Perception studies describe numerous discrete morphological facial features as important to judgements of various characteristics. Interestingly, little is known about whether people actually direct their visual attention to these features and how specific contexts or sex affect this attention. We, therefore, examined visual attention to faces in the context of intersexual (opposite-sex assessment of attractiveness) and intrasexual (same-sex assessment of dominance) selection. In total, 93 women and 33 men rated 80 high-resolution facial photographs of men and women while their gaze was recorded using eye-tracking. To explore patterns of raters' attention to faces and specific facial features, we used the number of fixations, fixation duration, and visit duration as visual attention measures. Women directed more visual attention towards the faces of potential partners (more fixations) than potential rivals, and men had longer fixation duration when assessing potential partners than rivals. Facial features that acquired the most visual attention across contexts and sexes were the eyes, nose, and mouth, but small differences between the sexes and contexts in visual attention were found for other facial regions suggested by previous perception studies, such as the chin and the cheeks indicating their importance in specific judgements.

Center for Virtual Reality Research in Mental Health and Neuroscience 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic

National Institute of Mental Health Klecany Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Abend, P., Pflüger, L. S., Koppensteiner, M., Coquerelle, M., & Grammer, K. (2015). The sound of female shape: A redundant signal of vocal and facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(3), 174–181. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.10.004 DOI

Albert, G., Wells, E., Arnocky, S., Liu, C. H., Hlay, J. K., & Hodges-Simeon, C. R. (2023). Does men’s facial sexual dimorphism affect male observers’ selective attention? Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 9(1), 1–25. 10.1007/s40750-022-00205-8 DOI

Althoff, R. R., & Cohen, N. J. (1999). Eye-movement-based memory effect: A reprocessing effect in face perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 997–1010. 10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.997 PubMed DOI

Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(5), 395–424. 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00068-2 DOI

Blais, C., Jack, R. E., Scheepers, C., Fiset, D., & Caldara, R. (2008). Culture shapes how we look at faces. PLoS ONE, 3(8), e3022. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003022 PubMed DOI PMC

Bleske, A. L., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Can men and women be just friends? Personal Relationships, 7(2), 131–151. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00008.x DOI

Burriss, R. P., Marcinkowska, U. M., & Lyons, M. T. (2014). Gaze properties of women judging the attractiveness of masculine and feminine male faces. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(1), 147470491401200. 10.1177/147470491401200102 PubMed DOI PMC

Cai, Z., Hahn, A. C., Zhang, W., Holzleitner, I. J., Lee, A., DeBruine, L., & Jones, B. (2019). No evidence that facial attractiveness, femininity, averageness, or coloration are cues to susceptibility to infectious illnesses in a university sample of young adult women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(2), 156–159. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.10.002 DOI

Calder, A., Rhodes, G., Johnson, M. H., & Haxby, J. V. (2011). Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press.

Chelnokova, O., & Laeng, B. (2011). Three-dimensional information in face recognition: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Vision, 11(13), 27–27. 10.1167/11.13.27 PubMed DOI

Csajbók, Z., Berkics, M., & Havlíček, J. (2022). Meeting minimum mate preference thresholds can be more important than the overall score. Personality and Individual Differences, 195, 111675. 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111675 DOI

Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness. Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 925–935. 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.925 DOI

Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., & Pike, C. L. (1990). What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 61–72. 10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.61 PubMed DOI

Dong, J., Leger, K., Shiramizu, V. K. M., Marcinkowska, U. M., Lee, A. J., & Jones, B. C. (2023). The importance of face-shape masculinity for perceptions of male dominance depends on study design. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 12620. 10.1038/s41598-023-39912-x PubMed DOI PMC

Duchowski, A. T. (2017). Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-57883-5 DOI

Fiala, V., Třebický, V., Pazhoohi, F., Leongómez, J. D., Tureček, P., Saribay, S. A., Akoko, R. M., & Kleisner, K. (2021). Facial attractiveness and preference of sexual dimorphism: A comparison across five populations. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 3, e38. 10.1017/ehs.2021.33 PubMed DOI PMC

