running classes to enhance students’ motivation” in ed. Goss G. ICBL (Cham: Springer; ), 303–315.

Chao H. W., Wu C. C., Tsai C. W. (2021). Do socio-cultural differences matter? A study of the learning effects and satisfaction with physical activity from digital learning assimilated into a university dance course. Comp. Educ. 165:14. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104150 DOI

Chiu T. K. (2021). Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory. Comput. Hum. Behav. 124:10. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909 DOI

Choi S. M., Sum K. W. R., Leung F. L. E., Ha S. C. A., Sit C., Yeung K. H. (2021). Predictors of physical activity levels in university physical education implementing sport education. J. Sports Sci. Med. 20:516. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2021.516 PubMed DOI PMC

Creaser A. V., Clemes S. A., Costa S., Hall J., Ridgers N. D., Barber S. E., et al. . (2021). The acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of wearable activity trackers for increasing physical activity in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18:28. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126211 PubMed DOI PMC

Deci E. L., Ryan M. R. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 11, 227–268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 DOI

Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can. Psychol. 49:182. doi: 10.1037/a0012801 DOI

Du S., Hu H., Cheng K., Li H. (2023). Exercise makes better mind: a data mining study on effect of physical activity on academic achievement of college students. Front. Psychol. 14:1271431. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1271431 PubMed DOI PMC

Durán-Vinagre M. Á., Ibáñez S. J., Feu S., Sánchez-Herrera S. (2023). Analysis of the motivational processes involved in university physical activity. Front. Psychol. 13:1080162. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1080162 PubMed DOI PMC

Eigenschenk B., Thomann A., McClure M., Davies L., Gregory M., Dettweiler U., et al. . (2019). Benefits of outdoor sports for society. A systematic literature review and reflections on evidence. Int. J. Environ.Res. Public Health 16:937. doi: 10.3390/IJERPH16060937 PubMed DOI PMC

European Commission (2024). Physical activity and health. Reviewed on 1st July 2024. Available at: https://sport.ec.europa.eu/policies/sport-and-society/physical-activity-and-health (Accessed July 1,2024).

Gowin M., Cheney M., Gwin S., Franklin Wann T. (2015). Health and fitness app use in college students: a qualitative study. Am. J. Health Educ. 46, 223–230. doi: 10.1080/19325037.2015.1044140 DOI

Gut V., Conzelmann A., Schmid J. (2022). What do adolescents and young adults strive for in sport and exercise? An explorative study on goal profiles in sport and exercise. J. Sports Sci. 40, 571–582. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2021.2004703 PubMed DOI

Guthold R., Stevens G. A., Riley L. M., Bull F. C. (2020). Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participants. Lancet Child Adolesc.Health 4, 23–35. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2 PubMed DOI PMC

Hamid A. S. F., Ismail N. N., Abdul Razak F. A., Shahudin N. N. (2019). “Motivation in physical activity: smartphone sport tracker applications” in MoHE (Singapore: Springer Singapore; ), 463–470.

Helsen K., Janssen M., Vos S., Scheerder J. (2022). Two of a kind? Similarities and differences between runners and walkers in sociodemographic characteristics, sports related characteristics and wearable usage. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19:17. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159284 PubMed DOI PMC

Hewitt B., Deranek K., McLeod A., Gudi A. (2022). Exercise motives impact on physical activities measured using wearable devices. Health Promot. Int. 37:12. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac071 PubMed DOI

Ho C. F., Lin Y. S., Lin C. T., Yang C. C., Shen C. C. (2022). The effect of the motivation of wearable fitness devices use on exercise engagement: the mediating effect of exercise commitment. Ann. Appl. Sport Sci. 10:8. doi: 10.52547/aassjournal.1044 DOI

Hrastinski S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends 63, 564–569. doi: 10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5 DOI

Jambusaria S., Berry S., Sanghvi S., Bhadra S. (2020). Research paper on physical activity and fitness patterns among university students in Mumbai. Int. J. Adv. Res. Ideas Innov. Technol 6, 568–575.

Janssen M., Walravens R., Thibaut E., Scheerder J., Brombacher A., Vos S. (2020). Understanding different types of recreational runners and how they use running-related technology. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17:17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181167 PubMed DOI PMC

Jin D., Halvari H., Maehle N., Olafsen A. H. (2022). Self-tracking behaviour in physical activity: a systematic review of drivers and outcomes of fitness tracking. Behav. Inf. Technol. 41, 242–261. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2020.1801840 DOI

Jones J., Tsibolane P., van Belle J. P. (2022). “Motivations and challenges related to the use of fitness self-tracking technology” in ed. Goss G. I3E (Cham: Springer International Publishing; ), 374–387.

