The Development and Validation of the Smell-Qx Questionnaire, Based on a Systematic Review of the Literature and the COMET Initiative on the Development of Core Outcome Sets for Clinical Trials in Olfactory Disorders

. 2025 Sep ; 15 (9) : 974-984. [epub] 20250509

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, systematický přehled, validační studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid40344493

BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction affects up to 22% of the population. Accurate assessment is vital for diagnosis and tracking outcomes, often using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). AIMS: We aimed to develop and validate a novel questionnaire for assessing olfactory and gustatory dysfunction. METHODS: A systematic review identified existing smell and taste questionnaires, followed by item generation and selection. After two Delphi cycles and consultation with a large panel of smell and taste experts, the Smell-Qx questionnaire was developed. A validation study recruited patients from smell and taste clinics (cases) and general ENT clinics (controls) to complete the Smell-Qx. Additionally, patients with smell and taste disorders underwent psychophysical testing using Sniffin' Stick Threshold, Discrimination, and Identification (TDI) tests. RESULTS: The Smell-Qx is an 11-domain instrument, with five core domains used for total score calculation and six history/quality-of-life domains for obtaining a comprehensive history. The validation study recruited 60 participants (32 patients with smell/taste disorders and 28 controls). Items showed acceptable to significant internal consistency (Cronbach's α: 0.64-0.97) and test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.65-0.99, p < 0.001). The Smell-Qx was effective at distinguishing patients with smell and taste disorders from controls (t = 9.99, df = 58, p < 0.0001). Concurrent criterion validity was good with overall SATD-related quality of life (r = 0.43, p = 0.015), as well as with the smell loss domain and overall smell TDI scores (r = -0.54, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: The Smell-Qx is a reliable and valid PROM for assessing olfactory and self-reported gustatory disorders, capturing symptom severity and quality-of-life impact. It can integrate into a multi-modal assessment approach alongside psychophysical testing.

2nd Academic ORL Department Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Greece

5th Sense Bicester UK

Department of Anatomy Université du Québec à Trois Rivières Trois Rivières Quebec Canada

Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Øre Næse og Halskirurgi RHG Aarhus N Denmark

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Biruni University School of Medicine Istanbul Turkey

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Harvard Medical School Boston USA

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Diego School of Medicine La Jolla California USA

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Regional Hospital Pardubice and Faculty of Health Studies University of Pardubice Pardubice Czech Republic

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc Université Catholique de Louvain Brussels Belgium

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc Brussels Belgium

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Inselspital Bern University Hospital University of Bern Bern Switzerland

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Hospital Clínic Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Hospital Unit West Central Denmark Region Hospital Unit West Holstebro Denmark

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Smell and Taste Clinic Technische Universität Dresden Dresden Germany

Department of Surgery The University of Chicago Chicago Illinois USA

Division of Surgery and Interventional Science UCL London UK

Ear Nose and Throat Department James Paget University Hospital James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Great Yarmouth UK

ENT Department ASST Sette Laghi University of Insubria Varese Italy

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Boston USA

Royal National Ear Nose Throat and Eastman Dental Hospitals London UK

Sheffield Children's Hospital Sheffield UK

UCL Cancer Institute London UK

UCL Ear Institute University College London London UK

UCL London UK

University of East Anglia Medical School University of East Anglia Norwich UK

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Langstaff L., Pradhan N., Clark A., et al., “Validation of the Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire for English‐Speaking Patients With Olfactory Disorders,” Clinical Otolaryngology 44, no. 5 (2019): 715–728, 10.1111/coa.13351. PubMed DOI

Hernandez A. K., Landis B., Altundag A., et al., “Olfactory Nomenclature: An Orchestrated Effort to Clarify Terms and Definitions of Dysosmia, Anosmia, Hyposmia, Normosmia, Hyperosmia, Olfactory Intolerance, Parosmia, and Phantosmia/Olfactory Hallucination,” Orl; Journal for Oto‐Rhino‐Laryngology and Its Related Specialties (2023): 1–9, 10.1159/000530211. PubMed DOI PMC

