Multivariate analyses of Aurignacian and Gravettian personal ornaments support cultural continuity in the Early Upper Palaeolithic
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, historické články
PubMed
40465694
PubMed Central
PMC12136358
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0323148
PII: PONE-D-24-47785
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- archeologie * MeSH
- dějiny starověku MeSH
- kultura * MeSH
- kulturní evoluce * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- multivariační analýza MeSH
- Check Tag
- dějiny starověku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- historické články MeSH
Traditionally, lithic artefacts have served as the principal proxy for the definition of archaeological cultures in the Upper Paleolithic. However, the culture-historical framework in use, constructed unsystematically and shaped by regional research traditions, features a number of widely acknowledged drawbacks. Here we use personal ornaments to explore the nature of Early Upper Paleolithic cultural entities and establish to what extent they represent distinct or evolving cultural adaptations. We present an analysis of an updated georeferenced dataset composed of personal ornaments coming from two key successive Upper Paleolithic technocomplexes, the Aurignacian (42-34,000 years ago) and the Gravettian (34-24,000 years ago). Using a range of multivariate statistics, we demonstrate that, at both European and regional scales, people belonging to these technocomplexes wore similar personal ornaments, though fully-shaped personal ornaments appear more different between technocomplexes. We additionally show that the variability of the Aurignacian ornaments suggests more fragmented cultural clusters compared to the Gravettian, implying more extensive symbolic networks in the latter. Despite a long-standing consensus based on other archaeological proxies, which emphasises the dissimilarity between these cultural entities, our results demonstrate the complex nature of Upper Paleolithic cultures which are characterised by discontinuities in economic and technical systems and continuity in the culturalisation of the body.
BonesLab Dipartimento di Beni Culturali Università di Bologna Ravenna Italy
Moravian Museum Brno Czech Republic
SFF Centre for Early Sapiens Behaviour University of Bergen Bergen Norway
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Roberts BW, Vander Linden M. Investigating archaeological cultures: material culture, variability, and transmission. New York: Springer; 2011. Available from: https://books.google.fr/books?id=P-L4RNGQc7gC
Reynolds N, Riede F. House of cards: cultural taxonomy and the study of the European Upper Palaeolithic. Antiquity. 2019;93(371):1350–8. doi: 10.15184/aqy.2019.49 DOI
Feinman GM, Neitzel JE. Excising culture history from contemporary archaeology. J Anthropol Archaeol. 2020;60:101230. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2020.101230 DOI
Shennan SJ. Genes, memes and human history. Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. London, UK: Thames and Hudson; 2002.
Tylor EB. Primitive culture: researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art and custom. J. Murray; 1871.
Lowie RH. Primitive society. New York: Boni and Liveright; 1920.
Bidney D. Culture: a critical review of concepts and definitions. 1954.
White LA. The concept of culture. American Anthropol. 1959;61(2):227–51. doi: 10.1525/aa.1959.61.2.02a00040 DOI
O’Brien MJ, Lyman RL. Evolutionary archeology: Current status and future prospects. Evolution Anthropol. 2002;11(1):26–36. doi: 10.1002/evan.10007 DOI
Riede F. Steps towards operationalizing an evolutionary archaeological definition of culture. In: Roberts B, Vander Linden M, editors. Investigating archaeological cultures: material culture, variability, and transmission. New York, US: Spinger Verlag; 2011. p. 245–70.
Kossinna G. Die Herkunft der Germanen. Zur Methode der Siedlungsarchäologie. 1911;2. Available from: https://acikders.ankara.edu.tr/pluginfile.php/22117/mod_resource/content/1/Kossinna1911_optimised.pdf
d’Errico F, Rigaud S. La faute des civilisations. Odile Jacob. In: Pirenne-Delforge V, Quintana-Murci L, editors. Civilisations: questionner l’identité et la diversité. Odile Jacob. Brochée; 2021. p. 133–61.
Veit U. Toward a Historical Sociology of German Archaeology. In: Lozny LR, editor. Comparative Archaeologies. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2011. p. 53–77. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4419-8225-4_3 DOI
Childe VG. The Danube in prehistory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1929.
