Clinical risk stratification: Prague validation of the DAAE score, a clinical tool for estimating risk of disesase progression in multiple sclerosis
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, validační studie
PubMed
40222333
DOI
10.1016/j.msard.2025.106423
PII: S2211-0348(25)00165-8
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- External validation, Objective criteria, Prognostic tool, Risk Stratification, Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, disease progression,
- MeSH
- chronicko-progresivní roztroušená skleróza * diagnóza patofyziologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hodnocení rizik MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- progrese nemoci * MeSH
- roztroušená skleróza * diagnóza MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- validační studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Secondary progressive MS is associated with a worse prognosis, warranting the need for early predictive tools. The DAAE score estimates the five-year risk of transition to clinical diagnosis of SPMS, showing a 38 % risk in high-risk patients in Amsterdam and Buffalo data. The DAAE score remains to be validated against objective disease progression criteria. METHODS: External validation using data from the Prague MS cohort and MSBase-Lorscheider criteria. RESULTS: Among 2022 patients from the Prague MS database, 14.3 % clinically progressed according to MSbase-Lorscheider criteria over five years. Risk increased with higher DAAE scores comparable to the Amsterdam and Buffalo data; secondary validation showed an AUROC of 0.742 with faster progression for higher risk groups (p < 0.05), therapy-adjusted. CONCLUSION: The DAAE score performs similarly between centers and using objective criteria. These validation steps support its use in personalized MS management and treatment.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org