Science is crucial for evidence-based decision-making. Public trust in scientists can help decision makers act on the basis of the best available evidence, especially during crises. However, in recent years the epistemic authority of science has been challenged, causing concerns about low public trust in scientists. We interrogated these concerns with a preregistered 68-country survey of 71,922 respondents and found that in most countries, most people trust scientists and agree that scientists should engage more in society and policymaking. We found variations between and within countries, which we explain with individual- and country-level variables, including political orientation. While there is no widespread lack of trust in scientists, we cannot discount the concern that lack of trust in scientists by even a small minority may affect considerations of scientific evidence in policymaking. These findings have implications for scientists and policymakers seeking to maintain and increase trust in scientists.

2i Programme of ICT Division and UNDP Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh

Behavior in Crisis Lab Institute of Psychology Jagiellonian University Cracow Poland

Cambridge Zero University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

Center for Integrated Disaster Information Research Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan

Center for Social and Cultural Psychology Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium

Center for Sociocultural Research HSE University Moscow Russia

Centre for Climate and Energy Transformation University of Bergen Bergen Norway

Centre for Climate Change Communication George Mason University Fairfax VA USA

Centre for Language Studies Radboud University Nijmegen Nijmegen the Netherlands

Centre for Research in Communication and Culture Department of Communication and Media Loughborough University Loughborough UK

Centre for Research on Evaluation Science and Technology Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa

Centre for the Politics of Feelings University of London London UK

Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politícnico Nacional Mexico City Mexico

Communication Arts Programme Bowen University Iwo Nigeria

Computer Science Department Harvey Mudd College Claremont CA USA

Departamento de Psicología Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia La Molina Peru

Département de Sociologie Université Officielle de Bukavu Bukavu Democratic Republic of the Congo

Department of Advertising Public Relations Michigan State University East Lansing MI USA

Department of Architecture University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology University of Buea Buea Cameroon

Department of Biochemistry Faculty of Science University of Dschang Dschang Cameroon

Department of Biomedical Sciences University of Botswana Gaborone Botswana

Department of Business Administration Instituto Técnológico Autónomo de México Mexico City Mexico

Department of Civil Law Faculty of Law University of Tirana Milto Tutulani Tirana Albania

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology Faculty of Psychology University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

Department of Cognition Emotion and Methods in Psychology Faculty of Psychology University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Cognitive Psychology Universität Hamburg Hamburg Germany

Department of Communication and Internet Studies Cyprus University of Technology Limassol Cyprus

Department of Communication and Media Research University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Department of Communication George Mason University Fairfax VA USA

Department of Communication Science and Political Science Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands

Department of Communication University of Muenster Münster Germany

Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Notre Dame Notre Dame IN USA

Department of Economics Harvard University Cambridge MA USA

Department of Economics University of Bath Bath UK

Department of Economics University of Birmingham Birmingham UK

Department of Environmental Systems Science ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Department of Geography University of Bergen Bergen Norway

Department of Government and Politics Jahangirnagar University Dhaka Bangladesh

Department of Health Law Policy and Management Boston University School of Public Health Boston MA USA

Department of Implementation Research Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine Hamburg Germany

Department of Information Science and Media Studies University of Bergen Bergen Norway

Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science University of Utrecht Utrecht the Netherlands

Department of International and Political Sciences University of Genoa Genoa Italy

Department of Journalism and Mass Communication Lviv Polytechnic National University Lviv Ukraine

Department of Labor and Social Policy University of Lodz Lodz Poland

Department of Management Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

Department of Management and Supply Chain Studies Nkumba University Entebbe Uganda

Department of Management University of Adger Kristiansand Norway

Department of Media and Communication City University of Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong

Department of Media and Communication LMU Munich Munich Germany

Department of Nutritional Sciences University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Philosophy Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia

Department of Physics Egerton University Egerton Kenya

Department of Political Science Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

Department of Political Science and Annenberg School for Communication University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA

Department of Political Science and International Relations Carleton College Northfield MN USA

Department of Political Science and International Relations KIMEP University Almaty Kazakhstan

Department of Political Science and International Relations School of Sciences and Humanities Nazarbayev University Astana Kazakhstan

Department of Political Science and International Relations University of Delaware Newark DE USA

Department of Psychobiology and Methodology Faculty of Psychology Universidad Complutense de Madrid Madrid Spain

