Introduction of Biopharmaceuticals in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Study of Early Diffusion Patterns and Data Availability

. 2025 Sep ; 39 (5) : 735-751. [epub] 20250808

Jazyk angličtina Země Nový Zéland Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid40779010
Odkazy

PubMed 40779010
PubMed Central PMC12354550
DOI 10.1007/s40259-025-00732-2
PII: 10.1007/s40259-025-00732-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Biopharmaceuticals add value in the treatment of many diseases but different health systems in Europe face clinical and economic challenges with introducing them. Joint efforts across Europe are therefore essential to ensure their sustainable and equitable use. However, to date few cross-national comparative studies have assessed their introduction. This study aimed to assess the availability of health authority data and variation in the early diffusion of biopharmaceuticals across Europe. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was undertaken to analyze the diffusion of 17 biopharmaceuticals, approved between 2015 and 2019, among European countries between 2015 and 2022. The study assessed data availability, diffusion rates measured as accumulated defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants, as well as relative rankings between countries during the first 4 years following market authorization. RESULTS: Twenty countries and two regions out of 31 European countries provided data on biopharmaceutical utilization for out-of-hospital care, 15 provided wholesaler data, and 14 provided hospital data. Certain countries and regions contributed data in multiple categories, while six did not provide any data. Diffusion rates were assessed for 17 countries and two regions, which showed appreciable variation, with secukinumab and erenumab being introduced in most countries and follitropin delta and tildrakizumab in the least number of countries. Germany, Austria, and Norway demonstrated the highest early diffusion rates, while Lithuania, Romania, and Latvia had the lowest. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a substantial variation between European countries and regions in the early diffusion of biopharmaceuticals and the availability of data to monitor their use. The reasons behind these patterns require further investigation to support European countries in optimizing the use of biopharmaceuticals to reach an equitable and cost-effective use of medicines across Europe.

Albert Szent Györgyi Health Centre Institute of Clinical Pharmacy University of Szeged Szeged Hungary

Antibiotic Policy Group Institute for Infection and Immunity City St George's University of London London UK

AOK Research Institute Berlin Germany

Área del Medicament Servei Català de la Salut Barcelona Spain

Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre Brussels Belgium

Centre for Health Evaluation and Research Infosaúde National Association of Pharmacies Lisbon Portugal

Departament de Farmacologia de Terapèutica i de Toxicologia Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Department of Applied Pharmacy Faculty of Pharmacy and Institute of Public Health Riga Stradins University Riga Latvia

Department of Life Sciences Health and Health Professions Link Campus University Rome Italy

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences University of Bologna Bologna Italy

Department of Organisation and Management in Pharmacy Faculty of Pharmacy Comenius University in Bratislava Bratislava Slovakia

Department of Organization and Economy of Pharmacy Faculty of Pharmacy Medical University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria

Department of Pharmacoepidemiology Andrija Stampar Teaching Institute of Public Health Zagreb Croatia

Department of Pharmacy Faculty of Pharmacy Uppsala University Box 580 751 23 Uppsala Sweden

Department of Public Health Pharmacy and Management School of Pharmacy Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University Pretoria South Africa

Estonian State Agency of Medicines Tartu Estonia

Faculdade de Farmácia da Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland

Faculty of Pharmacy Institute of Clinical Pharmacy University of Szeged Szeged Hungary

INVEST Research Flagship Centre University of Turku Turku Finland

Italian Medicines Agency Rome Italy

Laboratory of Systems Integration Pharmacology Clinical and Regulatory Science Research Institute for Medicines of the University of Lisbon Lisbon Portugal

Life and Health Sciences Research Institute School of Medicine University of Minho Campus de Gualtar Braga Portugal

Pharmaceutical Care Research Group School of Pharmacy University College Cork Cork Ireland

Pharmacology Physiology and Pathophysiology Department Faculty of Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj Napoca Romania

Pharmacy and Pharmacology Center Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania

Pharmacy Department Bon Secours Hospital Cork Ireland

Pharmacy Services Landspitali University Hospital Hringbraut Reykjavik Iceland

Public Health Scotland Edinburgh UK

Research and Information Section Finnish Medicines Agency Helsinki Finland

School of Public Health University College Cork Cork Ireland

Servei de Farmacología Clínica Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Barcelona Spain

State Institute for Drug Control Prague Czech Republic

Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK

The Social Insurance Institution of Finland Helsinki Finland

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Kesik-Brodacka M. Progress in biopharmaceutical development. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2018;65:306–22. 10.1002/bab.1617. PubMed PMC

Behera BK. Biopharmaceuticals: challenges and opportunities. 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2021. 10.1201/9781351013154.

