A series of 12-phenyl-closo-thiaboranes (12-(4-X-C6H4)-closo-1-SB11H10, where X = OMe (2), X = SMe (3), X = Ph (4), and X = NMe2 (5)) has been prepared. Except for 2, all compounds exhibit a chalcogen bond of thiaborane to the phenyl ring or the neighboring molecule as major supramolecular structural motif. 5, having the strongest (-12.47 kcal/mol) structure-making intermolecular interaction via noncovalent S···π(phenyl) chalcogen bond, was crystallized from different solvents in the form of various solvatopolymorphs. n-Hexane and diethyl ether can be removed from 5 easily upon the formation of a porous material with large cavities (up to 20.5% of the unit cell). This first stable and useful noncovalently bound organic framework material with an ultramicroporous structure exhibits a molecular sieve effect. The selective and repeatable adsorption of CO2 to the material crystallized from n-hexane was explained on the basis of cooperative and consecutive machine-like molecular interactions of quadrupolar CO2 molecule with B-H and amino groups inside rectangular cavities.

Departament de Química Universitat de les Illes Balears Crta de Valldemossa km 7 5 07122 Palma de Mallorca Spain

Department of General and Inorganic Chemistry Faculty of Chemical Technology University of Pardubice Studentská 573 532 10 Pardubice Czech Republic

Department of Physical Chemistry Faculty of Chemical Technology University of Pardubice Studentská 573 532 10 Pardubice Czech Republic

Institute of Inorganic Chemistry Czech Academy of Sciences Husinec Řež 250 68 Czech Republic

Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences Flemingovo náměstí 542 2 Praha 6 166 10 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Sels B. F.; Kustov L. M.. Zeolites and Zeolite-like Materials; Elsevier: Maarssen, 2016.

Čejka J.; Morris R. E.; Nachtigall P.. Zeolites in Catalysis: Properties and Applications; RSC: Croydon, UK, 2017.

Zhang H.; Samsudin I. b.; Jaenicke S.; Chuah G.-K. Zeolites in catalysis: sustainable synthesis and its impact on properties and applications. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2022, 12 (19), 6024–6039. 10.1039/D2CY01325H. DOI

Pérez-Botella E.; Valencia S.; Rey F. Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122 (24), 17647–17695. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140. PubMed DOI PMC

Tian G.; Chen G.; Yang G.; Diao Z.; Bai R.; Han J.; Guan B.; Yu J. Construction of Metal/Zeolite Hybrid Nanoframe Reactors via in-Situ-Kinetics Transformations. ACS Cent. Sci. 2024, 10 (8), 1473–1480. 10.1021/acscentsci.4c00439. PubMed DOI PMC

Li Y.; Yu J. Emerging applications of zeolites in catalysis, separation and host–guest assembly. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6, 1156–1174. 10.1038/s41578-021-00347-3. DOI

Yaghi O. M.; Kalmutzki M. J.; Diercks C. S.. Introduction to Reticular Chemistry: Metal-Organic Frameworks and Covalent Organic Frameworks; Wiley VCH: Weinheim, 2019.

Chen Z.; Jiang H.; Li M.; O’Keeffe M.; Eddaoudi M. Reticular chemistry 3.2: Typical minimal edge-transitive derived and related nets for the design and synthesis of metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120 (16), 8039–8065. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00648. PubMed DOI

Li X.; Chen K.; Guo R.; Wei Z. Ionic Liquids Functionalized MOFs for Adsorption. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 10432–10467. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00248. PubMed DOI

Kitagawa S. Future porous materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50 (3), 514–516. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00500. PubMed DOI

Geng K.; He T.; Liu R.; Dalapati S.; Tan K. T.; Li Z.; Tao S.; Gong Y.; Jiang Q.; Jiang D. Covalent Organic Frameworks: design, synthesis, and functions. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120 (16), 8814–8933. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00550. PubMed DOI