Fink, B., Klappauf, D., Brewer, G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2014). Female physical characteristics and intra-sexual competition in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 138–141. 10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.015 DOI

Fisher, M. L. (2004). Female intrasexual competition decreases female facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271(suppl_5), S283–S285. 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0160 PubMed DOI PMC

Foo, Y. Z., Simmons, L. W., & Rhodes, G. (2017). Predictors of facial attractiveness and health in humans. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 39731. 10.1038/srep39731 PubMed DOI PMC

Galley, N., Betz, D., & Biniossek, C. (2015). Fixation durations—Why are they so highly variable? In Heinen T. (Ed.), Advances in Visual Perception Research (1st ed., pp. 83–106). Nova Science Publishers.

Galperin, A., Fessler, D. M. T., Johnson, K. L., & Haselton, M. G. (2013). Seeing storms behind the clouds: Biases in the attribution of anger. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(5), 358–365. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.06.003 DOI

Gillath, O., Bahns, A. J., & Burghart, H. A. (2017). Eye movements when looking at potential friends and romantic partners. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(8), 2313–2325. 10.1007/s10508-017-1022-5 PubMed DOI

Hall, J. K., Hutton, S. B. & Morgan, M. J. (2010). Sex differences in scanning faces: Does attention to the eyes explain female superiority in facial expression recognition? Cognition & Emotion, 24(4), 629–637. 10.1080/02699930902906882 DOI

Havlíček, J., Štěrbová, Z., & Csajbók, Z. (2022). Human mate choice. In Freeberg T. M., Ridley A. & d’Ettorre P. (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Comparative Psychology (pp. 338–354). Routledge.

Hermens, F., Golubickis, M., & Macrae, C. N. (2018). Eye movements while judging faces for trustworthiness and dominance. PeerJ, 6, e5702. 10.7717/peerj.5702 PubMed DOI PMC

Hewig, J., Trippe, R. H., Hecht, H., Straube, T., & Miltner, W. H. R. (2008). Gender differences for specific body regions when looking at men and women. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 32, 67–78. 10.1007/s10919-007-0043-5 DOI

Hickman, L., Firestone, A. R., Beck, F. M., & Speer, S. (2010). Eye fixations when viewing faces. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 141(1), 40–46. 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0019 PubMed DOI

Jacob, R. J. K., & Karn, K. S. (2003). Commentary on section 4 - Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. In Hyönä J., Radach R. & Deubel H. (Eds.), The Mind’s Eye (pp. 573–605). North-Holland. 10.1016/B978-044451020-4/50031-1 DOI

Jones, B. C., Holzleitner, I. J., & Shiramizu, V. (2021). Does facial attractiveness really signal immunocompetence? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(12), 1018–1020. 10.1016/j.tics.2021.09.003 PubMed DOI

Keating, C. F. (1985). Gender and the physiognomy of dominance and attractiveness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(1), 61–70. 10.2307/3033782 DOI

Kleisner, K., Pokorný, Š., & Saribay, S. A. (2019). Toward a new approach to cross-cultural distinctiveness and typicality of human faces: The cross-group typicality/ distinctiveness metric. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 124. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00124 PubMed DOI PMC

Kleisner, K., & Saribay, S. A. (2019). The dual nature of mimicry: Organismal form and beholder’s eye. Biosemiotics, 12(1), 79–98. 10.1007/s12304-018-9333-z DOI

Kleisner, K., Tureček, P., Saribay, S. A., Pavlovič, O., Leongómez, J. D., Roberts, S. C., Havlíček, J., Valentova, J. V., Apostol, S., Akoko, R. M., & Varella, M. A. C. (2024). Distinctiveness and femininity, rather than symmetry and masculinity, affect facial attractiveness across the world. Evolution and Human Behavior, 45(1), 82–90. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.10.001 DOI

Knight, G. P., Fabes, R. A., & Higgins, D. A. (1996). Concerns about drawing causal inferences from meta-analyses: An example in the study of gender differences in aggression. Psychological Bulletin, 119(3), 410–421. 10.1037/0033-2909.119.3.410 PubMed DOI

