Existing research indicates that the shape of various facial regions is linked to perceived attractiveness and perceived formidability. Interestingly, little evidence shows that people directly focus on these specific facial regions during judgments of attractiveness and formidability, and there is little support for the notion that the levels of attractiveness and formidability affect raters' visual attention. We employed eye-tracking to examine visual attention (the number of fixations and dwell time) in 40 women and 37 men, while they assessed 45 male faces in life-sized photographs for attractiveness and formidability. The facial photographs were grouped by varying levels of attractiveness and formidability (low, medium, and high). Our results showed that regardless of the characteristics rated, both men and women paid the most visual attention to the eyes, nose, mouth, and forehead regions. We found statistically discernible variation in visual attention in relation to the rater's sex or target's attractiveness levels for other facial features (the chin, cheeks, or ears), but these differences may not be substantial enough to have practical implications. We suggest that the eyes, the nose, and the mouth regions play a central role in the evolution of face perception as regions most salient to the acquisition of informative cues about others. Further, during both attractiveness and formidability judgments, men looked longer at the stimuli than women did, which may hint at increased difficulty of this task for men, possibly because they compare themselves with the stimuli. Additionally, irrespective of sex, raters looked marginally longer at faces with a medium level of formidability than at those with a high formidability level, which may reflect ambiguity of these stimuli and uncertainty regarding assessment. We found no other significantly relationships between the target's attractiveness and formidability levels and the rater's visual attention to whole faces.

3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Center for Advanced Studies of Brain and Consciousness National Institute of Mental Health Klecany Czech Republic

Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Faculty of Science Charles University Viničná 7 128 44 Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology,8(4), 291–322. 10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291

Blais, C., Jack, R. E., Scheepers, C., Fiset, D., & Caldara, R. (2008). Culture shapes how we look at faces. PLoS ONE,3(8), e3022. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003022 PubMed PMC

Calder, A., Rhodes, G., Johnson, M. H., & Haxby, J. V. (2011). Oxford handbook of face perception. Oxford University Press.

Chelnokova, O., & Laeng, B. (2011). Three-dimensional information in face recognition: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Vision,11(13), 27–27. 10.1167/11.13.27 PubMed

Clark, V. P., Maisog, J. M., & Haxby, J. V. (1998). fMRI study of face perception and memory using random stimulus sequences. Journal of Neurophysiology,79(6), 3257–3265. 10.1152/jn.1998.79.6.3257 PubMed

Crovitz, H. F., & Zener, K. (1962). A group-test for assessing hand- and eye-dominance. American Journal of Psychology,75(2), 271–276. 10.2307/1419611 PubMed

Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., & Pike, C. L. (1990). What Do Women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,59(1), 61–72. 10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.61 PubMed

Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Ormsby, D. K., & Dixson, A. F. (2014). Eye-tracking women’s preferences for men’s somatotypes. Evolution and Human Behavior,35(2), 73–79. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.10.003

Duchowski, A. T. (2017). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-57883-5

Durkee, P. K., Goetz, A. T., & Lukaszewski, A. W. (2018). Formidability assessment mechanisms: Examining their speed and automaticity. Evolution and Human Behavior,39(2), 170–178. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.12.006

Garza, R., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2021). Effects of women’s short-term mating orientation and self-perceived attractiveness in rating and viewing men’s waist to chest ratios. Archives of Sexual Behavior,50(2), 543–551. 10.1007/s10508-020-01846-0 PubMed

Guo, K., Liu, C. H., & Roebuck, H. (2011). I know you are beautiful even without looking at you: Discrimination of facial beauty in peripheral vision. Perception,40(2), 191–195. 10.1068/p6849 PubMed

Hermens, F., Golubickis, M., & Macrae, C. N. (2018). Eye movements while judging faces for trustworthiness and dominance. PeerJ,6, e5702. 10.7717/peerj.5702 PubMed PMC

Hewig, J., Trippe, R. H., Hecht, H., Straube, T., & Miltner, W. H. R. (2008). Gender differences for specific body regions when looking at men and women. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,32, 67–78. 10.1007/s10919-007-0043-5

Hickman, L., Firestone, A. R., Beck, F. M., & Speer, S. (2010). Eye fixations when viewing faces. Journal of the American Dental Association,141(1), 40–46. 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0019 PubMed