Childe VG. Prehistoric migrations in Europe. Netherlands: Anthropolical Publications; 1950. Available from: https://books.google.fr/books?id=0cvnAAAAMAAJ
Phillips P, Willey GR. Method and theory in American archeology: An operational basis for culture‐historical integration. American Anthropologist. 1953;55(5):615–33. doi: 10.1525/aa.1953.55.5.02a00030 DOI
Tostevin GB. Seeing lithics: A middle-range theory for testing for cultural transmission in the Pleistocene. Oakville (CT): Oxbow Books; 2013.
Mesoudi A, Whiten A. The multiple roles of cultural transmission experiments in understanding human cultural evolution. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2008;363(1509):3489–501. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0129 PubMed DOI PMC
Smolla M, Akçay E. Cultural selection shapes network structure. Sci Adv. 2019;5(8):eaaw0609. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw0609 PubMed DOI PMC
Collard M, Shennan SJ, Tehrani JJ. Branching, blending, and the evolution of cultural similarities and differences among human populations. Evolution Human Behav. 2006;27(3):169–84. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.003 DOI
Banks WE. Assessing relationships between human adaptative responses and ecology via eco-cultural niche modeling. Habilitation à diriger des recherches en Sciences et environnement, spécialité: Préhistoire, Université de Bordeaux. 2013.
Banks WE, d’Errico F, Zilhão J. Human-climate interaction during the Early Upper Paleolithic: testing the hypothesis of an adaptive shift between the Proto-Aurignacian and the Early Aurignacian. J Hum Evol. 2013;64(1):39–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.10.001 PubMed DOI
d’Errico F, Banks W. Identifying mechanisms behind Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age cultural trajectories. Curr Anthropol. 2013;S000.
Mattson HV. Ornaments as socially valuable objects: Jewelry and identity in the Chaco and post-Chaco worlds. J Anthropol Archaeol. 2016;42:122–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2016.04.001 DOI
Daly C. Beads and bead makers: Gender, material culture and meaning. 1999.
Dubin LS. North American Indian jewelry and adornment. From prehistory to the present. New York: Harry N. Abrams Inc.; 1999.
Munisi NC, Biginagwa TJ, Pollard E, Ichumbaki EB. Archaeological and ethnographic perspectives on the meaning and consumption of glass beads in ancient Kilwa Kisiwani, southern Tanzania. Azania Archaeol Res Africa. 2024;59(4):553–81. doi: 10.1080/0067270x.2024.2419781 DOI
Sanders JM. Ethnic boundaries and identity in plural societies. Annu Rev Sociol. 2002;28(1):327–57. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140741 DOI
Rogers DS, Ehrlich PR. Natural selection and cultural rates of change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(9):3416–20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711802105 PubMed DOI PMC
Newell RR. An inquiry into the ethnic resolution of Mesolithic Regional Groups: The study of their decorative ornaments in time and space: by RR Newell…[et Al]. Brill; 1990.
Beck CH. Classification and nomenclature of beads and pendants. Society of Antiquaries of London; 1926.
White R. Ivory personnal ornaments of Aurignacian Age: technological, social and symbolic perspectives. In: Hahn J, Taborin Y, Walter Ph, Widemann F, editors. Le travail et l’usage de l’ivoire au Paléolithique supérieur. Ravello; 1995.
Taborin. La parure en coquillage au Paléolithique. Gallia Préhistoire; 1993;29.
d’Errico F, van Niekerk KL, Geis L, Henshilwood CS. New Blombos Cave evidence supports a multistep evolutionary scenario for the culturalization of the human body. J Hum Evol. 2023;184:103438. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2023.103438 PubMed DOI
Rigaud S. La parure: traceur de la géographie culturelle et des dynamiques de peuplement au passage Mésolithique-Néolithique en Europe. Scienses et environnements - Université de Bordeaux. 2011.
