Biventricular Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Atrial Sensing but No Atrial Lead: A Prospective Registry of Patients, Complications, and Therapy Responses

. 2025 Jul 15 ; 14 (14) : . [epub] 20250715

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid40725698

Grantová podpora
n.a. Biotronik (Germany)

Background/Objectives: Patients with normal sinus rhythms undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation may benefit from a novel two-lead CRT-D system (CRT-DX), which features an atrial sensing dipole integrated into the right ventricular lead. This single-arm, international, non-controlled investigation focused on the safety and clinical efficacy of CRT-DX devices in CRT-D candidates who do not require atrial pacing. Methods: Patients indicated for CRT-D implantation (resting heart rates > 40 bpm and ≥100 bpm during exercise, no second or higher-degree AV block, and no history of persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation) were enrolled across 21 sites in four European countries. The primary endpoint was the need for an additional RA lead implantation within 12 months. Secondary endpoints comprised any invasive re-intervention to the CRT-DX system or infection. Results: Among the 110 patients (mean age 62 years, 70% male), 60% had an underlying non-ischemic cardiac disease. During 12 months of follow-up, RA lead implantation was required in two patients for atrial undersensing or chronotropic incompetence (RA lead implantation-free rate: 98.2% (95% CI: 92.7-99.5%)). Atrial sensing amplitudes were stable (mean: 4.7 ± 1.7 mV), AV-synchrony was maintained at >99%, and the median percentage of biventricular pacing exceeded 98%. The left ventricular ejection fraction improved by an absolute 14.7%. Conclusions: Using simple, clinically applicable inclusion criteria, the two-lead CRT-DX system demonstrated a low rate of subsequent RA lead implantations (1.8%) and maintained adequate RA sensing amplitudes throughout the observation period. The two-lead CRT-DX concept appears to be a feasible alternative for patients with preserved chronotropic competence.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Glikson M., Nielsen J.C., Kronborg M.B., Michowitz Y., Auricchio A., Barbash I.M., Barrabés J.A., Boriani G., Braunschweig F., Brignole M., et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur. Heart J. 2021;42:3427–3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364. Erratum in: Eur. Heart J. 2022, 43, 1651. PubMed DOI

McDonagh T.A., Metra M., Adamo M., Gardner R.S., Baumbach A., Böhm M., Burri H., Butler J., Čelutkienė J., Chioncel O., et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur. Heart J. 2021;42:3599–3726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368. Erratum in Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 4901. PubMed DOI

Bristow M.R., Saxon L.A., Boehmer J., Krueger S., Kass D.A., De Marco T., Carson P., DiCarlo L., DeMets D., White B.G., et al. Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Investigators. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;350:2140–2150. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032423. PubMed DOI

Cleland J.G., Daubert J.C., Erdmann E., Freemantle N., Gras D., Kappenberger L., Tavazzi L. Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Failure (CARE-HF) Study Investigators. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;352:1539–1549. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050496. PubMed DOI

Al-Majed N.S., McAlister F.A., Bakal J.A., Ezekowitz J.A. Meta-analysis: Cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with less symptomatic heart failure. Ann. Intern. Med. 2011;154:401–412. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-6-201103150-00313. PubMed DOI

Dewland T.A., Pellegrini C.N., Wang Y., Marcus G.M., Keung E., Varosy P.D. Dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator selection is associated with increased complication rates and mortality among patients enrolled in the NCDR implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011;58:1007–1013. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.039. PubMed DOI

Peterson P.N., Varosy P.D., Heidenreich P.A., Wang Y., Dewland T.A., Curtis J.P., Go A.S., Greenlee R.T., Magid D.J., Normand S.L., et al. Association of single- vs. dual-chamber ICDs with mortality, readmissions, and complications among patients receiving an ICD for primary prevention. JAMA. 2013;309:2025–2034. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.4982. PubMed DOI PMC

Sticherling C., Müller D., Schaer B.A., Krüger S., Kolb C. Pre-CRAFT investigators. Atrial electrogram quality in single-pass defibrillator leads with floating atrial bipole in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol. J. 2018;18:140–145. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2018.03.005. PubMed DOI PMC