Department of Psychological Science Pomona College Claremont CA USA

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Boston College Chestnut Hill MA USA

Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy Witten Herdecke University Witten Germany

Department of Psychology Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Tübingen Germany

Department of Psychology Education and Child Studies Erasmus University Rotterdam Rotterdam the Netherlands

Department of Psychology Erzurum Technical University Erzurum Turkey

Department of Psychology Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences Lillehammer Elverum Norway

Department of Psychology KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

Department of Psychology Ludwig Maximilians Universität München Munich Germany

Department of Psychology Nantes Université LPPL Nantes France

Department of Psychology New York University New York NY USA

Department of Psychology Royal Holloway University of London Egham UK

Department of Psychology Saarland University Saarbrücken Germany

Department of Psychology Universidad de Concepción Concepción Chile

Department of Psychology Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Indonesia

Department of Psychology University of Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands

Department of Psychology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

Department of Psychology University of Crete Rethymno Greece

Department of Psychology University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA

Department of Psychology University of the Philippines Diliman Quezon City Philippines

Department of Psychology University of Victoria Victoria British Columbia Canada

Department of Psychology Ural Federal University Yekaterinburg Russia

Department of Public Health University of Otago Wellington New Zealand

Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

Department of Science and Technology Studies Faculty of Science Universiti Malaya Kuala Lumpur Malaysia

Department of Scientific and Innovation Culture Spanish Foundation for Science and Technology Madrid Spain

Department of Social Research University of Turku Turku Finland

Department of Social Sciences University of Hamburg Hamburg Germany

Department of Sociology University of the Philippines Diliman Quezon City Philippines

Department of the History of Science Harvard University Cambridge MA USA

Division of Economics Department of Management and Engineering Linköping University Linköping Sweden

Division of Public Policy Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Hong Kong Hong Kong

ELTE Institute of Psychology Eotvos Lorand University Budapest Hungary

Faculté des Sciences Sociales Université Catholique de Bukavu Bukavu Democratic Republic of the Congo

Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences University of Groningen Groningen the Netherlands

Faculty of Data and Decision Sciences Technion Israel Institute of Technology Haifa Israel

Faculty of Health Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Trinity Western University Langley British Columbia Canada

Faculty of Life Sciences Food Nutrition and Health University of Bayreuth Kulmbach Germany

Faculty of Management and Economics Ruhr University Bochum Bochum Germany

Faculty of Management University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland

Faculty of Philosophy and Social Science Nicolaus Copernicus University Toruń Poland

Faculty of Polish and Classical Philology University of Adam Mickiewicz Poznań Poland

Faculty of Political Science and Economics Waseda University Tokyo Japan

Faculty of Psychology Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia Jakarta Indonesia

Faculty of Psychology University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland

Faculty of Technology and Bionics Rhine Waal University Kleve Germany

Graduate Institute of Journalism National Taiwan University Taipei Taiwan

Harding Center for Risk Literacy University of Potsdam Potsdam Germany

Harvard Kennedy School's Shorenstein Center Harvard University Cambridge MA USA

Hixon Center for Climate and the Environment Harvey Mudd College Claremont CA USA

Independent Researcher Cairo Egypt

Institut des Géosciences de l'Environnement University Grenoble Alpes CNRS IRD Grenoble INP Grenoble France

Institut Jean Nicod Département d'études cognitives ENS EHESS PSL University CNRS Paris France

Institut Langage et Communication University of Louvain Louvain la Neuve Belgium

Institute for Data Systems and Society Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA USA

Institute for Management and Organization Leuphana University Lueneburg Germany

Institute for Planetary Health Behaviour University of Erfurt Erfurt Germany

Institute for Sociology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava Slovakia

Institute of Communication Studies and Journalism Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Institute of Environmental Health Faculty of Medicine University of Lisbon Lisbon Portugal

Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine University of Bonn University Hospital Bonn Bonn Germany

Institute of Malaysian and International Studies National University of Malaysia Bangi Malaysia

Institute of Medical Psychology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany

Institute of Multimedia and Interactive Systems University of Lübeck Lübeck Germany

Institute of Political Science and Sociology University of Bonn Bonn Germany

Institute of Political Science University of Bamberg Bamberg Germany

Institute of Political Science University of St Gallen St Gallen Switzerland

Institute of Psychology Nicolaus Copernicus University Toruń Poland

Institute of Psychology SWPS University Warsaw Poland

Institute of Psychology University of Silesia in Katowice Katowice Poland

Institute of Sociology University Bern Bern Switzerland

Laboratoire Parisien de Psychologie Sociale Université Paris Nanterre Nanterre France

