Incidence, Management, and Prevention of Gynecomastia and Breast Pain in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Antiandrogen Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country Netherlands Media electronic-ecollection
Document type Journal Article, Review
PubMed
39935942
PubMed Central
PMC11810703
DOI
10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.001
PII: S2666-1683(25)00011-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Androgen deprivation therapy, Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, Antiandrogen therapy, Breast pain, Gynecomastia,
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In patients with prostate cancer treated with antiandrogen monotherapy, gynecomastia and breast pain are relatively common. In the setting of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs), the incidence of these adverse events (AEs) remains unclear. In addition, the effect of prophylactic treatment on gynecomastia remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of gynecomastia and breast pain in prostate cancer patients treated with ARPIs compared with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and the effect of prophylactic treatment for these AEs due to antiandrogen therapy. METHODS: In June 2024, we queried four databases-PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase-for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating prostate cancer treatments involving antiandrogen therapy. The endpoints of interest were the incidence of these AEs due to ARPIs and the effect of prophylactic treatment for these. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Eighteen RCTs, comprising 5036 patients, were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. ARPIs included enzalutamide, darolutamide, and apalutamide. The results indicated that patients who received ARPI monotherapy had a significantly higher incidence of gynecomastia than those who received ADT monotherapy (risk ratio [RR]: 5.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.58-7.51, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of gynecomastia between ARPI plus ADT therapy and ADT monotherapy (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.84-1.93, p = 0.2). Prophylactic tamoxifen or radiotherapy reduced significantly the incidence of gynecomastia and breast pain caused by bicalutamide monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: We found that ARPI monotherapy increases the incidence of these AEs significantly compared with ADT. In contrast, ARPI plus ADT therapy did not result in a higher incidence of AEs. The use of either tamoxifen or radiotherapy was effective in reducing the incidence of these AEs due to bicalutamide monotherapy. These prophylactic treatments could reduce the incidence of AEs due to ARPI monotherapy. However, further studies are needed to clarify their efficacy. PATIENT SUMMARY: Although androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improves overall survival in patients with prostate cancer, it is associated with several complications. Androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) monotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy for improving oncological outcomes in these patients. However, ARPI monotherapy increases gynecomastia and breast pain in prostate cancer patients compared with ADT, while ARPI plus ADT did not result in a higher incidence of adverse events.
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Department of Urology Shimane University Faculty of Medicine Shimane Japan
Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery The University of Jordan Amman Jordan
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria
See more in PubMed
Nguyen P.L., Alibhai S.M., Basaria S., et al. Adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy and strategies to mitigate them. Eur Urol. 2015;67:825–836. PubMed
Tombal B.F., Gomez-Veiga F., Gomez-Ferrer A., et al. A Phase 2 randomized open-label study of oral darolutamide monotherapy versus androgen deprivation therapy in men with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (EORTC-GUCG 1532) Eur Urol Oncol. 2024;7:1051–1060. PubMed
Tran P.T., Lowe K., Tsai H.L., et al. Phase II randomized study of salvage radiation therapy plus enzalutamide or placebo for high-risk prostate-specific antigen recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: the SALV-ENZA trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:1307–1317. PubMed PMC
Sweeney C.J., Martin A.J., Stockler M.R., et al. Testosterone suppression plus enzalutamide versus testosterone suppression plus standard antiandrogen therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (ENZAMET): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24:323–334. PubMed
Freedland S.J., de Almeida L.M., De Giorgi U., et al. Improved outcomes with enzalutamide in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:1453–1465. PubMed
Smith M.R., Hussain M., Saad F., et al. Darolutamide and survival in metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:1132–1142. PubMed PMC
Shore N.D., Renzulli J., Fleshner N.E., et al. Enzalutamide monotherapy vs active surveillance in patients with low-risk or intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer: the ENACT randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:1128–1136. PubMed PMC
Ghadjar P., Aebersold D.M., Albrecht C., et al. Treatment strategies to prevent and reduce gynecomastia and/or breast pain caused by antiandrogen therapy for prostate cancer: statement from the DEGRO working group prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol. 2020;196:589–597. PubMed PMC
Tombal B., Borre M., Rathenborg P., et al. Enzalutamide monotherapy in hormone-naive prostate cancer: primary analysis of an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:592–600. PubMed
Braunstein G.D. Clinical practice. Gynecomastia. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1229–1237. PubMed
Serretta V., Altieri V., Morgia G., et al. A randomized trial comparing tamoxifen therapy vs. tamoxifen prophylaxis in bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2012;10:174–179. PubMed
Ozen H., Akyol F., Toktas G., et al. Is prophylactic breast radiotherapy necessary in all patients with prostate cancer and gynecomastia and/or breast pain? J Urol. 2010;184:519–524. PubMed
Bedognetti D., Rubagotti A., Conti G., et al. An open, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy of two tamoxifen schedules in preventing gynaecomastia induced by bicalutamide monotherapy in prostate cancer patients. Eur Urol. 2010;57:238–245. PubMed
Schardt C., Adams M.B., Owens T., Keitz S., Fontelo P. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007;7:16. PubMed PMC
Rohatgi, A. (September, 2022). "WebPlotDigitizer." 4.6. from https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer.
