Toward European harmonization of national myasthenia gravis registries: modified Delphi procedure-based expert consensus on collectable data
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
40069719
PubMed Central
PMC11895382
DOI
10.1186/s13023-024-03520-3
PII: 10.1186/s13023-024-03520-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Delphi procedure, European registry, Expert panel, Myasthenia gravis, Rare disease registry,
- MeSH
- delfská metoda MeSH
- konsensus MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- myasthenia gravis * epidemiologie MeSH
- registrace * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disorder. Several new treatment concepts have emerged in recent years, but access to these treatments varies due to differing national reimbursement regulations, leading to disparities across Europe. This highlights the need for high-quality data collection by stakeholders to establish MG registries. A European MG registry could help bridge the treatment access gap across different countries, offering critical data to support regulatory decisions, foster international collaborations, and enhance clinical and epidemiological research. Several national MG registries already exist or are in development. To avoid duplication and ensure harmonization in data collection, a modified Delphi procedure was implemented to identify essential data elements for inclusion in national registries. RESULTS: Following a literature review, consultations with patient associations and pharmaceutical companies, and input from multiple European MG experts, 100 data elements were identified. Of these, 62 reached consensus for inclusion and classification, while only 1 item was agreed for exclusion. 30 items failed to reach the ≥ 80% agreement threshold and were excluded. Among the 62 accepted items, 21 were classified as mandatory data elements, 32 optional, and 9 items pertained to the informed consent form. CONCLUSIONS: Through a modified Delphi procedure, consensus was successfully achieved. This consensus-based approach represents a crucial step toward harmonizing MG registries across Europe. The resulting dataset will facilitate the sharing of knowledge and enhance European collaborations. Furthermore, the harmonized data may assist in regulatory or reimbursement decisions regarding novel therapies, as well as address treatment access disparities between European countries.
Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences University of Pavia IRCCS Mondino Foundation Pavia Italy
Department of Clinical Medicine University of Bergen Bergen Norway
Department of Human Neurosciences Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy
Department of Neurology Faculty of Medicine University Hospital Brno Masaryk University Brno Czechia
Department of Neurology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands
Department of Pediatric Neurosciences Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milan Italy
ESIEE PARIS School Gustave Eiffel University Paris France
Neuromuscular Diseases Unit Hospital de La Santa Creu 1 Sant Pau Barcelona Spain
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Gilhus NE. Myasthenia and the neuromuscular junction. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012;25:523–9. 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3283572588. PubMed
Verschuuren JJGM, Huijbers MG, Plomp JJ, et al. Pathophysiology of myasthenia gravis with antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor, muscle-specific kinase and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4. Autoimmun Rev. 2013;12:918–23. 10.1016/j.autrev.2013.03.001. PubMed
Vincent A, Huda S, Cao M, et al. Serological and experimental studies in different forms of myasthenia gravis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1413:143–53. 10.1111/nyas.13592. PubMed
Guptill JT, Sanders DB, Evoli A. Anti-MuSK antibody myasthenia gravis: clinical findings and response to treatment in two large cohorts. Muscle Nerve. 2011;44:36–40. 10.1002/mus.22006. PubMed
Lavrnic D, Losen M, Vujic A, et al. The features of myasthenia gravis with autoantibodies to MuSK. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:1099–102. 10.1136/jnnp.2004.052415. PubMed PMC
Evoli A, Tonali PA, Padua L, et al. Clinical correlates with anti-MuSK antibodies in generalized seronegative myasthenia gravis. Brain J Neurol. 2003;126:2304–11. 10.1093/brain/awg223. PubMed
