Feasibility and effectiveness of cardiac telerehabilitation for older adults with coronary heart disease: A pilot randomized controlled trial
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country Netherlands Media electronic-ecollection
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
39319320
PubMed Central
PMC11421251
DOI
10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101365
PII: S2451-8654(24)00112-1
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Cardiac telerehabilitation, Coronary heart disease, Older adults, Pilot, Randomized controlled trial,
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation is a beneficial multidisciplinary treatment of exercise promotion, patient education, risk factor management, and psychosocial counseling for people with coronary heart disease (CHD) that is underutilized due to substantial disparities in access, referral, and participation. Empirical studies suggest that cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR) have safety and efficacy comparable to traditional in-person cardiac rehabilitation, however, older adults are under-reported with effectiveness, feasibility, and usability remains unclear. METHODS: The study randomized 43 older adults (84 % males) to the 12-week CTR intervention or standard of care. Guided by Social Cognitive Theory, participants received individualized in-person assessment and e-coaching sessions, followed by CTR usage at home. Data were collected at baseline (T0), six-week (T1), and 12-week (T2). RESULTS: Participants in the CTR intervention group showed significant improvement in daily steps (T1: β = 4126.58, p = 0.001; T2: β = 5285, p = 0.01) and health-promoting lifestyle profile (T1: β = 23.26, p < 0.001; T2: β = 12.18, p = 0.008) across study endpoints. Twenty participants completed the intervention, with 40 % used the website for data-uploading or experiential learning, 90 % used the pedometer for tele-monitoring. Improving awareness of rehabilitation and an action focus were considered key facilitators while physical discomforts and difficulties in using the technology were described as the main barriers. CONCLUSIONS: The CTR is feasible, safe and effective in improving physical activity and healthy behaviors in older adults with CHD. Considering the variation in individual cardiovascular risk factors, full-scale RCT with a larger sample is needed to determine the effect of CTR on psychological symptoms, body weight and blood pressure, and quality of life.
Department of Public Health Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Rehabilitation University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
School of Nursing The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong SAR China
See more in PubMed
Khan M.A., Hashim M.J., Mustafa H., Baniyas M.Y., Al Suwaidi S., AlKatheeri R., et al. Global epidemiology of ischemic heart disease: results from the global burden of disease study. Cureus. 2020;12(7) PubMed PMC
Alfaraidhy M.A., Regan C., Forman D.E. Cardiac rehabilitation for older adults: current evidence and future potential. Expert Rev Cardiovas. 2022;20(1):13–34. PubMed PMC
Oliveros E., Patel H., Kyung S., Fugar S., Goldberg A., Madan N., et al. Hypertension in older adults: assessment, management, and challenges. Clin. Cardiol. 2020;43(2):99–107. PubMed PMC
Fiatarone Singh MA. Tailoring assessments and prescription in cardiac rehabilitation for older adults: the relevance of geriatric domains. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2019;35(4):423–443. PubMed
Schopfer D.W., Forman D.E. Cardiac rehabilitation in older adults. Can. J. Cardiol. 2016;32(9):1088–1096. PubMed
Ijaz N., Buta B., Xue Q.L., Mohess D.T., Bushan A., Tran H.…Damluji A.A. Interventions for frailty among older adults with cardiovascular disease: JACC state-of-the-art review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2022;79(5):482–503. PubMed PMC
Kumar K.R., Pina I.L. Cardiac rehabilitation in older adults: new options. Clin. Cardiol. 2020;43(2):163–170. PubMed PMC
Flint K.M., Stevens-Lapsley J., Forman D.E. Cardiac rehabilitation in frail older adults with cardiovascular disease A new diagnostic and treatment paradigm. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2020;40(2):72–78. PubMed
Taylor R., Dalal H.M., McDonagh S.T.J. The role of cardiac rehabilitation in improving cardiovascular outcomes. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2022;19(3):180. 194. PubMed PMC
Cowie A., Buckley J., Doherty P., Furze G., Hayward J., Hinton S., et al. Standards and core components for cardiovascular disease prevention and rehabilitation. Heart. 2019;105(7):510. + PubMed PMC
Suaya J.A., Stason W.B., Ades P.A., Normand S.L.T., Shepard D.S. Cardiac rehabilitation and survival in older coronary patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009;54(1):25–33. PubMed
Ritchey M.D., Maresh S., McNeely J., Shaffer T., Jackson S.L., Keteyian S.J., et al. Tracking cardiac rehabilitation participation and completion among medicare beneficiaries to inform the efforts of a national initiative. Circ-Cardiovasc Qual. 2020;13(1) PubMed PMC