Jung H, Jeon J, Choi H. Important factors in the development of biopharmaceutical logistics centers. Asian J Shipp Logist. 2021;37:301–6. 10.1016/j.ajsl.2021.07.003.

Makurvet FD. Biologics vs. small molecules: drug costs and patient access. Med Drug Discov. 2021;9: 100075. 10.1016/j.medidd.2020.100075.

Godman B, Fadare J, Kwon H-Y, Dias CZ, Kurdi A, Dias Godói IP, et al. Evidence-based public policy making for medicines across countries: findings and implications for the future. J Comp Eff Res. 2021;10:1019–52. 10.2217/cer-2020-0273. PubMed

Baumgart DC, Misery L, Naeyaert S, Taylor PC. Biological therapies in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: can biosimilars reduce access inequities? Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:279. 10.3389/fphar.2019.00279. PubMed PMC

Henrickson SE, Ruffner MA, Kwan M. Unintended immunological consequences of biologic therapy. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2016;16:46. 10.1007/s11882-016-0624-7. PubMed PMC

Skaarup L, Ingrid E, Sepriano A, Nikiphorou E, Østgård R, Lauper K, et al. A systematic overview of contraindications and special warnings for biologic and targeted synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs: establishing a framework to create a “Safety Checklist.” Drug Saf. 2024;47:1075–93. 10.1007/s40264-024-01461-1. PubMed

Barth K, Gill H, Singh N. Long-term safety of biologic and targeted synthetic disease modifying drugs in rheumatology. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2024;36:113–9. 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000995. PubMed PMC

Godman B, Hill A, Simoens S, Selke G, Selke Krulichová I, Zampirolli Dias C, et al. Potential approaches for the pricing of cancer medicines across Europe to enhance the sustainability of healthcare systems and the implications. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021;21:527–40. 10.1080/14737167.2021.1884546. PubMed

Godman B, Bucsics A, Vella Bonanno P, Oortwijn W, Rothe CC, Ferrario A, et al. Barriers for access to new medicines: searching for the balance between rising costs and limited budgets. Front Public Health. 2018;6:328. 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00328. PubMed PMC

Chen BK, Yang YT, Bennett CL. Why biologics and biosimilars remain so expensive: despite two wins for biosimilars, the Supreme Court’s recent rulings do not solve fundamental barriers to competition. Drugs. 2018;78:1777–81. 10.1007/s40265-018-1009-0. PubMed

Brinkhuis F, Goettsch WG, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Bloem LT. Added benefit and revenues of oncology drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency between 1995 and 2020: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2024;384: e077391. 10.1136/bmj-2023-077391. PubMed PMC

Davis C, Naci H, Gurpinar E, Poplavska E, Pinto A, Aggarwal A. Availability of evidence of benefits on overall survival and quality of life of cancer drugs approved by European Medicines Agency: retrospective cohort study of drug approvals 2009–13. BMJ. 2017;359: j4530. 10.1136/bmj.j4530. PubMed PMC

Etekal T, Koehn K, Sborov DW, McClune B, Prasad V, Haslam A, et al. Time-to-event surrogate end-points in multiple myeloma randomised trials from 2005 to 2019: a surrogacy analysis. Br J Haematol. 2023;200:587–94. 10.1111/bjh.18568. PubMed

Pontes C, Zara C, Torrent-Farnell J, Obach M, Nadal C, Vella-Bonanno P, et al. Time to review authorisation and funding for new cancer medicines in Europe? Inferences from the case of olaratumab. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020;18:5–16. 10.1007/s40258-019-00527-x. PubMed

Global oncology trends 2024: outlook to 2028. Durham, North Carolina: IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science; 2024.