Leite MI, Ströbel P, Jones M, et al. Fewer thymic changes in MuSK antibody-positive than in MuSK antibody-negative MG. Ann Neurol. 2005;57:444–8. 10.1002/ana.20386. PubMed
Higuchi O, Hamuro J, Motomura M, Yamanashi Y. Autoantibodies to low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 in myasthenia gravis. Ann Neurol. 2011;69:418–22. 10.1002/ana.22312. PubMed
Zisimopoulou P, Evangelakou P, Tzartos J, et al. A comprehensive analysis of the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of anti-LRP4 in myasthenia gravis. J Autoimmun. 2014;52:139–45. 10.1016/j.jaut.2013.12.004. PubMed
Gilhus NE, Verschuuren JJ. Myasthenia gravis: subgroup classification and therapeutic strategies. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:1023–36. 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00145-3. PubMed
Heldal AT, Owe JF, Gilhus NE, Romi F. Seropositive myasthenia gravis: a nationwide epidemiologic study. Neurology. 2009;73:150–1. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ad53c2. PubMed
Berrih-Aknin S, Ruhlmann N, Bismuth J, et al. CCL21 overexpressed on lymphatic vessels drives thymic hyperplasia in myasthenia. Ann Neurol. 2009;66:521–31. 10.1002/ana.21628. PubMed
Romi F, Aarli JA, Gilhus NE. Myasthenia gravis patients with ryanodine receptor antibodies have distinctive clinical features. Eur J Neurol. 2007;14:617–20. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.01785.x. PubMed
Romi F, Skeie GO, Aarli JA, Gilhus NE. Muscle autoantibodies in subgroups of myasthenia gravis patients. J Neurol. 2000;247:369–75. 10.1007/s004150050604. PubMed
Berrih-Aknin S, Le Panse R. Myasthenia gravis: a comprehensive review of immune dysregulation and etiological mechanisms. J Autoimmun. 2014;52:90–100. 10.1016/j.jaut.2013.12.011. PubMed
Jayawant S, Parr J, Vincent A. Autoimmune myasthenia gravis. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;113:1465–8. 10.1016/B978-0-444-59565-2.00015-0. PubMed
Kerty E, Elsais A, Argov Z, et al. EFNS/ENS guidelines for the treatment of ocular myasthenia. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21:687–93. 10.1111/ene.12359. PubMed
Meriggioli MN, Sanders DB. Autoimmune myasthenia gravis: emerging clinical and biological heterogeneity. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:475–90. 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70063-8. PubMed PMC
Vissing J, Atula S, Savolainen M, et al. Epidemiology of myasthenia gravis in Denmark, Finland and Sweden: a population-based observational study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2024;95:919–26. 10.1136/jnnp-2023-333097. PubMed PMC
Aragonès JM, Bolíbar I, Bonfill X, et al. Myasthenia gravis: a higher than expected incidence in the elderly. Neurology. 2003;60:1024–6. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000050461.05432.c5. PubMed
Onodera H. The role of the thymus in the pathogenesis of myasthenia gravis. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2005;207:87–98. 10.1620/tjem.207.87. PubMed
Chanson J-B, Bouhour F, Aubé-Nathier A-C, et al. Myasthenia gravis treatment in the elderly presents with a significant iatrogenic risk: a multicentric retrospective study. J Neurol. 2023;270:5819–26. 10.1007/s00415-023-11925-6. PubMed
Gilhus NE, Tzartos S, Evoli A, et al. Myasthenia gravis. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2019;5:30. 10.1038/s41572-019-0079-y. PubMed
Gasperi C, Melms A, Schoser B, et al. Anti-agrin autoantibodies in myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2014;82:1976–83. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000478. PubMed
Zhang B, Shen C, Bealmear B, et al. Autoantibodies to agrin in myasthenia gravis patients. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e91816. 10.1371/journal.pone.0091816. PubMed PMC
Suzuki S, Utsugisawa K, Nagane Y, Suzuki N. Three types of striational antibodies in myasthenia gravis. Autoimmune Dis. 2011;2011:740583. 10.4061/2011/740583. PubMed PMC
Gallardo E, Martínez-Hernández E, Titulaer MJ, et al. Cortactin autoantibodies in myasthenia gravis. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13:1003–7. 10.1016/j.autrev.2014.08.039. PubMed
Cortés-Vicente E, Gallardo E, Martínez MÁ, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with double-seronegative myasthenia gravis and antibodies to cortactin. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73:1099–104. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.2032. PubMed
Cordts I, Bodart N, Hartmann K, et al. Screening for lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4-, agrin-, and titin-antibodies and exploring the autoimmune spectrum in myasthenia gravis. J Neurol. 2017;264:1193–203. 10.1007/s00415-017-8514-z. PubMed