Knight, G. P., Guthrie, I. K., Page, M. C., & Fabes, R. A. (2002). Emotional arousal and gender differences in aggression: A meta-analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 28(5), 366–393. 10.1002/ab.80011 DOI

Król, M. E., & Król, M. (2019). A novel machine learning analysis of eye-tracking data reveals suboptimal visual information extraction from facial stimuli in individuals with autism. Neuropsychologia, 129, 397–406. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.022 PubMed DOI

Kwart, D. G., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Age and beauty are in the eye of the beholder. Perception, 41(8), 925–938. 10.1068/p7136 PubMed DOI

Leder, H., Mitrovic, A., & Goller, J. (2016). How beauty determines gaze! Facial attractiveness and gaze duration in images of real world scenes. I-Perception, 7(4), 2041669516664355. 10.1177/2041669516664355 PubMed DOI PMC

Leder, H., Tinio, P. P. L., Fuchs, I. M., & Bohrn, I. (2010). When attractiveness demands longer looks: The effects of situation and gender. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(9), 1858–1871. 10.1080/17470211003605142 PubMed DOI

Little, A. C. (2014). Facial attractiveness. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(6), 621–634. 10.1002/wcs.1316 PubMed DOI

Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Petrie, M., Jones, B. C., & Roberts, S. C. (2013). Oral contraceptive use in women changes preferences for male facial masculinity and is associated with partner facial masculinity. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(9), 1777–1785. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.02.014 PubMed DOI

Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & De Bruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1638–1659. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0404 PubMed DOI PMC

Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., & Gailliot, M. T. (2008). Selective attention to signs of success: Social dominance and early stage interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 488–501. 10.1177/0146167207311910 PubMed DOI

Martelli, M., Majaj, N. J., & Pelli, D. G. (2005). Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. Journal of Vision, 5(1), 6. 10.1167/5.1.6 PubMed DOI

Mitrovic, A., Hegelmaier, L. M., Leder, H., & Pelowski, M. (2020). Does beauty capture the eye, even if it’s not (overtly) adaptive? A comparative eye-tracking study of spontaneous attention and visual preference with VAST abstract art. Acta Psychologica, 209, 103133. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103133 PubMed DOI

Mitrovic, A., Tinio, P. P. L., & Leder, H. (2016). Consequences of beauty: Effects of rater sex and sexual orientation on the visual exploration and evaluation of attractiveness in real world scenes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 122. 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00122 PubMed DOI PMC

Mitteroecker, P., Windhager, S., Müller, G. B., & Schaefer, K. (2015). The morphometrics of “masculinity” in human faces. PLoS One, 10(2), e0118374. 10.1371/journal.pone.0118374 PubMed DOI PMC

Ness, C. D. (2004). Why girls fight: Female youth violence in the inner city. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595(1), 32–48. 10.1177/0002716204267176 DOI

Nguyen, H. T., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Rubin, P. A. D. (2009). Age- and fatigue-related markers of human faces: An eye-tracking study. Ophthalmology, 116(2), 355–360. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.007 PubMed DOI

Pátková Ž., Grygarová D., Adámek P., Třebická Fialová J., Havlíček J., and Třebický V.(2025). Possible Differences in Visual Attention to Faces in the Context of Mate Choice and Competition. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 54(3), 905–919. 10.1007/s10508-025-03086-6 PubMed DOI PMC

Pátková, Ž., Schwambergová, D., Třebická Fialová, J., Třebický, V., Stella, D., Kleisner, K., & Havlíček, J. (2022). Attractive and healthy-looking male faces do not show higher immunoreactivity. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 18432. 10.1038/s41598-022-22866-x PubMed DOI PMC

Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, S. P., Castles, D. L., & Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394(6696), 884–887. 10.1038/29772 PubMed DOI

Pflüger, L. S., Oberzaucher, E., Katina, S., Holzleitner, I. J., & Grammer, K. (2012). Cues to fertility: Perceived attractiveness and facial shape predict reproductive success. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(6), 708–714. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.05.005 DOI

Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 157–175. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005 DOI

Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 199–226. 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208 PubMed DOI

Rhodes, G., Chan, J., Zebrowitz, L. A., & Simmons, L. W. (2003). Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270(Suppl_1), S93–S95. 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0023 PubMed DOI PMC

Rhodes, G., Sumich, A., & Byatt, G. (1999). Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry? Psychological Science, 10(1), 52–58. 10.1111/1467-9280.00106 DOI

Rhodes, G., Zebrowitz, L. A., Clark, A., Kalick, S. M., Hightower, A., & McKay, R. (2001). Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(1), 31–46. 10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00060-X PubMed DOI

Rosvall, K. A. (2011). Intrasexual competition in females: Evidence for sexual selection? Behavioral Ecology, 22(6), 1131–1140. 10.1093/beheco/arr106 PubMed DOI PMC

Schaefer, K., Fink, B., Grammer, K., Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., & Bookstein, F. L. (2006). Female appearance: Facial and bodily attractiveness as shape. Psychology Science, 48(2), 187–204. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-10718-008.

Scott, I. M. L., Clark, A. P., Boothroyd, L. G., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2013). Do men’s faces really signal heritable immunocompetence? Behavioral Ecology, 24(3), 579–589. 10.1093/beheco/ars092 PubMed DOI PMC

Sell, A., Hone, L. S. E., & Pound, N. (2012). The importance of physical strength to human males. Human Nature, 23(1), 30–44. 10.1007/s12110-012-9131-2 PubMed DOI

Semmelmann, K., & Weigelt, S. (2018). Online webcam-based eye tracking in cognitive science: A first look. Behavior Research Methods, 50(2), 451–465. 10.3758/s13428-017-0913-7 PubMed DOI

Skaramagkas, V., Giannakakis, G., Ktistakis, E., Manousos, D., Karatzanis, I., Tachos, N. S., Tripoliti, E., Marias, K., Fotiadis, D. I., & Tsiknakis, M. (2023). Review of eye tracking metrics involved in emotional and cognitive processes. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 16, 260–277. 10.1109/RBME.2021.3066072 PubMed DOI

Stephen, I. D., & Luoto, S. (2023). Physical cues of partner quality. In Mogilski J. K., and Shackelford T. K. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology and Romantic Relationships, (pp. 42–73). Oxford University Press.

Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3(12), 452–460. 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01403-5 PubMed DOI

Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(2), 131–144. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.001 DOI

Třebický, V., Fialová, J., Stella, D., Štěrbová, Z., Kleisner, K., & Havlíček, J. (2018). 360 degrees of facial perception: Congruence in perception of frontal portrait, profile, and rotation photographs. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2405. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02405 PubMed DOI PMC

Třebický, V., Havlíček, J., Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., & Kleisner, K. (2013). Perceived aggressiveness predicts fighting performance in mixed-martial-arts fighters. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1664–1672. 10.1177/0956797613477117 PubMed DOI

Třebický, V., Kleisner, K., & Havlíček, J. (2012). Evolutionary concepts of human physical attractiveness: The case of male physique. Anthropologie, 50(1), 33–45. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26272385.

Vernon, R. J. W., Sutherland, C. A. M., Young, A. W., & Hartley, T. (2014). Modeling first impressions from highly variable facial images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(32), E3353–E3361. 10.1073/pnas.1409860111 PubMed DOI PMC

Windhager, S., Schaefer, K., & Fink, B. (2011). Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity. American Journal of Human Biology, 23(6), 805–814. 10.1002/ajhb.21219 PubMed DOI

Yang, T., Chen, H., Hu, Y., Zheng, Y., & Wang, W. (2015). Preferences for sexual dimorphism on attractiveness levels: An eye-tracking study. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 179–185. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.005 DOI

Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, J., Zhang, L., & Xiang, Y. (2017). Patterns of eye movements when observers judge female facial attractiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1909. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01909 PubMed DOI PMC