Hormonal biomarkers remain prognostically relevant within the molecular subgroups in endometrial cancer
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study
PubMed
39515079
DOI
10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.10.028
PII: S0090-8258(24)01185-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Biomarkers, Endometrial carcinoma, Immunohistochemical, Molecular classification, Pathology, Prognosis,
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor * genetics metabolism MeSH
- Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 genetics MeSH
- Endometrial Neoplasms * genetics metabolism pathology mortality MeSH
- DNA Mismatch Repair MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Receptors, Estrogen * metabolism biosynthesis MeSH
- Receptors, Progesterone * metabolism biosynthesis MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Biomarkers, Tumor * MeSH
- Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 MeSH
- Receptors, Estrogen * MeSH
- Receptors, Progesterone * MeSH
- TP53 protein, human MeSH Browser
OBJECTIVE: The prognostic relevance of hormonal biomarkers in endometrial cancer (EC) has been well-established. A refined three-tiered risk model for estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) expression was shown to improve prognostication. This has not been evaluated in relation to the molecular subgroups. This study aimed to evaluate the ER/PR expression within the molecular subgroups in EC. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed and data from the European Network for Individualized Treatment centers and Vancouver, Canada were used. ER/PR immunohistochemical expression was grouped as: ER/PR 0-10 %, 20-80 % or 90-100 %. Molecular subgroups were determined with full next-generation sequencing or combined with immunohistochemistry: POLEmut, mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), p53mut and no-specific molecular profile (NSMP). RESULTS: A total of 739 patients were included (median follow-up 5.0 years). Tumors were classified as POLEmut in 9.1 %(N = 67), MMRd in 27.6 %(N = 204), p53mut in 20.8 %(N = 154) and NSMP in 42.5 %(N = 314). Among all molecular subgroups, patients with ER/PR 90-100 % expression revealed the best disease-specific survival (DSS). Within p53mut, PR 90-100 % expression showed a 5-year DSS of 100.0 %. ER expression is prognostic more relevant in MMRd and NSMP tumors while PR expression in p53mut and NSMP tumors. Across all molecular subgroups, PR 0-10 %, p53mut, lympho-vascular space invasion and FIGO stage III-IV remained independently prognostic for reduced DSS Whereas PR 90-100 % and POLEmut remained independently prognostic for improved DSS. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that ER/PR expression remain prognostically relevant within the molecular subgroups, and that a three-tiered cutoff refines prognostication. These data support incorporating routine evaluation of ER/PR expression in clinical practice.
Department of Health Evidence Radboud university medical center Nijmegen the Netherlands
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen the Netherlands
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical Center University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands
Department of Pathology Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen the Netherlands
Department of Pathology Radboud university Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands
Department of Pathology University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Pathology University of Turku Turku Finland
Department of Radiation Oncology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands
References provided by Crossref.org