Laboratory for Research of Individual Differences University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia

Leibniz Institut für Wissensmedien Tübingen Germany

Leibniz Institute for Psychology Trier Germany

Linde Center for Science Society and Policy Division of Humanities and Social Science California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA

LMU Munich School of Management LMU Munich Munich Germany

LP3C Université Rennes 2 Rennes France

Max Planck Institute for Human Development Berlin Germany

Melbourne Centre for Behaviour Change University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

Molecular Haematology and Immunogenetics Laboratory Department of Medical Laboratory Science Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology College of Medicine University of Nigeria Nsukka Nsukka Nigeria

Museum of Natural Sciences 'Sabiha Kasimati' University of Tirana Tirana Albania

National Institute of Science and Technology on Social and Affective Neuroscience São Paulo Brazil

Network for Economic and Social Trends Western University London Ontario Canada

Network Science Institute Northeastern University Boston MA USA

NOVA Institute of Communication NOVA University of Lisbon Lisbon Portugal

Office for Quality Assurance Analyses and Reporting Project EUTOPIA University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia

Penn Center for Neuroaesthetics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA

Psychology Department TED University Ankara Turkey

Research Institute for Responsible Innovation School of Management University of St Gallen St Gallen Switzerland

School of Arts Media and Communiation UCLan Cyprus Pyla Cyprus

School of Collective Intelligence Mohammed 6 Polytechnic University Ben Guerir Morocco

School of Communication and Culture Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

School of Economics and Management Tongji University Shanghai China

School of Education Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland

School of Environment Tsinghua University Beijing China

School of Geography Planning and Spatial Sciences University of Tasmania Tasmania Australia

School of Medicine and Psychology Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

School of Politics and International Relations Australian National University Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

School of Psychological and Social Sciences University of Waikato Tauranga New Zealand

School of Psychological Science and Public Policy Institute University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia

School of Psychology and Public Health La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia

School of Psychology Aston University Birmingham UK

School of Psychology University of Birmingham Birmingham UK

School of Psychology University of Kent Canterbury UK

School of Psychology University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia

School of Psychology University of Sheffield Sheffield UK

School of Psychology University of Sussex Falmer UK

School of Psychology Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand

School of Social Work Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts Lucerne Switzerland

Science Studies Laboratory University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland

Sloan School of Management Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA USA

Social and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory Mackenzie Presbyterian University São Paulo Brazil

Sociology Department Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels Belgium

TRANSOC Complutense University of Madrid Madrid Spain

Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics University of Oxford Oxford UK

UNSW Institute for Climate Risk and Response University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Algan, Y., Cohen, D., Davoine, E., Foucault, M. & Stantcheva, S. Trust in scientists in times of pandemic: panel evidence from 12 countries. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA118, e2108576118 (2021). PubMed PMC

Sturgis, P., Brunton-Smith, I. & Jackson, J. Trust in science, social consensus and vaccine confidence. Nat. Hum. Behav.5, 1528–1534 (2021). PubMed

Cologna, V. & Siegrist, M. The role of trust for climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviour: a meta-analysis. J. Environ. Psychol.69, 101428 (2020).

Cologna, V., Hoogendoorn, G. & Brick, C. To strike or not to strike? An investigation of the determinants of strike participation at the Fridays for Future climate strikes in Switzerland. PLoS ONE16, e0257296 (2021). PubMed PMC

IPSOS Global Trustworthiness Monitor: Stability in an Unstable World (IPSOS, 2022).

Wellcome Global Monitor: How Does the World Feel about Science and Health? (Wellcome, 2018); https://wellcome.org/sites/default/files/wellcome-global-monitor-2018.pdf

Wellcome Global Monitor: How COVID-19 Affected People’s Lives and Their Views about Science (Wellcome, 2020); https://cms.wellcome.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/Wellcome-Global-Monitor-Covid.pdf

Nichols, T. M. The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters (Oxford Univ. Press, 2017).

Jamieson, K. H. Crisis or self-correction: rethinking media narratives about the well-being of science. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA115, 2620–2627 (2018). PubMed PMC

Shanahan, E. A., Mcbeth, M. K. & Hathaway, P. L. Narrative policy framework: the influence of media policy narratives on public opinion. Polit. Policy39, 373–400 (2011).