Yin Y.; Zhang Y.; Zhou X.; Gui B.; Wang W.; Jiang W.; Zhang Y.-B.; Sun J.; Wang C. Ultrahigh–surface area covalent organic frameworks for methane adsorption. Science 2024, 386 (6722), 693–696. 10.1126/science.adr0936. PubMed DOI

Tian Y. J.; Deng C.; Zhao L.; Zou J.-S.; Wu X.-C.; Jia Y.; Zhang Z.-Y.; Zhang J.; Peng Y.-L.; Chen G.; Zaworotko M. J. Pore configuration control in hybrid azolate ultra-microporous frameworks for sieving propylene from propane. Nat. Chem. 2025, 17, 141–147. 10.1038/s41557-024-01672-0. PubMed DOI

Nguyen H. L.; Gropp C.; Yaghi O. M. Reticulating 1D ribbons into 2D covalent organic frameworks by imine and imide linkages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (6), 2771–2776. 10.1021/jacs.9b13971. PubMed DOI

Zhou Y.; Kan L.; Eubank J. F.; Li G.; Zhang L.; Liu Y. Self-assembly of two robust 3D supramolecular organic frameworks from a geometrically nonplanar molecule for high gas selectivity performance. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10 (26), 6565–6571. 10.1039/C9SC00290A. PubMed DOI PMC

Sholl D. S.; Lively R. P. Seven Chemical Separations to Change the World. Nature 2016, 532, 435–437. 10.1038/532435a. PubMed DOI

Ying Y.; Tong M.; Ning S.; Ravi S. K.; Peh S. B.; Tan S. C.; Pennycook S. J.; Zhao D. Ultrathin two-dimensional membranes assembled by ionic covalent organic nanosheets with reduced apertures for gas separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (9), 4472–4480. 10.1021/jacs.9b13825. PubMed DOI

Bae Y.-S.; Farha O. K.; Spokoyny A. M.; Mirkin C. A.; Hupp J. T.; Snurr R. Q. Carborane-based metal–organic frameworks as highly selective sorbents for CO2 over methane. Chem. Commun. 2008, 35 (35), 4135–4137. 10.1039/b805785k. PubMed DOI

Huang Y.-B.; Liang J.; Wang X.-S.; Cao R. Multifunctional metal–organic framework catalysts: synergistic catalysis and tandem reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46 (46), 126–157. 10.1039/C6CS00250A. PubMed DOI

Begum S.; Hassan Z.; Bräse S.; Tsotsalas M. Polymerization in MOF-confined nanospaces: tailored architectures, functions, and applications. Langmuir 2020, 36 (36), 10657–10673. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01832. PubMed DOI

Lohse M. S.; Bein T. Covalent organic frameworks: structures, synthesis, and applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1705553.10.1002/adfm.201705553. DOI

Lü J.; Cao R. Porous organic molecular frameworks with extrinsic porosity: a platform for carbon storage and separation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55 (33), 9474–9480. 10.1002/anie.201602116. PubMed DOI

Zhou Y.; Liu B.; Sun X.; Li J.; Li G.; Huo Q.; Liu Y. Self-assembly of homochiral porous supramolecular organic frameworks with significant CO2 capture and CO2/N2 selectivity. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17 (12), 6653–6659. 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01282. DOI

Ma D.; Li J.; Liu K.; Li B.; Li C.; Shi Z. Diionic multifunctional porous organic frameworks for efficient CO2 fixation under mild and co-catalyst free conditions. Green Chem. 2018, 20 (23), 5285–5291. 10.1039/C8GC01867G. DOI

Shi Z.; Tao Y.; Wu J.; Zhang C.; He H.; Long L.; Lee Y.; Li T.; Zhang Y.-B. Robust metal – triazolate frameworks for CO2 capture from flue gas. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (6), 2750–2754. 10.1021/jacs.9b12879. PubMed DOI

Singh G.; Lee J.; Karakoti A.; Bahadur R.; Yi J.; Zhao D.; AlBahily K.; Vinu A. Emerging trends in porous materials for CO2 capture and conversion. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49 (13), 4360–4404. 10.1039/D0CS00075B. PubMed DOI

