This study investigates the safety risks of Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) collisions with humans, focusing on impact dynamics through controlled crash testing. Utilizing a custom-designed drop mechanism, 49 impact tests were conducted on a Hybrid III anthropomorphic test device at various velocities and kinetic energies (7-24 m/s and 1-280 J). Tested UASs included a range of designs and weights (20 g to over 1 kg). Results demonstrated limitations in using kinetic energy models and peak head acceleration for injury prediction. The Head Injury Criterion showed greater consistency, reflecting the temporal profile of impacts. Findings revealed that UAS structural fragility reduces energy transfer at higher impacts through deformation and fracturing. This work underscores the need for improved testing protocols and nuanced safety standards.

Department of Forensic Experts in Transportation CTU Prague FTS Prague Konviktská Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Campolettano ET, Bland ML, Gellner RA, Sproule DW, Rowson B, Tyson AM, et al.. Ranges of injury risk associated with impact from unmanned aircraft systems. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45(12):2733–41. doi: 10.1007/s10439-017-1921-6 PubMed DOI PMC

Koh CH, Low KH, Li L, Zhao Y, Deng C, Tan SK, et al.. Weight threshold estimation of falling UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) based on impact energy. Trans Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2018;93:228–55. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.04.021 DOI

Rattanagraikanakorn B, Schuurman M, Gransden DI, Happee R, De Wagter C, Sharpanskykh A, et al.. Modelling head injury due to unmanned aircraft systems collision: crash dummy vs human body. Int J Crashworthiness. 2020;27(2):400–13. doi: 10.1080/13588265.2020.1807687 DOI

Arterburn DR, Duling CT, Goli NR. Ground collision severity standards for UAS operating in the national airspace system (NAS). 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. 2017;3778.

Arterburn D. Final report for the FAA UAS Center of Excellence Task A4: UAS ground collision severity evaluation. Federal Aviation Administration; 2017. https://assureuas.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/A4-Final-Report.pdf

Arterburn D, Ewing M, Prabhu R, Zhu F, Francis D. Annex A. UAH Final Report. Task A14: UAS Ground Collision Severity Evaluation 2017-2019. Federal Aviation Administration. 2021. Draft Report DOT/FAA/AR-XX/XX. https://assureuas.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/A14-Annex-A.pdf

Olivares G. Annex B NIAR Final Report. Task A14: UAS Ground Collision Severity Evaluation 2017-2019. Federal Aviation Administration, Draft Report DOT/FAA/AR-XX/XX, https://assureuas.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/A14-Annex-B.pdf

Bolte J Annex C. OSU Final Report. Task A14: UAS Ground Collision Severity Evaluation 2017-2019. Federal Aviation Administration; 2021. Draft Report DOT/FAA/AR-XX/XX, Available: https://assureuas.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/A14-Annex-C.pdf

Svatý Z, Nouzovský L, Mičunek T, Frydrýn M. Evaluation of the drone-human collision consequences. Heliyon. 2022;8(11):e11677. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11677 PubMed DOI PMC

Magister T. The small unmanned aircraft blunt criterion based injury potential estimation. Safety Sc. 2010;48(10):1313–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.04.012 DOI

Feinstein DI. Personnel casualty study. Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute; Project No. J6067. AD 842573 1968.

Janser PW, Janser P, Janser W, et al. Lethality of unprotected persons due to debris and fragments. 1982.

Range Safety Group Risk Committee, Range Commanders Council. Common Risk Criteria for National Test Ranges, RCC 321-07, New Mexico: White Sands Missile Range;,2007.

Sturdivan LM, Viano DC, Champion HR. Analysis of injury criteria to assess chest and abdominal injury risks in blunt and ballistic impacts. J Trauma. 2004;56(3):651–63. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000074108.36517.d4 PubMed DOI

Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine Website, Nov. 2020. [Online]. Available: http://www.aaam.org/about‐ais.html.

Hayes WC, Erickson MS, Power ED. Forensic injury biomechanics. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;955–86. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.151946 PubMed DOI

Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Sances A Jr, Walsh PR, Ewing CL, Thomas DJ, et al.. Biomechanics of skull fracture. J Neurotrauma. 1995;12(4):659–68. doi: 10.1089/neu.1995.12.659 PubMed DOI

ASTM F3389/F3389M-21,” Standard Test Method for Assessing the Safety of Small Unmanned Aircraft Impacts”, ASTM International, 100. Barr Harbor Drive, PA; 2021.

Prasad P. Evaluation of the field relevance of several injury risk functions, SAE Technical Paper; 2010. PubMed

Mertz HJ, Irwin AL, Prasad P. Biomechanical and scaling bases for frontal and side impact injury assessment reference values. Stapp Car Crash J. 2003;47:155–88. doi: 10.4271/2003-22-0009 PubMed DOI

Mertz HJ, Prasad P, Nusholtz G. Head injury risk assessment for forehead impacts. SAE Technical Paper Series. 1996. doi: 10.4271/960099 DOI

Neades DN, Rudolph RR. An examination of injury criteria for potential application to explosive safety studies. Minutes of the Explosive Safety Seminar. 1984;2.

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU). 2019/945 of 12 March 2019 on unmanned aircraft systems and on third-country operators of unmanned aircraft systems. Off J Eur Union. 2019;L152.

European Aviation Safety Agency. Notice of Proposed Amendment 2017-05 (B). Introduction of a regulatory framework for the operation of drones Unmanned aircraft system operations in the open and specific category. RMT.0230, 2017

European Aviation Safety Agency. Technical Opinion, “Introduction of a regulatory framework for the operation of unmanned aircraft. RMT.0230, 2015.

Range Safety Group UAV Committee. Range Commanders Council, Range Safety Criteria for Unmanned Air Vehicles, Rationale and Methodology Supplement. New Mexico: White Sands Missile Range; 1999.

Golfo S, Virzì Mariotti G, Carollo F, Argo A, Barbaraci G. Safety considerations on teenage pedestrian–bus impact. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering. 2019;233(14):3839–56. doi: 10.1177/0954407019835617 DOI

European Aviation Safety Agency. Opinion No 01/2018, Introduction of a regulatory framework for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems in the ‘open’ and ‘specific’ categories. RMT.0230, 2018.

Shelley AV. A model of human harm from a falling unmanned aircraft: Implications for UAS regulation. Int J Aviat Aeron Aero. 2016;3(3):1.