A detailed analysis of game statistics of professional tennis players: An inferential and machine learning approach
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
39499678
PubMed Central
PMC11537396
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0309085
PII: PONE-D-24-05081
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- sportovci statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- sportovní výkon statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- strojové učení * MeSH
- tenis * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Tennis, a widely enjoyed sport, motivates athletes and coaches to optimize training for competitive success. This retrospective predictive study examines anthropometric features and statistics of 1990 tennis players in the 2022 season, using 20,040 data points retrospectively obtained from the ATP official source after the end of the season. These data were cross-verified with information from other sources before categorisation to address any discrepancies. Employing various analytical methods, the results emphasize the strategic importance of tournament participation and gameplay for financial gains and higher rankings. Prize money analysis reveals a significant disparity favoring top players. Multivariate Analysis of Variance highlights the need to consider multiple variables for understanding ATP rankings. Multinomial Logistic Regression identifies age, height, and specific service-related metrics as key determinants, with older and taller players more likely to secure top positions. Neural Network models exhibit potential in predicting ATP Rank outcomes, particularly for ATP Rank (500). Our results argue for the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), specifically Neural Networks, in handling complex interactions and emphasize that AI is a supportive tool in decision-making, requiring careful consideration by experienced individuals. In summary, this study enhances our understanding of ATP ranking factors, providing actionable insights for coaches, players, and stakeholders in the tennis community.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Ward P, Williams AM, Bennett SJ. Visual Search and Biological Motion Perception in Tennis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2002;73: 107–112. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2002.10608997 PubMed DOI
Shim J, Carlton LG, Chow JW, Chae W-S. The Use of Anticipatory Visual Cues by Highly Skilled Tennis Players. J Mot Behav. 2005;37: 164–175. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.37.2.164-175 PubMed DOI
Dimic M, Furuya R, Kanosue K. Importance of disguising groundstrokes in a match between two top tennis players (Federer and Djokovic). Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2023;18: 257–269. doi: 10.1177/17479541221075728 DOI
Hoskins T. The Tennis Drill Book. Human Kinetics; 2003.
Mann DTY, Williams AM, Ward P, Janelle CM. Perceptual-Cognitive Expertise in Sport: A Meta-Analysis. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007;29: 457–478. doi: 10.1123/jsep.29.4.457 PubMed DOI
Bartlett R. Performance analysis: can bringing together biomechanics and notational analysis benefit coaches? Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2001;1: 122–126. doi: 10.1080/24748668.2001.11868254 DOI
O’Donoghue P. Research Methods for Sports Performance Analysis. Routledge; 2010.
Lambrich J, Muehlbauer T. Effects of athletic training on physical fitness and stroke velocity in healthy youth and adult tennis players: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Sports Act Living. 2023;4. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1061087 PubMed DOI PMC
Kovacs MS. Tennis physiology: training the competitive athlete. Sports Medicine. 2007;37: 189–198. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200737030-00001 PubMed DOI
Hughes M. The application of notational analysis to racket sports. In: Hughes M, Maynard I, Lees A, Reilly T, editors. Science and Racket Sports II. London: Taylor & Francis; 1998. pp. 211–220. doi: 10.4324/9780203474617 DOI
O’Donoghue P. Match analysis in racket sports. In: Lees A, Kahn J-F, Maynard IW, editors. Science and Racket Sports III. London: Routledge; 2004. pp. 155–162.
