First-line immune-based combinations or sunitinib in favorable-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a real-world retrospective comparison from the ARON-1 study

. 2025 Jan 03 ; 74 (2) : 65. [epub] 20250103

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, srovnávací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid39752009
Odkazy

PubMed 39752009
PubMed Central PMC11699065
DOI 10.1007/s00262-024-03897-x
PII: 10.1007/s00262-024-03897-x
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

INTRODUCTION: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common types of urogenital cancer. The introduction of immune-based combinations, including dual immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or ICI plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has radically changed the treatment landscape for metastatic RCC, showing varying efficacy across different prognostic groups based on the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study, part of the ARON-1 project, aimed to evaluate the outcomes of favorable-risk metastatic RCC patients treated with immune-based combinations or sunitinib. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate. We carried out a survival analysis by a Cox regression model. RESULTS: A total of 524 favorable-risk patients were included in the analysis. After a median follow-up of 37.2 months, the median OS in the overall population was 56.1 months. There was no significant difference in OS between patients receiving sunitinib and those receiving TKI + ICI combinations (p = 0.761). Patients on TKI + ICI had significantly longer PFS compared to patient treated with sunitinib (30.7 vs 22.9 months, p = 0.007). Analysis of OS and PFS based on metastatic site revealed that patients with bone metastases benefited more from ICI plus TKI (56 patients with bone metastases receiving IO + TKI, 38 received pembrolizumab plus axitinib, 15 cabozantinib plus nivolumab and 3 pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib), while sunitinib was more effective for pancreatic and glandular metastases. Additionally, the number of metastatic sites played a role, with TKI plus ICI showing superiority in patients with a single metastatic site. The time from RCC diagnosis to metastatic disease also impacted outcomes, with TKI plus ICI being more effective in patients with a shorter interval (i.e., < 36 months). CONCLUSIONS: The choice between upfront combination or monotherapy for metastatic favorable prognosis RCC remains a current issue. While combination therapy offers prolonged PFS, it does not necessarily translate to improve OS compared to sunitinib. This real-world study supports the superiority in terms of PFS of TKI plus ICI vs TKI monotherapy but not in OS. Probable, other clinical factors should be taking into account to make clinical treatment decisions in this setting.

Alcalá University Madrid Spain

Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology National Institute of Oncology Budapest Hungary

Department of Health Sciences Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology University of Florence Viale Pieraccini 6 50139 Florence Italy

Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties University of Genoa Genoa Italy

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences University of Bologna Bologna Italy

Department of Medical Oncology Army Hospital Research and Referral New Delhi India

Department of Medical Oncology AUSL Della Romagna Ospedale Civile Degli Infermi Faenza Italy

Department of Medical Oncology Hospital Ramón y Cajal Madrid Spain

Department of Medical Oncology Maggiore Della Carità University Hospital 28100 Novara Italy

Department of Medical Oncology San Camillo Forlanini Hospital Rome Italy

Department of Oncology and Radiotherapeutics Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen Charles University Pilsen Czech Republic

Department of Oncology Radiotherapy Prof Dr Alexandru Trestioreanu Institute of Oncology Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest Romania

Department of Surgical Oncological and Oral Sciences Section of Medical Oncology University of Palermo Palermo Italy

Division of Medical Oncology National Cancer Centre Singapore Singapore Singapore

Division of Oncology Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment Asl Cn2 Alba Brà 12051 Alba Brà Italy

Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Biomedical Center Charles University Pilsen Czech Republic

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo SP Brazil

Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine University of Bari Aldo Moro and Division of Medical Oncology A O U Consorziale Policlinico Di Bari Piazza Giulio Cesare 11 70124 Bari Italy

IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino Genoa Italy

Klinik Für Urologie Ratzeburger Allee 160 23538 Lübeck Germany

Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group LACOG Porto Alegre Brazil

Medical Oncology IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Di Bologna Via Albertoni 15 Bologna Italy

Medical Oncology Ospedale Santa Corona 17027 Pietra Ligure Italy

Medical Oncology Tawam Hospital Al Ain United Arab Emirates

Medical Oncology Unit University Hospital of Parma Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Parma Parma Italy

Oncology and Hematology Department Hospital Sirio Libanês SGAS 613 Lote 94 Brasília DF Brazil

Oncology Unit A R N A S Civico Palermo Italy

Oncology Unit Macerata Hospital Macerata Italy

Ospedale San Paolo Medical Oncology 17100 Savona Italy

Section of Innovation Biomedicine Oncology Area Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine University of Verona Verona Italy

SOC Oncologia PO Pugliese Ciaccio Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Renato Dulbecco Catanzaro Italy

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A (2023) Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 73(1):17–48. 10.3322/caac.21763 PubMed

Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF et al (2018) Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 378(14):1277–1290. 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126 PubMed PMC

Motzer RJ, Penkov K, Haanen J et al (2019) Avelumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 380(12):1103–1115. 10.1056/NEJMoa1816047 PubMed PMC

Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V et al (2019) Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 380(12):1116–1127. 10.1056/NEJMoa1816714 PubMed

Motzer R, Alekseev B, Rha SY et al (2021) Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or everolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 384(14):1289–1300. 10.1056/NEJMoa2035716 PubMed