World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Panteli, Dimitra & Edwards, Suzanne. (‎2018). Ensuring access to medicines: how to stimulate innovation to meet patients’ needs?. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/331971. PubMed

Haycox A. Why cancer? Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34:625–7. 10.1007/s40273-016-0413-0. PubMed PMC

Gabe J, Chamberlain K, Norris P, Dew K, Madden H, Hodgetts D. The debate about the funding of Herceptin: a case study of ‘countervailing powers.’ Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:2353–61. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.009. PubMed

Aggarwal A, Fojo T, Chamberlain C, Davis C, Sullivan R. Do patient access schemes for high-cost cancer drugs deliver value to society? Lessons from the NHS Cancer Drugs Fund. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:1738–50. 10.1093/annonc/mdx110. PubMed PMC

Elseviers M, editor. Drug utilization research: methods and applications. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2024.

Moorkens E, Godman B, Huys I, Hoxha I, Malaj A, Keuerleber S, et al. The expiry of Humira PubMed PMC

Godman B, Haque M, Leong T, Allocati E, Kumar S, Islam S, et al. The current situation regarding long-acting insulin analogues including biosimilars among African, Asian, European, and South American countries; findings and implications for the future. Front Public Health. 2021;9: 671961. 10.3389/fpubh.2021.671961. PubMed PMC

Kirshner G, Makai P, Brouns C, Timmers L, Kemp R. The impact of an ‘evergreening’ strategy nearing patent expiration on the uptake of biosimilars and public healthcare costs: a case study on the introduction of a second administration form of trastuzumab in The Netherlands. Eur J Health Econ. 2024;25:1147–63. 10.1007/s10198-023-01648-w. PubMed PMC

Blais JE, Wei Y, Knapp M, Wong ICK, Wei L, Chan EW. Trends in PCSK9 inhibitor utilization in the United States, Europe, and other countries: an analysis of international sales data. Am Heart J. 2022;248:13–20. 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.02.008. PubMed

Sen R, Riofrio M, Singh JA. A narrative review of the comparative safety of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2024;23:687–714. 10.1080/14740338.2024.2348575. PubMed

Pisana A, Wettermark B, Kurdi A, Tubic B, Pontes C, Zara C, et al. Challenges and opportunities with routinely collected data on the utilization of cancer medicines: perspectives from health authority personnel across 18 European countries. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13: 873556. 10.3389/fphar.2022.873556. PubMed PMC

Ferrer P, Ballarín E, Sabaté M, Laporte J-R, Schoonen M, Rottenkolber M, et al. Sources of European drug consumption data at a country level. Int J Public Health. 2014;59:877–87. 10.1007/s00038-014-0564-8. PubMed

Sabaté M, Ferrer P, Ballarín E, Rottenkolber M, Amelio J, Schmiedl S, et al. Inpatient drug utilization in Europe: nationwide data sources and a review of publications on a slected group of medicines (PROTECT Project). Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;116:201–11. 10.1111/bcpt.12358. PubMed

WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. ATC classification index with DDDs. 2024.

Walsh G, Walsh E. Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2022. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40:1722–60. 10.1038/s41587-022-01582-x. PubMed PMC

Eriksson I, Wettermark B, Persson M, Edström M, Godman B, Lindhé A, et al. The Early awareness and alert system in Sweden: history and current status. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:674. 10.3389/fphar.2017.00674. PubMed PMC

Garattini S, Bertele’ V, Godman B, Haycox A, Wettermark B, Gustafsson LL, et al. Enhancing the rational use of new medicines across European health care systems. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;64:1137–8. 10.1007/s00228-008-0537-z. PubMed

Bergman U. The history of the Drug Utilization Research Group in Europe. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006;15:95–8. 10.1002/pds.1171. PubMed

Sabaté M, Pacheco JF, Ballarín E, Ferrer P, Petri H, Hasford J, et al. A compilation of research working groups on drug utilisation across Europe. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:143. 10.1186/1756-0500-7-143. PubMed PMC

European Medicines Agency. Download medicine data: EPAR 2023.