Wang C.; Lv Z.; Yang W.; Feng X.; Wang B. A rational design of functional porous frameworks for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023, 52 (4), 1382–1427. 10.1039/D2CS00843B. PubMed DOI

Jones W. D. Carbon capture and conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (11), 4955–4957. 10.1021/jacs.0c02356. PubMed DOI

Stavila V.; Talin A. A.; Allendorf M. D. MOF-based electronic and opto-electronic devices. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43 (16), 5994–6010. 10.1039/C4CS00096J. PubMed DOI

Meng J.; Liu X.; Niu C.; Pang Q.; Li J.; Liu F.; Liu Z.; Mai L. Advances in metal-organic framework coatings: versatile synthesis and broad applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49 (10), 3142–3186. 10.1039/C9CS00806C. PubMed DOI

Ajdari F. B.; Kowsari E.; Shahrak M. N.; Ehsani A.; Kiaei Z.; Torkzaban H.; Ershadi M.; Eshkalak S. K.; Haddadi-Asl V.; Chinnappan A.; Ramakrishna S. A review on the field patents and recent developments over the application of metal organic frameworks (MOFs) in supercapacitors. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 422, 213441.10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213441. DOI

Li H.-Y.; Zhao S.-N.; Zang S.-Q.; Li J. Functional metal-organic frameworks as effective sensors of gases and volatile compounds. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49 (17), 6364–6401. 10.1039/C9CS00778D. PubMed DOI

Cliffe M. J.; Mottillo C.; Stein R. S.; Bučar D.-K.; Friščić T. Accelerated aging: a low energy, solvent-free alternative to solvothermal and mechanochemical synthesis of metal–organic materials. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3 (8), 2495–2500. 10.1039/C2SC20344H. DOI

Okoro H. K.; Ayika S. O.; Ngila J. C.; Tella A. C. Rising profile on the use of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) for the removal of heavy metals from the environment: an overview. Appl. Water Sci. 2018, 8 (6), 169.10.1007/s13201-018-0818-3. DOI

Wang X.; Xu W.; Gu J.; Yan X.; Chen Y.; Guo M.; Zhou G.; Tong S.; Ge M.; Liu Y.; Chen C. MOF-based fibrous membranes adsorb PM efficiently and capture toxic gases selectively. Nanoscale 2019, 11 (38), 17782–17790. 10.1039/C9NR05795A. PubMed DOI

McKinlay A. C.; Morris R. E.; Horcajada P.; Férey G.; Gref R.; Couvreur P.; Serre C. BioMOFs: metal–organic frameworks for biological and medical applications. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49 (36), 6260–6266. 10.1002/anie.201000048. PubMed DOI

Riccò R.; Liang W.; Li S.; Gassensmith J. J.; Caruso F.; Doonan C.; Falcaro P. Metal–organic frameworks for cell and virus biology: a perspective. ACS Nano 2018, 12 (1), 13–23. 10.1021/acsnano.7b08056. PubMed DOI

Haynes W. M.CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 97th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL: 2016.

Lin R.-B.; He Y.; Li P.; Wang H.; Zhou W. B.; Chen B. Multifunctional porous hydrogen-bonded organic framework materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48 (5), 1362–1389. 10.1039/C8CS00155C. PubMed DOI PMC

Shields C. E.; Wang X.; Fellowes T.; Clowes R.; Chen L.; Day G. M.; Slater A. G.; Ward J. W.; Little M. A.; Cooper A. I. Experimental confirmation of a predicted porous hydrogen-bonded organic framework. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, 62 (34), e20230316710.1002/anie.202303167. PubMed DOI PMC

O’Shaughnessy M.; Glover J.; Hafizi R.; Barhi M.; Clowes R.; Chong S. Y.; Argent S. P.; Day G. M.; Cooper A. I. Porous isoreticular non-metal organic frameworks. Nature 2024, 630, 102–108. 10.1038/s41586-024-07353-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Meng D.; Yang J. L.; Xiao C.; Wang R.; Xing X.; Kocak O.; Aydin G.; Yavuz I.; Nuryyeva S.; Zhang L.; Liu G.; Li Z.; Yuan S.; Wang Z.-K.; Wei W.; Wang Z.; Houk K. N.; Yang Y. Noncovalent π-stacked robust topological organic Framework. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2020, 117 (34), 20397–20403. 10.1073/pnas.2010733117. PubMed DOI PMC

