Sexual partner number and distribution over time affect long-term partner evaluation: evidence from 11 countries across 5 continents
Status In-Process Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
315952/2021-0
The Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development
PubMed
40745437
PubMed Central
PMC12313963
DOI
10.1038/s41598-025-12607-1
PII: 10.1038/s41598-025-12607-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Cross-cultural psychology, Evolutionary psychology, Mate preferences, Sex, Sociosexuality,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
UNLABELLED: A prospective partner’s sexual history provides important information that can be used to minimise mating-related risks. Such information includes the number of past sexual partners, which has an inverse relationship with positive suitor evaluation. However, sexual encounters with new partners vary in frequency over time, providing an additional dimension of context not previously considered. Across three studies (N = 5,331) with 15 samples, we demonstrate that the impact of past partner number on a suitor’s desirability as a long-term partner varies as a function of distribution over time. Using graphical representations of a suitor’s sexual history, we found that past partner number effects were smaller when the frequency of new sexual encounters decreased over time. This moderation effect was stronger, and often curvilinear, when past partner numbers were higher. We replicated these findings in 11 countries from five world regions. Sex differences were minimal and inconsistent pointing to a lack of a sexual double standards. Sociosexuality (openness to casual sex) was a consistent moderator and tended to mute the sexual history effects. These findings suggest that people not only attend to a potential long-term mate’s quantity of sexual partners, but also the context surrounding these encounters such as pattern and timing. Together, the findings raise the possibility of an evolved mechanism for managing mating risks present in both sexes and across populations and adds nuance to a contentious topic of public interest. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-12607-1.
Department of Life Sciences Brunel University London Uxbridge UK
Department of Psychology Aberystwyth University Aberystwyth UK
Department of Psychology and Life Sciences Faculty of Humanities Charles University Pátkova Czechia
Department of Psychology Faculty of Arts Charles University Prague Czechia
Department of Psychology Faculty of Philosophy Fundação Santo André Santo André Brazil
Department of Psychology Fudan University Shanghai China
Department of Psychology Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway
Department of Psychology University of Macau Macau China
Department of Psychology University of Texas at Austin Austin USA
Department of Social Sciences University of Nicosia Nicosia Cyprus
IDN Being Human Lab Institute of Psychology University of Wrocław Wroclaw Poland
Institute of Psychology University of Wrocław Wrocław Poland
Psychology Research Institute University of Economics and Human Sciences Warsaw Poland
School of Psychology Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga Australia
School of Psychology Swansea University Swansea UK
School of Psychology University of Kent Canterbury UK
School of Psychology University of Nottingham Malaysia Semenyih Malaysia
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Ferreira, R. C. et al. PubMed PMC
Vaillancourt, T. Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy? PubMed PMC
Griskevicius, V. et al. Aggress to impress: hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy. PubMed
Melia, N. V. & Li, N. P.
Urganci, B. & Sevi, B.
Stewart-Williams, S. & Thomas, A. G. The ape that thought it was a peacock: does evolutionary psychology exaggerate human sex differences??
Buss, D. M. & Schmitt, D. P. Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. PubMed
Schacht, R. & Kramer, K. L.
Scelza, B. A. Choosy but not chaste: multiple mating in human females. PubMed
Wlodarski, R., Manning, J. & Dunbar, R. I. Stay or stray? Evidence for alternative mating strategy phenotypes in both men and women. PubMed PMC
Jackson, S. E. et al. Sociodemographic and behavioural correlates of lifetime number of sexual partners: findings from the english longitudinal study of ageing. PubMed PMC
French, J. E., Altgelt, E. E. & Meltzer, A. L. The implications of sociosexuality for marital satisfaction and dissolution. PubMed
Penke, L. & Asendorpf, J. B. Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. PubMed
Henrich, J., Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. The puzzle of monogamous marriage. PubMed PMC
Vaillancourt, T. & Sharma, A. Intolerance of sexy peers: intrasexual competition among women. PubMed
Logan, T. K. Examining stalking experiences and outcomes for men and women stalked by (Ex)partners and Non-partners.