Vamos M., Nemeth M., Balazs T., Zima E., Duray G.Z. Rationale and feasibility of the atrioventricular single-lead ICD systems with a floating atrial dipole (DX) in clinical practice. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2022;32:84–89. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2021.01.003. PubMed DOI

Biffi M., Massaro G., Candelora A., Angeletti A., Valzania C., Martignani C., Grassini D., Diemberger I., Ziacchi M. Less is more: Can we achieve cardiac resynchronization with 2 leads only? Int. J. Cardiol. 2017;249:184–190. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.189. PubMed DOI

Shaik N.A., Drucker M., Pierce C., Duray G.Z., Gillett S., Miller C., Harrell C., Thomas G. Novel two-lead cardiac resynchronization therapy system provides equivalent CRT responses with less complications than a conventional three-lead system: Results from the QP ExCELs lead registry. J Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2020;31:1784–1792. doi: 10.1111/jce.14552. PubMed DOI PMC

Brignole M., Auricchio A., Baron-Esquivias G., Bordachar P., Boriani G., Breithardt O.A., Cleland J., Deharo J.C., Delgado V., Elliott P.M., et al. 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Eur. Heart J. 2013;34:2281–2329. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht150. PubMed DOI

Ponikowski P., Voors A.A., Anker S.D., Bueno H., Cleland J.G.F., Coats A.J.S., Falk V., González-Juanatey J.R., Harjola V.P., Jankowska E.A., et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur. Heart J. 2016;37:2129–2200. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128. Erratum in: Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 860. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw383 . PubMed DOI

Bossard M., Sticherling C., Kühne M., Frey S., Osswald S., Schaer B. Outcome of patients with cardiac resynchronisation defibrillator therapy and a follow-up of at least five years after implant. Swiss Med. Wkly. 2014;144:w13938. doi: 10.4414/smw.2014.13938. PubMed DOI

Adelstein E.C., Liu J., Jain S., Schwartzman D., Althouse A.D., Wang N.C., Gorcsan J., 3rd, Saba S. Clinical outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator recipients 80 years of age and older. Europace. 2016;18:420–427. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv222. PubMed DOI

Buber J., Klein H., Moss A.J., McNitt S., Eldar M., Padeletti L., Vogt J., Meine M., Brown M.W., Barsheshet A., et al. Clinical course and outcome of patients enrolled in US and non-US centres in MADIT-CRT. Eur. Heart J. 2011;32:2697–2704. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr149. PubMed DOI

Ghani A., Delnoy P.P., Ramdat Misier A.R., Smit J.J., Adiyaman A., Ottervanger J.P., Elvan A. Incidence of lead dislodgement, malfunction and perforation during the first year following device implantation. Neth. Heart J. 2014;22:286–291. doi: 10.1007/s12471-014-0556-6. PubMed DOI PMC

Ruschitzka F., Abraham W.T., Singh J.P., Bax J.J., Borer J.S., Brugada J., Dickstein K., Ford I., Gorcsan J., 3rd, Gras D., et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy in heart failure with a narrow QRS complex. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;369:1395–1405. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1306687. PubMed DOI

Viechtbauer W., Smits L., Kotz D., Budé L., Spigt M., Serroyen J., Crutzen R. A simple formula for the calculation of sample size in pilot studies. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2015;68:1375–1379. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.014. PubMed DOI

Kirkfeldt R.E., Johansen J.B., Nohr E.A., Moller M., Arnsbo P., Nielsen J.C. Risk factors for lead complications in cardiac pacing: A population-based cohort study of 28,860 Danish patients. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:1622–1628. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.04.014. PubMed DOI

León A.R., Abraham W.T., Curtis A.B., Daubert J.P., Fisher W.G., Gurley J., Hayes D.L., Lieberman R., Petersen-Stejskal S., Wheelan K. MIRACLE Study Program. Safety of transvenous cardiac resynchronization system implantation in patients with chronic heart failure: Combined results of over 2000 patients from a multicenter study program. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005;46:2348–2356. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.031. PubMed DOI