Zheng T.; Nöthling N.; Wang Z.; Mitschke B.; Leutzsch M.; List B. A solid noncovalent organic double-helix framework catalyzes asymmetric [6 + 4] cycloaddition. Science 2024, 385 (6710), 765–770. 10.1126/science.adp1127. PubMed DOI

Chen S.; Ju Y.; Yang Y.; Xiang F.; Yao Z.; Zhang H.; Li Y.; Zhang Y.; Xiang S.; Chen B.; Zhang Z. Multistate structures in a hydrogen-bonded polycatenation non-covalent organic framework with diverse resistive switching behaviors. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 298–308. 10.1038/s41467-023-44214-x. PubMed DOI PMC

Li Y.-L.; Alexandrov E. V.; Yin Q.; Li L.; Fang Z.-B.; Yuan W.; Proserpio D. M.; Liu T.-F. Record complexity in the polycatenation of three porous hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks with stepwise adsorption behaviors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (15), 7218–7224. 10.1021/jacs.0c02406. PubMed DOI

Fletcher S. P.; Dumur F.; Pollard M. M.; Feringa B. L. A Reversible, Unidirectional Molecular Rotary Motor Driven by Chemical Energy. Science 2005, 310 (5745), 80–82. 10.1126/science.1117090. PubMed DOI

Perera U. G.; Ample F.; Kersell H.; Zhang Y.; Vives G.; Echeverria J.; Grisolia M.; Rapenne G.; Joachim C.; Hla S.-W. Controlled clockwise and anticlockwise rotational switching of a molecular motor. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 46–51. 10.1038/nnano.2012.218. PubMed DOI

Schliwa M.; Woehlke G. Molecular motors. Nature 2003, 422 (6933), 759–765. 10.1038/nature01601. PubMed DOI

van Delden R.; ter Wiel M. K. J.; Pollard M. M.; Vicario J.; Koumura N.; Feringa B. L. Unidirectional molecular motor on a gold surface. Nature 2005, 437 (7063), 1337–1340. 10.1038/nature04127. PubMed DOI

Kelly T. R.; De Silva H.; Silva R. A. Unidirectional rotary motion in a molecular system. Nature 1999, 401 (6749), 150–152. 10.1038/43639. PubMed DOI

Simpson C. D.; Mattersteig G.; Martin K.; Gherghel L.; Bauer R. E.; Räder H. J.; Müllen K. Nanosized Molecular Propellers by Cyclodehydrogenation of Polyphenylene Dendrimers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (10), 3139–3147. 10.1021/ja036732j. PubMed DOI

Wang B.; Král P. Chemically Tunable Nanoscale Propellers of Liquids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98, 266102.10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.266102. PubMed DOI

Marfavi A.; Kavianpour P.; Rendina L. M. Carboranes in drug discovery, chemical biology and molecular imaging. Nat. Rev. Chem 2022, 6 (7), 486–504. 10.1038/s41570-022-00400-x. PubMed DOI

Hey-Hawkins E.; Teixidor C. V.. Boron-based Compounds: Potential and Emerging Applications in Medicine; Wiley, 2018.

