BACKGROUND: The 6-minute walking test (6WT) has previously shown to be reliable and valid outcome measure in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar disorders (DLD). A role of 6WT in conservatively treated patients undergoing epidural steroid injection (ESI) remains unclear. METHODS: About 50 patients with DLD, scheduled for ESI were assessed by the smartphone-based 6WT and common paper-based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Core Outcome Measures Index [COMI] back, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Short Form Survey (SF-12). Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) was used to define the relationship between 6WT and PROMs. Reliability of the 6WT was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Age- and sex-adjusted objective functional impairment (OFI) z-scores were calculated for each patient. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients (mean age 52 years, SD 13; 25% female), including 35 patients (70%) with lumbar disc herniation and 15 patients (30%) with lumbar spinal stenosis were included. The mean 6-minute walking distance (6WD) was 454.1 m (SD 89.1); the age- and sex-adjusted mean OFI z-score was -2.1 (SD 4.0). A total of 17 (34%) patients had mild, 8 (16%) moderate, and 4 (8%) severe OFI, while 21 (42%) had 6WT results within the normal population range (no OFI). The PCCs between the 6WD and VAS back pain were r=-0.30, ODI r=-0.43, COMI back r=-0.36, and PCS-12 r=0.51 (all p<.05). The ICC of the 6WT was β=0.92. CONCLUSIONS: This external validation in a patient cohort with DLD, which was managed conservatively, confirms the reliability and content validity of the 6WT with similar PCCs with PROMs compared to the original surgical cohort. The results confirm the 6WT as a valid and useful tool for assessing OFI in patients with DLD and a broad range of functional restrictions in an outpatient setting.

1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery Luzerner Kantonsspital and University of Lucerne Lucerne Switzerland

Department of Neurosurgery Kantonsspital St Gallen and Medical School of St Gallen St Gallen Switzerland

Department of Neurosurgery University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Centre University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Spine Center of Eastern Switzerland Kantonsspital St Gallen and Medical School of St Gallen St Gallen Switzerland

See more in PubMed

Prescher A. Anatomy and pathology of the aging spine. Eur J Radiol. 1998;27(3):181–195. PubMed

Gautschi OP, Corniola M V, Schaller K, Smoll NR, Stienen MN. The need for an objective outcome measurement in spine surgery—the timed-up-and-go test. Spine J. 2014;14(10):2521–2522. PubMed

Mannion AF, Fekete TF, Wertli MM, et al. Could less be more when assessing patient-rated outcome in spinal stenosis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40(10):710–718. PubMed

Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, et al. Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J. 2005;14(10):1014–1026. PubMed

Carragee EJ. The rise and fall of the “minimum clinically important difference. Spine J. 2010;10(4):283–284. PubMed

Tomkins-Lane CC, Battié MC. Predictors of objectively measured walking capacity in people with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(4):345–352. PubMed

Ziga M, Sosnova M, Zeitlberger AM, et al. Objective outcome measures may demonstrate continued change in functional recovery in patients with ceiling effects of subjective patient-reported outcome measures after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders. Spine J. 2023;13:1314–1322. PubMed

Stienen MN, Ho AL, Staartjes VE, et al. Objective measures of functional impairment for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature. Spine J. 2019;19(7):1276–1293. PubMed

Gautschi OP, Smoll NR, Corniola M V, et al. Validity and reliability of a measurement of objective functional impairment in lumbar degenerative disc disease: the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Neurosurgery. 2016;79(2):270–278. PubMed

Stienen MN, Gautschi OP, Staartjes VE, et al. Reliability of the 6-minute walking test smartphone application. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;31(6):1–8. PubMed

Hamilton DM, Haennel RG. Validity and reliability of the 6-minute walk test in a cardiac rehabilitation population. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2000;20(3):156–164. PubMed

Maldaner N, Sosnova M, Zeitlberger AM, et al. Evaluation of the 6-minute walking test as a smartphone app-based self-measurement of objective functional impairment in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;33(6):1–10. PubMed

Tosic L, Goldberger E, Maldaner N, et al. Normative data of a smartphone app-based 6-minute walking test, test-retest reliability, and content validity with patient-reported outcome measures. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;33(4):1–10. PubMed

Chan YK. 6-minute walk test: a simple objective test in screening and monitoring of spinal claudication: prospective study on 1182 patients. Global Spine J. 2016;6(1_suppl) 36-36.

Loske S, Nüesch C, Byrnes KS, et al. Decompression surgery improves gait quality in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2018;18(12):2195–2204. PubMed

Takenaka H, Sugiura H, Kamiya M, et al. Predictors of walking ability after surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a prospective study. Spine J. 2019;19(11):1824–1831. PubMed

Sosnova M, Zeitlberger AM, Ziga M, et al. Longitudinal smartphone-based self- assessment of objective functional impairment in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disease: initial experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020;162(9):2061–2068. PubMed

Zeitlberger AM, Sosnova M, Ziga M, et al. Smartphone-based self- assessment of objective functional impairment (6-minute walking test) in patients undergoing epidural steroid injection. Neurospine. 2020;17(1):136–142. PubMed PMC

Sosnova M, Zeitlberger AM, Ziga M, et al. Patients undergoing surgery for lumbar degenerative spinal disorders favor smartphone-based objective self-assessment over paper-based patient-reported outcome measures. Spine J. 2021;21(4):610–617. PubMed

Overholser BR, Sowinski KM. Biostatistics primer: part 2. Nutr Clin Pract. 2008;23(1):76–84. PubMed

Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–428. PubMed

Stratford PW, Goldsmith CH. Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data. Phys Ther. 1997;77(7):745–750. PubMed

Staartjes VE, Joswig H, Corniola MV, Schaller K, Gautschi OP, Stienen MN. Association of medical comorbidities with objective functional impairment in lumbar degenerative disc disease. Global Spine J. 2022;12(6):1184–1191. PubMed PMC

Staartjes VE, Schröder ML. The five-repetition sit-to-stand test: evaluation of a simple and objective tool for the assessment of degenerative pathologies of the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;29(4):1–8. PubMed

Klukowska AM, Schröder ML, Stienen MN, Staartjes VE. Objective functional impairment in lumbar degenerative disease: concurrent validity of the baseline severity stratification for the five-repetition sit-to-stand test. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;33(1):1–8. PubMed

Mobbs RJ, Fonseka RD, Natarajan P, et al. The subjective and objective quality of life score (SOQOLTM) for the quantification of general health status: a preliminary study with initial normative population values. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024;8:7. PubMed PMC