Kaj M., Tékus É., Juhász I., Stomp K., Wilhelm M. (2015). Changes in physical fitness of Hungarian college students in the last fifteen years. Acta Biol. Hung. 66, 270–281. doi: 10.1556/018.66.2015.3.3 PubMed DOI

Karahanoğlu A., Gouveia R., Reenalda J., Ludden G. (2021). How are sports-trackers used by runners? Running-related data, personal goals, and self-tracking in running. Sensors 21:14. doi: 10.3390/s21113687 PubMed DOI PMC

Kemp B. J., Cliff D. P., Batterham M., Parrish A. M. (2021). Socio-ecological predictors of non-organized physical activity participation and decline between childhood and adolescence. J. Sports Sci. 39, 120–130. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1808296 PubMed DOI

Kendrick J., Duffy L., Ye L., Burke P. (2024). College students’ motivations for using fitness related technology. J. Am. Col. Health 72, 1224–1232. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2071622 PubMed DOI

Khanji M. Y., Ahmad S., Zaman I., Ricci F. (2022). Prescribing parkrun: a simple, cost-effective solution for sustainability, improving wellbeing, reducing loneliness, and disease prevention. Eur. Heart J. 43, 2722–2724. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac232 PubMed DOI

Kim M., Cardinal B. J. (2019). Psychological state and behavioural profiles of freshman enrolled in college and university instructional physical activity programmes under different policy conditions. Montenegrin J. Sports Sci. Med. 8, 13–20. doi: 10.26773/mjssm.190902 DOI

Kolář P. (2021). Posilování stresem. 1st Edn. Praha: Euromedia Group.

Lin Y. N., Hsia L. H., Hwang G. J. (2021). Promoting pre-class guidance and in-class reflection: a SQIRC-based mobile flipped learning approach to promoting students’ billiards skills, strategies, motivation and self-efficacy. Comp. Educ. 160:104035. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104035 DOI

Llorente-Cantarero F. J., Aguilar-Gómez F. J., Anguita-Ruiz A., Rupérez A. I., Vázquez-Cobela R., Flores-Rojas K., et al. . (2020). Changes in physical activity patterns from childhood to adolescence: genobox longitudinal study. Int. J. Environ. Res.Public Health 17:14. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197227 PubMed DOI PMC

Manferdelli G., La Torre A., Codella R. (2019). Outdoor physical activity bears multiple benefits to health and society. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 59, 868–879. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08771-6 PubMed DOI

Marquez D. X., Aguiñaga S., Vásquez P. M., Conroy D. E., Erickson K. I., Hillman C., et al. . (2020). A systematic review of physical activity and quality of life and well-being. Trans. Behav. Med. 10, 1098–1109. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz198 PubMed DOI PMC

Masters K. S., Ogles B. M., Jolton J. A. (1993). The development of an instrument to measure motivation for marathon running: The Motivations of Marathoners Scales (MOMS). RQES. 64, 134–143. PubMed

McFadden C. (2021). Wearable exercise technology and the impact on college women’s physical activity. Quest 73, 179–191. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2021.1891553 DOI

Melton B., Harris H. B. B., Kelly D., Chandler K. (2015). Evaluating a physical activity app in the classroom: a mixed methodological approach among. Phys. Educ. 72, 601–620. doi: 10.18666/TPE-2015-V72-I4-7139 DOI

Memon A. R., Stanton R., To, Q. Schoeppe S., Urooj A., Alley S., et al. . (2021). Sedentary behaviour research in adults: a scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J. Sports Sci. 39, 2219–2231. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1928382 PubMed DOI

Mokmin N. A. M., Jamiat N. (2021). The effectiveness of a virtual fitness trainer app in motivating and engaging students for fitness activity by applying motor learning theory. Educ. Inf. Technol. 26, 1847–1864. doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10337-7 DOI

Moustakas L., Robrade D. (2022). The challenges and realities of e-learning during COVID-19: the case of university sport and physical education. Challenges 13:9. doi: 10.3390/challe13010009 DOI

Noseworthy M., Peddie L., Buckler E. J., Park F., Pham M., Pratt S., et al. . (2023). The effects of outdoor versus indoor exercise on psychological health, physical health, and physical activity behaviour: a systematic review of longitudinal trials. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20:18. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031669 PubMed DOI PMC

Nuss K., Moore K., Nelson T., Li K. (2021). Effects of motivational interviewing and wearable fitness trackers on motivation and physical activity: a systematic review. Am. J. Health Promot. 35, 226–235. doi: 10.1177/0890117120939030 PubMed DOI

O’Brien M. W., Shivgulam M. E., Wojcik W. R., Barron B. A., Seaman R. E., Fowles J. R. (2022). 30 year trends of reduced physical fitness in undergraduate students studying human movement. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19:9. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114099 PubMed DOI PMC

Oc Y., Plangger K. (2022). GIST do it! How motivational mechanisms help wearable users develop healthy habits. Compu. Hum. Behav. 128:13. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107089 DOI

Ogles B. M., Masters K. S. (2003). A typology of marathon runners based on cluster analysis of motivations. J. Sport Behav. 26:16.