Palmisano P., Dell'Era G., Guerra F., Ammendola E., Ziacchi M., Laffi M., Donateo P., Guido A., Ghiglieno C., Parlavecchio A., et al. Complications of left bundle branch area pacing compared with biventricular pacing in candidates for resynchronization therapy: Results of a propensity score-matched analysis from a multicenter registry. Heart Rhythm. 2024;21:874–880. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.053. PubMed DOI

Van Rees J.B., de Bie M.K., Thijssen J., Borleffs C.J., Schalij M.J., van Erven L. Implantation-related complications of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011;58:995–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.007. PubMed DOI

Koplan B.A., Kaplan A.J., Weiner S., Jones P.W., Seth M., Christman S.A. Heart failure decompensation and all-cause mortality in relation to percent biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure: Is a goal of 100% biventricular pacing necessary? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009;53:355–360. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.043. PubMed DOI

Safak E., Schmitz D., Konorza T., Wende C., De Ros J.O., Schirdewan A., Linox D.X. Study Investigators. Clinical efficacy and safety of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead with a floating atrial sensing dipole. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2013;36:952–962. doi: 10.1111/pace.12171. PubMed DOI

Linde C., Abraham W.T., Gold M.R., St John Sutton M., Ghio S., Daubert C. REVERSE (REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction) Study Group. Randomized trial of cardiac resynchronization in mildly symptomatic heart failure patients and in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular dysfunction and previous heart failure symptoms. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008;52:1834–1843. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.027. PubMed DOI

Moss A.J., Hall W.J., Cannom D.S., Klein H., Brown M.W., Daubert J.P., Estes N.A., 3rd, Foster E., Greenberg H., Higgins S.L., et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:1329–1338. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906431. PubMed DOI

Burri H., Jastrzebski M., Cano Ó., Čurila K., de Pooter J., Huang W., Israel C., Joza J., Romero J., Vernooy K., et al. EHRA clinical consensus statement on conduction system pacing implantation: Endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS), and Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) Europace. 2023;25:1208–1236. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad043. PubMed DOI PMC

Yousaf A., Ahmad S., Peltz J., Ahsan M.J., Abbas K.S., Muhammad S., Watson C., Asad Z.U.A., Kim M.H. Left bundle branch area pacing vs biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm O2. 2023;4:671–680. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2023.06.011. PubMed DOI PMC

Lakshman H., Chowdhury M., Ahmed A., Woods E., Flemengos G., Abdou C., Patel H., Zughaib M., Bradley C. Clinical and Electrophysiological Outcomes of Left Bundle Area Pacing Compared to Biventricular Pacing: An Updated Meta-analysis. J. Innov. Card. Rhythm. Manag. 2024;15:5858–5865. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2024.15053. PubMed DOI PMC

Wang Y., Zhu H., Hou X., Wang Z., Zou F., Qian Z., Wei Y., Wang X., Zhang L., Li X., et al. LBBP-RESYNC Investigators. Randomized Trial of Left Bundle Branch vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2022;80:1205–1216. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.07.019. PubMed DOI

Pujol-Lopez M., Jiménez-Arjona R., Garre P., Guasch E., Borràs R., Doltra A., Ferró E., García-Ribas C., Niebla M., Carro E., et al. Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure and Wide QRS Patients: LEVEL-AT Trial. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. 2022;8:1431–1445. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.08.001. PubMed DOI

Ferreira Felix I., Collini M., Fonseca R., Guida C., Armaganijan L., Healey J.S., Carvalho G. Conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heart Rhythm. 2024;21:881–889. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.035. PubMed DOI

Varela D., Sandhu A., Zipse M., Aleong R.G. Feasibility of Single-lead Cardiac Resynchronization and Defibrillation Therapy in an Animal Model. J. Innov. Card. Rhythm. Manag. 2024;15:5985–5989. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2024.15081. PubMed DOI PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...