Liebermann DG, Katz L, Hughes MD, Bartlett RM, McClements J, Franks IM. Advances in the application of information technology to sport performance. J Sports Sci. 2002;20: 755–769. doi: 10.1080/026404102320675611 PubMed DOI
Takahashi H, Mitsuhashi S, Murakami S. Performance analysis in tennis since 2000: A systematic review focused on the methods of data collection. International Journal of Racket Sports Science. 2022;4: 40–55. doi: 10.30827/Digibug DOI
Ganser A, Hollaus B, Stabinger S. Classification of Tennis Shots with a Neural Network Approach. Sensors. 2021;21: 5703. doi: 10.3390/s21175703 PubMed DOI PMC
Fernandes M de A. Using Soft Computing Techniques for Prediction of Winners in Tennis Matches. Machine Learning Research. 2017;2: 86–98. doi: 10.11648/j.mlr.20170203.12 DOI
Whiteside D, Reid M. Spatial characteristics of professional tennis serves with implications for serving aces: A machine learning approach. J Sports Sci. 2017;35: 648–654. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1183805 PubMed DOI
Lambrich J, Muehlbauer T. Biomechanical analyses of different serve and groundstroke techniques in tennis: A systematic scoping review. PLoS One. 2023;18: e0290320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290320 PubMed DOI PMC
Colomar J, Corbi F, Baiget E. Improving Tennis Serve Velocity: Review of Training Methods and Recommendations. Strength Cond J. 2023;45: 385–394. doi: 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000733 DOI
Kovacs MS, Ellenbecker TS. A Performance Evaluation of the Tennis Serve: Implications for Strength, Speed, Power, and Flexibility Training. Strength Cond J. 2011;33: 22–30. doi: 10.1519/SSC.0b013e318225d59a DOI
O’Donoghue P, Brown E. The Importance of Service in Grand Slam Singles Tennis. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2008;8: 70–78. doi: 10.1080/24748668.2008.11868449 DOI
Chang C-W, Qiu Y-R. Constructing a Gaming Model for Professional Tennis Players Using the C5.0 Algorithm. Applied Sciences. 2022;12: 8222. doi: 10.3390/app12168222 DOI
Avilés C, Navia JA, Ruiz LM, Martínez de Quel Ó. Do expert tennis players actually demonstrate anticipatory behavior when returning a first serve under representative conditions? A systematic review including quality assessment and methodological recommendations. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2019;43: 16–26. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.12.015 DOI
Vaverka F, Cernosek M. Association between body height and serve speed in elite tennis players. Sports Biomech. 2013;12: 30–37. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2012.670664 PubMed DOI
O’Donoghue P. The Most Important Points in Grand Slam Singles Tennis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001;72: 125–131. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2001.10608942 PubMed DOI
Klaus A, Bradshaw R, Young W, O’Brien B, Zois J. Success in national level junior tennis: Tactical perspectives. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2017;12: 618–622. doi: 10.1177/1747954117727792 DOI
O’Donoghue P, Ingram B. A notational analysis of elite tennis strategy. J Sports Sci. 2001;19: 107–115. doi: 10.1080/026404101300036299 PubMed DOI
Gillet E, Leroy D, Thouvarecq R, Stein J-F. A Notational Analysis of Elite Tennis Serve and Serve-Return Strategies on Slow Surface. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23: 532–539. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31818efe29 PubMed DOI
Connaghan D, Moran K, O’Connor NE. An automatic visual analysis system for tennis. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sport Eng Technol. 2013;227: 273–288. doi: 10.1177/1754337112469330 DOI
Polk T, Yang J, Hu Y, Zhao Y. TenniVis: Visualization for Tennis Match Analysis. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2014;20: 2339–2348. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346445 PubMed DOI
Lara JPR, Vieira CLR, Misuta MS, Moura FA, Barros RML de. Validation of a video-based system for automatic tracking of tennis players. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2018;18: 137–150. doi: 10.1080/24748668.2018.1456886 DOI
Djurovic N, Lozovina V, Pavicic L. Evaluation of Tennis Match Data—New Acquisition Model. J Hum Kinet. 2009;21: 15–21. doi: 10.2478/v10078-09-0002-9 DOI
Ma S-M, Liu C-C, Tan Y, Ma S-C. Winning matches in Grand Slam men’s singles: An analysis of player performance-related variables from 1991 to 2008. J Sports Sci. 2013;31: 1147–1155. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.775472 PubMed DOI
Tudor PB, Zeić M, Matković B. Differences between 2010 and 2011 performance indicators of tennis play at the grand slam tournaments. Kinesiology: international journal of fundamental and applied kinesiology. 2014;46: 102–107. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:141512027
Filipcic A, Zecic M, Crespo M, Panjan A, Sarabon N. Differences in performance indicators of elite tennis players in the period 1991–2010. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2015;15: 671–677.