Yan J.; Yang W.; Zhang Q.; Yan Y. Introducing borane clusters into polymeric frameworks: architecture, synthesis, and applications. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56 (79), 11720–11734. 10.1039/D0CC04709K. PubMed DOI

Farha O. K.; Spokoyny A. M.; Mulfort K. L.; Hawthorne M. F.; Mirkin C. A.; Hupp J. T. Synthesis and Hydrogen Sorption Properties of Carborane Based Metal–Organic Framework Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129 (42), 12680–12681. 10.1021/ja076167a. PubMed DOI

Farha O. K.; Spokoyny A. M.; Mulfort K. L.; Galli S.; Hupp J. T.; Mirkin C. A. Gas-Sorption Properties of Cobalt(II)–Carborane-Based Coordination Polymers as a Function of Morphology. Small 2009, 5 (15), 1727–1731. 10.1002/smll.200900085. PubMed DOI

Huang S.-L.; Lin Y.-J.; Yu W.-B.; Jin G.-X. Porous Frameworks Based on Carborane–Ln2(CO2)6: Architecture Influenced by Lanthanide Contraction and Selective CO2 Capture. ChemPlusChem 2012, 77 (3), 141–147. 10.1002/cplu.201100083. DOI

Huang S.-L.; Weng L.-H.; Jin G.-X. Bottom-up synthesis of coordination polymers based on carborane backbones and Cu2(CO2)4 paddle-wheel: ligandmetathesis with metallotecons. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41 (38), 11657–11662. 10.1039/c2dt30708a. PubMed DOI

Spokoyny A. M.; Farha O. K.; Mulfort K. L.; Hupp J. T.; Mirkin C. A. Porosity tuning of carborane-based metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) via coordination chemistry and ligand design. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2010, 364 (1), 266–271. 10.1016/j.ica.2010.08.007. DOI

Kennedy R. D.; Krungleviciute V.; Clingerman D. J.; Mondloch J. E.; Peng Y.; Wilmer C. E.; Sarjeant A. A.; Snurr R. Q.; Hupp J. T.; Yildirim T.; Farha O. K.; Mirkin C. A. Carborane-Based Metal–Organic Framework with High Methane and Hydrogen Storage Capacities. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25 (17), 3539–3543. 10.1021/cm4020942. DOI

Boldog I.; Dušek M.; Jelínek T.; Švec P.; Ramos F. S. O.; Růžička A.; Bulánek R. Porous 10- and 12-Vertex (Bi)-P-Dicarba-Closo-Boranedicarboxylates of Cobalt and Their Gas Adsorptive Properties. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 271, 284–294. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.05.031. DOI

Idrees K. B.; Kirlikovali K. O.; Setter C.; Xie H.; Brand H.; Lal B.; Sha F.; Smoljan C. S.; Wang X.; Islamoglu T.; Macreadie L. K.; Farha O. K. Robust Carborane-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks for Hexane Separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145 (43), 23433–23441. 10.1021/jacs.3c04641. PubMed DOI

Gan L.; Chidambaram A.; Fonquernie P. G.; Light M. E.; Choquesillo-Lazarte D.; Huang H.; Solano E.; Fraile J.; Viñas C.; Teixidor F.; Navarro J. A. R.; Stylianou K. C.; Planas J. G. A Highly Water-Stable meta-Carborane-Based Copper Metal–Organic Framework for Efficient High-Temperature Butanol Separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (18), 8299–8311. 10.1021/jacs.0c01008. PubMed DOI

Xu X.; Cui Q.; Chen H.; Huang N. Carborane-Based Three-Dimensional Covalent Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145 (44), 24202–24209. 10.1021/jacs.3c08541. PubMed DOI

Fanfrlík J.; Přáda A.; Padělková Z.; Pecina A.; Macháček J.; Lepšík M.; Holub J.; Růžička A.; Hnyk D.; Hobza P. The dominant role of chalcogen bonding in the crystal packing of 2D/3D aromatics. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53 (38), 10139–10142. 10.1002/anie.201405901. PubMed DOI

Melichar P.; Hnyk D.; Fanfrlík J. A. Systematic Examination of Classical and Multi-center Bonding in Heteroborane Clusters. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20 (7), 4666–4675. 10.1039/C7CP07422K. PubMed DOI

Vrána J.; Holub J.; Růžičková Z.; Fanfrlík J.; Hnyk D.; Růžička A. Investigation of Thiaborane closo–nido Conversion Pathways Promoted by N-Heterocyclic Carbenes. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58 (4), 2471–2482. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b03037. PubMed DOI

