Content validation of the Global Adolescent and Child Physical Activity Questionnaire (GAC-PAQ) in low-, middle-, and high-income countries across 6 continents
Status Publisher Jazyk angličtina Země Čína Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
40623649
PubMed Central
PMC12828600
DOI
10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101074
PII: S2095-2546(25)00053-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Content validity, Cultural adaptation, Global health, Measurement, Surveillance,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Investigators from low-, middle-, and high-income countries representing 6 continents contributed to the development of the Global Adolescent and Child Physical Activity Questionnaire (GAC-PAQ). The GAC-PAQ is designed to assess physical activity (PA) across all key domains (i.e., school, chores, work/volunteering, transport, free time, outdoor time). It aimed to address multiple gaps in global PA surveillance (e.g., omission of important PA domains, insufficient cultural adaptation, underrepresentation of rural areas in questionnaire validation studies).The purpose of this study was to assess the content validity of the GAC-PAQ among PA experts, 8- to 17-year-olds, and one of their parents/guardians, and to discuss changes made to the questionnaire based on participants' feedback. METHODS: Sixty-two experts in PA measurement and/or surveillance from 24 countries completed an online survey that included both closed- and open-ended questions about the content validity of the GAC-PAQ. The proportion of experts who agreed or strongly agreed with the items was calculated. Child-parent/guardian dyads from 15 countries (n = 250; 10-40 per country) participated in a structured cognitive interview to assess the clarity of the questions and response options, and they were encouraged to provide suggestions to improve clarity and facilitate completion of the questionnaire. Participating countries are: Aotearoa New Zealand, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, India, Malawi, Mexico, Nepal, Nigeria, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, and the United Arab Emirates. Interviews were conducted in 13 different languages and structured by PA domain. Generic images were included to help participants in answering questions about PA intensity. RESULTS: Expert agreement with the items for each domain exceeded 75%, and their qualitative feedback was used to revise the questionnaire before cognitive interviews. In general, participants found the questionnaire to be comprehensive. Adolescents (12-17 years) found it easier than children (8-11 years) to answer the questions. Several children struggled to answer questions about the duration and intensity of activities and/or concepts related to travel modes, active trips, and organized activities. Many parents/guardians were unsure about the frequency, duration, and intensity of their children's or adolescents' PA at school and/or recommended using more culturally relevant and appropriate images. Some participants misunderstood the concept of activities that "make you stronger" (intended to assess resistance activities) and/or struggled to differentiate between work, volunteering, and chores. CONCLUSION: Participants' feedback was used to develop a revised, simplified, and culturally adapted GAC-PAQ, which will be pilot-tested in all 15 countries in an App that will include country-specific images and narration in local languages. Further research is needed to assess the reliability and validity of the revised GAC-PAQ.
Active Healthy Kids Global Alliance Ottawa ON K1H 8L1 Canada
Centre for Social Research University of Malawi Zomba 305200 Malawi
Department of Medicine Karolinska Institutet NEO Group MLÖ Huddinge 141 83 Sweden
Department of Physical Education Federal University of Santa Catarina Florianópolis 88040 900 Brazil
Department of Physiotherapy Redeemer's University Akoda 232101 Nigeria
Department of Psychological Sciences and Health University of Strathclyde Glasgow G1 1QE UK
Department of Sports and Computer Science Universidad Pablo de Olavide Sevilla 41013 Spain
Division of Medical Sciences University of Northern British Columbia Prince George BC V2N 4Z9 Canada
Faculty of Health Sciences University of Lethbridge Lethbridge AB T1K 3M4 Canada
Faculty of Kinesiology Sport and Recreation University of Alberta Edmonton AB T6G 2H9 Canada
Faculty of Physical Culture Palacký University Olomouc Olomouc 779 00 Czech Republic
Health Analysis Division Statistics Canada Ottawa ON K1A 0T6 Canada
Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group CHEO Research Institute Ottawa ON K1H 8L1 Canada
Hirabai Cowasji Jehangir Medical Research Institute Jehangir Hospital Pune 411001 India
Institute for Population and Social Research Mahidol University Nakhon Pathom 73170 Thailand
School of Medicine Universidad de los Andes Bogotá 111711 Colombia
School of Occupational and Public Health Toronto Metropolitan University Toronto ON M5B 2K3 Canada
School of Physical Education Shanghai University of Sport Shanghai 200438 China
School of Sport Exercise and Health Sciences Loughborough University Loughborough LE11 3TU UK
Te Hau Kori Faculty of Health Victoria University of Wellington Wellington 6140 Aotearoa New Zealand
Waipapa Taumata Rau University of Auckland Auckland 1142 New Zealand
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Bull F.C., Al-Ansari S.S., Biddle S., et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54:1451–1462. PubMed PMC
Aubert S., Barnes J.D., Demchenko I., et al. Global Matrix 4.0 Physical Activity Report Card grades for children and adolescents: Results and analyses from 57 countries. J Phys Act Health. 2022;19:700–728. PubMed
Guthold R., Stevens G.A., Riley L.M., Bull FC. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: A pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1.6 million participants. Lancet Child Adoles Health. 2020;4:23–35. PubMed PMC
van Sluijs E.M., Ekelund U., Crochemore-Silva I., et al. Physical activity behaviours in adolescence: Current evidence and opportunities for intervention. The Lancet. 2021;398:429–442. PubMed PMC
Lee I.M., Shiroma E.J., Lobelo F., et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: An analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380:219–229. PubMed PMC
Costa Santos A., Willumsen J., Meheus F., Ilbawi A., Bull F.C. The cost of inaction on physical inactivity to public health-care systems: A population-attributable fraction analysis. Lancet Global Health. 2023;11:e32–e39. PubMed PMC
Bland V.L., Heatherington-Rauth M., Howe C., et al. Association of objectively measured physical activity and bone health in children and adolescents: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Osteoporos Int. 2020;31:1865–1894. PubMed
Dale L.P., Vanderloo L., Moore S., Faulkner G. Physical activity and depression, anxiety, and self-esteem in children and youth: An umbrella systematic review. Mental Health Phys Act. 2019;16:66–79.
Lubans D.R., Morgan P.J., Cliff D.P., Barnett L.M., Okely AD. Fundamental movement skills in children and adolescents: Review of associated health benefits. Sports Med. 2010;40:1019–1035. PubMed
Skrede T., Steene-Johannessen J., Anderssen S.A., Resaland G.K., Ekelund U. The prospective association between objectively measured sedentary time, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and cardiometabolic risk factors in youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2019;20:55–74. PubMed
Trudeau F., Shephard RJ. Physical education, school physical activity, school sports and academic performance. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:10. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-10. PubMed DOI PMC
Bornstein D.B., Pate R.R., Pratt M. A review of the national physical activity plans of six countries. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6(Suppl. 2):S245–S264. PubMed
Klepac Pogrmilovic B., Ramirez Varela A., Pratt M., et al. National physical activity and sedentary behaviour policies in 76 countries: Availability, comprehensiveness, implementation, and effectiveness. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17:116. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01022-6. PubMed DOI PMC
World Health Organization Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: More active people for a healthier world. 2024. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/272722/9789241514187-eng.pdf?sequence=1 Available at. [accessed 9.11.2024]
World Health Organization Global status report on physical activity 2022. 2024. https://www.who.int/teams/health-promotion/physical-activity/global-status-report-on-physical-activity-2022 Available at. [accessed 16.10.2024]
Aubert S., Brazo-Sayavera J., González SA., et al. Global prevalence of physical activity for children and adolescents; inconsistencies, research gaps, and recommendations: A narrative review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18:81. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01155-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Reilly J., Aubert S., Brazo-Sayavera J., Liu Y., Cagas J., Tremblay M. Surveillance to improve physical activity of children and adolescents. Bull World Health Org. 2022;100:815–824. PubMed PMC
Reilly J.J., Andrew R., Abdeta C., et al. Improving national and international surveillance of movement behaviours in childhood and adolescence: An international modified Delphi Study. Sports Med. 2025;55:203–219. PubMed PMC
Sallis J.F., Pate RR. Creating the future of physical activity surveillance in the USA: Better data for better health. J Phys Act Health. 2021;18(Suppl. 1):S1–S5. PubMed
Hidding L.M., Chinapaw M.J., van Poppel M.N., Mokkink L.B., Altenburg TM. An updated systematic review of childhood physical activity questionnaires. Sports Med. 2018;48:2797–2842. PubMed PMC
Rostami Haji Abadi M, Kwaghbo N, Onyeso OK, et al. Psychometric properties of physical activity questionnaires for children and adolescents: An updated systematic review. PubMed
Larouche R., Rostami Haji Abadi M., Aubert S., et al. Development and validation of the Global Adolescent and Child Physical Activity Questionnaire (GAC-PAQ) in 14 countries: Study protocol. BMJ Open. 2024;14 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082275. PubMed DOI PMC
World Medical Association.