Huibregtse, B. M. et al. Etiological overlap between sex under the influence and number of lifetime sexual partners. PubMed PMC
Bailey, J. M. et al. Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. PubMed
Cherkas, L. F. et al. Genetic influences on female infidelity and number of sexual partners in humans: a linkage and association study of the role of the vasopressin receptor gene (AVPR1A). PubMed
Zietsch, B. P. et al. Genetic analysis of human extrapair mating: heritability, between-sex correlation, and receptor genes for vasopressin and Oxytocin.
Stewart-Williams, S., Butler, C. A. & Thomas, A. G. Sexual history and present attractiveness: people want a mate with a bit of a past, but not too much. PubMed
Davis, A. et al.
Kennair, L. E. O. et al. Examining the sexual double standards and hypocrisy in partner suitability appraisals within a Norwegian sample. PubMed PMC
Hlay, J. K. et al. The evolution of disgust for pathogen detection and avoidance. PubMed PMC
Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M. G. & Buss, D. M. Disgust and mating strategy.
Pipitone, R. N. et al. Sex differences in attitudes toward casual sex: using STI contraction likelihoods to assess evolved mating strategies. PubMed PMC
Epstein, J. et al. Perceived physical attractiveness, sexual history, and sexual intentions: an internet study.
Sprecher, S. et al. Preferred level of sexual experience in a date or mate: the merger of two methodologies.
O’Sullivan, L. F. Less is more: the effects of sexual experience on judgments of men’s and women’s personality characteristics and relationship desirability.
Gentry, M. The sexual double standard.
Aubrey, J. S. Sex and punishment: an examination of sexual consequences and the sexual double standard in teen programming.
Kreager, D. A. & Staff, J. The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance. PubMed PMC
Thomas, A. G. et al. Mate preference priorities in the East and west: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model. PubMed
Buss, D. M. Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures.
Chang, L. et al. Chinese mate preferences: cultural evolution and continuity across a quarter of a century.
Amano, Y. & Wakao, Y. Women’s sensitivity to men’s past relationships: reliable information use for Mate-Choice copying in humans.
Busche, L., Marks, M. & Oates, K. The effect of recent sexual activity on partner desirability: an evolutionary perspective.
Jones, D. N.
Smith, E. L.
Duffy, B. et al.
Widmer, E. D., Treas, J. & Newcomb, R. Attitudes toward nonmarital sex in 24 countries.
Inglehart, R. & Baker, W. E. Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values.
Walter, K. V. et al. PubMed PMC
Schmitt, D. P. PubMed
Parish, W. L., Laumann, E. O. & Mojola, S. A. Sexual behavior in china: trends and comparisons.
Urban, N. Social class and sexual liberalism in contemporary china: an analysis of attitudes towards sexuality.
Tang, M. & Hou, J. Changes of sex ratio at birth and son preferences in china: a mixed method study.
Statbank & Norway
Thomas, A. G. et al. Sex differences in voyeuristic and exhibitionistic interests: exploring the mediating roles of sociosexuality and sexual compulsivity from an evolutionary perspective. PubMed PMC
@whatever2ND.
Davis, A. C. et al. Gossip as an intrasexual competition strategy: sex differences in gossip frequency, content, and attitudes.
Eastwick, P. W. et al. PubMed
Conroy-Beam, D. & Buss, D. M. Do mate preferences influence actual mating decisions? Evidence from computer simulations and three studies of mated couples. PubMed
Thomas, A. G. et al. Polygamous interest in a mononormative nation: the roles of sex and sociosexuality in polygamous interest in a heterosexual sample from the UK. PubMed
Muggleton, N. K. & Fincher, C. L. Unrestricted sexuality promotes distinctive short-and long-term mate preferences in women.
Webb, M. A. & Tangney, J. P. Too good to be true: bots and bad data from mechanical Turk. PubMed