Early Surgical Treatment Options for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
Jazyk čeština Země Česko Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy, anglický abstrakt
PubMed
40145588
DOI
10.55095/achot2024/055
- Klíčová slova
- ACL, InternalBrace., primary repair, proximal rupture,
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ligamentum cruciatum anterius chirurgie MeSH
- poranění předního zkříženého vazu * chirurgie MeSH
- rekonstrukce předního zkříženého vazu * metody MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- anglický abstrakt MeSH
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most commonly injured structures in distortion injuries of the knee joint. Currently, there is no consensus among the professional community regarding the basic principles and timing of ACL injury management. An analysis of several retrospective studies from the 2008-2023 period provides information on ACL preservation procedures and a comparison of these results with those of ACL reconstruction surgery using a graft. The most comprehensive information was provided by a large meta-analysis conducted by Van der List et al. in 2019, which compared 1101 patients from 13 studies who had undergone an ACL preservation surgery. Wilson et al. carried out a retrospective study of patients who underwent ACL repair with InternalBrace (Arthrex© implant system) ligament augmentation. In their meta-analysis, Van der List et al. reported the failure rate of 7-11% and the functional outcome score > 85% of maximum scores in the scoring systems used (Lysholm, KOOS, IKDC score) for the preservation procedures. Wilson et al. in their retrospective study reported the failure rate of 10.4% and the functional outcome > 87% of maximum scores in the scoring systems used. These values are consistent with similar outcomes reported in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery using a graft. According to the available literature, the primary ACL refixation with InternalBrace augmentation for proximal ruptures appears to be a safe technique with satisfactory outcomes when properly timed and indicated. In acute proximal ruptures, this technique should be considered as an alternative to ACL reconstruction using a graft, with potential benefits of preserving the original tissue and proprioception of the ligament. A prospective randomized study which would compare these two surgical techniques is still lacking in the literature.
3 lekarska fakulta Univerzita Karlova Praha
Krajska nemocnice Liberec Oddeleni klinicke biomechaniky Liberec
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Adams R. Abnormal conditions of the knee joint. In: Todd RB (ed) Cyclopaedia of Anatomy and Physiology, Vol III. Sherwood Gilbert & Piper, London, 1847, pp.48-78.
DiFelice GS, van der List JP. Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5:e1057-e1061. doi:10.1016/j.eats.2016.05.009 PubMed DOI
Donaldson WF III, Warren RF, Wickiewicz T. A comparison of acute anterior cruciate ligament examinations. Initial versus ex- amination under anesthesia. Am J Sports Med. 1985;13:5-10. PubMed DOI
Duthon VB, Barea C, Abrassart S, Fasel JH, Fritschy D, Ménétrey J. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:204-213. PubMed DOI
Eriksson K, von Essen C, Jonhagen S, Barenius B. No risk of arthrofibrosis after acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:2875-2882. PubMed DOI
Fernandes LR, Ouanezar H, Saithna A, Sonnery-Cottet B. Combined ACL reconstruction and Segond fracture fixation fails to abolish anterolateral rotatory instability. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018:bcr2018224457. PubMed DOI
Galen. On the usefulness of the parts of the body. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;411:4-12. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000068182.83581.01. PubMed DOI
Hassebrock JD, Gulbrandsen MT, Asprey WL, Makovicka JL, Chhabra A. Knee ligament anatomy and biomechanics. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2020;28:80-86. PubMed DOI
Herbst E, Hoser C, Gfoller P, Hepperger C, Abermann E, Neumayer K. Impact of surgical timing on the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:569-577. PubMed DOI
Hopper GP, Aithie JMS, Jenkins JM, Wilson WT, MacKay GM. Satisfactory patient-reported outcomes at 5 years following primary repair with sutu- re tape augmentation for proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;30:253-259. PubMed DOI
Jonsson T, Althoff B, Peterson L, Renstrom P. Clinical diagnosis of ruptures of the anterior drawer ligament: a comparative study of the Lachman test and the anterior drawer sign. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10:100-102. PubMed DOI
Kalina R, Holibka R, Fidler E, Gallo J, Sigmund M. [InternalBrace ACL repair - first experiences and outcomes]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2019;86:423-430. DOI
MacKay G, Anthony IC, Jenkins PJ, Blyth M. Anterior cruciate ligament repair revisited preliminary results of primary repair with InternalBrace ligament augmentation: a case series. Orthop Muscul Syst. 2015;4:188. doi:10.4172/2161-0533.1000188 DOI
Malanga GA, Andrus S, Nadler SF, McLean J. Physical examination of the knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:592-603. PubMed DOI
Massey P, Parker D, McClary K, Robinson J, Barton RS, Solitro GF, Biomechanical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament repair with internal brace augmentation versus anterior cruciate ligament repair without augmentation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2020;77:105065. PubMed DOI
Nixon JE. Acute injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee: primary repair. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1980;56:483-487.
Schindler OS. The story of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Perioper Pract. 2012;22:189-196. PubMed DOI
Segond P. Recherches cliniques et expérimentales sur les épanchements sanguins du genou par entorse. Progrés Médical.1879;7:297-299,319-321,340-341.
Sherman MF, Lieber L, Bonamo JR, Podesta L, Reiter I. The long-term follow-up of primary anterior cruciate ligament repair. Defining a rationale for augmentation. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:243-255. PubMed DOI
Torg JS, Conrad W, Kalen V. Clinical diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament instability in the athlete. Am J Sports Med. 1976;4:84-93. PubMed DOI
Toy BJ, Yeasting RA, Morse DE, McCann P. Arterial supply to the human anterior cruciate ligament. J Athl Train. 1995;30:149-152.
Van der List JP, DiFelice GS. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging predict eligibility for arthroscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;26:660-671. PubMed DOI
Van der List JP, DiFelice GS. Primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: a paradigm shift. Surgeon. 2017;15:161-168. PubMed DOI
Van der List JP, DiFelice GS. Range of motion and complications following primary repair versus reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee. 2017;24:798-807. PubMed DOI
Van der List JP, Jonkergouw A, Van Noort A, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, DiFelice GS. Identifying candidates for arthroscopic primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: A case-control study. Knee. 2019;26:619-627. PubMed DOI
Wilson WT, Hopper GP, Banger MS, Blyth MJG, Riches PE, MacKay GM. Anterior cruciate ligament repair with internal brace augmentation: a systematic review. Knee. 2022;35:192-200. PubMed DOI