Perceptions and Needs of Stakeholders Regarding MyPal Project's Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App: Cross-Sectional Qualitative Focus Group Study

. 2025 Aug 13 ; 11 () : e57388. [epub] 20250813

Jazyk angličtina Země Kanada Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid40802976
Odkazy

PubMed 40802976
PubMed Central PMC12391845
DOI 10.2196/57388
PII: v11i1e57388
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: Palliative care is crucial for patients with life-threatening and serious diseases such as cancer, as it addresses their physical, psychosocial, and spiritual needs. Hematological malignancies significantly contribute to global cancer cases, impacting both older adults and children. To meet the increasing demand for palliative care, electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) interventions offer valuable insights into patient monitoring and treatment decision-making. The MyPal project developed a digital ePRO solution to improve palliative care by enabling structured symptom reporting and promoting physician-patient communication. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the perceptions, opinions, and needs of adult and pediatric patients with cancer, caregivers, and health care professionals (HCPs) regarding low-fidelity versions of the MyPal project's digital solution, which is designed to improve palliative cancer care. METHODS: A qualitative, cross-sectional study was conducted using 12 prepilot focus groups (FGs) across 4 European countries (Greece, Italy, Germany, and the Czech Republic) at participating hospitals and research centers. The FGs, held in person, included 61 participants, including 27 (44%) adult patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes, 19 (31%) children with hematological malignancies or solid tumors and their parents, and 15 (25%) HCPs specializing in oncology and palliative care. A semistructured discussion guide, informed by vignettes and user personas, was used to facilitate discussions. Sessions were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify and extract themes and subthemes from the FG discussions. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged from the FG discussions. The first theme, improved care, showcased the project's potential to enhance health care through patient-reported measures by improving symptom monitoring, streamlining decision-making, and strengthening physician-patient communication. Patients and caregivers valued the ability to report symptoms remotely, reducing unnecessary hospital visits, while HCPs appreciated having structured patient data to guide treatment. The second theme, digital communication framework, revealed that while participants recognized the benefits of digital tools, they had concerns about data security, privacy, and clarity regarding communication protocols. Questions emerged about how and when HCPs would review and respond to patient-reported data. In the third theme, applicability for use in health care, participants emphasized the importance of the system's ease of use, particularly for older patients and young children. Concerns were raised about the potential intrusiveness of the system, particularly regarding notification frequency and the impact on daily life. HCPs highlighted workload challenges, suggesting the need for a structured alert system to prioritize urgent cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that ePRO-based interventions such as MyPal can improve palliative care by facilitating communication and patient monitoring. However, addressing privacy concerns, optimizing usability for diverse populations, and ensuring seamless integration into clinical workflows are critical for successful adoption. Insights from this study will inform future development and optimization of eHealth interventions in palliative care.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Ferrell BR, Twaddle ML, Melnick A, Meier DE. National consensus project clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care guidelines, 4th edition. J Palliat Med. 2018 Dec;21(12):1684–9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0431. PubMed DOI

Sepúlveda C, Marlin A, Yoshida T, Ullrich A. Palliative care: the World Health Organization's global perspective. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Aug;24(2):91–6. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00440-2. S0885392402004402 PubMed DOI

Maresova P, Javanmardi E, Barakovic S, Barakovic Husic J, Tomsone S, Krejcar O, Kuca K. Consequences of chronic diseases and other limitations associated with old age - a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 01;19(1):1431. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7762-5. 10.1186/s12889-019-7762-5 PubMed DOI PMC

Nwosu AC, McGlinchey T, Sanders J, Stanley S, Palfrey J, Lubbers P, Chapman L, Finucane A, Mason S. Identification of digital health priorities for palliative care research: modified Delphi study. JMIR Aging. 2022 Mar 21;5(1):e32075. doi: 10.2196/32075. v5i1e32075 PubMed DOI PMC

De Moraes Hungria VT, Chiattone C, Pavlovsky M, Abenoza LM, Agreda GP, Armenta J, Arrais C, Avendaño Flores O, Barroso F, Basquiera AL, Cao C, Cugliari MS, Enrico A, Foggliatto LM, Galvez KM, Gomez D, Gomez A, de Iracema D, Farias D, Lopez L, Mantilla WA, Martínez D, Mela MJ, Miguel CE, Ovilla R, Palmer L, Pavlovsky C, Ramos C, Remaggi G, Santucci R, Schusterschitz S, Sossa CL, Tuna-Aguilar E, Vela J, Santos T, de la Mora O, Machnicki G, Fernandez M, Barreyro P. Epidemiology of hematologic malignancies in real-world settings: findings from the hemato-oncology Latin America observational registry study. J Glob Oncol. 2019 Nov;5:1–19. doi: 10.1200/JGO.19.00025. PubMed DOI PMC

Hallek M. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: 2015 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment. Am J Hematol. 2015 May;90(5):446–60. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23979. PubMed DOI