Paraskevopoulou A. T., Chletsou M., Malesios C. (2022). Runners experience lower heart rate, increased speed, and joy/calm on routes with trees, by the sea and through parks: implications for climate change design. Sustain. For. 14:27. doi: 10.3390/su142316280 DOI

Pereira S., Reyes A. C., Chaves R., Santos C., Vasconcelos O., Tani G. O., et al. . (2022). Correlates of the physical activity decline during childhood. Med.Sci.Sports Exerc. 54:8. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003013 PubMed DOI PMC

Pheiffer K., Wierenga M. (2019). Promoting physical activity through youth sport. Kinesiol. Rev. 8, 204–210. doi: 10.1123/kr.2019-0033 DOI

Podstawski R., Żurawik M., Borysławski K., Bukova A., Masanovic B., Alföldi Z., et al. . (2021). State and status of physical education in tertiary institutions in selected European countries in the second decade of the 21st century. Acta Gymnica. 51:7. doi: 10.5507/ag.2021.013 DOI

Posadzki P., Pieper D., Bajpai R., Makaruk H., Könsgen N., Neuhaus A. L., et al. . (2020). Exercise/physical activity and health outcomes: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. BMC Public Health 20, 1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09855-3 PubMed DOI PMC

Ramirez O., Bernhardt V. (2020). Using Fitbit competitions to increase physical activity in college students. Macksey J. 1:18.

Rana L., Aslam M., Kamran H., Awan R., Akram H. A. (2023). Evaluation of psychological perceptions and effectiveness of health-related technologies in University Students: psychological perceptions and effectiveness of health-related technologies. Pak. Biomed.l J., 6, 09–13. doi: 10.54393/pbmj.v6i01.839 DOI

Rapp A., Tirabeni L. (2020). Self-tracking while doing sport: comfort, motivation, attention and lifestyle of athletes using personal informatics tools. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 140:14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102434 DOI

Rasheed R. A., Kamsin A., Abdullah N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: a systematic review. Comp. Educ. 144:17. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701 DOI

Rivers D. J. (2020). Strava as a discursive field of practice: technological affordances and mediated cycling motivations. Discourse Context Media 34:100345. doi: 10.1016/J.DCM.2019.100345 DOI

Rogerson M., Gladwell V. F., Gallagher D. J., Barton J. L. (2016). Influences of green outdoors versus indoors environmental settings on psychological and social outcomes of controlled exercise. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 13:363. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13040363 PubMed DOI PMC

Rozmiarek M., Guereňo P. L., Serrano M. A. T., Thuany M., Gomes T. N., Plozsaj K., et al. . (2022). Motivation and eco-attitudes among night runners during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustain. For. 14:13. doi: 10.3390/su14031512 DOI

Russell H. C., Potts C., Nelson E. (2023). “If It's not on Strava it Didn’t happen”: perceived psychosocial implications of Strava use in collegiate Club runners. Recreat. Sports J. 47, 15–25. doi: 10.1177/15588661221148 DOI

Ruth J., Willwacher S., Korn O. (2022). Acceptance of digital sports: a study showing the rising acceptance of digital health activities due to the SARS-CoV-19 pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010596 PubMed DOI PMC

Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 61:11. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 PubMed DOI

Schüler J., Wolff W., Duda J. L. (2023). Intrinsic motivation in the context of sports. Sport and exercise psychology: theory and application. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 171–192.

Sember V., Jurak G., Kovač M., Đurić S., Starc G. (2020). Decline of physical activity in early adolescence: a 3-year cohort study. PLoS One 15:e0229305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229305 PubMed DOI PMC

Shi Q. (2023). Construction of physical education teaching system in colleges and universities based on the concept of lifelong physical education. J. Educ. Educ. Res. 2, 75–78. doi: 10.54097/jeer.v2i2.6444 DOI

Silva F. R. M., Mendonca C. R., Azevedo V. D., Raoof Memon A., Noll P., Noll M. (2022). Barriers to high school and university students’ physical activity: a systematic review. PLoS One 17:e0265913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265913 PubMed DOI PMC

