Optimizing Advance Care Planning in Dementia: Recommendations From a 33-Country Delphi Study
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
K24 AG054415
NIA NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
40032035
DOI
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.471
PII: S0885-3924(25)00532-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Advance care planning, decision making, dementia, end of life, guidelines, palliative care,
- MeSH
- delfská metoda MeSH
- demence * terapie MeSH
- konsensus MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- paliativní péče MeSH
- péče o umírající MeSH
- předběžné plánování péče * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
CONTEXT: Advance care planning (ACP) is relevant yet challenging with cognitive decline. OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence and consensus-based clinical recommendations for how to conduct ACP in dementia. METHODS: International Delphi study conducted by the European Association for Palliative Care 'ACP in dementia' taskforce with four online surveys (September 2021-June 2022). A panel of 107 experts from 33 countries and seven individuals with dementia contributed. The recommendations specific for dementia were initially based on two earlier Delphi studies and literature searches addressing guidance including the right timing and how to personalize ACP. We used conservative preregistered criteria for consensus. RESULTS: Thirty constitutive elements of ACP were identified (e.g., 'assess understanding of ACP'). Only five were deemed 'optional.' The panel estimated a median of four conversations could address elements to be addressed at least once. Recommendations included to assume capacity as a principle, conscious of the need to explore its fluctuation, to encourage engaging and playing active roles, and to establish connection and inform and prepare family. There was a consensus to offer ACP around dementia diagnosis, to raise end-of-life issues later, and to personalize ACP with flexibility, providing of information and exploring understanding. The advice of the persons with dementia pointed to a wish for a well-coordinated holistic approach. CONCLUSION: Consensus was reached, including in areas of ambiguity, to guide ACP in dementia. ACP should be embedded in a nonprescriptive, individualized approach that involves both the person with dementia and their families. Future studies may evaluate trade-offs between optimal ACP and feasible implementation.
Department of Psychiatric Nursing Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
Department of Public Health Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands
Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics Turin University Turin Italy
Division of Geriatrics San Francisco CA USA
Research and Publications Dementia UK De Montfort University Leicester UK
University Psychiatric Hospital Vrapče School of Medicine University of Zagreb Zagreb Croatia
VUB UGent End of Life Care Research Group Jette Brussels Belgium
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org