Rigaud S, Rybin EP, Khatsenovich AM, Queffelec A, Paine CH, Gunchinsuren B, et al.. Symbolic innovation at the onset of the Upper Paleolithic in Eurasia shown by the personal ornaments from Tolbor-21 (Mongolia). Scientific Reports. 2023;13:9545. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36140-1 PubMed DOI PMC
Sehasseh EM, Fernandez P, Kuhn S, Stiner M, Mentzer S, Colarossi D, et al.. Early Middle Stone Age personal ornaments from Bizmoune Cave, Essaouira, Morocco. Sci Adv. 2021;7(39):eabi8620. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi8620 PubMed DOI PMC
d’Errico F, Henshilwood C, Vanhaeren M, van Niekerk K. Nassarius kraussianus shell beads from Blombos Cave: evidence for symbolic behaviour in the Middle Stone Age. J Hum Evol. 2005;48(1):3–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.09.002 PubMed DOI
Vanhaereny M, d’Errico F, Stringer C, James SL, Todd JA, Mienis HK. Middle Paleolithic shell beads in Israel and Algeria. Science. 2006;312(5781):1785–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1128139 PubMed DOI
Hublin J-J, Sirakov N, Aldeias V, Bailey S, Bard E, Delvigne V, et al.. Initial Upper Palaeolithic Homo sapiens from Bacho Kiro Cave, Bulgaria. Nature. 2020;581(7808):299–302. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2259-z PubMed DOI
Vanhaeren M, d’Errico F, Julien M, Mourer-Chauviré C, Lozouet P. Les objets de parure. Le Châtelperronien de la grotte du Renne (Arcy-sur-Cure, Yonne, France). 2019. Available from: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02412704
Vanhaeren M, d’Errico F. Aurignacian ethno-linguistic geography of Europe revealed by personal ornaments. J Archaeol Sci. 2006;33(8):1105–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2005.11.017 DOI
Baker J, Rigaud S, Pereira D, Courtenay LA, d’Errico F. Evidence from personal ornaments suggest nine distinct cultural groups between 34,000 and 24,000 years ago in Europe. Nat Hum Behav. 2024;8(3):431–44. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01803-6 PubMed DOI
Pereira D, Manen C, Rigaud S. The shaping of social and symbolic capital during the transition to farming in the Western Mediterranean: Archaeological network analyses of pottery decorations and personal ornaments. PLoS One. 2023;18(11):e0294111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294111 PubMed DOI PMC
Rigaud S, Manen C, García-Martínez de Lagrán I. Symbols in motion: Flexible cultural boundaries and the fast spread of the Neolithic in the western Mediterranean. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0196488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196488 PubMed DOI PMC
Rigaud S, d’Errico F, Vanhaeren M. Ornaments reveal resistance of North European cultures to the spread of farming. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0121166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121166 PubMed DOI PMC
d’Errico F, Vanhaeren M. Upper palaeolithic mortuary practices: reflection of ethnic affiliation, social complexity, and cultural turnover. In: Death rituals, social order and the archaeology of immortality in the ancient world: death shall have no dominion. 2015. p. 45–62.
Kovacevic M, Shennan S, Vanhaeren M, d’Errico F, Thomas MG. Simulating geographical variation in material culture: were early modern humans in Europe ethnically structured? In: Mesoudi A, Aoki K, editors. Learning Strategies and Cultural Evolution during the Palaeolithic. Tokyo: Springer Japan; 2015. p. 103–120. doi: 10.1007/978-4-431-55363-2_8 DOI
Hardy OJ, Vekemans X. Isolation by distance in a continuous population: reconciliation between spatial autocorrelation analysis and population genetics models. Heredity (Edinb). 1999;83(Pt 2):145–54. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00558.x PubMed DOI
Rohlf FJ, Schnell GD. An investigation of the isolation-by-distance model. American Natural. 1971;105(944):295–324. doi: 10.1086/282727 DOI
d’Errico F, Vanhaeren M. Upper Palaeolithic mortuary practices: reflection of ethnic affiliation, social complexity, and cultural turnover. In: Renfrew C, Boyd M, Morley I, editors. Rituals, social order and the archaeology of immortality in the ancient world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. p. 45–62.
Posth C, Yu H, Ghalichi A, Rougier H, Crevecoeur I, Huang Y, et al.. Palaeogenomics of Upper Palaeolithic to Neolithic European hunter-gatherers. Nature. 2023;615(7950):117–26. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05726-0 PubMed DOI PMC
Banks WE, d’Errico F, Zilhão J. Revisiting the chronology of the Proto-Aurignacian and the Early Aurignacian in Europe: a reply to Higham et al.’s comments on Banks et al. (2013). J Hum Evol. 2013;65(6):810–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.08.004 PubMed DOI
Doyon L. The Aurignacian socio-symbolic landscape: cross-referencing ornaments, symbols and osseous projectile points morphology. Bull Mus Anthropol Préhist Monaco. 2022.