Toff, B. Exploring the effects of polls on public opinion: how and when media reports of policy preferences can become self-fulfilling prophesies. Res. Polit.5, 2053168018812215 (2018).

Sonck, N. & Loosveldt, G. Impact of poll results on personal opinions and perceptions of collective opinion. Int. J. Public Opin. Res.22, 230–255 (2010).

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D. & Bromme, R. Measuring laypeople’s trust in experts in a digital age: the Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI). PLoS ONE10, e0139309 (2015). PubMed PMC

Wintterlin, F. et al. Predicting public trust in science: the role of basic orientations toward science, perceived trustworthiness of scientists, and experiences with science. Front. Commun. 10.3389/fcomm.2021.822757 (2022).

Cologna, V., Baumberger, C., Knutti, R., Oreskes, N. & Berthold, A. The communication of value judgements and its effects on climate scientists’ perceived trustworthiness. Environ. Commun.16, 1094–1107 (2022).

Bromme, R., Mede, N. G., Thomm, E., Kremer, B. & Ziegler, R. An anchor in troubled times: trust in science before and within the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE17, e0262823 (2022). PubMed PMC

Motta, M. The enduring effect of scientific interest on trust in climate scientists in the United States. Nat. Clim. Change8, 485–488 (2018).

McCright, A. M., Dentzman, K., Charters, M. & Dietz, T. The influence of political ideology on trust in science. Environ. Res. Lett.8, 044029 (2013).

Azevedo, F. & Jost, J. T. The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Process. Intergroup Relat.24, 518–549 (2021).

Mede, N. G. Legacy media as inhibitors and drivers of public reservations against science: global survey evidence on the link between media use and anti-science attitudes. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun.9, 40 (2022).

Rutjens, B. T. et al. Science skepticism across 24 countries. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci.13, 102–117 (2022).

Chan, E. Are the religious suspicious of science? Investigating religiosity, religious context, and orientations towards science. Public Underst. Sci.27, 967–984 (2018). PubMed

Gil de Zúñiga, H., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., Diehl, T., Gómez Patiño, M. & Liu, J. H. Trust in institutional actors across 22 countries. Examining political, science, and media trust around the world. Rev. Lat. Comun. Soc.74, 237–262 (2019).

Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G. & Roth, C. Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Anal.20, 353–362 (2000). PubMed

Besley, J. C. & Tiffany, L. A. What are you assessing when you measure ‘trust’ in scientists with a direct measure? Public Underst. Sci. 10.1177/09636625231161302 (2023). PubMed

Ghai, S., Forscher, P. S. & Chuan-Peng, H. Big-team science does not guarantee generalizability. Nat. Hum. Behav.8, 1053–1056 (2024). PubMed

Forscher, P. S. et al. The benefits, barriers, and risks of big-team science. Perspect. Psychol. Sci.18, 607–623 (2023). PubMed

Odeny, B. & Bosurgi, R. Time to end parachute science. PLoS Med.19, e1004099 (2022). PubMed PMC

Dubow, S. Racial irredentism, ethnogenesis, and white supremacy in high-apartheid South Africa. Kronos41, 236–264 (2015).

Brandt, A. M. Racism and research: the case of the Tuskegee syphilis study. Hastings Cent. Rep.8, 21–29 (1978). PubMed

Scharff, D. P. et al. More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation. J. Health Care Poor Underserved21, 879–897 (2010). PubMed PMC

West, J. D. & Bergstrom, C. T. Misinformation in and about science. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA118, e1912444117 (2021). PubMed PMC

Roozenbeek, J. et al. Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. R. Soc. Open Sci.7, 201199 (2020). PubMed PMC

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D. & Bromme, R. Replication crisis = trust crisis? The effect of successful vs failed replications on laypeople’s trust in researchers and research. Public Underst. Sci.29, 270–288 (2020). PubMed

Rutjens, B. T. & Većkalov, B. Conspiracy beliefs and science rejection. Curr. Opin. Psychol.46, 101392 (2022). PubMed

Douglas, K. M. Are conspiracy theories harmless? Span. J. Psychol.24, e13 (2021). PubMed

Mede, N. G. & Schäfer, M. S. Science-related populism: conceptualizing populist demands toward science. Public Underst. Sci.29, 473–491 (2020). PubMed PMC

Mede, N. G., Schäfer, M. S. & Füchslin, T. The SciPop scale for measuring science-related populist attitudes in surveys: development, test, and validation. Int. J. Public Opin. Res.33, 273–293 (2021).