Chui S. S.-Y.; Low K.-H.; Lu J.; Roy V. . .; Chan S. L.-F.; Che C.-M. Homoleptic platinum(II) and palladium(II) organothiolates and phenylselenolates: solvothermal synthesis, structural determination, optical properties, and single-source precursors for PdSe and PdS nanocrystals. Chem.—Asian J. 2010, 5 (9), 2062–2074. 10.1002/asia.201000233. PubMed DOI

Kulmaczewski R.; Halcrow M. A. Structures and spin states of crystalline [Fe(NCS)2L2] and [FeL3]2+ complexes (L = an annelated 1,10-phenanthroline derivative). CrystEngComm 2016, 18 (14), 2570–2578. 10.1039/C6CE00163G. DOI

Bader R. F. W.Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory; Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1990.

Johnson E. R.; Keinan S.; Mori-Sánchez P.; Contreras-García J.; Cohen A. J.; Yang W. Revealing Noncovalent Interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (18), 6498–6506. 10.1021/ja100936w. PubMed DOI PMC

Bickelhaupt F. M.; Baerends E. J. Kohn-Sham Density Functional Theory: Predicting and Understanding Chemistry. Rev. Comput. Chem. 2000, 15, 1–86. 10.1002/9780470125922.ch1. DOI

Silvi B.; Savin A. Classification of chemical bonds based on topological analysis of electron localization functions. Nature 1994, 371, 683–686. 10.1038/371683a0. DOI

Weinhold F.; Landis C. R. Natural bond orbitals and extensions of localized bonding concepts. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2001, 2 (2), 91–104. 10.1039/B1RP90011K. DOI

Spek A. L. PLATON SQUEEZE: a tool for the calculation of the disordered solvent contribution to the calculated structure factors. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, C71 (1), 9–18. 10.1107/S2053229614024929. PubMed DOI

Tome L. C.; Marrucho I. M. Ionic liquid-based materials: a platform to design engineered CO2 separation membranes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45 (10), 2785–2824. 10.1039/C5CS00510H. PubMed DOI

Goeppert A.; Czaun M.; Surya Prakash G. K.; Olah G. A. Air as the renewable carbon source of the future: an overview of CO2 capture from the atmosphere. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5 (7), 7833–7853. 10.1039/C2EE21586A. DOI

Rochelle G. T. Amine scrubbing for CO2 capture. Science 2009, 325 (5948), 1652–1654. 10.1126/science.1176731. PubMed DOI

Chowdhury F. A.; Yamada H.; Higashii T.; Goto K.; Onoda M. CO2 capture by tertiary amine absorbents: a performance comparison study. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52 (24), 8323–8331. 10.1021/ie400825u. DOI

Yu C.-H.; Huang C.-H.; Tan C.-S. A review of CO2 capture by absorption and adsorption. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2012, 12, 745–769. 10.4209/aaqr.2012.05.0132. DOI

Taylor R. G. D.; Carta M.; Bezzu C. G.; Walker J.; Msayib K. J.; Kariuki B. M.; McKeown N. B. Triptycene-Based Organic Molecules of Intrinsic Microporosity. Org. Lett. 2014, 16 (7), 1848–1851. 10.1021/ol500591q. PubMed DOI PMC

Eckstein B. J.; Brown L. C.; Noll B. C.; Moghadasnia M. P.; Balaich G. J.; McGuirk C. M. A Porous Chalcogen-Bonded Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143 (48), 20207–20215. 10.1021/jacs.1c08642. PubMed DOI

Macháček J.; Plešek J.; Holub J.; Hnyk D.; Všetečka V.; Císařová I.; Kaupp M.; Štíbr B. New route to 1-thia-closo-dodecaborane(11), closo-1-SB11H11, and its halogenation reactions. The effect of the halogen on the dipole moments and the NMR spectra and the importance of spin–orbit coupling for the 11B chemical shifts. Dalton Trans. 2006, 8, 1024–1029. 10.1039/B512345C. PubMed DOI

Sheldrick G. M. SHELXT - Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, A71, 3–8. 10.1107/S2053273314026370. PubMed DOI PMC

Bruker S. V. A.APEX3 v2016.9-0; Bruker AXS Inc, 2016.

