BACKGROUND: Stroke often impairs upper extremity motor function, with recovery in the sub-acute phase being crucial for regaining independence. This study examines changes in isometric muscle strength, dexterity, and self-care independence during this period, and evaluates the effects of a comprehensive intensive rehabilitation (COMIRESTROKE). METHODS: Individuals in sub-acute stroke recovery and age- and sex-matched controls were assessed for pre- and post-rehabilitation differences in primary outcomes (grip/pinch strength, Nine Hole Peg Test [NHPT], Action Research Arm Test [ARAT]). COMIRESTROKE's effects on primary and secondary outcomes (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS], Modified Rankin Scale [MRS], Functional Independence Measure [FIM]) were evaluated. Outcomes were analyzed for dominant and non-dominant limbs, both regardless of impairment and with a focus on impaired limbs. RESULTS: Fifty-two individuals with stroke (NIHSS 7.51 ± 5.71, age 70.25 ± 12.66 years, 21.36 ± 12.06 days post-stroke) and forty-six controls participated. At baseline, individuals with stroke showed significantly lower strength (dominant grip, key pinch, tip-tip pinch, p adj < 0.05), higher NHPT scores (p adj < 0.05), and lower ARAT scores (p adj < 0.001). COMIRESTROKE led to improvements in dominant key pinch, non-dominant tip-tip pinch, NHPT, and both dominant and non-dominant ARAT (p adj < 0.05). Notably, non-dominant key pinch improved significantly when considering only impaired hands. Pre- and post-test differences between groups were significant only for ARAT (both limbs), even after adjustment (p adj < 0.05). All secondary outcomes (NIHSS, MRS, FIM) showed significant improvement post-COMIRESTROKE (p adj < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Individuals with stroke exhibit reduced muscle strength and dexterity, impairing independence. However, comprehensive intensive rehabilitation significantly improves these functions. Data are available from the corresponding author upon request and are part of a sub-study of NCT05323916.

Center of Scientific Information 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia

Department of Neurology 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Thomayer University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine 2nd Medical Faculty Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czech Republic

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia

Department of Rheumatology and Physiotherapy 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Thomayer University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Department of Statistical Modelling Institute of Computer Science of the Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czechia

See more in PubMed

Liao WW, Wu CY, Hsieh YW, Lin KC, Chang WY. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. (2012) 26:111–20. doi: 10.1177/0269215511416383, PMID: PubMed DOI

de Silva MAS, Cook C, Stinear CM, Wolf SL, Borich MR. Paretic upper extremity strength at acute rehabilitation evaluation predicts motor function outcome after stroke. MedRxiv. (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.10.05.21264572 DOI

Ingram LA, Butler AA, Brodie MA, Lord SR, Gandevia SC. Quantifying upper limb motor impairment in chronic stroke: a physiological profiling approach. J Appl Physiol. (2021) 131:949–65. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00078.2021, PMID: PubMed DOI

Lin KC, Chang YF, Wu CY, Chen YA. Effects of constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training on motor performance, daily functions, and quality of life in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2009) 23:441–8. doi: 10.1177/1545968308328719 PubMed DOI

Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. (2009) 8:741–54. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4 PubMed DOI

Santisteban L, Teremetz M, Bleton JP, Baron JC, Maier MA, Lindberg PG. Upper limb outcome measures used in stroke rehabilitation studies: a systematic literature review. PLoS One. (2016) 11:e0154792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154792, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Sathian K, Buxbaum LJ, Cohen LG, Krakauer JW, Lang CE, Corbetta M, et al. . Neurological principles and rehabilitation of action disorders: common clinical deficits. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2011) 25:21S–32S. doi: 10.1177/1545968311410941, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Prado-Medeiros CL, Silva MP, Lessi GC, Alves MZ, Tannus A, Lindquist AR, et al. . Muscle atrophy and functional deficits of knee extensors and flexors in people with chronic stroke. Phys Ther. (2012) 92:429–39. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090127, PMID: PubMed DOI

Kwakkel G, Kollen B. Predicting improvement in the upper paretic limb after stroke: a longitudinal prospective study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. (2007) 25:453–60. Available at: https://content.iospress.com/articles/restorative-neurology-and-neuroscience/rnn00380 PMID: PubMed

Mercier C, Bourbonnais D. Relative shoulder flexor and handgrip strength is related to upper limb function after stroke. Clin Rehabil. (2004) 18:215–21. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr724oa PubMed DOI

Rabelo M, Nunes GS, da Costa Amante NM, de Noronha M, Fachin-Martins E. Reliability of muscle strength assessment in chronic post-stroke hemiparesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Top Stroke Rehabil. (2016) 23:26–35. doi: 10.1179/1945511915Y.0000000008, PMID: PubMed DOI

Thompson-Butel AG, Lin G, Shiner CT, McNulty PA. Comparison of three tools to measure improvements in upper-limb function with poststroke therapy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2014) 29:341–8. doi: 10.1177/1545968314547766 PubMed DOI