Šipl M., Hurych E. (2022). The effect of physical activities on somatic parameters of Masaryk University students–some selected results. Studia Sportiva 16, 283–291. doi: 10.5817/sts2022-2-28 DOI

Smith L., Volkwyn C. A. (2022). Promotion of physical activity through health applications among students of selected universities-a preliminary study. Cent. Eur. J. Sport Sci. Med. 38, 5–12. doi: 10.18276/cej.2022.2-01 DOI

Soulé B., Marchant G., Verchère R. (2021). Sport and fitness app uses: a review of humanities and social science perspectives. Eur. J. Sport Soc. 19, 170–189. doi: 10.1080/16138171.2021.1918896 DOI

Steeves J. A., Guillaume B., Eul J., Thompson M., Oody J. I. (2023). Outdoors is medicine®: college faculty and students outdoor time, behaviors, and perceived health benefits: 1775. MSSE 55:602.

Stragier J., Abeele M. V., de Marez L. (2018). Recreational athletes’ running motivations as predictors of their use of online fitness community features. Behav. Inform. Technol. 37, 815–827. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1484516 DOI

Strain T., Flaxman S., Guthold R., Semenova E., Cowan M., Riley L. M., et al. . (2024). National, regional, and global trends in insufficient physical activity among adults from 2000 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 507 population-based surveys with 5· 7 million participants. Lancet Glob. Health. 12:21. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00150-5 PubMed DOI PMC

Strava (2023). We’re the largest sports community in the world. Retrieved December 10, 2023. Available at: https://www.strava.com/about (Accessed December 10, 2023).

Tammelin T., Näyhä S., Hills A. P., Järvelin M. R. (2003). Adolescent participation in sports and adult physical activity. Am. J. Prev. Med. 24, 22–28. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00575-5 PubMed DOI

Thievel D., Tardieu M., Genin P., Fillon A., Larras B., Melsens P., et al. . (2021). COVID-19–related National re-confinement: recommendations from the National French Observatory for physical activity and sedentary behaviors (ONAPS). J. Phys. Act. Health 18, 474–476. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2020-0735 PubMed DOI

Trabelsi O., Souissi M. A., Scharenberg S., Mrayeh M., Gharbi A. (2022). YouTube as a complementary learning tool in times of COVID-19: self-reports from sports science students. Trends Neurosci. Educ. 29:100186. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2022.100186 PubMed DOI PMC

Vasconcellos D., Parker P. D., Hilland T., Cinelli R., Owen K. B., Kapsal N., et al. . (2020). Self-determination theory applied to physical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Educ. Psychol. 112:1444. doi: 10.1037/edu0000420.supp DOI

Wallar J. L. (2021). College students motivation to use fitness related technology to influence physical activity: a descriptive qualitative study with college students: Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University. ProQuest.

Wang C., Omar Dev R. D., Soh K. G., Mohd Nasirudddin N. J., Yuan Y., Ji X. (2023). Blended learning in physical education: a systematic review. Front. Public Health 11:1073423. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1073423 PubMed DOI PMC

Wang Y., Zhang X., Wang L. (2022). Assessing the intention to use sports bracelets among Chinese university students: an extension of technology acceptance model with sports motivation. Front. Psychol. 13:846594. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.846594 PubMed DOI PMC

Wen C. (2023). University curriculum update on aerobic physical education. Rev. Bras. Med. Esporte 29:e2022_0536. doi: 10.1590/1517-8692202329012022_0536 DOI

Wicks C., Barton J., Orbell S., Andrews L. (2022). Psychological benefits of outdoor physical activity in natural versus urban environments: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Appl. Psychol. Health Well-Being 14, 1037–1061. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12353 PubMed DOI PMC

Wilson O. W., Walters S. R., Naylor M. E., Clarke J. C. (2022). Changes in physical activity and motives following the transition from high school to university. Int. J. Kinesiol. High.Educ. 6, 56–67. doi: 10.1080/24711616.2020.1866468 DOI

Wunsch K., Fiedler J., Bachert P., Woll A. (2021). The tridirectional relationship among physical activity, stress, and academic performance in university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18:739. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020739 PubMed DOI PMC

Yoo J. I., Cho J., Baek K. W., Kim M. H., Kim J. S., Yoo J. I., et al. . (2020). Relationship between smartphone use time, sitting time, and fitness level in university students. Exerc. Sci. Fit. 29, 170–177. doi: 10.15857/ksep.2020.29.2.170 DOI

Zhang Z., Chen W. (2019). A systematic review of the relationship between physical activity and happiness. J. Happiness Stud. 20, 1305–1322. doi: 10.1007/s10902-018-9976-0 DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...