Ivančić Valenko, S., Cviljušac, V., Zlatić, S., & Modrić, D. (2020). The impact of physical parameters on the perception of the moving elements in peripheral part of the screen. Tehnički vjesnik. 26(5), 1444–1450. 10.17559/TV-20190214125057

Jacob, R. J. K., & Karn, K. S. (2003). Commentary on Section 4 - Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The Mind’s Eye (pp. 573–605). North-Holland. 10.1016/B978-044451020-4/50031-1

Jones, B. C., Holzleitner, I. J., & Shiramizu, V. (2021). Does facial attractiveness really signal immunocompetence? Trends in Cognitive Sciences,25(12), 1018–1020. 10.1016/j.tics.2021.09.003 PubMed

Kirkpatrick, M., & Ryan, M. J. (1991). The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature,350(6313), 33–38. 10.1038/350033a0

Kleisner, K., & Saribay, S. A. (2019). The dual nature of mimicry: Organismal form and beholder’s eye. Biosemiotics,12(1), 79–98. 10.1007/s12304-018-9333-z

Król, M. E., & Król, M. (2019). A novel machine learning analysis of eye-tracking data reveals suboptimal visual information extraction from facial stimuli in individuals with autism. Neuropsychologia,129, 397–406. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.022 PubMed

Kwart, D. G., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Age and beauty are in the eye of the beholder. Perception,41(8), 925–938. 10.1068/p7136 PubMed

Leder, H., Mitrovic, A., & Goller, J. (2016). How beauty determines gaze! Facial attractiveness and gaze duration in images of real world scenes. I-Perception,7(4), 2041669516664355. 10.1177/2041669516664355 PubMed PMC

Little, A. C. (2014). Facial attractiveness. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science,5(6), 621–634. 10.1002/wcs.1316 PubMed

Martín-Loeches, M., Hernández-Tamames, J. A., Martín, A., & Urrutia, M. (2014). Beauty and ugliness in the bodies and faces of others: An fMRI study of person esthetic judgement. Neuroscience,277, 486–497. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.040 PubMed

Millen, A. E., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2019). Eye see through you! Eye tracking unmasks concealed face recognition despite countermeasures. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications,4(1). 10.1186/s41235-019-0169-0 PubMed PMC

Mitrovic, A., Goller, J., Tinio, P. P. L., & Leder, H. (2018). How relationship status and sociosexual orientation influence the link between facial attractiveness and visual attention. PLoS ONE,13(11), e0207477. 10.1371/journal.pone.0207477 PubMed PMC

Mitrovic, A., Tinio, P. P. L., & Leder, H. (2016). Consequences of beauty: Effects of rater sex and sexual orientation on the visual exploration and evaluation of attractiveness in real world scenes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,10, 122. 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00122 PubMed PMC

Nguyen, H. T., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Rubin, P. A. D. (2009). Age- and fatigue-related markers of human faces: An eye-tracking study. Ophthalmology,116(2), 355–360. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.007 PubMed

Pátková, Ž, Schwambergová, D., Třebická Fialová, J., Třebický, V., Stella, D., Kleisner, K., & Havlíček, J. (2022). Attractive and healthy-looking male faces do not show higher immunoreactivity. Scientific Reports,12(1), 18432. 10.1038/s41598-022-22866-x PubMed PMC

Pazhoohi, F., Garza, R., Doyle, J. F., Macedo, A. F., & Arantes, J. (2019). Sex differences for preferences of shoulder to hip ratio in men and women: An eye tracking study. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5, 405–415. 10.1007/s40806-019-00204-1

Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior,31(3), 157–175. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005

Qvarnström, A., & Forsgren, E. (1998). Should females prefer dominant males? Trends in Ecology and Evolution,13(12), 498–501. 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01513-4 PubMed

Rudolfová, V., Štolhoferová, I., Elmi, H. S. A., Rádlová, S., Rexová, K., Berti, D. A., Král, D., Sommer, D., Landová, E., Frýdlová, P., & Frynta, D. (2022). Do spiders ride on the fear of scorpions? A cross-cultural eye tracking study. Animals,12(24), 3466. 10.3390/ani12243466 PubMed PMC

Sell, A., Hone, L. S. E., & Pound, N. (2012). The importance of physical strength to human males. Human Nature,23, 30–44. 10.1007/s12110-012-9131-2 PubMed