Van Harlinger W, Blalock L, Merritt JL. Upper limb strength: study providing normative data for a clinical handheld dynamometer. PM R. (2015) 7:135–40. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.09.007, PMID: PubMed DOI

Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, Avni N, Katz N. Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disabil Rehabil. (2007) 29:559–66. doi: 10.1080/09638280600924996 PubMed DOI

Etoh S, Noma T, Miyata R, Shimodozono M. Effects of repetitive facilitative exercise on spasticity in the upper paretic limb after subacute stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2018) 27:2863–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.06.013, PMID: PubMed DOI

Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, Ward NS, Wolf SL, Borschmann K, et al. . Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable taskforce. Int J Stroke. (2017) 12:444–50. doi: 10.1177/1747493017711816, PMID: PubMed DOI

Grefkes C, Fink GR. Recovery from stroke: current concepts and future perspectives. Neurol Res Pract. (2020) 2:17. doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-00060-6, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Kiær C, Lundquist CB, Brunner I. Knowledge and application of upper limb prediction models and attitude toward prognosis among physiotherapists and occupational therapists in the clinical stroke setting. Top Stroke Rehabil. (2021) 28:135–41. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1783915, PMID: PubMed DOI

Stinear CM. Prediction of motor recovery after stroke: advances in biomarkers. Lancet Neurol. (2017) 16:826–36. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30283-1 PubMed DOI

Stinear CM, Byblow WD. Predicting and accelerating motor recovery after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol. (2014) 27:624–30. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000153, PMID: PubMed DOI

Matthews PM, Johansen-Berg H, Reddy J. Non-invasive mapping of brain functions and brain recovery: applying lessons from cognitive neuroscience to neurorehabilitation. Restor Neurol Neurosci. (2004) 22:245–60. Available at: https://content.iospress.com/articles/restorative-neurology-and-neuroscience/rnn00273 PMID: PubMed

Zhang Z, Fang W, Gu X. Objective assessment of upper-limb mobility for poststroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. (2016) 63:859–68. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2477095, PMID: PubMed DOI

Shimodozono M, Noma T, Nomoto Y, Hisamatsu N, Kamada K, Miyata R, et al. . Benefits of a repetitive facilitative exercise program for the upper paretic extremity after subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2013) 27:296–305. doi: 10.1177/1545968312465896, PMID: PubMed DOI

Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. (2011) 377:1693–702. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5 PubMed DOI

Rocha LSO, Gama GCB, Rocha RSB, Rocha LB, Dias CP, Santos LLS, et al. . Constraint induced movement therapy increases functionality and quality of life after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2021) 30:105774. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105774, PMID: PubMed DOI

Cauraugh JH, Kim SB. Chronic stroke motor recovery: duration of active neuromuscular stimulation. J Neurol Sci. (2003) 215:13–9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-510X(03)00169-2, PMID: PubMed DOI

Mandon L, Boudarham J, Robertson J, Bensmail D, Roche N, Roby-Brami A. Faster reaching in chronic spastic stroke patients comes at the expense of arm-trunk coordination. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2016) 30:209–20. doi: 10.1177/1545968315591704, PMID: PubMed DOI

Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. (1990) 21:241–6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.21.2.241 PubMed DOI

Burton CR, Horne M, Woodward-Nutt K, Bowen A, Tyrrell P. What is rehabilitation potential? Development of a theoretical model through the accounts of healthcare professionals working in stroke rehabilitation services. Disabil Rehabil. (2015) 37:1955–60. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.991454, PMID: PubMed DOI

Hu MH, Hsu SS, Yip PK, Jeng JS, Wang YH. Early and intensive rehabilitation predicts good functional outcomes in patients admitted to the stroke intensive care unit. Disabil Rehabil. (2010) 32:1251–9. doi: 10.3109/09638280903464448 PubMed DOI

Hopman WM, Verner J. Quality of life during and after inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. (2003) 34:801–5. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000057978.15397.6F PubMed DOI

Bunketorp-Käll L, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Samuelsson H, Pekny T, Blomve K, Pekna M, et al. . Long-term improvements after multimodal rehabilitation in late phase after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. (2017) 48:1916–24. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016433, PMID: PubMed DOI

Řasová K, Martinková P, Vařejková M, Miznerová B, Pavlíková M, Hlinovská J, et al. . COMIRESTROKE-A clinical study protocol for monitoring clinical effect and molecular biological readouts of COMprehensive intensive REhabilitation program after STROKE: a four-arm parallel-group randomized double blinded controlled trial with a longitudinal design. Front Neurol. (2022) 13:954712. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.954712, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Kristensen OH, Stenager E, Dalgas U. Muscle strength and poststroke hemiplegia: a systematic review of muscle strength assessment and muscle strength impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2017) 98:368–80. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.023, PMID: PubMed DOI

Kim M, Kothari DH, Lum PS, Patten C. Reliability of dynamic muscle performance in the hemiparetic upper limb. J Neurol Phys Ther. (2005) 29:9–17. doi: 10.1097/01.NPT.0000282257.74325.2b, PMID: PubMed DOI