Kovalchik SA, Reid M. Comparing Matchplay Characteristics and Physical Demands of Junior and Professional Tennis Athletes in the Era of Big Data. J Sports Sci Med. 2017;16: 489–497. PubMed PMC
Cui Y, Gómez M-Á, Gonçalves B, Sampaio J. Performance profiles of professional female tennis players in grand slams. PLoS One. 2018;13: e0200591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200591 PubMed DOI PMC
Cui Y, Liu H, Gómez M-Á, Liu H, Gonçalves B. Set-to-set Performance Variation in Tennis Grand Slams: Play with Consistency and Risks. J Hum Kinet. 2020;73: 153–163. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0140 PubMed DOI PMC
Damani C, Damani B, Bagchi A. Match statistics significant to win the initial and intense rounds of a tennis tournament. Trends Sport Sci. 2020;27: 225–231.
Fernández-Garcia AI, Gimenez-Egido JM, Torres-Luque G. Differences in Grand Slam competition statistics between professional and U-18 players according to the sex. [Diferencias en las estadísticas de competición de Grand Slam entre jugadores profesionales y Sub-18 según el género]. RICYDE Revista internacional de ciencias del deporte. 2021;17: 25–37. doi: 10.5232/ricyde2021.06303 DOI
Makino M, Odaka T, Kuroiwa J, Suwa I, Shirai H. Feature Selection to Win the Point of ATP Tennis Players Using Rally Information. Int J Comput Sci Sport. 2020;19: 37–50. doi: 10.2478/ijcss-2020-0003 DOI
Carboch J, Blau M, Sklenarik M, Siman J, Placha K. Ball change in tennis: How does it affect match characteristics and rally pace in Grand Slam tournaments? Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2019;15. doi: 10.14198/jhse.2020.151.14 DOI
Edelmann-Nusser A, Raschke A, Bentz A, Montenbruck S, Edelmann-Nusser J, Lames M. Validation of Sensor-Based Game Analysis Tools in Tennis. Int J Comput Sci Sport. 2019;18: 49–59. doi: 10.2478/ijcss-2019-0013 DOI
Schmidhofer S, Leser R, Ebert M. A comparison between the structure in elite tennis and kids tennis on scaled courts (Tennis 10s). Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2014;14: 829–840. doi: 10.1080/24748668.2014.11868761 DOI
Fitzpatrick A, Davids K, Stone JA. Effects of Lawn Tennis Association mini tennis as task constraints on children’s match-play characteristics. J Sports Sci. 2017;35: 2204–2210. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1261179 PubMed DOI
Stare M, Zibrat U, Filipcic A. Stroke effectivness in professional and junior tennis [ucinkovitost udarcev v profesionalnem in mladinskem tenisu]. Kinesiologia Slovenica. 2015;21: 39–50. Available: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/stroke-effectivness-professional-junior-tennis/docview/1764881922/se-2?accountid=16531
Reid M, Morgan S, Whiteside D. Matchplay characteristics of Grand Slam tennis: implications for training and conditioning. J Sports Sci. 2016;34: 1791–1798. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1139161 PubMed DOI
Pereira TJC, van Emmerik REA, Misuta MS, Barros RML, Moura FA. Interpersonal coordination analysis of tennis players from different levels during official matches. J Biomech. 2018;67: 106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.11.036 PubMed DOI
Hizan H, Whipp P, Reid M. Comparison of serve and serve return statistics of high performance male and female tennis players from different age-groups. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2011;11: 365–375. doi: 10.1080/24748668.2011.11868556 DOI
Mergheş PE, Simion B, Nagel A. Comparative Analysis of Return of Serve as Counter-attack in Modern Tennis. Timisoara Physical Education and Rehabilitation Journal. 2014;6: 18–22. doi: 10.2478/tperj-2014-0023 DOI
Söğüt M. Stature: Does it really make a difference in match-play outcomes among professional tennis players? Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2018;18: 255–261. doi: 10.1080/24748668.2018.1466259 DOI
Grambow R O’Shannessy C, Born P, Meffert D, Vogt T. Serve efficiency developments at Wimbledon between 2002 and 2015: a longitudinal approach to impact tomorrow’s tennis practice. Human Movement. 2020;21: 65–72. doi: 10.5114/hm.2020.88155 DOI
Kim H, Cai F, Ryu J, Haddad JM, Zelaznik HN. Tennis match time Series do not exhibit long term correlations. Int J Sport Psychol. 2015;46: 542–554.