Frisch M. J.; Trucks G. W.; Schlegel H. B.; Scuseria G. E.; Robb M. A.; Cheeseman J. R.; Scalmani G.; Barone V.; Mennucci B.; Petersson G. A.; Nakatsuji H.; Caricato M.; Li X.; Hratchian H. P.; Izmaylov A. F.; Bloino J.; Zheng G.; Sonnenberg J. L.; Hada M.; Ehara M.; Toyota K.; Fukuda R.; Hasegawa J.; Ishida M.; Nakajima T.; Honda Y.; Kitao O.; Nakai H.; Vreven T.; Montgomery J. A.; Peralta Jr. J. E.; Ogliaro F.; Bearpark M.; Heyd J. J.; Brothers E.; Kudin K. N.; Staroverov V. N.; Kobayashi R.; Normand J.; Raghavachari K.; Rendell A.; Burant J. C.; Iyengar S. S.; Tomasi J.; Cossi M.; Rega N.; Millam J. M.; Klene M.; Knox J. E.; Cross J. B.; Bakken V.; Adamo C.; Jaramillo J.; Gomperts R.; Stratmann R. E.; Yazyev O.; Austin A. J.; Cammi R.; Pomelli C.; Ochterski J. W.; Martin R. L.; Morokuma K.; Zakrzewski V. G.; Voth G. A.; Salvador P.; Dannenberg J. J.; Dapprich S.; Daniels A. D.; Farkas O.; Foresman J. B.; Ortiz J. V.; Cioslowski J.; Fox D. J.. Gaussian 09, Revision, D.01; Gaussian, Inc., 2009.

Flűkiger P.; Lűthi H. P.; Portmann S.; Weber J.. MOLEKEL 4.3; Swiss Center for Scientific Computing, 2000.

Portmann S.; Lűthi H. P. MOLEKEL: An Interactive Molecular Graphics Tool. Chimia 2000, 54, 766–770. 10.2533/chimia.2000.766. DOI

Jeziorski B.; Moszynski R.; Szalewicz K. Perturbation Theory Approach to Intermolecular Potential Energy Surfaces of van der Waals Complexes. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 1887–1930. 10.1021/cr00031a008. DOI

Parker T. M.; Burns L. A.; Parrish R. M.; Ryno A. G.; Sherrill C. D. Levels of symmetry adapted perturbation theory (SAPT). I. Efficiency and performance for interaction energies. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140 (9), 094106.10.1063/1.4867135. PubMed DOI

Hostaš J.; Řezáč J. Accurate DFT-D3 Calculations in a Small Basis Set. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017, 13 (8), 3575–3585. 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00365. PubMed DOI

Ahlrichs R.; Bar M.; Haser M.; Horn H.; Kolmel C. Electronic structure calculations on workstation computers: The program system Turbomole. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989, 162 (3), 165–169. 10.1016/0009-2614(89)85118-8. DOI

Turney J. M.; Simmonett A. C.; Parrish R. M.; Hohenstein E. G.; Evangelista F. A.; Fermann J. T.; Mintz B. J.; Burns L. A.; Wilke J. J.; Abrams M. L.; Russ N. J.; Leininger M. L.; Janssen C. L.; Seidl E. T.; Allen W. D.; Schaefer H. F.; King R. A.; Valeev E. F.; Sherrill C. D.; Crawford T. D. Psi4: an open-source ab initio electronic structure program. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2 (4), 556–565. 10.1002/wcms.93. DOI

Řezáč J. Cuby: An integrative framework for computational chemistry. J. Comput. Chem. 2016, 37, 1230–1237. 10.1002/jcc.24312. PubMed DOI

Case D. A.; Babin V.; Berryman J. T.; Betz R. M.; Cai Q.; Cerutti D. S.; Cheatham T.; Darden T.; Duke R. E.; Gohlke H.; Goetz A. W.; Gusarov S.; Homeyer N.; Janowski P.; Kaus J.; Kolossváry I.; Kovalenko A.; Lee T. S.; LeGrand S.; Luchko T.; Luo R.; Madej B.; Merz K. M.; Paesani F.; Roe D. R.; Roitberg A.; Sagui C.; Salomon-Ferrer R.; Seabra G.; Simmerling C. L.; Smith W.; Swails J.; Walker R. C.; Wang J.; Wolf R. M.; Wu X.; Kollman P. A.. Amber; University of California, 2014.