Semmelmann, K., & Weigelt, S. (2018). Online webcam-based eye tracking in cognitive science: A first look. Behavior Research Methods,50(2), 451–465. 10.3758/s13428-017-0913-7 PubMed

Skaramagkas, V., Giannakakis, G., Ktistakis, E., Manousos, D., Karatzanis, I., Tachos, N. S., Tripoliti, E., Marias, K., Fotiadis, D. I., & Tsiknakis, M. (2023). Review of eye tracking metrics involved in emotional and cognitive processes. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering,16, 260–277. 10.1109/RBME.2021.3066072 PubMed

Snyder, J. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Barrett, H. C. (2008). The dominance dilemma: Do women really prefer dominant mates? Personal Relationships,15(4), 425–444. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00208.x

Spaniel, F., Tintera, J., Rydlo, J., Ibrahim, I., Kasparek, T., Horacek, J., Zaytseva, Y., Matejka, M., Fialova, M., Slovakova, A., Mikolas, P., Melicher, T., Görnerova, N., Höschl, C., & Hajek, T. (2016). Altered neural correlate of the self-agency experience in first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum patients: An fMRI study. Schizophrenia Bulletin,42(4), 916–925. 10.1093/schbul/sbv188 PubMed PMC

Stephen, I. D., & Luoto, S. (2023). Physical cues of partner quality. In J. K. Mogilski & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology and romantic relationships (pp. 42–73). Oxford University Press.

Sui, J., & Liu, C. H. (2009). Can beauty be ignored? Effects of facial attractiveness on covert attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,16(2), 276–281. 10.3758/PBR.16.2.276 PubMed PMC

The jamovi project (Version Version 2.3). (2023). [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org

Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Science,3(12), 452–460. 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01403-5 PubMed

Třebický, V., Adámek, P., Pátková, Ž, Grygarová, D., Fialová, J. T., & Havlíček, J. (2024a). Magnet, magnet in the wall, who is the fairest/scariest of them all the neural correlates of attractiveness and formidability perception of the male faces and bodies. OSF. 10.31219/osf.io/sfx5e

Třebický, V., Fialová, J., Stella, D., Coufalová, K., Pavelka, R., Kleisner, K., Kuba, R., Štěrbová, Z., & Havlíček, J. (2019). Predictors of fighting ability inferences based on faces. Frontiers in Psychology,9, 2740. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02740 PubMed PMC

Třebický, V., Fialová, J., Stella, D., Štěrbová, Z., Kleisner, K., & Havlíček, J. (2018). 360 degrees of facial perception: congruence in perception of frontal portrait, profile, and rotation photographs. Frontiers in Psychology,9, 2405. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02405 PubMed PMC

Třebický, V., & Havlíček, J. (2021). Signals of body size. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. Springer International Publishing.

Třebický, V., Havlíček, J., Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., & Kleisner, K. (2013). Perceived aggressiveness predicts fighting performance in mixed-martial-arts fighters. Psychological Science,24(9), 1664–1672. 10.1177/0956797613477117 PubMed

Třebický, V., Kleisner, K., & Havlíček, J. (2012). Evolutionary concepts of human physical attractiveness: The case of male physique. Anthropologie,50(1), 33–45.

Třebický, V., Stirrat, M., & Havlíček, J. (2021). Fighting assessment. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. Springer International Publishing.

Třebický, V., Tureček, P., Třebická Fialová J., Pátková Ž., Grygarová D. & Havlíček, J. (2024b). Even small differences in attractiveness and formidability affect the probability and speed of selection: An online study and an offline replication. Evolution and Human Behavior, 45, 106634. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.106634

Valuch, C., Pflüger, L. S., Wallner, B., Laeng, B., & Ansorge, U. (2015). Using eye tracking to test for individual differences in attention to attractive faces. Frontiers in Psychology,6. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00042 PubMed PMC

Windhager, S., Schaefer, K., & Fink, B. (2011). Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity. American Journal of Human Biology,23(6), 805–814. 10.1002/ajhb.21219 PubMed

Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, J., Zhang, L., & Xiang, Y. (2017). Patterns of eye movements when observers judge female facial attractiveness. Frontiers in Psychology,8, 1909. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01909 PubMed PMC

Visual attention to faces during attractiveness and dominance judgements