Neukirchen J, Schoonen WM, Strupp C, Gattermann N, Aul C, Haas R, Germing U. Incidence and prevalence of myelodysplastic syndromes: data from the Düsseldorf MDS-registry. Leuk Res. 2011 Dec;35(12):1591–6. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2011.06.001.S0145-2126(11)00272-4 PubMed DOI

Scarfò L, Karamanidou C, Doubek M, Garani-Papadatos T, Didi J, Pontikoglou C, Ling J, Payne C, Papadaki HA, Rosenquist R, Stavroyianni N, Payne S, Ghia P, Natsiavas P, Maramis C, Stamatopoulos K. MyPal ADULT study protocol: a randomised clinical trial of the MyPal ePRO-based early palliative care system in adult patients with haematological malignancies. BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 02;11(11):e050256. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050256. bmjopen-2021-050256 PubMed DOI PMC

Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(1):12–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820. PubMed DOI

Borrescio-Higa F, Valdés N. The psychosocial burden of families with childhood blood cancer. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 05;19(1):599. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010599. ijerph19010599 PubMed DOI PMC

Ananth P, Wolfe J, Johnston EE. Charting a path to high-quality end-of-life care for children with cancer. Cancer. 2022 Oct;128(20):3586–92. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34419. PubMed DOI PMC

Lupu D, Quigley L, Mehfoud N, Salsberg ES. The growing demand for hospice and palliative medicine physicians: will the supply keep up? J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Apr;55(4):1216–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.01.011. S0885-3924(18)30031-9 PubMed DOI

Maguire R, Fox PA, McCann L, Miaskowski C, Kotronoulas G, Miller M, Furlong E, Ream E, Armes J, Patiraki E, Gaiger A, Berg GV, Flowerday A, Donnan P, McCrone P, Apostolidis K, Harris J, Katsaragakis S, Buick AR, Kearney N. The eSMART study protocol: a randomised controlled trial to evaluate electronic symptom management using the advanced symptom management system (ASyMS) remote technology for patients with cancer. BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 06;7(5):e015016. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015016. bmjopen-2016-015016 PubMed DOI PMC

Capurro D, Ganzinger M, Perez-Lu J, Knaup P. Effectiveness of eHealth interventions and information needs in palliative care: a systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Mar 07;16(3):e72. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2812. v16i3e72 PubMed DOI PMC

Gill RK, Ogilvie G, Norman WV, Fitzsimmons B, Maher C, Renner R. Feasibility and acceptability of a mobile technology intervention to support postabortion care (the FACTS study phase II) after surgical abortion: user-centered design. JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 Oct 10;6(4):e14558. doi: 10.2196/14558. v6i4e14558 PubMed DOI PMC

Gonzales MJ, Riek LD. Co-designing patient-centered health communication tools for cancer care. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare and Workshops; Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare and Workshops, PervasiveHealth ;208?215; May 5-8, 2013; Venice, Italy. 2013. pp. 208–15.

Scott D, Hudson P, Charnley K, Payne C, Westcott G. Development of an eHealth information resource for family carers supporting a person receiving palliative care on the island of Ireland. BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Aug 30;18(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0457-y. 10.1186/s12904-019-0457-y PubMed DOI PMC

Allsop MJ, Johnson O, Taylor S, Hackett J, Allen P, Bennett MI, Bewick BM. Multidisciplinary software design for the routine monitoring and assessment of pain in palliative care services: the development of PainCheck. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2019 Sep;3:1–17. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00120. PubMed DOI PMC

Nieroda ME, Lophatananon A, McMillan B, Chen L, Hughes J, Daniels R, Clark J, Rogers S, Muir KR. Online decision support tool for personalized cancer symptom checking in the community (REACT): acceptability, feasibility, and usability study. JMIR Cancer. 2018 Jul 04;4(2):e10073. doi: 10.2196/10073. v4i2e10073 PubMed DOI PMC

Meyerheim M, Karamanidou C, Payne S, Garani-Papadatos T, Sander A, Downing J, Stamatopoulos K, Ling J, Payne C, Scarfò L, Lokaj P, Maramis C, Graf N. MyPal-Child study protocol: an observational prospective clinical feasibility study of the MyPal ePRO-based early palliative care digital system in paediatric oncology patients. BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 13;11(4):e045226. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045226. bmjopen-2020-045226 PubMed DOI PMC

Maramis C, Payne S, Pospisilova S, Rosenquist R, Ghia P, Pontikoglou C, Sander A, Doubek M, Graf N, Ling J, Downing J, Karamanidou C, Pavi E, Koutkias V, Schera F, Kiefer S, Koumakis L, Marias K, Hoffmann S, Parker H, Reston J. Using electronic patient reported outcomes to foster palliative cancer care: the MyPal approach. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering; BIBE '19; October 28-30, 2019; Athens, Greece. 2019. pp. 405–9. DOI

Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication; 2009.