Terwee C.B., Prinsen C.A., Chiarotto A., et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: A Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1159–1170. PubMed PMC
Mokkink L.B., Prinsen C.A.C., Patrick D.L., et al. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs): User manual. 2024. https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-syst-review-for-PROMs-manual_version-1_feb-2018.pdf Available at. [accessed 9.11.2024]
Mokkink L.B., Terwee C.B., Patrick D.L., et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:539–549. PubMed PMC
Byrne R., Terranova C.O., Chai L.K., et al. Cognitive testing of items measuring movement behaviours in young children aged zero to five years: Development of the movement behaviour questionnaires for-baby (MBQ-B) and -child (MBQ-C) Children. 2023;10:1554. doi: 10.3390/children10091554. PubMed DOI PMC
Flodén A., Brostrom E.W., von Heideken J., et al. A qualitative study examining the validity and comprehensibility of physical activity items: Developed and tested in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2019;17:16. doi: 10.1186/s12969-019-0317-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Tucker C.A., Bevans K.B., Becker B.D., Teneralli R., Forrest CB. Development of the PROMIS pediatric physical activity item banks. Phys Ther. 2020;100:1393–1410. PubMed PMC
Thunberg S., Arnell L. Pioneering the use of technologies in qualitative research—A research review of the use of digital interviews. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2022;25:757–768.
Larouche R., Bélanger M., Brussoni M., et al. Correlates of active school transportation during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national study. J Phys Act Health. 2024;21:294–306. PubMed
Veugelers R., Gaakeer M.I., Patka P., Huijsman R. Improving design choices in Delphi Studies in medicine: The case of an exemplary physician multi-round panel study with 100% response. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20:156. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01029-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Ritchie J., Spencer L. In: Analyzing qualitative data. Bryman A., Burgess R.G., editors. Taylor & Francis; London: 1994. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research; pp. 173–194.
Ritchie J., Spencer L., O’Connor W. In: Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Ritchie J., Lewis J., editors. SAGE Publications; London: 2003. Carrying out qualitative analysis; pp. 219–262.
Swallow V., Newton J., Van Lottum C. How to manage and display qualitative data using “Framework” and Microsoft® Excel. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12:610–612. PubMed
Graham RW. Illustrating triangulation in mixed-methods nursing research. Nurse Res. 2005;12:7–18. PubMed
Hagströmer M., Bergman P., De Bourdeaudhuij I., et al. Concurrent validity of a modified version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-A) in European adolescents: The HELENA Study. Int J Obes. 2008;32(Suppl. 5):S42–S48. PubMed
Oliver M., Mavoa S., Badland H.M., et al. What constitutes a “trip”? Examining child journey attributes using GPS and self-report. Child Geogr. 2014;12:249–256.
Arts J., Chinapaw M.J., Gubbels J.S., et al. Development and content validity of an application to assess 24-hour movement behaviors in 0–4-year-old children involving end-users and key stakeholders: The My Little Moves App. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024;21:2. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01552-9. PubMed DOI PMC
Hidding L.M., Chinapaw M.J.M., Belmon L.S., Altenburg TM. Co-creating a 24-hour movement behavior tool together with 9–12-year-old children using mixed-methods: MyDailyMoves. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17:63. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00965-0. PubMed DOI PMC
Cardon G., Salmon J. Why have youth physical activity trends flatlined in the last decade? Opinion piece on “Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: A pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1.6 million participants” by Guthold et al. J Sport Health Sci. 2020;9:335–338. PubMed PMC
Ainsworth B., Cahalin L., Buman M., Ross R. The current state of physical activity assessment tools. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;57:387–395. PubMed
Boudreaux B.D., Hebert E.P., Hollander D.B., et al. Validity of wearable activity monitors during cycling and resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50:624–633. PubMed
Butte N.F., Ekelund U., Westerterp KR. Assessing physical activity using wearable monitors: Measures of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(Suppl. 1):S5–12. PubMed
Shang Z. Use of Delphi in health sciences research: A narrative review. Medicine. 2023;102 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032829. PubMed DOI PMC
Davison K.K., Gicevic S., Aftosmes-Tobio A., et al. Fathers’ representation in observational studies on parenting and childhood obesity: A systematic review and content analysis. Am J Public Health. 2016;106:e14–e21. PubMed PMC
Gropp K.M., Pickett W., Janssen I. Multi-level examination of correlates of active transportation to school among youth living within 1 mile of their school. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:124. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-124. PubMed DOI PMC
Jenkins M., Lustosa L., Chia V., et al. What do we know about pedal assist E-bikes? A scoping review to inform future directions. Transport Pol. 2022;128:25–37.