European Medicines Agency. Orphan designation: overview 2024.

European Medicines Agency. Post-authorisation 2024.

Godman B, Malmström RE, Diogene E, Gray A, Jayathissa S, Timoney A, et al. Are new models needed to optimize the utilization of new medicines to sustain healthcare systems? Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2015;8:77–94. 10.1586/17512433.2015.990380. PubMed

de Bruijn W, Ibáñez C, Frisk P, Bak Pedersen H, Alkan A, Vella Bonanno P, et al. Introduction and utilization of high priced HCV medicines across Europe; implications for the future. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:197. 10.3389/fphar.2016.00197. PubMed PMC

Godman B, Wladysiuk M, McTaggart S, Kurdi A, Allocati E, Jakovljevic M, et al. Utilisation trend of long-acting insulin analogues including biosimilars across Europe: findings and Implications. BioMed Res Int. 2021;2021:1–16. 10.1155/2021/9996193. PubMed PMC

Improving data on pharmaceutical expenditure in hospitals and other health care settings, vol 139. 2022. 10.1787/6c0d64a2-en.

Eurostat 2024. 10.2908/TPS00001.

Blümel M, Spranger A, Achstetter K, Maresso A, Busse R. Germany: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2020;22:1–272. PubMed

Bachner F, Bobek J, Habimana K, Ladurner J, Lepuschutz L, Ostermann H, et al. Austria: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2018;20:1–254. PubMed

Moon JC, Godman B, Petzold M, Alvarez-Madrazo S, Bennett K, Bishop I, et al. Different initiatives across Europe to enhance losartan utilization post generics: impact and implications. Front Pharmacol. 2014;5:219. 10.3389/fphar.2014.00219. PubMed PMC

Picavet E, Annemans L, Cleemput I, Cassiman D, Simoens S. Market uptake of orphan drugs: a European analysis: market uptake of orphan drugs. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012;37:664–7. 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2012.01364.x. PubMed

Laires PA, Exposto F, Mesquita R, Martins AP, Cunha-Miranda L, Fonseca JE. Patients’ access to biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison between Portugal and other European countries. Eur J Health Econ. 2013;14:875–85. 10.1007/s10198-012-0432-5. PubMed

Costa-Font J, McGuire A, Varol N. Regulation effects on the adoption of new medicines. Empir Econ. 2015;49:1101–21. 10.1007/s00181-014-0903-x.

Bergstra SA, Branco JC, Vega-Morales D, Salomon-Escoto K, Govind N, Allaart CF, et al. Inequity in access to bDMARD care and how it influences disease outcomes across countries worldwide: results from the METEOR-registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:1413–20. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213289. PubMed

Putrik P, Ramiro S, Kvien TK, Sokka T, Uhlig T, Boonen A, et al. Variations in criteria regulating treatment with reimbursed biologic DMARDs across European countries. Are differences related to country’s wealth? Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:2010–21. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203819. PubMed

Orlewska E, Ancuta I, Anic B, Codrenau C, Damjanov N, Djukic P, et al. Access to biologic treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. Med Sci Monit. 2011;17:SR1–13. 10.12659/MSM.881697. PubMed PMC

Rencz F, Kemény L, Gajdácsi JZ, Owczarek W, Arenberger P, Tiplica GS, et al. Use of biologics for psoriasis in Central and Eastern European countries. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29:2222–30. 10.1111/jdv.13222. PubMed

De Labry Lima AO, Balbino JE, Forns JR. Literature review on entry of medicines in European small markets. Pharm Policy Law. 2012;14:187–93. 10.3233/PPL-120353.

