SENECA study: staging endometrial cancer based on molecular classification
Language English Country United States Media electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study
PubMed
39153831
DOI
10.1136/ijgc-2024-005711
PII: S1048-891X(24)03563-1
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Endometrial Neoplasms, Sentinel Lymph Node,
- MeSH
- Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy methods MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lymphatic Metastasis MeSH
- Endometrial Neoplasms * pathology genetics classification MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Sentinel Lymph Node pathology MeSH
- Neoplasm Staging * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Management of endometrial cancer is advancing, with accurate staging crucial for guiding treatment decisions. Understanding sentinel lymph node (SLN) involvement rates across molecular subgroups is essential. To evaluate SLN involvement in early-stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 I-II) endometrial cancer, considering molecular subtypes and new European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) risk classification. METHODS: The SENECA study retrospectively reviewed data from 2139 women with stage I-II endometrial cancer across 66 centers in 16 countries. Patients underwent surgery with SLN assessment following ESGO guidelines between January 2021 and December 2022. Molecular analysis was performed on pre-operative biopsies or hysterectomy specimens. RESULTS: Among the 2139 patients, the molecular subgroups were as follows: 272 (12.7%) p53 abnormal (p53abn, 1191 (55.7%) non-specific molecular profile (NSMP), 581 (27.2%) mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), 95 (4.4%) POLE mutated (POLE-mut). Tracer diffusion was detected in, at least one side, in 97.2% of the cases; with a bilateral diffusion observed in 82.7% of the cases. By ultrastaging (90.7% of the cases) or one-step nucleic acid amplification (198 (9.3%) of the cases), 205 patients were identified with affected sentinel lymph nodes, representing 9.6% of the sample. Of these, 139 (67.8%) had low-volume metastases (including micrometastases, 42.9%; and isolated tumor cells, 24.9%) while 66 (32.2%) had macrometastases. Significant differences in SLN involvement were observed between molecular subtypes, with p53abn and MMRd groups having the highest rates (12.50% and 12.40%, respectively) compared with NSMP (7.80%) and POLE-mut (6.30%), (p=0.004); (p53abn, OR=1.69 (95% CI 1.11 to 2.56), p=0.014; MMRd, OR=1.67 (95% CI 1.21 to 2.31), p=0.002). Differences were also noted among ESGO risk groups (2.84% for low-risk patients, 6.62% for intermediate-risk patients, 21.63% for high-intermediate risk patients, and 22.51% for high-risk patients; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals significant differences in SLN involvement among patients with early-stage endometrial cancer based on molecular subtypes. This underscores the importance of considering molecular characteristics for accurate staging and optimal management decisions.
ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda Milan Italy
Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital San Gerardo Monza Italy
Clinica Universidad de Navarra Pamplona Navarra Spain
Departamento de Ginecologia y Obstetricia Clinica Universidad de Navarra Pamplona Navarra Spain
Department of Gynaecologic Oncology Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre Madrid Spain
Department of Gynaecology Son Espases University Hospital Palma de Mallorca Spain
Department of Gynecologic Oncology Hospital Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain
Department of Gynecologic Oncology Nairi Medical Center Yerevan Armenia
Department of Gynecologic Oncology Universidad de Navarra Pamplona Navarra Spain
Department of Gynecologic Oncology University Hospital La Fe Valencia Valencia Spain
Department of Gynecological Oncology Wroclaw Medical University Wroclaw Poland
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Mauriziano Hospital Torino Italy
Department of Gynecology Centre Oscar Lambret Lille France
Department of Gynecology Clinica Universidad de Navarra Pamplona Navarra Spain
Department of Medical Oncology Clinica Universidad de Navarra Madrid Spain
Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Milan Bicocca Milano Italy
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Clinico Lozano Blesa Hospital Zaragoza Spain
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Bezmialem Vakif Universitesi Istanbul Istanbul Turkey
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Brno University Hospital Brno Czech Republic Czech Republic
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology CHU de Liège Liege Belgium
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia Valencia Spain
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Lariboisière Paris France
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology La Paz University Hospital Madrid Madrid Spain
Department of Oncological Gynecology Lower Silesian Oncology Center Wrocław Wroclaw Poland
Department of Woman and Child Health Sciences University Hospital Agostino Gemelli Roma Lazio Italy
Holycross Cancer Center Kielce Poland
Hospital Universitari Dexeus Barcelona Catalunya Spain
Hospital Universitario Nuestra Senora de la Candelaria Santa Cruz de Tenerife Spain
Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine Fatih Istanbul Turkey
Istituto Europeo di Oncologia Milano Anognnn Italy
References provided by Crossref.org