Thomas R.J., Petersen C.E., Olson T.P., Beatty A.L., Ding R.J., Supervia M. Asynchronous and synchronous delivery models for home-based cardiac rehabilitation A scientific review. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2021;41(6):407–412. PubMed PMC
Grace S.L., Shanmugasegaram S., Gravely-Witte S., Brual J., Suskin N., Stewart D.E. Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation: does age make a difference? J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009;29(3):183–187. PubMed PMC
Doll J.A., Hellkamp A., Ho P.M., Kontos M.C., Whooley M.A., Peterson E.D., et al. Participation in cardiac rehabilitation programs among older patients after acute myocardial infarction. JAMA Intern. Med. 2015;175(10):1700–1702. PubMed
De Lima A.P., Pereira D.G., Nascimento I.O., Martins T.H., Oliveira A.C., Nogueira T.S., et al. Cardiac telerehabilitation in a middle-income country: analysis of adherence, effectiveness and cost through a randomized clinical trial. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2022;58(4):598–605. PubMed PMC
Su J.J., Wong A.K., Zhang L.P., Bayuo J., Lin R.S., Abu-Odah H., et al. Technology-assisted cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease patients with central obesity: a randomized controlled trial. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2023 PubMed PMC
Sari D.M., Wijaya L.C.G. Cardiac rehabilitation via telerehabilitation in COVID-19 pandemic situation. Egypt Heart J. 2021;73(1) PubMed PMC
Batalik L., Filakova K., Sladeckova M., Dosbaba F., Su J.J., Pepera G. The cost-effectiveness of exercise-based cardiac telerehabilitation intervention: a systematic review. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2023 PubMed PMC
Nacarato D., Sardeli A.V., Mariano L.O., Chacon-Mikahil M.P.T. Cardiovascular telerehabilitation improves functional capacity, cardiorespiratory fitness and quality of life in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Telemed. Telecare. 2022 PubMed
Snoek J.A., Prescott E.I., van der Velde A.E., Eijsvogels T.M.H., Mikkelsen N., Prins L.F., et al. Effectiveness of home-based mobile guided cardiac rehabilitation as alternative strategy for nonparticipation in clinic-based cardiac rehabilitation among elderly patients in Europe A randomized clinical trial. Jama Cardiol. 2021;6(4):463–468. PubMed PMC
Su J.J., Liu J.Y.W., Cheung D.S.K., Wang S., Christensen M., Kor P.P.K., Tyrovolas S., Leung A.Y.M. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing; 2023. Long-term Effects of eHealth Secondary Prevention on Cardiovascular Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PubMed
Platz K., Kools S., Howie-Esquivel J. Benefits, facilitators, and barriers of alternative models of cardiac rehabilitation A qualitative systematic review. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2023;43(2):83–92. PubMed
Beatty A.L., Beckie T.M., Dodson J., Goldstein C.M., Hughes J.W., Kraus W.E., et al. A new era in cardiac rehabilitation delivery: research gaps, questions, strategies, and priorities. Circulation. 2023;147(3):254–266. PubMed PMC
Shi Y.X., Ma D.H., Zhang J., Chen B.W. In the digital age: a systematic literature review of the e-health literacy and influencing factors among Chinese older adults. J Public Health-Heid. 2023;31(5):679–687. PubMed PMC
Wilson J., Heinsch M., Betts D., Booth D., Kay-Lambkin F. Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review. BMC Publ. Health. 2021;21(1) PubMed PMC
Coley N., Andre L., Hoevenaar-Blom M.P., Ngandu T., Beishuizen C., Barbera M., et al. Factors predicting engagement of older adults with a coach-supported eHealth intervention promoting lifestyle change and associations between engagement and changes in cardiovascular and dementia risk: secondary analysis of an 18-month multinational randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2022;24(5) PubMed PMC
Redfern J. Can older adults benefit from smart devices, wearables, and other digital health options to enhance cardiac rehabilitation? Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2019;35(4):489. + PubMed
Statista Smartphone penetration rate in China from 2018 to 2022 with forecasts until 2027. 2022. https://www.statista.com/statistics/321482/smartphone-user-penetration-in-china/ [Available from:
Rawstorn J.C., Gant N., Direito A., Beckmann C., Maddison R. Telehealth exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2016;102(15):1183–1192. PubMed
Whitehead A.L., Julious S.A., Cooper C.L., Campbell M.J. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 2016;25(3):1057–1073. PubMed PMC
Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ. Behav. 2004;31(2):143–164. PubMed
Beauchamp M.R., Crawford K.L., Jackson B. Social cognitive theory and physical activity: mechanisms of behavior change, critique, and legacy. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2019;42:110–117.
Liguori G., American College of Sports Medicine . Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2020. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription.