Whitcroft K. L., Altundag A., Balungwe P., et al., “Position Paper on Olfactory Dysfunction: 2023,” Rhinology 61, no. 33 (2023): 1–131, 10.4193/rhin22.483. PubMed DOI

Patel Z. M., Holbrook E. H., Turner J. H., et al., “International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Olfaction,” International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology 12, no. 4 (2022): 327–380, 10.1002/alr.22929. PubMed DOI PMC

Mullol J., Alobid I., Marino‐Sanchez F., et al., “Furthering the Understanding of Olfaction, Prevalence of Loss of Smell and Risk Factors: A Population‐Based Survey (OLFACAT Study),” BMJ Open 2, no. 6 (2012): e001256, 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001256. PubMed DOI PMC

Liu G., Zong G., Doty R. L., et al., “Prevalence and Risk Factors of Taste and Smell Impairment in a Nationwide Representative Sample of the US Population: A Cross‐Sectional Study,” BMJ Open 6 (2016): e013246, 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013246. PubMed DOI PMC

Lechner M., Liu J., Counsell N., et al., “High Prevalence of Persistent Smell Loss and Qualitative Smell Dysfunction During the COVID‐19 Pandemic in the United States: Urgent Need for Clinical Trials,” International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology 13 (2023): 1558–1560, 10.1002/alr.23100. PubMed DOI PMC

Lechner M., Liu J., Counsell N., et al., “The COVANOS Trial—Insight Into Post‐COVID Olfactory Dysfunction and the Role of Smell Training,” Rhinology 60, no. 3 (2022): 188–199, 10.4193/rhin21.470. PubMed DOI

Welge‐Luessen A., Hummel T., Stojan T., and Wolfensberger M., “What Is the Correlation Between Ratings and Measures of Olfactory Function in Patients With Olfactory Loss?,” American Journal of Rhinology 19, no. 6 (2005): 567–571, 10.1177/194589240501900606. PubMed DOI

Hummel T., Kobal G., Gudziol H., et al., “Normative Data for the “Sniffin' Sticks” Including Tests of Odor Identification, Odor Discrimination, and Olfactory Thresholds: An Upgrade Based on a Group of More Than 3,000 Subjects,” European Archives of Oto‐Rhino‐Laryngology 264, no. 3 (2006): 237–243, 10.1007/s00405-006-0173-0. PubMed DOI

Ta N. H., Gao J., and Philpott C., “A Systematic Review to Examine the Relationship Between Objective and Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures in Sinonasal Disorders: Recommendations for Use in Research and Clinical Practice,” International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology 11, no. 5 (2021): 910–923, 10.1002/alr.22744. PubMed DOI PMC

Han P., Su T., Qin M., et al., “A Systematic Review of Olfactory Related Questionnaires and Scales,” Rhinology 59 (2021): 133–143, 10.4193/rhin20.291. PubMed DOI

Landis B. N., “Ratings of Overall Olfactory Function,” Chemical Senses 28, no. 8 (2003): 691–694, 10.1093/chemse/bjg061. PubMed DOI

Wrobel B. B. and Leopold D. A., “Clinical Assessment of Patients With Smell and Taste Disorders,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 37, no. 6 (2004): 1127–1142, 10.1016/j.otc.2004.06.010. PubMed DOI PMC

Croy I., Hoffmann H., Philpott C., et al., “Retronasal Testing of Olfactory Function: An Investigation and Comparison in Seven Countries,” European Archives of Oto‐Rhino‐Laryngology 271, no. 5 (2014): 1087–1095, 10.1007/s00405-013-2684-9. PubMed DOI

Philpott C., Kumaresan K., Fjaeldstad A. W., et al., “Developing a Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials in Olfactory Disorders: A COMET Initiative,” Rhinology 61, no. 4 (2023): 312–319, 10.4193/Rhin22.116. PubMed DOI

Fifth Sense , Fifth Sense – Supporting People Affected by Smell and Taste Disorders, https://www.fifthsense.org.uk/.