Higham T, Jacobi R, Basell L, Ramsey CB, Chiotti L, Nespoulet R. Precision dating of the Palaeolithic: a new radiocarbon chronology for the Abri Pataud (France), a key Aurignacian sequence. J Hum Evol. 2011;61(5):549–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.06.005 PubMed DOI
Kozłowski JK. The origin of the Gravettian. Quaternary Int. 2015;359–360:3–18. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.03.025 DOI
Taller A, Conard NJ. Were the technological innovations of the Gravettian triggered by climatic change? Insights from the Lithic assemblages from Hohle Fels, SW Germany: Special issue: The impact of Upper Pleistocene climatic and environmental change on Hominin occupations and landscape use, Part 1. PaleoAnthropology. 2022; 82–108.
Wilczyński J, Goslar T, Wojtal P, Oliva M, Göhlich UB, Antl-Weiser W, et al.. New radiocarbon dates for the Late Gravettian in Eastern Central Europe. Radiocarbon. 2019;62(1):243–59. doi: 10.1017/rdc.2019.111 DOI
Banks WE, Bertran P, Ducasse S, Klaric L, Lanos P, Renard C, et al.. An application of hierarchical Bayesian modeling to better constrain the chronologies of Upper Paleolithic archaeological cultures in France between ca. 32,000–21,000 calibrated years before present. Quaternary Sci Rev. 2019;220:188–214. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.07.025 DOI
Beresford-Jones D, Taylor S, Paine C, Pryor A, Svoboda J, Jones M. Rapid climate change in the Upper Palaeolithic: the record of charcoal conifer rings from the Gravettian site of Dolní Vĕstonice, Czech Republic. Quaternary Sci Rev. 2011;30(15–16):1948–64. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2011.04.021 DOI
Bradtmöller M, Pastoors A, Weninger B, Weniger G-C. The repeated replacement model – Rapid climate change and population dynamics in Late Pleistocene Europe. Quaternary Int. 2012;247:38–49. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.10.015 DOI
Lisá L, Škrdla P, Havlín Nováková D, Bajer A, Čejchan P, Nývltová Fišáková M, et al.. The role of abiotic factors in ecological strategies of Gravettian hunter–gatherers within Moravia, Czech Republic. Quaternary Int. 2013;294:71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.08.2107 DOI
Shao Y, Limberg H, Klein K, Wegener C, Schmidt I, Weniger G-C, et al.. Human-existence probability of the Aurignacian techno-complex under extreme climate conditions. Quaternary Sci Rev. 2021;263:106995. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106995 DOI
Wygal BT, Heidenreich SM. Deglaciation and human colonization of Northern Europe. J World Prehist. 2014;27(2):111–44. doi: 10.1007/s10963-014-9075-z DOI
Doyon L. On the shape of things: a geometric morphometrics approach to investigate Aurignacian group membership. J Archaeol Sci. 2019;101:99–114.
Tejero J-M, Arrizabalaga Á, Villaluenga A. The Proto-Aurignacian and Early Aurignacian retouchers of Labeko Koba (Basque Country, Spain). A techno-economic and chrono-cultural interpretation using lithic and faunal data. Comptes Rendus Palevol. 2016;15(8):994–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.crpv.2016.05.003 DOI
Belfer-Cohen A, Bar-Yosef O. The Aurignacian at Hayonim Cave. Paleorient. 1981;7(2):19–42. doi: 10.3406/paleo.1981.4296 DOI
Goring-Morris A, Belfer-Cohen A. A hard look at the “Levantine Aurignacian”: how real is the taxon. Towards a Definition of the Aurignacian. 2006;45:294–313.
