Clinical risk stratification: Prague validation of the DAAE score, a clinical tool for estimating risk of disesase progression in multiple sclerosis
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Validation Study
PubMed
40222333
DOI
10.1016/j.msard.2025.106423
PII: S2211-0348(25)00165-8
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- External validation, Objective criteria, Prognostic tool, Risk Stratification, Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, disease progression,
- MeSH
- Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive * diagnosis physiopathology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Risk Assessment MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Disease Progression * MeSH
- Multiple Sclerosis * diagnosis MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Validation Study MeSH
BACKGROUND: Secondary progressive MS is associated with a worse prognosis, warranting the need for early predictive tools. The DAAE score estimates the five-year risk of transition to clinical diagnosis of SPMS, showing a 38 % risk in high-risk patients in Amsterdam and Buffalo data. The DAAE score remains to be validated against objective disease progression criteria. METHODS: External validation using data from the Prague MS cohort and MSBase-Lorscheider criteria. RESULTS: Among 2022 patients from the Prague MS database, 14.3 % clinically progressed according to MSbase-Lorscheider criteria over five years. Risk increased with higher DAAE scores comparable to the Amsterdam and Buffalo data; secondary validation showed an AUROC of 0.742 with faster progression for higher risk groups (p < 0.05), therapy-adjusted. CONCLUSION: The DAAE score performs similarly between centers and using objective criteria. These validation steps support its use in personalized MS management and treatment.
References provided by Crossref.org