Boissy P, Bourbonnais D, Carlotti MM, Gravel D, Arsenault BA. Maximal grip force in chronic stroke subjects and its relationship to global upper extremity function. Clin Rehabil. (1999) 13:354–62. doi: 10.1191/026921599676433080, PMID: PubMed DOI

Lacas A, Rockwood K. Frailty in primary care: a review of its conceptualization and implications for practice. BMC Med. (2012) 10:4. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-4, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Hlinovský D, Doležalová I, Hlinovská J. Komplexní rehabilitace pacientů po cévní mozkové přhodĕ - projekt iktového centra Thomayerovy nemocnice [Complex rehabilitation of patients after stroke – project of stroke Centre in Thomayer’s Hospital]. Prakt Lék. (2016) 96:267–71. Available at: https://www.prolekare.cz/casopisy/prakticky-lekar/2016-6/komplexni-rehabilitace-pacientu-po-cevni-mozkove-prihode-projekt-iktoveho-centra-thomayerovy-nemocnice-59726

Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. (1971) 9:97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 PubMed DOI

Bertrand AM, Mercier C, Bourbonnais D, Desrosiers J, Gravel D. Reliability of maximal static strength measurements of the arms in subjects with hemiparesis. Clin Rehabil. (2007) 21:248–57. doi: 10.1177/0269215506070792, PMID: PubMed DOI

Lafayette Instrument Company . Lafayette hydraulic hand dynamometer user instructions (2022). Available at: https://rehabmart.com.sg/pub/media/files/Dynamometer_User_Manual_Lafayette_-_MAN32261-j00105-pdf-rev5.pdf (accessed September 7, 2024).

Chen HF, Lin KC, Wu CY, Chen CL. Rasch validation and predictive validity of the action research arm test in patients receiving stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2012) 93:1039–45. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.033, PMID: PubMed DOI

Chen HM, Chen CC, Hsueh IP, Huang SL, Hsieh CL. Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2009) 23:435–40. doi: 10.1177/1545968308331146, PMID: PubMed DOI

Lyden P, Raman R, Liu L, Emr M, Warren M, Marler J. National Institutes of Health stroke scale certification is reliable across multiple venues. Stroke. (2009) 40:2507–11. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.532069, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

van Swieten J. Modified Rankin scale for neurologic disability (2021). Available at: https://www.mdcalc.com/modified-rankin-scale-neurologic-disability#creator-insights (accessed September 7, 2024).

Ring H, Feder M, Schwartz J, Samuels G. Functional measures of first-stroke rehabilitation inpatients: usefulness of the functional Independence measure total score with a clinical rationale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (1997) 78:630–5. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90429-9, PMID: PubMed DOI

Ustün TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Rehm J, Kennedy C, Epping-Jordan J, et al. . Developing the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ. (2010) 88:815–23. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067231, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier RL, Wagner JM, Miller JP, Videen TO, et al. . Very early constraint-induced movement during stroke rehabilitation (VECTORS): a single-center RCT. Neurology. (2009) 73:195–201. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ab2b27, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Lang CE, Edwards DF, Birkenmeier RL, Dromerick AW. Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2008) 89:1693–700. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.022, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Langan J, van Donkelaar P. The influence of hand dominance on the response to a constraint-induced therapy program following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2008) 22:298–304. doi: 10.1177/1545968307307123, PMID: PubMed DOI

Hmaied Assadi S, Feige Gross-Nevo R, Dudkiewicz I, Barel H, Rand D. Improvement of the upper extremity at the subacute stage poststroke: does hand dominance play a role? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2020) 34:1030–7. doi: 10.1177/1545968320962502, PMID: PubMed DOI

Gilbertson L, Barber-Lomax S. Power and pinch grip strength recorded using the hand-held Jamar® dynamometer and B+L hydraulic pinch gauge: British normative data for adults. Br J Occup Ther. (1994) 57:483–8. doi: 10.1177/030802269405701209 DOI

Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (1985) 66:69–74. PMID: PubMed

Beebe JA, Lang CE. Relationships and responsiveness of six upper extremity function tests during the first six months of recovery after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. (2009) 33:96–103. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181a33638 PubMed DOI PMC

Rabadi MH, Rabadi FM. Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2006) 87:962–6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.036, PMID: PubMed DOI

Franck JA, Smeets RJEM, Seelen HAM. Changes in arm-hand function and arm-hand skill performance in patients after stroke during and after rehabilitation. PLoS One. (2017) 12:e0179453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179453, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

van Delden AL, Peper CL, Beek PJ, Kwakkel G. Match and mismatch between objective and subjective improvements in upper limb function after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. (2013) 35:1961–7. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.768303, PMID: PubMed DOI

Beninato M, Gill-Body KM, Salles S, Stark PC, Black-Schaffer RM, Stein J. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2006) 87:32–9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.130 PubMed DOI

See more in PubMed

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05323916