Funk, C., Tyson, A., Kennedy, B. & Johnson, C. Science and Scientists Held in High Esteem across Global Publics (Pew Research Center Science & Society, 2020); https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2020/09/29/science-and-scientists-held-in-high-esteem-across-global-publics/

Li, N. & Qian, Y. Polarization of public trust in scientists between 1978 and 2018: insights from a cross-decade comparison using interpretable machine learning. Polit. Life Sci.41, 45–54 (2022). PubMed

Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999); 10.1017/CBO9781139175043

Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Martin, M. & Stallworth, L. M. Consensual racism and career track: some implications of social dominance theory. Polit. Psychol.12, 691–721 (1991).

Kerr, J. R. & Wilson, M. S. Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Process. Intergroup Relat.24, 550–567 (2021).

Achterberg, P., de Koster, W. & van der Waal, J. A science confidence gap: education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014. Public Underst. Sci.26, 704–720 (2017). PubMed

Besley, J. C., Lee, N. M. & Pressgrove, G. Reassessing the variables used to measure public perceptions of scientists. Sci. Commun. 10.1177/1075547020949547 (2020).

Mede, N. G. et al. Perceptions of science, science communication, and climate change attitudes in 68 countries: the TISP dataset. Sci. Data.10.1038/s41597-024-04100-7 (2025). PubMed PMC

Putnick, D. L. & Bornstein, M. H. Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: the state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Dev. Rev.41, 71–90 (2016). PubMed PMC

Besley, J. C., Lee, N. M. & Pressgrove, G. Reassessing the variables used to measure public perceptions of scientists. Sci. Commun.43, 3–32 (2021).

Rutjens, B. T. & van der Lee, R. Spiritual skepticism? Heterogeneous science skepticism in the Netherlands. Public Underst. Sci.29, 335–352 (2020). PubMed PMC

McPhetres, J., Jong, J. & Zuckerman, M. Religious Americans have less positive attitudes toward science, but this does not extend to other cultures. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci.12, 528–536 (2021).

De Cruz, H. in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (eds Zalta, E. N. & Nodelman, U.) https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/religion-science/ (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford Univ., 2022).

Johnson, C., Thigpen, C. & Funk, C. On the Intersection of Science and Religion (Pew Research Center’s Religion & Public Life Project, 2020); https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2020/08/26/on-the-intersection-of-science-and-religion/

Vlasceanu, M. et al. Addressing climate change with behavioral science: a global intervention tournament in 63 countries. Sci. Adv.10, eadj5778 (2024). PubMed PMC

Van Bavel, J. J. et al. National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic. Nat. Commun.13, 517 (2022). PubMed PMC

De keersmaecker, J., Schmid, K., Sibley, C. G. & Osborne, D. The association between political orientation and political knowledge in 45 nations. Sci. Rep.14, 2590 (2024). PubMed PMC

Lasco, G. & Curato, N. Medical populism. Soc. Sci. Med.221, 1–8 (2019). PubMed

Otjes, S. & Rekker, R. Socialised to think in terms of left and right? The acceptability of the left and the right among European voters. Elect. Stud.72, 102365 (2021).

Weeden, J. & Kurzban, R. Do people naturally cluster into liberals and conservatives? Evol. Psychol. Sci.2, 47–57 (2016).

Thorisdottir, H., Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I. & Shrout, P. E. Psychological needs and values underlying left–right political orientation: cross-national evidence from eastern and western Europe. Public Opin. Q.71, 175–203 (2007).

Bauer, P. C., Barberá, P., Ackermann, K. & Venetz, A. Is the left–right scale a valid measure of ideology? Polit. Behav.39, 553–583 (2017).

2022 Corruption Perceptions Index (Transparency International, 2022); https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2022

Bauer, M. W. The Cultural Authority of Science: Comparing across Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas (Routledge, 2018).

Clausen, B., Kraay, A. & Nyiri, Z. Corruption and confidence in public institutions: evidence from a global survey. World Bank Econ. Rev.25, 212–249 (2011).