Tejero J-M, Rabinovich R, Yeshurun R, Abulafia T, Bar-Yosef O, Barzilai O, et al.. Personal ornaments from Hayonim and Manot caves (Israel) hint at symbolic ties between the Levantine and the European Aurignacian. J Hum Evol. 2021;160:102870. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102870 PubMed DOI
Bosselin B, Djindjian F. Périgordien et Gravettien: L’épilogue d’une contradiction? Préhistoire européenne. 1994;6:117–31.
Hoffecker JF. The Eastern Gravettian “Kostenki culture” as an arctic adaptation. Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska (NS). 2002;2:115–36.
Klaric L. Regional groups in the European middle Gravettian: a reconsideration of the Rayssian technology. Antiquity. 2007;81:176–90.
Noiret P, Otte M. De quoi Gravettien est-il le nom. Les Gravettiens. 2013;29–64.
Svoboda J, Novák M, Sázelová S, Demek J. Pavlov I: A large Gravettian site in space and time. Quaternary Int. 2016;406:95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.09.015 DOI
Tomaskova S. Boundaries and differences: Palaeolithic central Europe under a microscope. 1996.
Vignoles A, Banks WE, Klaric L, Kageyama M, Cobos ME, Romero-Alvarez D. Investigating relationships between technological variability and ecology in the Middle Gravettian (ca. 32–28 ky cal. BP) in France. Quaternary Sci Rev. 2021;253:106766. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106766 DOI
Calvo A, Arrizabalaga A. Piecing together a new mosaic: Gravettian lithic resources and economic territories in the western Pyrenees. Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2020;12:1–22.
Conard NJ, Moreau L. Current research on the Gravettian of the Swabian Jura. Mitteilungen der Ges fur Urgeschichte. 2004;13:29–57.
Marreiros J, Bicho N. Lithic technology variability and human ecodynamics during the Early Gravettian of Southern Iberian Peninsula. Quaternary Int. 2013;318:90–101. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.05.008 DOI
Moreau L. Geißenklösterle. The Swabian Gravettian in its European context: Geißenklösterle. Das schwäbische Gravettien im europäischen Kontext. Quartär. 2010;57:79–93.
Polanská M, Hromadová B, Sázelová S. The upper and final Gravettian in Western Slovakia and Moravia. different approaches, new questions. Quaternary Int. 2021.
Tartar É. Origin and development of aurignacian osseous technology in western europe: a review of current knowledge. Palethnol Archéol Sci Hum. 2015.
Tejero J-M, Grimaldi S. Assessing bone and antler exploitation at Riparo Mochi (Balzi Rossi, Italy): implications for the characterization of the Aurignacian in South-western Europe. J Archaeol Sci. 2015;61:59–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2015.05.003 DOI
Bolus M. The Cultural context of the Aurignacian of the Swabian Jura. Instituto Português de Arqueologia. The Chronology of the Aurignacian and of the Transitional Technocomplexes Dating, Stratigraphies, Cultural Implications. Instituto Português de Arqueologia. Lisboa: Zilhao J. and d’Errico F.; 2003. p. 153–63.
Conard NJ. A female figurine from the basal Aurignacian of Hohle Fels Cave in southwestern Germany. Nature. 2009;459(7244):248–52. doi: 10.1038/nature07995 PubMed DOI
Delporte H. L’image de la femme dans l’art préhistorique. 1979.
Dixson AF, Dixson BJ. Venus figurines of the European Paleolithic: Symbols of fertility or attractiveness? J Anthropol. 2011;2011:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2011/569120 DOI
Etxepare R, Irurtzun A. Gravettian hand stencils as sign language formatives. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021;376(1824):20200205. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0205 PubMed DOI PMC
Garate D, Rivero O, Rios-Garaizar J, Arriolabengoa M, Intxaurbe I, Salazar S. Redefining shared symbolic networks during the Gravettian in Western Europe: New data from the rock art findings in Aitzbitarte caves (Northern Spain). PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240481 PubMed DOI PMC
García-Diez M, Garrido D, Hoffmann D, Pettitt P, Pike A, Zilhão J. The chronology of hand stencils in European Palaeolithic rock art: implications of new U-series results from El Castillo Cave (Cantabria, Spain). J Anthropol Sci. 2015;93:135–52. doi: 10.4436/JASS.93004 PubMed DOI
García-Diez M, Hoffmann DL, Zilhão J, de las Heras C, Lasheras JA, Montes R, et al.. Uranium series dating reveals a long sequence of rock art at Altamira Cave (Santillana del Mar, Cantabria). J Archaeol Sci. 2013;40(11):4098–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.05.011 DOI
Johnson RJ, Lanaspa MA, Fox JW. Upper Paleolithic figurines showing women with obesity may represent survival symbols of climatic change. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021;29(1):11–5. doi: 10.1002/oby.23028 PubMed DOI PMC
Pettitt P, Arias P, García-Diez M, Hoffmann D, Castillejo AM, Ontañon-Peredo R, et al.. Are hand stencils in European cave art older than we think? An evaluation of the existing data and their potential implications. In: Prehistoric art as prehistoric culture: Studies in honour of Professor Rodrigo de Balbín-Behrmann. 2015. p. 31–43.