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006 Jan;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. DOI

Ritchie J, Lewis J, Lewis P, Nicholls C, Ormston R. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication; 2013.

Tan-MacNeill KM, Smith IM, Weiss SK, Johnson SA, Chorney J, Constantin E, Shea S, Hanlon-Dearman A, Brown CA, Godbout R, Ipsiroglu O, Reid GJ, Corkum PV. An eHealth insomnia intervention for children with neurodevelopmental disorders: results of a usability study. Res Dev Disabil. 2020 Mar;98:103573. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103573.S0891-4222(20)30003-2 PubMed DOI

Jacob C, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Social, organizational, and technological factors impacting clinicians' adoption of mobile health tools: systematic literature review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Feb 20;8(2):e15935. doi: 10.2196/15935. v8i2e15935 PubMed DOI PMC

Jacob C, Lindeque J, Klein A, Ivory C, Heuss S, Peter MK. Assessing the quality and impact of eHealth tools: systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Mar 23;10:e45143. doi: 10.2196/45143. v10i1e45143 PubMed DOI PMC

Morrison LG, Hargood C, Pejovic V, Geraghty AW, Lloyd S, Goodman N, Michaelides DT, Weston A, Musolesi M, Weal MJ, Yardley L. The effect of timing and frequency of push notifications on usage of a smartphone-based stress management intervention: an exploratory trial. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0169162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169162. PONE-D-16-32583 PubMed DOI PMC

Meyerowitz-Katz G, Ravi S, Arnolda L, Feng X, Maberly G, Astell-Burt T. Rates of attrition and dropout in app-based interventions for chronic disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 29;22(9):e20283. doi: 10.2196/20283. v22i9e20283 PubMed DOI PMC

Nymberg VM, Bolmsjö BB, Wolff M, Calling S, Gerward S, Sandberg M. 'Having to learn this so late in our lives…' Swedish elderly patients' beliefs, experiences, attitudes and expectations of e-health in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Mar 08;37(1):41–52. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1570612. PubMed DOI PMC

Park J, Han J, Kim Y, Rho MJ. Development, acceptance, and concerns surrounding app-based services to overcome the COVID-19 outbreak in South Korea: web-based survey study. JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jul 30;9(7):e29315. doi: 10.2196/29315. v9i7e29315 PubMed DOI PMC

Raj M, Ryan K, Amara PS, Nong P, Calhoun K, Trinidad MG, Thiel D, Spector-Bagdady K, De Vries R, Kardia S, Platt J. Policy preferences regarding health data sharing among patients with cancer: public deliberations. JMIR Cancer. 2023 Jan 31;9:e39631. doi: 10.2196/39631. v9i1e39631 PubMed DOI PMC

Sharma A, Czerwinska KP, Brenna L, Johansen D, Johansen HD. Privacy perceptions and concerns in image-based dietary assessment systems: questionnaire-based study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2020 Oct 15;7(4):e19085. doi: 10.2196/19085. v7i4e19085 PubMed DOI PMC

Lupton D. Digital health now and in the future: findings from a participatory design stakeholder workshop. Digit Health. 2017 Nov 09;3:2055207617740018. doi: 10.1177/2055207617740018. 10.1177_2055207617740018 PubMed DOI PMC

Karamanidou C, Natsiavas P, Koumakis L, Marias K, Schera F, Schäfer M, Payne S, Maramis C. Electronic patient-reported outcome-based interventions for palliative cancer care: a systematic and mapping review. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 Jul;4:647–56. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00015. PubMed DOI PMC

Broekhuis M, van Velsen L, Hermens H. Assessing usability of eHealth technology: a comparison of usability benchmarking instruments. Int J Med Inform. 2019 Aug;128:24–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.05.001.S1386-5056(19)30067-X PubMed DOI

Steele Gray C, Khan AI, Kuluski K, McKillop I, Sharpe S, Bierman AS, Lyons RF, Cott C. Improving patient experience and primary care quality for patients with complex chronic disease using the electronic patient-reported outcomes tool: adopting qualitative methods into a user-centered design approach. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Feb 18;5(1):e28. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5204. v5i1e28 PubMed DOI PMC

Elgamal R. Meta-analysis: eHealth literacy and attitudes towards internet/computer technology. Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Jun;123:108196. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108196. S0738-3991(24)00063-6 PubMed DOI

Klingberg A, Sawe HR, Hammar U, Wallis LA, Hasselberg M. m-Health for burn injury consultations in a low-resource setting: an acceptability study among health care providers. Telemed J E Health. 2020 Apr 01;26(4):395–405. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0048. PubMed DOI PMC

Hirvonen N, Enwald H, Känsäkoski H, Eriksson-Backa K, Nguyen H, Huhta A, Huvila I. Older adults' views on eHealth services: a systematic review of scientific journal articles. Int J Med Inform. 2020 Mar;135:104031. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104031.S1386-5056(18)30031-5 PubMed DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...