Jong-sung, Y. & Khagram, S. A comparative study of inequality and corruption. Am. Sociol. Rev.70, 136–157 (2005).

Sturgis, P. & Allum, N. Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Underst. Sci.13, 55–74 (2004).

Cologna, V., Knutti, R., Oreskes, N. & Siegrist, M. Majority of German citizens, US citizens and climate scientists support policy advocacy by climate researchers and expect greater political engagement. Environ. Res. Lett.16, 024011 (2021).

Besley, J. C. The National Science Foundation’s science and technology survey and support for science funding, 2006–2014. Public Underst. Sci.27, 94–109 (2018). PubMed

Bubela, T. et al. Science communication reconsidered. Nat. Biotechnol.27, 514–518 (2009). PubMed

Freedman, G., Moutoux, I., Hermans, I. & Green, M. C. ‘She made a mean beef stroganoff’: gendered portrayals of women in STEM in newspaper articles and their effects. Commun. Monogr.91, 262–282 (2024).

Mitchell, M. & McKinnon, M. ‘Human’ or ‘objective’ faces of science? Gender stereotypes and the representation of scientists in the media. Public Underst. Sci.28, 177–190 (2019). PubMed

Myers, T. A. et al. Predictors of trust in the general science and climate science research of US federal agencies. Public Underst. Sci.26, 843–860 (2017). PubMed

Stanley, S. K. & Wilson, M. S. Meta-analysing the association between social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and attitudes on the environment and climate change. J. Environ. Psychol.61, 46–56 (2019).

Franta, B. Weaponizing economics: Big Oil, economic consultants, and climate policy delay. Environ. Polit.31, 555–575 (2022).

Oreskes, N. & Conway, E. M. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming (Bloomsbury, 2010).

Xie, J. et al. Social consensus through the influence of committed minorities. Phys. Rev. E84, 011130 (2011). PubMed

Centola, D., Becker, J., Brackbill, D. & Baronchelli, A. Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention. Science360, 1116–1119 (2018). PubMed

Lewandowsky, S., Pilditch, T. D., Madsen, J. K., Oreskes, N. & Risbey, J. S. Influence and seepage: an evidence-resistant minority can affect public opinion and scientific belief formation. Cognition188, 124–139 (2019). PubMed

Oreskes, N. What is the social responsibility of climate scientists? Daedalus149, 33–45 (2020).

Beall, L., Myers, T. A., Kotcher, J., Vraga, E. K. & Maibach, E. W. Controversy matters: impacts of topic and solution controversy on the perceived credibility of a scientist who advocates. PLoS ONE12, e0187511 (2017). PubMed PMC

Kotcher, J., Myers, T. A., Vraga, E. K., Stenhouse, N. & Maibach, E. W. Does engagement in advocacy hurt the credibility of scientists? Results from a randomized national survey experiment. Environ. Commun.11, 415–429 (2017).

Funk, C., Hefferon, M., Kennedy, B. & Johnson, C. Trust and Mistrust in Americans’ Views of Scientific Experts (Pew Research Center Science & Society, 2019); https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2019/08/02/trust-and-mistrust-in-americans-views-of-scientific-experts/

Pratto, F. et al. Social dominance in context and in individuals: contextual moderation of robust effects of social dominance orientation in 15 languages and 20 countries. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci.4, 587–599 (2013).

Green, P. & MacLeod, C. J. SIMR: an R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods Ecol. Evol.7, 493–498 (2016).

Lumley, T. survey: Analysis of complex survey samples. R package v.4.4-2 https://cran.r-project.org/package=survey (2023).

Battaglia, M. P., Hoaglin, D. C. & Frankel, M. R. Practical considerations in raking survey data. Surv. Pract. 10.29115/SP-2009-0019 (2009).

Bates, D. et al. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using ‘Eigen’ and S4. R package v.1.1-35 https://cran.r-project.org/package=lme4 (2023).

Patil, I. et al. datawizard: Easy data wrangling and statistical transformations. R package v.0.12.03 https://cran.r-project.org/package=datawizard (2023).

O’brien, R. M. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual. Quant.41, 673–690 (2007).

Satterthwaite, F. E. Synthesis of variance. Psychometrika6, 309–316 (1941).

Extreme weather event attribution predicts climate policy support across the world

Perceptions of science, science communication, and climate change attitudes in 68 countries - the TISP dataset