Simonet A. Gravettians at Brassempouy (Landes, France), 30,000 BP: a semi-sedentary territorial organization? World Archaeol. 2017;49:648–65.
Trinkaus E. The adiposity paradox in the Middle Danubian Gravettian. Anthropol. 2005;43:263–72.
Weber GW, Lukeneder A, Harzhauser M, Mitteroecker P, Wurm L, Hollaus L-M, et al.. The microstructure and the origin of the Venus from Willendorf. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):2926. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06799-z PubMed DOI PMC
White R. The women of Brassempouy: A century of research and interpretation. J Archaeol Method Theory. 2006;13(4):250–303. doi: 10.1007/s10816-006-9023-z DOI
French JC, Nowell A. Growing up Gravettian: Bioarchaeological perspectives on adolescence in the European Mid-Upper Paleolithic. J Anthropol Archaeol. 2022;67:101430. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2022.101430 DOI
Henry-Gambier D. Comportement des populations d’Europe au Gravettien: pratiques funéraires et interprétations. Rev archéol préhist. 2008;20:399–438.
Henry-Gambier D, Nespoulet R, Chiotti L. Attribution culturelle au Gravettien ancien des fossiles humains de l’abri Cro-Magnon (Les Eyzies-de-Tayac, Dordogne, France). PALEO. 2013;24:121–38.
Zilhão J, Trinkaus E. Portrait of the artist as a child. The Gravettian human skeleton from the Abrigo do Lagar Velho and its archaeological context. Trab Arqueol. 2002;22:609.
Coste P. La parure dans les sépultures d’époque gravettienne: un indice pour la reconstitution du vêtement paléolithique. Mémoire de Master 2, Paris 1 La Sorbonne; 2016.
Taborin Y. La parure en coquillage au Paléolithique. Paris: CNRS Éditions; 1993.
Belfer-Cohen A, Bar-Yosef O. The levantine Aurignacian: 60 years of research. In: Dorothy Garrod and the progress of the Palaeolithic. 1999. p. 118–34.
Dubin LS. The history of beads. From 30,000 B.C. to the present. London: Thames and Hudson; 1987.
Erikson JM. The universal bead. New York: W.W. Norton; 1969.
Whallon R, Brown J. Essays on archaeological typology. Evanston: Center for American Archaeology Press; 1982.
Adams W, Adams E. Archaeological typology and practical reality: a dialectical approach to artefact classification and sorting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
Whittaker JC, Caulkins D, Kamp KA. Evaluating consistency in typology and classification. J Archaeol Method Theory. 1998;5(2):129–64. doi: 10.1007/bf02427967 DOI
Lartet E, Christy H. Cavernes du Périgord: objets gravés et sculptés des temps pré-historiques dans l’Europe occidentale. Rev archéol. 1864.
Riviere É. Note sur l’homme fossile des cavernes de Baoussé-Roussé (Italie), dites grottes de Menton. In: Congrès International d’Anthropologie et d’Archéologie Préhistoriques, 6ème session, Bruxelles. 1872. p. 164–75.
WoRMS Editorial Board. World Register of Marine Species. 2023. [cited 2023-12-04]. Available from https://www.marinespecies.org at VLIZ; 10.14284/170 DOI
D’Errico F, Villa P. Holes and grooves: the contribution of microscopy and taphonomy to the problem of art origins. J Hum Evol. 1997;33(1):1–31. doi: 10.1006/jhev.1997.0141 PubMed DOI
Jaccard P. Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura. Bull Soc Vaudoise Sci Nat. 1901;37:547–79.