Wilson RS, David GK, Murphy SC, Angilletta MJ, Niehaus AC, Hunter AH, et al. Skill not athleticism predicts individual variation in match performance of soccer players. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2017;284: 20170953. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0953 PubMed DOI PMC
Vaverka F, Nykodym J, Hendl J, Zhanel J, Zahradnik D. Association between serve speed and court surface in tennis. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2018;18: 262–272. doi: 10.1080/24748668.2018.1467995 DOI
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
Anonymized. NN 3.1 model. Fi gshare. 2023. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24762705.v1 DOI
Safari S, Baratloo A, Elfil M, Negida A. Evidence Based Emergency Medicine; Part 5 Receiver Operating Curve and Area under the Curve. Emergency. 2016;4: 111–113. Available: www.jemerg.com PubMed PMC
Hernandez J, Lobos G, Matus I, del Pozo A, Silva P, Galleguillos M. Using Ridge Regression Models to Estimate Grain Yield from Field Spectral Data in Bread Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) Grown under Three Water Regimes. Remote Sens (Basel). 2015;7: 2109–2126. doi: 10.3390/rs70202109 DOI
Lazaridis DC, Verbesselt J, Robinson AP. Penalized regression techniques for prediction: a case study for predicting tree mortality using remotely sensed vegetation indices. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 2011;41: 24–34. doi: 10.1139/X10-180 DOI
Fei S, Xu D, Chen Z, Xiao Y, Ma Y. MLR-based feature splitting regression for estimating plant traits using high-dimensional hyperspectral reflectance data. Field Crops Res. 2023;293: 108855. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108855 DOI
Wang J, Shi T, Yu D, Teng D, Ge X, Zhang Z, et al. Ensemble machine-learning-based framework for estimating total nitrogen concentration in water using drone-borne hyperspectral imagery of emergent plants: A case study in an arid oasis, NW China. Environmental Pollution. 2020;266: 115412. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115412 PubMed DOI
Lin J, Short L, Sundaresan V. Predicting National Basketball Association Winners. CS 229 FINAL PROJECT. 2014; 1–5. Available: https://cs229.stanford.edu/proj2014/Jasper%20Lin,%20Logan%20Short,%20Vishnu%20Sundaresan,%20Predicting%20National%20Basketball%20Association%20Game%20Winners.pdf
Horvat T, Job J. The use of machine learning in sport outcome prediction: A review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 2020;10. doi: 10.1002/widm.1380 DOI
Bozděch M, Vychodilová R. Evaluation of neural network feature and function settings on the model performance and accuracy. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2023;23: 983–989. doi: 10.7752/jpes.2023.04123 DOI
Feldman D, Gross ST, Long Y. Gender Competitiveness and Predictability, and Prize Money in Grand Slam Tennis Tournaments. Quarterly Journal of Finance. 2020;10: 2050006. doi: 10.1142/S2010139220500068 DOI
Balliauw M, Verlinden T, Van Den Spiegel T, Van Hecke J. How to achieve a sustainable circuit for professional tennis players? International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing. 2023;23: 391–418. doi: 10.1504%2FIJSMM.2023.133162
Vacek J, Vagner M, Cleather DJ, Stastny P. A Systematic Review of Spatial Differences of the Ball Impact within the Serve Type at Professional and Junior Tennis Players. Applied Sciences. 2023;13: 3586. doi: 10.3390/app13063586 DOI