Hummel T., Sekinger B., Wolf S. R., et al., “Sniffin‘ Sticks’: Olfactory Performance Assessed by the Combined Testing of Odor Identification, Odor Discrimination, and Olfactory Threshold,” Chemical Senses 22, no. 1 (1997): 39–52, 10.1093/chemse/22.1.39. PubMed DOI

Ursachi G., Horodnic I. A., and Zait A., “How Reliable Are Measurement Scales?,” Procedia Economics and Finance 20 (2015): 679–686.

Gent J. F., Goodspeed R. B., Zagraniski R. T., et al., “Taste and Smell Problems: Validation of Questions for the Clinical History,” The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 60, no. 1 (1987): 27–35. PubMed PMC

Nordin S., Murphy C., Davidson T. M., et al., “Prevalence and Assessment of Qualitative Olfactory Dysfunction in Different Age Groups,” Laryngoscope 106, no. 6 (1996): 739–744, 10.1097/00005537-199606000-00008. PubMed DOI

Nordin S., Bramerson A., Murphy C., et al., “A Scandinavian Adaptation of the Multi‐Clinic Smell and Taste Questionnaire: Evaluation of Questions About Olfaction,” Acta Oto‐Laryngologica 123, no. 4 (2003): 536–542, 10.1080/00016480310001118. PubMed DOI

Olsson P., Berglind N., Bellander T., et al., “Prevalence of Self‐Reported Allergic and Non‐Allergic Rhinitis Symptoms in Stockholm: Relation to Age, Gender, Olfactory Sense and Smoking,” Acta Oto‐Laryngologica 123, no. 1 (2003): 75–80, 10.1080/00016480210000350. PubMed DOI

Frasnelli J. and Hummel T., “Olfactory Dysfunction and Daily Life,” European Archives of Oto‐Rhino‐Laryngology 262, no. 3 (2005): 231–235, 10.1007/s00405-004-0796-y. PubMed DOI

Goldberg A. N., Shea J. A., Deems D. A., et al., “A ChemoSensory Questionnaire for Patients Treated for Cancer of the Head and Neck,” Laryngoscope 115, no. 12 (2005): 2077–2086, 10.1097/01.mlg.0000181467.40764.80. PubMed DOI

Hopkins C., Gillett S., Slack R., et al., “Psychometric Validity of the 22‐Item Sinonasal Outcome Test,” Clinical Otolaryngology 34, no. 5 (2009): 447–454, 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x. PubMed DOI

Croy I., Buschhuter D., Seo H. S., et al., “Individual Significance of Olfaction: Development of a Questionnaire,” European Archives of Oto‐Rhino‐Laryngology 267, no. 1 (2010): 67–71, 10.1007/s00405-009-1047-7. PubMed DOI

Landis B. N., Frasnelli J., Croy I., et al., “Evaluating the Clinical Usefulness of Structured Questions in Parosmia Assessment,” Laryngoscope 120, no. 8 (2010): 1707–1713, 10.1002/lary.20987. PubMed DOI

Takebayashi H., Tsuzuki K., Oka H., et al., “Clinical Availability of a Self‐Administered Odor Questionnaire for Patients With Olfactory Disorders,” Auris, Nasus, Larynx 38, no. 1 (2011): 65–72, 10.1016/j.anl.2010.04.003. PubMed DOI

Wehling E., Nordin S., Espeseth T., et al., “Unawareness of Olfactory Dysfunction and Its Association With Cognitive Functioning in Middle‐Aged and Old Adults,” Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 26, no. 3 (2011): 260–269, 10.1093/arclin/acr017. PubMed DOI