Shennan SJ, Bentley RA. Style, interaction, and demography among the earliest farmers of central Europe. In: Cultural transmission and archaeology: issues and case studies. 2008. p. 164–77.
Ricotta C, Podani J, Pavoine S. A family of functional dissimilarity measures for presence and absence data. Ecol Evol. 2016;6(15):5383–9. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2214 PubMed DOI PMC
Shennan SJ, Crema ER, Kerig T. Isolation-by-distance, homophily, and “core” vs. “package” cultural evolution models in Neolithic Europe. Evol Human Behav. 2015;36(2):103–9. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.09.006 DOI
Bathke AC, Friedrich S, Pauly M, Konietschke F, Staffen W, Strobl N, et al.. Testing mean differences among groups: multivariate and repeated measures analysis with minimal assumptions. Multivariate Behav Res. 2018;53(3):348–59. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1446320 PubMed DOI PMC
Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 1967;27(2):209–20. PubMed
Borcard D, Legendre P. Is the Mantel correlogram powerful enough to be useful in ecological analysis? A simulation study. Ecology. 2012;93(6):1473–81. doi: 10.1890/11-1737.1 PubMed DOI
Hammer Ø. Spectral analysis of a Plio-Pleistocene multispecies time series using the Mantel periodogram. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology. 2007;243(3–4):373–7. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.08.009 DOI
Gallardo-Cruz J, Meave J, Pérez-García E, Hernández-Stefanoni J. Spatial structure of plant communities in a complex tropical landscape: implications for β-diversity. Community Ecol. 2010;11(2):202–10. doi: 10.1556/comec.11.2010.2.8 DOI
Gower JC. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika. 1966;53(3/4):325. doi: 10.2307/2333639 DOI
Anderson M. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance, vol. 26. Auckland: Department of Statistics, University of Auckland; 2005. p. 32–46.
McArdle BH, Anderson MJ. Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology. 2001;82(1):290–7. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0290:fmmtcd]2.0.co;2 DOI
Rousseeuw PJ. Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J Computation Appl Math. 1987;20:53–65. doi: 10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 DOI
Saputra DM, Saputra D, Oswari LD. Effect of distance metrics in determining k-value in k-means clustering using elbow and silhouette method. Sriwijaya International Conference on Information Technology and Its Applications (SICONIAN 2019). Atlantis Press; 2020. p. 341–6.
Yuan C, Yang H. Research on K-value selection method of K-means clustering algorithm. J. 2019;2:226–35.
Kassambara A, Mundt F. Package ‘factoextra.’ Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. 2017;76. Available from: https://piyanit.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/factoextra.pdf
Hartigan JA, Wong MA. Algorithm AS 136: A K-means clustering algorithm. Appl Statist. 1979;28(1):100. doi: 10.2307/2346830 DOI
MacQueen J. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. Oakland, CA, USA; 1967. p. 281–97. Available from: https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=IC4Ku_7dBFUC&oi=fnd&pg=PA281&dq=Some+Methods+for+Classification+and+Analysis+of+Multivariate+Observations.&ots=nP-kGYHanP&sig=lJ22B1l7T4gt4t6Lh_KqwHEmH6M
Kolmogorov A. Sulla determinazione empirica di una legge didistribuzione. Giorn dell’Inst Ital Degli Att. 1933;4:89–91.
Smirnov N. Table for estimating the goodness of fit of empirical distributions. Ann Math Statist. 1948;19(2):279–81. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177730256 DOI
Wickham H, Wickham MH. Package tidyverse. Easily install and load the ‘Tidyverse’. 2017. [cited 19 Jul 2024]. Available from: http://gwmodel.whu.edu.cn/mirrors/CRAN/web/packages/tidyverse/tidyverse.pdf
Brower JC, Kile KM. Seriation of an original data matrix as applied to paleoecology. Lethaia. 1988;21(1):79–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1502-3931.1988.tb01756.x DOI
Mills BJ. Social network analysis in archaeology. Annu Rev Anthropol. 2017;46(1):379–97. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041423 DOI
Prignano L, Morer I, Diaz-Guilera A. Wiring the past: a network science perspective on the challenge of archeological similarity networks. Front Digit Humanit. 2017;4:13. doi: 10.3389/fdigh.2017.00013 DOI
Hansen DL, Shneiderman B, Smith MA, Himelboim I. Social network analysis: measuring, mapping, and modeling collections of connections. In: Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL. 2020. p. 31–51.