Promotion. OoDPaH Health literacy online. 2016. https://health.gov/healthliteracyonline/ [Available from:
American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation . sixth ed. Human Kinetics; Champaign, IL: 2020. Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention Programs.
American Diabetes Association Cardiovascular disease and risk management: standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:S86–S104. PubMed
American Psychological Association Emotional health. 2022. https://www.apa.org/pubs/search?query=&fq=ClassificationFilt:%22EmotionalHealth%22&sort=ContentDateSortdesc [Available from:
Hu D.Y.L.N., Tong Q.G. China Light Industry Press; Beijing: 2017. Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia_ Diet and Exercise.
Diseases. NCfC . 2019. Report on Cardiovascular Disease in China 2018.
Su J.J., Yu D.S.F. Effectiveness of eHealth cardiac rehabilitation on health outcomes of coronary heart disease patients: a randomized controlled trial protocol. Bmc Cardiovasc Disor. 2019;19(1) PubMed PMC
Deng H.B., Macfarlane D.J., Thomas G.N., Lao X.Q., Jiang C.Q., Cheng K.K., et al. Reliability and validity of the IPAQ-Chinese: the guangzhou biobank cohort study. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2008;40(2):303–307. PubMed
Walker S.N., Sechrist K.R., Pender N.J. The Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile: development and psychometric characteristics. Nurs. Res. 1987;36(2):76–81. PubMed
Cao W.J., Chen C.S., Hua Y., Li Y.M., Xu Y.Y., Hua Q.Z. Factor analysis of a health-promoting lifestyle profile (HPLP): application to older adults in Mainland China. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2012;55(3):632–638. PubMed
Sullivan M.D., LaCroix A.Z., Russo J., Katon W.J. Self-efficacy and self-reported functional status in coronary heart disease: a six-month prospective study. Psychosom. Med. 1998;60(4):473–478. PubMed
Zhang X., Zhan Y., Liu J., Chai S., Xu L., Lei M., et al. Chinese translation and psychometric testing of the cardiac self-efficacy scale in patients with coronary heart disease in mainland China. Health Qual. Life Outcome. 2018;16(1):43. PubMed PMC
Hofer S., Lim L., Guyatt G., Oldridge N. The MacNew Heart Disease health-related quality of life instrument: a summary. Health Qual. Life Outcome. 2004;2:3. PubMed PMC
Thompson D.R., Oldridge N.B., Yu D.S., Yu C.M. Translation and validation of two Chinese health-related quality of life instruments in patients with coronary heart disease. Hong Kong Med. J. 2009;15(Suppl 2):8–11. PubMed
Crawford J.R., Henry J.D. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 2003;42(Pt 2):111–131. PubMed
Lovibond P.F., Lovibond S.H. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav. Res. Ther. 1995;33(3):335–343. PubMed
Chan R.C., Xu T., Huang J., Wang Y., Zhao Q., Shum D.H., et al. Extending the utility of the Depression Anxiety Stress scale by examining its psychometric properties in Chinese settings. Psychiatr. Res. 2012;200(2–3):879–883. PubMed
Davies C.A., Spence J.C., Vandelanotte C., Caperchione C.M., Mummery W.K. Meta-analysis of internet-delivered interventions to increase physical activity levels. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2012;9 PubMed PMC
Thabane L., Hopewell S., Lancaster G.A., Bond C.M., Coleman C.L., Campbell M.J., et al. Methods and processes for development of a CONSORT extension for reporting pilot randomized controlled trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016;2:25. PubMed PMC
Kwon S., Perera S., Pahor M., Katula J.A., King A.C., Groessl E.J., et al. What is a meaningful change in physical performance? Findings from a clinical trial in older adults (the LIFE-P study) J. Nutr. Health Aging. 2009;13(6):538–544. PubMed PMC
Lee P.G., Jackson E.A., Richardson C.R. Exercise prescriptions in older adults. Am. Fam. Physician. 2017;95(7):425–432. PubMed
Soares-Miranda L., Siscovick D.S., Psaty B.M., Longstreth W.T., Jr., Mozaffarian D. Physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke in older adults: the cardiovascular health study. Circulation. 2016;133(2):147–155. PubMed PMC
Su J.J., Paguio J., Baratedi W.M., Abu-Odah H., Batalik L. Experience of coronary heart disease patients with a nurse-led eHealth cardiac rehabilitation: qualitative process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial. Heart Lung. 2022;57:214–221. PubMed
Kelders S.M., Kok R.N., Ossebaard H.C., Van Gemert-Pijnen J.E.W.C. Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions. J. Med. Internet Res. 2012;14(6):17–40. PubMed PMC