Transseptal Transition Patterns During Left Bundle Branch Area Lead Implantation
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
39387738
DOI
10.1016/j.jacep.2024.07.025
PII: S2405-500X(24)00754-0
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- continuous pacing, current of injury, left bundle branch pacing, left ventricular septal pacing, transseptal patterns,
- MeSH
- Bundle-Branch Block physiopathology therapy MeSH
- Electrocardiography * MeSH
- Bundle of His physiopathology MeSH
- Cardiac Pacing, Artificial methods MeSH
- Pacemaker, Artificial MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Heart Septum physiopathology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: Continuous deep septal pacing and signal recording during implantation of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) lead enables to monitor beat-to-beat changes of electrocardiogram (ECG) and myocardial current of injury (COI) as the lead crosses the septum. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize patterns of continuous QRS, ST-T, and COI change for monitoring of the lead depth and instantaneous determination of the obtained capture type (LBBP vs left ventricular septal pacing [LVSP]). METHODS: The ECG and COI during lead implantation were scrutinized for sudden changes of V6 R-wave peak time, V1 initial and terminal R-wave amplitude, V3-V6 R-wave amplitude, repolarization pattern and S-wave amplitude in I, V5-V6, and COI drop. The sudden and gradual transition patterns were diagnosed depending on the presence or absence of the above beat-to-beat ECG phenomena, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 212 pacemaker recipients were analyzed; LBBP and LVSP were obtained in 77.4% and 22.6%, respectively. There were 4.7 ± 2.1 and 0.2 ± 0.6 beat-to-beat phenomena in LBBP and LVSP patients, respectively. The sudden transition pattern, recognized in 80.7%, had sensitivity and specificity for LBBP diagnosis of 98.8% and 81.2%, respectively. A sudden drop of COI (29.4 ± 8.5 mV to 12.8 ± 4.9 mV) was observed in 53.9% patients (LBBP was simultaneously obtained in 92.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Capture of left bundle branch during lead penetration is a beat-to-beat phenomenon. Two transseptal transition patterns were identified: 1) sudden, which is typical for obtaining LBBP; and 2) gradual, which is typical for obtaining LVSP. A sudden COI drop, a very observable phenomenon, also identified reaching the left subendocardial area.
Cardiac Pacing Unit Cardiology Department University Hospital of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
Electrophysiology Laboratory University Hospital in Krakow Krakow Poland
Geisinger Heart Institute Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine Wilkes Barre Pennsylvania USA
References provided by Crossref.org