Pettersen E. F.; Goddard T. D.; Huang C. C.; Couch G. S.; Greenblatt D. M.; Meng E. C.; Ferrin T. E. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25 (13), 1605–1612. 10.1002/jcc.20084. PubMed DOI

Wang J.; Wolf R. M.; Caldwell J. W.; Kollman P. A.; Case D. A. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25 (9), 1157–1174. 10.1002/jcc.20035. PubMed DOI

Fanfrlík J.; Pecina A.; Řezáč J.; Lepšík M.; Sárosi M. B.; Hnyk D.; Hobza P. Benchmark Data Sets of Boron Cluster Dihydrogen Bonding for the Validation of Approximate Computational Methods. ChemPhysChem 2020, 21 (23), 2599–2604. 10.1002/cphc.202000729. PubMed DOI

Bader R. F. W. A quantum theory of molecular structure and its applications. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91 (5), 893–928. 10.1021/cr00005a013. DOI

Kitaura K.; Morokuma K. A new energy decomposition scheme for molecular interactions within the Hartree-Fock approximation. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1976, 10, 325–340. 10.1002/qua.560100211. DOI

Becke A. D.; Edgecombe K. E. A simple measure of electron localization in atomic and molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 5397–5403. 10.1063/1.458517. DOI

Contreras-García J.; Johnson E. R.; Keinan S.; Chaudret R.; Piquemal J.-P.; Beratan D. N.; Yang W. NCIPLOT: A Program for Plotting Noncovalent Interaction Regions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7 (3), 625–632. 10.1021/ct100641a. PubMed DOI PMC

Adamo C.; Barone V. Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 6158–6170. 10.1063/1.478522. DOI

Caldeweyher E.; Ehlert S.; Hansen A.; Neugebauer H.; Spicher S.; Bannwarth C.; Grimme S. A generally applicable atomic-charge dependent London dispersion correction. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 154122.10.1063/1.5090222. PubMed DOI

Weigend F. Accurate Coulomb-fitting basis sets for H to Rn. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8 (9), 1057–1065. 10.1039/b515623h. PubMed DOI

Weigend F.; Ahlrichs R. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7 (18), 3297–3305. 10.1039/b508541a. PubMed DOI

Gomila R. M.; Frontera A.; Tiekink E. R. T. Te···I secondary-bonding interactions in crystals containing tellurium(II), tellurium(IV) and iodide atoms: supramolecular aggregation patterns, nature of the non-covalent interactions and energy considerations. CrystEngComm 2024, 26 (21), 2784–2795. 10.1039/D4CE00305E. DOI

Beccaria R.; Dhaka A.; Calabrese M.; Pizzi A.; Frontera A.; Resnati G. Chalcogen and Hydrogen Bond Team up in Driving Anion···Anion Self-Assembly. Chem.—Eur. J. 2024, 30, e20230364110.1002/chem.202303641. PubMed DOI

Humphrey W.; Dalke A.; Schulten K. V. M. D. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14, 33–38. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5. PubMed DOI

Lu T.; Chen F. Multiwfn A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 580–592. 10.1002/jcc.22885. PubMed DOI

Glendening E. D.; Landis C. R.; Weinhold F. Natural bond orbital methods. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 1–42. 10.1002/wcms.51. DOI

Glendening E. D.; Badenhoop J. K.; Reed A. E.; Carpenter J. E.; Bohmann J. A.; Morales C. M.; Karafiloglou P.; Landis C. R.; Weinhold F.. NBO 7.0; University of Wisconsin, 2018.