Choueiri TK, Powles T, Burotto M et al (2021) Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 384(9):829–841. 10.1056/NEJMoa2026982 PubMed PMC

Massari F, Rizzo A, Mollica V et al (2021) Immune-based combinations for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 154:120–127. 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.015 PubMed

Santoni M, Buti S, Myint ZW et al (2023) Real-world outcome of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and intermediate- or poor-risk international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium criteria treated by immune-oncology combinations: differential effectiveness by risk group? Eur Urol Oncol 17(1):102–111 PubMed

Lee D, Gittleman H, Weinstock C et al (2023) A U.S. food and drug administration-pooled analysis of frontline combination treatment survival benefits by risk groups in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 84(4):373–378. 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.05.030 PubMed

McDermott DF, Huseni MA, Atkins MB et al (2018) Clinical activity and molecular correlates of response to atezolizumab alone or in combination with bevacizumab versus sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma. Nat Med 24(6):749–757. 10.1038/s41591-018-0053-3 PubMed PMC

Motzer RJ, Robbins PB, Powles T et al (2020) Avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: biomarker analysis of the phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 trial. Nat Med 26(11):1733–1741. 10.1038/s41591-020-1044-8 PubMed PMC

Motzer RJ, Banchereau R, Hamidi H, Powles T, McDermott D, Atkins MB, Escudier B, Liu LF, Leng N, Abbas AR, Fan J, Koeppen H, Lin J, Carroll S, Hashimoto K, Mariathasan S, Green M, Tayama D, Hegde PS, Schiff C, Huseni MA, Rini B (2020) Molecular subsets in renal cancer determine outcome to checkpoint and angiogenesis blockade. Cancer Cell 38(6):803-817.e4 PubMed PMC

Rosellini M, Marchetti A, Mollica V, Rizzo A, Santoni M, Massari F (2023) Prognostic and predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Urol 20(3):133–157. 10.1038/s41585-022-00676-0 PubMed

Santoni M, Massari F, Myint ZW et al (2023) Clinico-Pathological Features Influencing the Prognostic Role of Body Mass Index in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated by Immuno-Oncology Combinations (ARON-1). Clin Genitourin Cancer 21(5):309-319.e1. 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.03.006 PubMed

Santoni M, Massari F, Myint ZW et al (2023) Global real-world outcomes of patients receiving immuno-oncology combinations for advanced renal cell carcinoma: the ARON-1 study. Target Oncol 18(4):559–570. 10.1007/s11523-023-00978-2 PubMed

Porta C, Bamias A, Zakopoulou R et al (2023) Geographical differences in the management of metastatic de novo renal cell carcinoma in the era of immune-combinations. Minerva Urol Nephrol 75(4):460–470. 10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05369-7 PubMed

Schwartz LH, Litière S, de Vries E, Ford R, Gwyther S, Mandrekar S et al (2016) RECIST 1.1-Update and clarification: from the RECIST committee. Eur J Cancer 62:132–137 PubMed PMC

McGregor B, Geynisman DM, Burotto M, Suárez C, Bourlon MT, Barata PC, Gulati S, Huo S, Ejzykowicz F, Blum SI, Del Tejo V, Hamilton M, May JR, Du EX, Wu A, Kral P, Ivanescu C, Chin A, Betts KA, Lee CH, Choueiri TK, Cella D, Porta C (2023) A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus pembrolizumab plus axitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol Oncol 6(3):339–348. 10.1016/j.euo.2023.01.012 PubMed

Buti S, Petrelli F, Ghidini A, Vavassori I, Maestroni U, Bersanelli M (2020) Immunotherapy-based combinations versus standard first-line treatment for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Transl Oncol 22(9):1657–1663. 10.1007/s12094-020-02292-z PubMed

Cattrini C, Messina C, Airoldi C, Buti S, Roviello G, Mennitto A, Caffo O, Gennari A, Bersanelli M (2021) Is there a preferred first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma? A network meta-analysis. Ther Adv Urol 29(13):17562872211053188. 10.1177/17562872211053189.PMID:34733356;PMCID:PMC8558789 PubMed PMC

Bosma NA, Warkentin MT, Gan CL, Karim S, Heng DYC, Brenner DR, Lee-Ying RM (2022) Efficacy and safety of first-line systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur Urol Open Sci 22(37):14–26. 10.1016/j.euros.2021.12.007.PMID:35128482;PMCID:PMC8792068 PubMed PMC

Singla N, Xie Z, Zhang Z, Gao M, Yousuf Q, Onabolu O, McKenzie T, Tcheuyap VT, Ma Y, Choi J, McKay R, Christie A, Torras OR, Bowman IA, Margulis V, Pedrosa I, Przybycin C, Wang T, Kapur P, Rini B, Brugarolas J (2020) Pancreatic tropism of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. JCI Insight 5(7):e134564. 10.1172/jci.insight.134564.PMID:32271170;PMCID:PMC7205259 PubMed PMC

Heng DY, Xie W, Regan MM, Warren MA, Golshayan AR, Sahi C, Eigl BJ, Ruether JD, Cheng T, North S, Venner P, Knox JJ, Chi KN, Kollmannsberger C, McDermott DF, Oh WK, Atkins MB, Bukowski RM, Rini BI, Choueiri TK (2009) Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 27(34):5794–5799. 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4809 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace