Development of the CHILD-SHOE Reporting Checklist: A Scoping Review and Modified Delphi Study to Support Reporting in Children's Footwear Research
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article, Scoping Review
PubMed
40635302
PubMed Central
PMC12241440
DOI
10.1002/jfa2.70065
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- consensus, foot, gait, outcome measures, paediatric,
- MeSH
- Delphi Technique MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Consensus MeSH
- Checklist * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Shoes * standards MeSH
- Research Design standards MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Scoping Review MeSH
BACKGROUND: Inconsistent reporting of interventions and outcomes is a key barrier to research translation. Children's footwear research is often inconsistently reported as there are no standards or recommendations on what to report or consensus on which outcomes are important. The primary aim of this research was to develop expert consensus in children's footwear features and descriptions for research reporting. The secondary aim focused on consensus building of outcome measures relating to footwear in research in children. The outcome of this study was to develop a reporting checklist and guidance for researchers who are conducting children's footwear studies. METHODS: This was a three-round modified Delphi survey informed by a scoping review. We searched four databases to enable data extraction from 109 records related to children's footwear research. These data established the basis for Round 1. Authors were identified through the scoping review and invited to participate. In Round 1, participants rated the appropriateness of domains relating to reporting footwear descriptions and features and outcomes. Outcome measures were organised against a childhood adaptation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-F-words in childhood disability domains. Consensus and agreement levels were set at 70%. Where 50%-69% of participants agreed, the item was returned for rating in Rounds 2 and 3. RESULTS: There were 33 participants who responded to Round 1 and 29 (88%) in both subsequent rounds. Participants agreed on 20 statements that researchers should use to describe children's footwear and their features. All ICF domains met consensus for outcome collection. There were 17 outcome measures that participants agreed should be used in the future when a researcher's aim aligns with specific domains. Where no specific outcome measures reached consensus or agreement within a domain, a statement was developed to guide researcher choice in the subsequently developed checklist. CONCLUSION: Participants reached consensus on the essential footwear characteristics and descriptions that should be consistently reported in children's footwear research. This enabled us to produce a list of preferred outcome measures. Using this checklist can support future research through collection and reporting of comparable data.
Allied Health and Human Performance University of South Australia Adelaide Australia
Allied Health Office KK Women's and Children's Hospital Singapore Singapore
Aname Baby Design Belo Horizonte Brazil
Australian Centre for Precision Health and Technology Griffith University Nathan Australia
Centre for Biomechanics and Rehabilitation Technologies Staffordshire University Staffordshire UK
Centre for Health Exercise and Sports Medicine The University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia
Decathlon SportsLab Lille France
Department of Human Movement Studies University of Ostrava Moravská Ostrava a Přívoz Czech Republic
Department of Neurology The Royal Children's Hospital Parkville Australia
Department of Nursing and Podiatry University of Malaga Malaga Spain
Monash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education Monash University Clayton Australia
Monash Health Clayton Australia
National Institute of Education Nanyang Technological University Singapore Singapore
Neurosciences Clinical Sciences Murdoch Children's Research Institute Parkville Australia
Nnewi Campus Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka Nigeria
Program in Physical Therapy College of Health Oregon State University Cascades Bend Oregon USA
School of Health Sciences and Social Work Griffith University Nathan Australia
School of Life Course and Population Sciences King's College London UK
School of Primary and Allied Health Care Monash University Frankston Australia
See more in PubMed
Price C., Morrison S., Haley M., Nester C., and Williams A., “Searching for Online Information on the Fit of Children’s Footwear During the COVID‐19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Google Trends Data,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 16, no. 1 (2023): 1, 10.1186/s13047-022-00598-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Williams C. M., Banwell H. A., Paterson K. L., et al., “Parents, Health Professionals and Footwear Stakeholders’ Beliefs on the Importance of Different Features of Young Children’s Footwear: A Qualitative Study,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 15, no. 1 (2022): 73, 10.1186/s13047-022-00580-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Price C., Haley M., Williams A., Nester C., and Morrison S. C., “Professional Appraisal of Online Information About Children’s Footwear Measurement and Fit: Readability, Usability and Quality,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 13, no. 1 (2020): 2, 10.1186/s13047-020-0370-x. PubMed DOI PMC
Morrison S. C., Price C., McClymont J., and Nester C., “Big Issues for Small Feet: Developmental, Biomechanical and Clinical Narratives on Children’s Footwear,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 11, no. 1 (2018): 39, 10.1186/s13047-018-0281-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Cranage S., Perraton L., Bowles K.‐A., and Williams C., “The Impact of Shoe Flexibility on Gait, Pressure and Muscle Activity of Young Children. A Systematic Review,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 12, no. 1 (2019): 55, 10.1186/s13047-019-0365-7. PubMed DOI PMC
Wegener C., Hunt A. E., Vanwanseele B., Burns J., and Smith R. M., “Effect of Children’s Shoes on Gait: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 4, no. 1 (2011): 3, 10.1186/1757-1146-4-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Grand View Research , Kids Footwear Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Product (Casual, Sports, Formal), by End‐Use (Boys, Girls, Unisex), by Region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific), and Segment Forecasts, 2025—2030 (2025).
Rao U. B. and Joseph B., “The Influence of Footwear on the Prevalence of Flat Foot. A Survey of 2300 Children,” Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British 74, no. 4 (1992): 525–527, 10.1302/0301-620x.74b4.1624509. PubMed DOI
Klein C., Groll‐Knapp E., Kundi M., and Kinz W., “Increased Hallux Angle in Children and its Association With Insufficient Length of Footwear: A Community Based Cross‐Sectional Study,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 10 (2009): 1–7, 10.1186/1471-2474-10-159. PubMed DOI PMC
Lim P. Q. X., Shields N., Nikolopoulos N., et al., “The Association of Foot Structure and Footwear Fit With Disability in Children and Adolescents With Down Syndrome,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 8, no. 1 (2015): 4, 10.1186/s13047-015-0062-0. PubMed DOI PMC
Kennedy R. A., McGinley J. L., Paterson K. L., Ryan M. M., and Carroll K., “Gait and Footwear in Children and Adolescents With Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth Disease: A Cross‐Sectional, Case‐Controlled Study,” Gait & Posture 62 (2018): 262–267, 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.03.029. PubMed DOI
Hill M., Healy A., and Chockalingam N., “Defining and Grouping Children’s Therapeutic Footwear and Criteria for Their Prescription: An International Expert Delphi Consensus Study,” BMJ Open 11, no. 8 (2021): e051381, 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051381. PubMed DOI PMC
Buldt A. K. and Menz H. B., “Incorrectly Fitted Footwear, Foot Pain and Foot Disorders: A Systematic Search and Narrative Review of the Literature,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 11, no. 1 (2018): 43, 10.1186/s13047-018-0284-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Lam W. K., Kan W. H., Chia J. S., and Kong P. W., “Effect of Shoe Modifications on Biomechanical Changes in Basketball: A Systematic Review,” Sports Biomechanics 21, no. 5 (2022): 577–603, 10.1080/14763141.2019.1656770. PubMed DOI
Luo Bo, Cai Y., Chen D., et al., “Effects of Special Therapeutic Footwear on the Prevention of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials,” Journal of Diabetes Research 2022, no. 1 (2022): 9742665–9742710, 10.1155/2022/9742665. PubMed DOI PMC
Menz H. B., “Foot Problems, Footwear, and Falls,” in Falls in Older People: Risk Factors, Strategies for Prevention and Implications for Practice (2021), 119–129.
Hoogkamer W., Kipp S., Frank J. H., Farina E. M., Luo G., and Kram R., “A Comparison of the Energetic Cost of Running in Marathon Racing Shoes,” Sports Medicine 48, no. 4 (2018): 1009–1019, 10.1007/s40279-017-0811-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Ramsey C. A., Lamb P., Kaur M., Baxter G. D., and Ribeiro D. C., “How Are Running Shoes Assessed? A Systematic Review of Characteristics and Measurement Tools Used to Describe Running Footwear,” Journal of Sports Sciences 37, no. 14 (2019): 1617–1629, 10.1080/02640414.2019.1578449. PubMed DOI
Esculier J.‐F., Dubois B., Dionne C. E., Leblond J., and Roy J.‐S., “A Consensus Definition and Rating Scale for Minimalist Shoes,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 8 (2015): 1–9, 10.1186/s13047-015-0094-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Ellis S., Branthwaite H., and Chockalingam N., “Evaluation and Optimisation of a Footwear Assessment Tool for Use Within a Clinical Environment,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 15, no. 1 (2022): 12, 10.1186/s13047-022-00519-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Jones J. and Hunter D., “Consensus Methods for Medical and Health Services Research,” BMJ 311, no. 7001 (1995): 376–380, 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376. PubMed DOI PMC
Vernon W., “The Delphi Technique: A Review,” International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 16, no. 2 (2009): 69–76, 10.12968/ijtr.2009.16.2.38892. DOI
Williams C. M., “CHILD’s SHOE REPORT: A Checklist of Reporting Information on Children’s Footwear Research,” in Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) (2025).