Rivner MH, Quarles BM, Pan J-X, et al. Clinical features of LRP4/agrin-antibody-positive myasthenia gravis: a multicenter study. Muscle Nerve. 2020;62:333–43. 10.1002/mus.26985. PubMed PMC
Cossins J, Belaya K, Zoltowska K, et al. The search for new antigenic targets in myasthenia gravis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1275:123–8. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06833.x. PubMed
Verschuuren JJ, Palace J, Murai H, et al. Advances and ongoing research in the treatment of autoimmune neuromuscular junction disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21:189–202. 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00463-4. PubMed
Narayanaswami P, Sanders DB, Wolfe G, et al. International consensus guidance for management of myasthenia gravis: 2020 update. Neurology. 2021;96:114–22. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011124. PubMed PMC
Petersson M, et al. Patient-reported symptom severity in a nationwide myasthenia gravis cohort: cross-sectional analysis of the Swedish GEMG study. Neurology. 2021;97:1141. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013021. PubMed PMC
Powell C. The Delphi technique: myths and realities. J Adv Nurs. 2003;41:376–82. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x. PubMed
Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:1008–15. PubMed
Atalaia A, Wandrei D, Lalout N, et al. EURO-NMD registry: federated FAIR infrastructure, innovative technologies and concepts of a patient-centred registry for rare neuromuscular disorders. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024;19:66. 10.1186/s13023-024-03059-3. PubMed PMC
Thomsen JLS, Andersen H. Outcome measures in clinical trials of patients with myasthenia gravis. Front Neurol. 2020;11:596382. 10.3389/fneur.2020.596382. PubMed PMC
Vanoli F, Mantegazza R. Current drug treatment of myasthenia gravis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2023;36:410–5. 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001196. PubMed
Saccà F, Salort-Campana E, Jacob S, et al. Refocusing generalized myasthenia gravis: patient burden, disease profiles, and the role of evolving therapy. Eur J Neurol. 2024;31:e16180. 10.1111/ene.16180. PubMed PMC
DeHart-McCoyle M, Patel S, Du X. New and emerging treatments for myasthenia gravis. BMJ Med. 2023;2:e000241. 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000241. PubMed PMC
Saccà F, Pane C, Espinosa PE, et al. Efficacy of innovative therapies in myasthenia gravis: a systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2023;30:3854–67. 10.1111/ene.15872. PubMed
Smith AG, Wolfe GI, Habib AA, et al. Risk-benefit analysis of novel treatments for patients with generalized myasthenia gravis. Adv Ther. 2024;41:4628–47. 10.1007/s12325-024-03014-5. PubMed PMC
Mestre-Ferrandiz J, Meulien P, Ostwald DA, Acha V. Collaboration for new therapies: maximizing health and innovation. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1383107. 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1383107. PubMed PMC
ERN Registries Generic Informed Consent Forms. In: EJP RD - Eur. Jt. Programme Rare Dis. https://www.ejprarediseases.org/ern-registries-generic-icf/. Accessed 11 December 2024
Landi A, Mimouni Y, Giannuzzi V, et al. The creation of an adaptable informed consent form for research purposes to overcome national and institutional bottlenecks in ethics review: experience from rare disease registries. Front Med. 2024;11:1384026. 10.3389/fmed.2024.1384026. PubMed PMC
Voháňka S, Tichopád A, Horáková M, et al. Burden of myasthenia gravis in the Czech Republic: analysis of the nationwide patient registry. Neurol Ther. 2024. 10.1007/s40120-024-00682-x. PubMed PMC
Muppidi S, Silvestri NJ, Tan R, et al. Utilization of MG-ADL in myasthenia gravis clinical research and care. Muscle Nerve. 2022;65:630–9. 10.1002/mus.27476. PubMed PMC
Asmail A, Kesler A, Drory VE, et al. Effect of ethnic origin and gender on the clinical manifestations of myasthenia gravis among the Jewish population in Israel. J Neuroimmunol. 2017;307:47–52. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2017.04.003. PubMed
Guideline on registry-based studies - Scientific guideline (2021) European Medicines Agency (EMA). https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/guideline-registry-based-studies-scientific-guideline. Accessed 11 December 2024