Alterations in DNA Damage Repair Genes Before and After Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
39717660
PubMed Central
PMC11664179
DOI
10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.022
PII: S2666-1683(24)01413-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, DNA repair genes, Muscle-invasive bladder cancer, Mutation, Next-generation sequencing,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The role of genetic variants in response to systemic therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is still elusive. We assessed variations in genes involved in DNA damage repair (DDR) before and after cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and correlation of alteration patterns with DNA damage and response to therapy. METHODS: Matched tissue from 46 patients with MIBC was investigated via Ion Torrent-based next-generation sequencing using a self-designed panel of 30 DDR genes. Phosphorylation of γ-histone 2A.X (H2AX) was analyzed via immunohistochemistry to evaluate DNA damage. Genetic variants were analyzed along with clinical data and quantitative phospho-H2AX data using the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression analysis, and factor analysis of mixed data. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Twenty-five patients (54%) had a response (
Center for Cancer Research Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Clinical Institute of Pathology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Witjes J.A., Babjuk M., Bellmunt J., et al. EAU-ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer—an international collaborative multistakeholder effort. Eur Urol. 2020;77:223–250. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.035. PubMed DOI
Petrelli F., Coinu A., Cabiddu M., Ghilardi M., Vavassori I., Barni S. Correlation of pathologic complete response with survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bladder cancer treated with cystectomy: a meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2014;65:350–357. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.049. PubMed DOI
Ploussard G., Shariat S.F., Dragomir A., et al. Conditional survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: evidence for a patient changing risk profile over time. Eur Urol. 2014;66:361–370. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.050. PubMed DOI
Powles T., Bellmunt J., Comperat E., et al. Bladder cancer: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022;33:244–258. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.012. PubMed DOI
Shariat S.F., Lotan Y., Vickers A., et al. Statistical consideration for clinical biomarker research in bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2010;28:389–400. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.02.011. PubMed DOI PMC
Taber A., Christensen E., Lamy P., et al. Molecular correlates of cisplatin-based chemotherapy response in muscle invasive bladder cancer by integrated multi-omics analysis. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4858. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18640-0. PubMed DOI PMC
Zargar H., Espiritu P.N., Fairey A.S., et al. Multicenter assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;67:241–249. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.007. PubMed DOI PMC
Desai N.B., Scott S.N., Zabor E.C., et al. Genomic characterization of response to chemoradiation in urothelial bladder cancer. Cancer. 2016;122:3715–3723. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30219. PubMed DOI PMC
Plimack E.R., Dunbrack R.L., Brennan T.A., et al. Defects in DNA repair genes predict response to neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68:959–967. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.009. PubMed DOI PMC
Eisenhauer E.A., Therasse P., Bogaerts J., et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. PubMed DOI
Cancer Genome Atlas Research N Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nature. 2014;507:315–322. doi: 10.1038/nature12965. PubMed DOI PMC
Bannon S.A., Routbort M.J., Montalban-Bravo G., et al. Next-generation sequencing of DDX41 in myeloid neoplasms leads to increased detection of germline alterations. Front Oncol. 2020;10 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.582213. PubMed DOI PMC
Stout L.A., Kassem N., Hunter C., Philips S., Radovich M., Schneider B.P. Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing. Sci Rep. 2021;11:13624. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93084-0. PubMed DOI PMC
Yang L., Ghosh R.P., Franklin J.M., et al. NuSeT: a deep learning tool for reliably separating and analyzing crowded cells. PLoS Comput Biol. 2020;16 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008193. PubMed DOI PMC
Mayakonda A., Lin D.C., Assenov Y., Plass C., Koeffler H.P. Maftools: efficient and comprehensive analysis of somatic variants in cancer. Genome Res. 2018;28:1747–1756. doi: 10.1101/gr.239244.118. PubMed DOI PMC
Flanagan S.E., Patch A.M., Ellard S. Using SIFT and PolyPhen to predict loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2010;14:533–537. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2010.0036. PubMed DOI
Tsongalis G.J., Peterson J.D., de Abreu F.B., et al. Routine use of the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq cancer hotspot panel for identification of clinically actionable somatic mutations. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014;52:707–714. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2013-0883. PubMed DOI
Heeke A.L., Pishvaian M.J., Lynce F., et al. Prevalence of homologous recombination-related gene mutations across multiple cancer types. JCO Precis Oncol. 2018;2018 doi: 10.1200/PO.17.00286. PubMed DOI PMC
Teo M.Y., Seier K., Ostrovnaya I., et al. Alterations in DNA damage response and repair genes as potential marker of clinical benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in advanced urothelial cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1685–1694. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.7740. PubMed DOI PMC
Robertson A.G., Kim J., Al-Ahmadie H., et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cell. 2017;171:540–556.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.007. PubMed DOI PMC
Nassar A.H., Umeton R., Kim J., et al. Mutational analysis of 472 urothelial carcinoma across grades and anatomic sites. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:2458–2470. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3147. PubMed DOI
Van Allen E.M., Mouw K.W., Kim P., et al. Somatic ERCC2 mutations correlate with cisplatin sensitivity in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:1140–1153. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0623. PubMed DOI PMC
Liu D., Abbosh P., Keliher D., et al. Mutational patterns in chemotherapy resistant muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Nat Commun. 2017;8:2193. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02320-7. PubMed DOI PMC
Liu D., Plimack E.R., Hoffman-Censits J., et al. Clinical validation of chemotherapy response biomarker ERCC2 in muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:1094–1096. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1056. PubMed DOI PMC
Lin P.C., Yeh Y.M., Wu P.Y., Hsu K.F., Chang J.Y., Shen M.R. Germline susceptibility variants impact clinical outcome and therapeutic strategies for stage III colorectal cancer. Sci Rep. 2019;9:3931. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40571-0. PubMed DOI PMC
Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S., et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–424. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. PubMed DOI PMC
Carlo M.I., Mukherjee S., Mandelker D., et al. Prevalence of germline mutations in cancer susceptibility genes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1228–1235. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1986. PubMed DOI PMC
Tripathi A., Grivas P. The utility of next generation sequencing in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6:41–44. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.08.016. PubMed DOI