Jünger S., Payne S. A., Brine J., Radbruch L., and Brearley S. G., “Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in Palliative Care: Recommendations Based on a Methodological Systematic Review,” Palliative Medicine 31, no. 8 (2017): 684–706, 10.1177/0269216317690685. PubMed DOI
Tricco A. C., Lillie E., Zarin W., et al., “A Scoping Review on the Conduct and Reporting of Scoping Reviews,” BMC Medical Research Methodology 16, no. 1 (2016): 1–10, 10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Williams C. M., Morrison S. C., Paterson K., et al., “Young Children’s Footwear Taxonomy: An International Delphi Survey of Parents, Health and Footwear Industry Professionals,” PLoS One 17, no. 6 (2022): e0269223, 10.1371/journal.pone.0269223. PubMed DOI PMC
Rosenbaum P. and Gorter J. W., “The ‘F‐Words’ in Childhood Disability: I Swear This Is How We Should Think,” Child: Care, Health and Development 38, no. 4 (2012): 457–463, 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01338.x. PubMed DOI
Dars S., Uden H., Kumar S., and Banwell H. A., “When, Why and How Foot Orthoses (FOs) Should Be Prescribed for Children With Flexible Pes Planus: A Delphi Survey of Podiatrists,” PeerJ 6 (2018): e4667, 10.7717/peerj.4667. PubMed DOI PMC
Cranage S., Banwell H., and Williams C. M., “Gait and Lower Limb Observation of Paediatrics (GALLOP): Development of a Consensus Based Paediatric Podiatry and Physiotherapy Standardised Recording Proforma,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 9, no. 1 (2016): 1–10, 10.1186/s13047-016-0139-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Palermo T. M., Walco G. A., Paladhi U. R., et al., “Core Outcome Set for Pediatric Chronic Pain Clinical Trials: Results From a Delphi Poll and Consensus Meeting,” Pain 162, no. 10 (2021): 2539–2547, 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002241. PubMed DOI PMC
Plesek J., Silvernail J. F., Hamill J., and Jandacka D., “Footfall Pattern During Running in Preschool Children According to Age and Footwear,” NA 38, no. 1 (2020): 400–NA.
Plesek J., Hamill J., Blaschova D., Freedman – Silvernail J., and Jandacka D., “Acute Effects of Footwear on Running Impact Loading in the Preschool Years,” Sports Biomechanics 22, no. 3 (2023): 442–458, 10.1080/14763141.2022.2058599. PubMed DOI
Plesek J., Freedman Silvernail J., Hamill J., and Jandacka D., “Running Footstrike Patterns and Footwear in Habitually Shod Preschool Children,” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 53, no. 8 (2021): 1630–1637, 10.1249/mss.0000000000002629. PubMed DOI
Gimunová M., Kolářová K., Vodička T., Bozděch M., and Zvonař M., “How Barefoot and Conventional Shoes Affect the Foot and Gait Characteristics in Toddlers,” PLoS One 17, no. 8 August (2022): e0273388, 10.1371/journal.pone.0273388. PubMed DOI PMC
Mueller J., Richter M., Schaefer K., Ganz J., Lohscheller J., and Mueller S., “How to Measure Children’s Feet: 3D Foot Scanning Compared With Established 2D Manual or Digital Methods,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 16, no. 1 (2023): 21, 10.1186/s13047-023-00618-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Krabak B. J., Roberts W. O., Tenforde A. S., et al., “Youth Running Consensus Statement: Minimising Risk of Injury and Illness in Youth Runners,” British Journal of Sports Medicine 55, no. 6 (2021): 305–318, 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102518. PubMed DOI