Pusswald G., Auff E., and Lehrner J., “Development of a Questionnaire for the Assessment of Self‐reported Smell and Taste Disturbances in Aging and Early Neurodegenerative Diseases,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 29, no. 4 (2012): 921–929, 10.3233/JAD-2012-111760. DOI

Philpott C. M., Wolstenholme C. R., Goodenough P. C., et al., “Comparison of Subjective Perception with Objective Measurement of Olfactory Function in Patients With Olfactory Disorders,” Clinical Otolaryngology 33, no. 5 (2008): 442–447, 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01896.x. DOI

Mackay‐Sim A. and Doty R. L, “Olfaction in Neurodegenerative Disease,” in Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation, 2nd ed., ed. R. L. Doty (2003), 455–472.

Ottaviano G., Cantone E., D'Errico A., Salvalaggio A., Rizzo S., Pendolino A. L., et al., “Olfactory Outcomes and Patient‐Reported Quality of Life After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Prospective Study,” Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal 99, no. 7 (2020): 494–503, 10.1177/0145561319876943. DOI

Amezaga J., Alfaro B., Rios Y., et al., “Assessing Taste and Smell Alterations in Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy According to Treatment,” Supportive Care in Cancer 26, no. 12 (2018): 4077–4086. PubMed

Mattos J. L., Edwards C., Schlosser R. J., et al., “A Brief Version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis,” International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology 9, no. 10 (2019): 1144–1150. PubMed PMC

Lee J. J., Mahadev A., Kallogjeri D., et al., “Development and Psychometric Validation of the Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating,” JAMA Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery 148 (2022): 1132–1139, 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.3299. PubMed DOI PMC

Niklassen A. S., Christensen K. B., Fjaeldstad A. W., et al., “Development and Psychometric Validation of the Taste and Smell Tool for Evaluation (TASTE) Questionnaire,” JAMA Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery 148 (2022): 1164–1172, 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.3392. PubMed DOI PMC

Naimi B. R., Hunter S. R., Boateng K., et al., “Patient Insights Into the Diagnosis of Smell and Taste Disorders in the United States,” Medrxiv (2023), 10.1101/2023.09.20.23295861. DOI

Hildebrandt M. E., Møller P. R., Fjældstad A. W., et al., “Postinfectious Conditions Challenge Disease‐Specificity of SNOT‐22,” European Archives of Oto‐Rhino‐Laryngology 281 (2024): 2395–2402, 10.1007/s00405-023-08385-z. PubMed DOI

Schäfer L., Schriever V. A., Croy I., et al., “Human Olfactory Dysfunction: Causes and Consequences,” Cell and Tissue Research 383, no. 1 (2021): 569–579, 10.1007/s00441-020-03381-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Murphy C., “Prevalence of Olfactory Impairment in Older Adults,” Jama 288, no. 18 (2002): 2307, 10.1001/jama.288.18.2307. PubMed DOI

Lundberg M., Maurer R., Tchekmedyian R., et al., “Validation of a Questionnaire Assessing Smell Loss in an International Aspirin‐Exacerbated Respiratory Disease Population,” Allergy and Asthma Proceedings 45, no. 1 (2024): 5–13, 10.2500/aap.2024.45.230079. PubMed DOI

Liu D. T., Welge‐Lüssen A., Besser G., et al., “Assessment of Odor Hedonic Perception: The Sniffin' Sticks Parosmia Test (SSParoT),” Scientific Reports 10, no. 1 (2020): 1–8, 10.1038/s41598-020-74967-0. PubMed DOI PMC

Sekine R., Menzel S., Hähner A., et al., “Assessment of Postviral Qualitative Olfactory Dysfunction Using the Short SSParoT in Patients With and Without Parosmia,” European Archives of Oto‐Rhino‐Laryngology 279, no. 1 (2022): 63–70, 10.1007/s00405-022-07574-6. PubMed DOI PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...