Diff erent expression of genes involved in unfolded protein response in multiple myeloma and extramedullary dis ease patients
Language English Country Czech Republic Media print
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
40088436
DOI
10.48095/ccko202545
PII: 139885
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Kahler-Pick law, Multiple myeloma, Plasma cells, extramedullary disease, unfolded protein response,
- MeSH
- Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiP MeSH
- Endoribonucleases genetics MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Multiple Myeloma * genetics metabolism pathology MeSH
- Plasma Cells metabolism MeSH
- Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases genetics MeSH
- Heat-Shock Proteins genetics MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Unfolded Protein Response * genetics MeSH
- Transcription Factor CHOP genetics MeSH
- Regulatory Factor X Transcription Factors MeSH
- X-Box Binding Protein 1 genetics MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiP MeSH
- DDIT3 protein, human MeSH Browser
- EIF2AK3 protein, human MeSH Browser
- Endoribonucleases MeSH
- ERN1 protein, human MeSH Browser
- HSPA5 protein, human MeSH Browser
- eIF-2 Kinase MeSH
- Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases MeSH
- Heat-Shock Proteins MeSH
- Transcription Factor CHOP MeSH
- Regulatory Factor X Transcription Factors MeSH
- XBP1 protein, human MeSH Browser
- X-Box Binding Protein 1 MeSH
BACKGROUND: The unfolded protein response (UPR) enables myeloma cells to overcome the stress conditions arising from excessive proteosynthesis and thus provides a survival advantage for myeloma cells. Extramedullary disease is a more aggressive form of multiple myeloma in which myeloma cells lose their dependence on the bone marrow microenvironment and are able to infiltrate other tissues and organs. The pathogenesis of extramedullary disease is not fully elucidated yet. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in the expression of UPR-related genes between bone marrow plasma cells from multiple myeloma and extramedullary disease patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gene expression of six genes involved in UPR (ERN1, DDIT3, EIF2AK3, TUSC3, XBP1, HSPA5) was analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. In total, 76 bone marrow plasma cell samples were used, of which 44 were from patients with multiple myeloma and 32 from patients with extramedullary disease. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was observed between the multiple myeloma and extramedullary disease groups regarding the expression of HSPA5, DDIT3, EIF2AK3, and ERN1 genes. However, in the case of XBP1 and TUSC3 genes, no statistically significant difference in the expression was found. Several statistically significant correlations between the expression levels of the analyzed genes and the clinical data of the patients were observed as well. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest the importance of UPR in the pathogenesis of extramedullary disease. UPR appears to be a promising avenue for further research.
References provided by Crossref.org