Panteli D, Arickx F, Cleemput I, Dedet G, Eckhardt H, Fogarty E, et al. Pharmaceutical regulation in 15 European countries review. Health Syst Transit. 2016;18:1–122. PubMed

Inotai A, Csanadi M, Petrova G, Dimitrova M, Bochenek T, Tesar T, et al. Patient access, unmet medical need, expected benefits, and concerns related to the utilisation of biosimilars in Eastern European countries: a survey of experts. BioMed Res Int. 2018;2018:9597362. 10.1155/2018/9597362. PubMed PMC

Moorkens E, Vulto AG, Huys I, Dylst P, Godman B, Keuerleber S, et al. Policies for biosimilar uptake in Europe: an overview. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0190147. 10.1371/journal.pone.0190147. PubMed PMC

Brian G, Biljana T, Eleonora A, Magdalene W, Stuart M, Amanj K, et al. Biosimilars are essential for sustainable healthcare systems; however, key challenges remain as seen with long-acting insulin analogues. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2022. 10.7324/JAPS.2022.120306.

Greene L, Singh RM, Carden MJ, Pardo CO, Lichtenstein GR. Strategies for overcoming barriers to adopting biosimilars and achieving goals of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act: a survey of managed care and specialty pharmacy professionals. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019;25:904–12. 10.18553/jmcp.2019.18412. PubMed PMC

Post HC, Schutte T, Van Oijen MGH, Van Laarhoven HWM, Hollak CEM. Time to reimbursement of novel anticancer drugs in Europe: a case study of seven European countries. ESMO Open. 2023;8: 101208. 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101208. PubMed PMC

Vallano A, Pontes C, Agustí A. The challenges of access to innovative medicines with limited evidence in the European Union. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1215431. 10.3389/fphar.2023.1215431. PubMed PMC

Le Pen C, Bauduceau B, Ansolabehere X, Troubat A, Bineau S, Ripert M, et al. Penetration rates of new pharmaceutical products in Europe: a comparative study of several classes recently launched in type-2 diabetes. Ann Endocrinol. 2021;82:99–106. 10.1016/j.ando.2020.12.009. PubMed

Hofmarcher T, Lindgren P, Wilking N. Systemic anti-cancer therapy patterns in advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Europe. J Cancer Policy. 2022;34: 100362. 10.1016/j.jcpo.2022.100362. PubMed

Ferrario A, Kanavos P. Dealing with uncertainty and high prices of new medicines: a comparative analysis of the use of managed entry agreements in Belgium, England, the Netherlands and Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 2015;124:39–47. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.003. PubMed

Vogler S, Paris V, Dimitra Panteli, Richardson E, Palm W, Mossialos E. Ensuring access to medicines: How to redesign pricing, reimbursement and procurement? [Internet]. Nih.gov. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2018 [cited 2024 Jun 5]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK526411/. PubMed

Efthymiadou O, Kanavos P. Impact of managed entry agreements on availability of and timely access to medicines: an ex-post evaluation of agreements implemented for oncology therapies in four countries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22:1066. 10.1186/s12913-022-08437-w. PubMed PMC

Fischer P, Reiss T, Mahlich J, Gicquel E, Aichinger H, Pullmann L, et al. Unlocking the value of innovative medicines: insights from the advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP) innovation systems in Germany and Sweden. Health Policy Technol. 2023;12: 100744. 10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100744.

Fontrier A-M, Visintin E, Kanavos P. Similarities and differences in health technology assessment systems and implications for coverage decisions: evidence from 32 countries. Pharmacoecon Open. 2022;6:315–28. 10.1007/s41669-021-00311-5. PubMed PMC

Hunger T, Schnell-Inderst P, Sahakyan N, Siebert U. Using expert opinion in health technology assessment: a guideline review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016;32:131–9. 10.1017/S0266462316000209. PubMed

Van Haesendonck L, Ruof J, Desmet T, Van Dyck W, Simoens S, Huys I, et al. The role of stakeholder involvement in the evolving EU HTA process: insights generated through the European Access Academy’s multi-stakeholder pre-convention questionnaire. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2023;11:2217543. 10.1080/20016689.2023.2217543. PubMed PMC

Brax H, Fadlallah R, Al-Khaled L, Kahale LA, Nas H, El-Jardali F, et al. Association between physicians’ interaction with pharmaceutical companies and their clinical practices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0175493. 10.1371/journal.pone.0175493. PubMed PMC