Shim S., Lim Y., Hong M., Song G., Han H. Statistical data extraction and validation from graph for data integration and meta-analysis. Korea J Big Data. 2021;6:61–70.
Higgins J.P., Altman D.G., Gøtzsche P.C., et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343 PubMed PMC
Assel M., Sjoberg D., Elders A., et al. Guidelines for reporting of statistics for clinical research in urology. Eur Urol. 2019;75:358–367. PubMed PMC
Aggarwal R., Alumkal J.J., Szmulewitz R.Z., et al. Randomized, open-label phase 2 study of apalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy versus apalutamide monotherapy versus androgen deprivation monotherapy in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer. 2022;2022 PubMed PMC
Maluf F.C., Schutz F.A., Cronemberger E.H., et al. A phase 2 randomized clinical trial of abiraterone plus ADT, apalutamide, or abiraterone and apalutamide in patients with advanced prostate cancer with non-castrate testosterone levels (LACOG 0415) Eur J Cancer. 2021;158:63–71. PubMed
Iguchi T., Tamada S., Kato M., et al. Enzalutamide versus flutamide for castration-resistant prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade therapy with bicalutamide: the OCUU-CRPC study. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020;25:486–494. PubMed
Fradet Y., Egerdie B., Andersen M., et al. Tamoxifen as prophylaxis for prevention of gynaecomastia and breast pain associated with bicalutamide 150 mg monotherapy in patients with prostate cancer: a randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-response study. Eur Urol. 2007;52:106–114. PubMed
Saltzstein D., Sieber P., Morris T., Gallo J. Prevention and management of bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia and breast pain: randomized endocrinologic and clinical studies with tamoxifen and anastrozole. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2005;8:75–83. PubMed
Perdonà S., Autorino R., De Placido S., et al. Efficacy of tamoxifen and radiotherapy for prevention and treatment of gynaecomastia and breast pain caused by bicalutamide in prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:295–300. PubMed
Boccardo F., Rubagotti A., Battaglia M., et al. Evaluation of tamoxifen and anastrozole in the prevention of gynecomastia and breast pain induced by bicalutamide monotherapy of prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:808–815. PubMed
Tyrrell C.J., Payne H., Tammela T.L., et al. Prophylactic breast irradiation with a single dose of electron beam radiotherapy (10 Gy) significantly reduces the incidence of bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60:476–483. PubMed
Widmark A., Fosså S.D., Lundmo P., et al. Does prophylactic breast irradiation prevent antiandrogen-induced gynecomastia? Evaluation of 253 patients in the randomized Scandinavian trial SPCG-7/SFUO-3. Urology. 2003;61:145–151. PubMed
Davis I.D., Martin A.J., Stockler M.R., et al. Enzalutamide with standard first-line therapy in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:121–131. PubMed
Parker C.C., James N.D., Brawley C.D., et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;392:2353–2366. PubMed PMC
Fizazi K., Tran N., Fein L., et al. Abiraterone plus prednisone in metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:352–360. PubMed
McLeod D.G., Iversen P., See W.A., Morris T., Armstrong J., Wirth M.P. Bicalutamide 150 mg plus standard care vs standard care alone for early prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2006;97:247–254. PubMed
Di Lorenzo G., Autorino R., Perdonà S., De Placido S. Management of gynaecomastia in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:972–979. PubMed