A worldwide test of the predictive validity of ideal partner preference matching
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie
HSE University; Basic Research Program
University of Wroclaw; IDN Being Human Lab
John Templeton Foundation
National Science Foundation
Australian Research Council
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia
University of California, Davis
NPO EXCELES: Systemic Risk Institute
Sabanci University
Adam Mickiewicz University; Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science
VEGA
NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
39480282
DOI
10.1037/pspp0000524
PII: 2025-39184-001
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Sexual Partners * psychology MeSH
- Choice Behavior * physiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Ideal partner preferences (i.e., ratings of the desirability of attributes like attractiveness or intelligence) are the source of numerous foundational findings in the interdisciplinary literature on human mating. Recently, research on the predictive validity of ideal partner preference matching (i.e., Do people positively evaluate partners who match vs. mismatch their ideals?) has become mired in several problems. First, articles exhibit discrepant analytic and reporting practices. Second, different findings emerge across laboratories worldwide, perhaps because they sample different relationship contexts and/or populations. This registered report-partnered with the Psychological Science Accelerator-uses a highly powered design (N = 10,358) across 43 countries and 22 languages to estimate preference-matching effect sizes. The most rigorous tests revealed significant preference-matching effects in the whole sample and for partnered and single participants separately. The "corrected pattern metric" that collapses across 35 traits revealed a zero-order effect of β = .19 and an effect of β = .11 when included alongside a normative preference-matching metric. Specific traits in the "level metric" (interaction) tests revealed very small (average β = .04) effects. Effect sizes were similar for partnered participants who reported ideals before entering a relationship, and there was no consistent evidence that individual differences moderated any effects. Comparisons between stated and revealed preferences shed light on gender differences and similarities: For attractiveness, men's and (especially) women's stated preferences underestimated revealed preferences (i.e., they thought attractiveness was less important than it actually was). For earning potential, men's stated preferences underestimated-and women's stated preferences overestimated-revealed preferences. Implications for the literature on human mating are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Behavioral Decision Making Group University of California Los Angeles Anderson School of Management
Center for Sociocultural Research HSE University
Center for the Study of Language and Information Stanford University
Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences Slovak Academy of Sciences
College of Engineering Shibaura Institute of Technology
Departament of Social Psychology University of Granada
Departamento de Letras Vernaculas Universidade Federal de Sergipe
Departamento de Psicologia Universidade Federal de Sergipe
Department of Anthropology and Psychology Universidad de Sonora
Department of Educational Psychology and Psychology of Health Pavol Jozef Safarik University
Department of Law Universidad de Sonora
Department of Philosophy Macquarie University
Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science Adam Mickiewicz University
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Duke University
Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy Witten Herdecke University
Department of Psychology and Speech Language Pathology University of Turku
Department of Psychology Bilkent University
Department of Psychology Christ University
Department of Psychology Faculty of Arts Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice
Department of Psychology Faculty of Philosophy Ss Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje
Department of Psychology Franklin and Marshall College
Department of Psychology Ithaca College
Department of Psychology Marmara University
Department of Psychology Northwestern University
Department of Psychology Redeemer's University
Department of Psychology Teesside University
Department of Psychology Toronto Metropolitan University
Department of Psychology Universidad de Sonora
Department of Psychology Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga
Department of Psychology University of California Davis
Department of Psychology University of Colorado
Department of Psychology University of Edinburgh
Department of Psychology University of Hong Kong
Department of Psychology University of Ibadan
Department of Psychology University of San Carlos
Department of Psychology University of the Philippines
Department of Psychology University of Toronto
Department of Psychology University of Utah
Department of Psychology University of Zadar
Department of Psychology Wellesley College
Department of Psychology Yonsei University
Department of Psychology York University
Department of Social and Organizational Psychology Iscte University Institute of Lisbon
Department of Social Psychology University of Kansas
Faculty of Arts and Science Kyushu University
Faculty of Philosophy Department of Psychology University of Belgrade
Faculty of Philosophy Institute of Psychology Jagiellonian University
Faculty of Psychology Chulalongkorn University
Faculty of Psychology Universitas Indonesia
Graduate School of Human Environment Studies Kyushu University
Health and Social Sciences Cluster Singapore Institute of Technology
IDN Being Human Institute of Polish Studies University of Wroclaw
IDN Being Human Institute of Psychology University of Wroclaw
Institut de Psychologie Universite Paris Cite
Institute for Research and Development of Education Faculty of Education Charles University
Institute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences Beijing Normal University
Institute of Psychology Eotvos Lorand University
Institute of Psychology Jagiellonian University in Krakow
Institute of Psychology University of Wroclaw
Olomouc University Social Health Institute Palacky University Olomouc
Psychology Program Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Sabanci University
School of Psychology Sport and Sensory Sciences Anglia Ruskin University
School of Psychology University of Chester
School of Psychology University of Queensland
Sloan School of Management Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Wellington Faculty of Health School of Health Victoria University of Wellington
References provided by Crossref.org