Rémuzat C, Dorey J, Cristeau O, Ionescu D, Radière G, Toumi M. Key drivers for market penetration of biosimilars in Europe. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017;5:1272308. 10.1080/20016689.2016.1272308. PubMed PMC

Monleón C, Martin-Späth H, Crespo C, Dussart C, Toumi M. Implicit factors influencing the HTA deliberative processes in 5 European countries: results from a mixed-methods research. Health Policy Open. 2023;5: 100109. 10.1016/j.hpopen.2023.100109. PubMed PMC

Vallano A, Pontes C. Escalating costs of innovative medicines: perspective and proposals. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1449707. 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1449707. PubMed PMC

European Commission. Pharmaceutical strategy for Europe 2024.

Kristensen FB, Mäkelä M, Neikter SA, Rehnqvist N, Håheim LL, Mørland B, et al. European Network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA: planning, development, and implementation of a sustainable European network for health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25:107–16. 10.1017/S0266462309990754. PubMed

Putrik P, Ramiro S, Kvien TK, Sokka T, Pavlova M, Uhlig T, et al. Inequities in access to biologic and synthetic DMARDs across 46 European countries. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:198. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202603. PubMed

Péntek M, Lakatos PL, Oorsprong T, Gulácsi L, Pavlova M, Groot W, et al. Access to biologicals in Crohn’s disease in ten European countries. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:6294. 10.3748/wjg.v23.i34.6294. PubMed PMC

Richards M. Extent and causes of international variations in drug usage A report for the Secretary of State for Health by Professor Sir Mike Richards CBE [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2024 Jun 3]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7c9f4040f0b65b3de0a166/dh_117977.pdf.

Lublóy Á. Factors affecting the uptake of new medicines: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:469. 10.1186/1472-6963-14-469. PubMed PMC

Chauhan D, Mason A. Factors affecting the uptake of new medicines in secondary care a literature review. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008;33:339–48. 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00925.x. PubMed

Medlinskiene K, Tomlinson J, Marques I, Richardson S, Stirling K, Petty D. Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of new medicines into clinical practice: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21:1198. 10.1186/s12913-021-07196-4. PubMed PMC

Sarnola K, Koskinen H, Klintrup K, Astrup C, Kurko T. Uptake and availability of new outpatient cancer medicines in 2010–2021 in Nordic countries: survey of competent authorities. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23:1437. 10.1186/s12913-023-10421-x. PubMed PMC

Cohen D. Cancer drugs: high price, uncertain value. BMJ. 2017;359: j4543. 10.1136/bmj.j4543. PubMed PMC

Petersen A, editor. Handbook on the sociology of health and medicine. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2023. 10.4337/9781839104756.

European Commission. European Health Data Space Regulation (EHDS).

Pastorino R, De Vito C, Migliara G, Glocker K, Binenbaum I, Ricciardi W, et al. Benefits and challenges of Big Data in healthcare: an overview of the European initiatives. Eur J Public Health. 2019;29:23–7. 10.1093/eurpub/ckz168. PubMed PMC

Kolasa K, Goettsch W, Petrova G, Berler A. Without data, you’re just another person with an opinion. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020;20:147–54. 10.1080/14737167.2020.1751612. PubMed

Raab R, Küderle A, Zakreuskaya A, Stern AD, Klucken J, Kaissis G, et al. Federated electronic health records for the European health data space. Lancet Digit Health. 2023;5:e840–7. 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00156-5. PubMed

Vogler S. Access to high-cost medicines in Europe: equitable access high-cost pharm. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2018. p. 143–64. 10.1016/B978-0-12-811945-7.00010-5.

European Health and Digital Executive Agency. Gesundheit Österreich Beratungs GmbH, Tetra Tech. Study on best practices in the public procurement of medicines: final report. LU: Publications Office; 2022.

International price comparison 2023. The Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency; 2023.

Detiček A, Locatelli I, Kos M. Patient access to medicines for rare diseases in European countries. Value Health. 2018;21:553–60. 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.007. PubMed

Hofmarcher T, Lindgren P, Wilking N, Jönsson B. The cost of cancer in Europe 2018. Eur J Cancer. 2020;129:41–9. 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.011. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...