Brughmans T, Peeples MA. Network science in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 2023.
Perlès C, Vanhaeren M. BlackCyclope neritea marine shell ornaments in the Upper Palaeolithic and Mesolithic of Franchthi Cave, Greece: Arguments for Intentional Heat Treatment. J Field Archaeol. 2010;35(3):298–309. doi: 10.1179/009346910x12707321358874 DOI
Perlès C. Ornaments and other ambiguous artifacts from Franchthi. Volume 1, the Palaeolithic and the Mesolithic. Excavations at Franchthi Cave, Greece. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2018.
Arif J. The burial practices of the Gravettian and the Epi-Gravettian periods in Italy, Czech Republic, and Russia.
Svoboda JA. The burials: ritual and taphonomy. In: Trinkaus E, Svoboda JA, editors. Early Modern Human Evolution in Central Europe The People of Dolní Věstonice and Pavlov. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 15–26.
Pettitt. The Palaeolithic origins of human burial. Routledge; 2013.
Martini F, Giacobini G. Aesthetics of death in the Paleolithic and Mesolithic of Italy. The evolution of grave goods. L’Anthropologie. 2024;128(3):103279. doi: 10.1016/j.anthro.2024.103279 DOI
Lázničková-Galetová M. Gravettian ivory ornaments in Central Europe, Moravia (Czech Republic). L’Anthropologie. 2021;125(2):102870. doi: 10.1016/j.anthro.2021.102870 DOI
Derex M, Perreault C, Boyd R. Divide and conquer: intermediate levels of population fragmentation maximize cultural accumulation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018;373(1743):20170062. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0062 PubMed DOI PMC
Derex M, Beugin M-P, Godelle B, Raymond M. Experimental evidence for the influence of group size on cultural complexity. Nature. 2013;503(7476):389–91. doi: 10.1038/nature12774 PubMed DOI
Derex M, Boyd R. Partial connectivity increases cultural accumulation within groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(11):2982–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518798113 PubMed DOI PMC
Schmidt I, Zimmermann A. Population dynamics and socio-spatial organization of the Aurignacian: Scalable quantitative demographic data for western and central Europe. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0211562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211562 PubMed DOI PMC
Taller A, Conard NJ. Transition or replacement? Radiocarbon dates from Hohle Fels cave (Alb-Donau-Kreis/D) and the passage from Aurignacian to Gravettian. Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt. 2019;49:165–81.
Almeida F. Looking for names and missing the point. The case of the Portuguese “Aurignacian V” in the framework of definitions of the Aurignacian. Towards a definition of the Aurignacian Lisbon. Trabalhos de Arqueologia. 2006;45:71–92.
Borgia V, Ranaldo F, Ronchitelli A, Wierer U. What differences in production and use of Aurignacian and Early Gravettian Lithic Assemblages. The case of Grotta Paglicci (Rignano Garganico, Foggia, Southern Italy). Mémoire LIII de la Société Préhistorique Française. 2011. p. 161–74.
Wierer U. Variability and standardization: The early Gravettian lithic complex of Grotta Paglicci, Southern Italy. Quaternary Int. 2013;288:215–38. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.04.043 DOI
Goutas N, Tejero J-M. Osseous technology as a reflection of chronological, economic and sociological aspects of Palaeolithic hunter-gatherers: Examples from key Aurignacian and Gravettian sites in South-West Europe. Quaternary Int. 2016;403:79–89. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.11.143 DOI
Tejero J-M, Christensen M, Bodu P. Red deer antler technology and early modern humans in Southeast Europe: an experimental study. J Archaeol Sci. 2012;39(2):332–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.09.018 DOI
Hahn J. Aurignacian and gravettian settlement patterns in central Europe. In: The pleistocene old world. Springer; 1987. p. 251–61.