• This record comes from PubMed

Prediction of Sinus Rhythm Maintenance After Electrical Cardioversion Using Spectral and Vector Cardiographic ECG Analysis

. 2025 Sep ; 30 (5) : e70105.

Status In-Process Language English Country United States Media print

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
National Institute for Research of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases (CarDia)

INTRODUCTION: Electrical cardioversion (ECV) remains a treatment option for atrial fibrillation (AF). The study aimed to find predictors of SR maintenance after ECV using spectral and vector cardiographic (VCG) analysis of ECGs. METHODS: Consecutive patients with AF referred for elective ECV were prospectively enrolled. A digital ECG recording was obtained before the ECV and was analyzed using spectral and VCG analysis. AF activity was analyzed using spectral analysis to determine the dominant frequency (DF), RI (regularity index), and OI (organizational index). QRS complexes were analyzed using vectorcardiography to determine the dXmean, dYmean, and dZmean (derivation of VCG signals). We used Lasso Logistic Regression (LLR) in five-fold cross-validation for feature selection and to build combined predictive models of SR maintenance. For model training and evaluation, data were split in a 60%-40% ratio for training and testing, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients were enrolled (age 70.2 ± 10.6 years, 49 (61%) were men, BMI 29.7 kg/m2). At the 3-month follow-up, AF recurrence was present in 36 patients (45%). The best single VCG parameter to predict SR maintenance was dZMean (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.06-0.51, p < 0.001). VCG-domain parameters combined into the LLR model showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78. From the spectral analysis domain, the best predictor was DF (OR 3.54, 95% CI 1.28-10.25), p = 0.006; spectral features led to an AUC of 0.76 when combined in the LLR model. Clinical features did not form a model since no features passed feature selection. Combining VCG and spectral analysis features led to an LLR model with an AUC of 0.79. CONCLUSION: The combination of spectral analysis of AF activity and VCG analysis of ventricular activity provided more accurate predictive information than either analysis alone.

See more in PubMed

Aizawa, Y. , Watanabe H., and Okumura K.. 2017. “Electrocardiogram (ECG) for the Prediction of Incident Atrial Fibrillation: An Overview.” Journal of Atrial Fibrillation 10, no. 4: 1724. 10.4022/jafib.1724. PubMed DOI PMC

Alcaraz, R. , Hornero F., and Rieta J. J.. 2011. “Noninvasive Time and Frequency Predictors of Long‐Standing Atrial Fibrillation Early Recurrence After Electrical Cardioversion.” Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 34, no. 10: 1241–1250. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03125.x. PubMed DOI

Alcaraz, R. , Hornero F., and Rieta J. J.. 2016. “Electrocardiographic Spectral Features for Long‐Term Outcome Prognosis of Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation.” Annals of Biomedical Engineering 44, no. 11: 3307–3318. 10.1007/s10439-016-1641-3. PubMed DOI

Alcaraz, R. , and Rieta J. J.. 2009. “Time and Frequency Recurrence Analysis of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation After Electrical Cardioversion.” Physiological Measurement 30, no. 5: 479–489. 10.1088/0967-3334/30/5/005. PubMed DOI

Attia, Z. I. , Noseworthy P. A., Lopez‐Jimenez F., et al. 2019. “An Artificial Intelligence‐Enabled ECG Algorithm for the Identification of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation During Sinus Rhythm: A Retrospective Analysis of Outcome Prediction.” Lancet 394, no. 10201: 861–867. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31721-0. PubMed DOI

Berenfeld, O. 2007. “Quantifying Activation Frequency in Atrial Fibrillation to Establish Underlying Mechanisms and Ablation Guidance.” Heart Rhythm 4, no. 9: 1225–1234. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.05.004. PubMed DOI

Berry‐Noronha, A. , Bonavia L., Song E., et al. 2024. “ECG Predictors of AF: A Systematic Review (Predicting AF in Ischaemic Stroke‐PrAFIS).” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 237: 108164. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108164. PubMed DOI

Calkins, H. , Kuck K. H., Cappato R., et al. 2012. “2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Patient Selection, Procedural Techniques, Patient Management and Follow‐Up, Definitions, Endpoints, and Research Trial Design.” Europace 14, no. 4: 528–606. 10.1093/europace/eus027. PubMed DOI

Chugh, S. S. , Havmoeller R., Narayanan K., et al. 2014. “Worldwide Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation: A Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study.” Circulation 129, no. 8: 837–847. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119. PubMed DOI PMC

Doring, C. , Richter U., Ulbrich S., et al. 2023. “The Impact of Right Atrial Size to Predict Success of Direct Current Cardioversion in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.” Korean Circulation Journal 53, no. 5: 331–343. 10.4070/kcj.2022.0291. PubMed DOI PMC

January, C. T. , Wann L. S., Alpert J. S., et al. 2014. “2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 64, no. 21: e1–e76. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.022. PubMed DOI

Kornej, J. , Benjamin E. J., and Magnani J. W.. 2021. “Atrial Fibrillation: Global Burdens and Global Opportunities.” Heart 107: 516–518. 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318480. PubMed DOI

Langberg, J. J. , Burnette J. C., and McTeague K. K.. 1998. “Spectral Analysis of the Electrocardiogram Predicts Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Cardioversion.” Journal of Electrocardiology 31: 80–84. 10.1016/s0022-0736(98)90297-7. PubMed DOI

Lankveld, T. , Zeemering S., Scherr D., et al. 2016. “Atrial Fibrillation Complexity Parameters Derived From Surface ECGs Predict Procedural Outcome and Long‐Term Follow‐Up of Stepwise Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.” Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 9, no. 2: e003354. 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003354. PubMed DOI

Lin, J. M. , Lin J. L., Lai L. P., Tseng Y. Z., and Stephen Huang S. K.. 2002. “Predictors of Clinical Recurrence After Successful Electrical Cardioversion of Chronic Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical and Electrophysiological Observations.” Cardiology 97, no. 3: 133–137. 10.1159/000063329. PubMed DOI

Martinez, J. P. , Almeida R., Olmos S., Rocha A. P., and Laguna P.. 2004. “A Wavelet‐Based ECG Delineator: Evaluation on Standard Databases.” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 51, no. 4: 570–581. 10.1109/TBME.2003.821031. PubMed DOI

Noseworthy, P. A. , Kapa S., Deshmukh A. J., et al. 2015. “Risk of Stroke After Catheter Ablation Versus Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation: A Propensity‐Matched Study of 24,244 Patients.” Heart Rhythm 12, no. 6: 1154–1161. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.02.020. PubMed DOI

Park, S. M. , Kim Y. H., Choi J. I., Pak H. N., Kim Y. H., and Shim W. J.. 2010. “Left Atrial Electromechanical Conduction Time Can Predict Six‐Month Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm After Electrical Cardioversion in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation by Doppler Tissue Echocardiography.” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 23, no. 3: 309–314. 10.1016/j.echo.2009.12.019. PubMed DOI

Plesinger, F. , Hassouna S., Carna Z., et al. 2025. “Automatically Optimized Vectorcardiographic Features Are Associated With Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Electrical Cardioversion.” Scientific Reports 15, no. 1: 1257. 10.1038/s41598-025-85340-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Purkayastha, P. , Ibrahim A., Haslen D., and Gamma R.. 2023. “The Efficacy and Safety of a Nurse‐Led Electrical Cardioversion Service for Atrial Fibrillation Over a 2‐Year Time Period.” European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 22, no. 4: 425–429. 10.1093/eurjcn/zvac090. PubMed DOI

Raniga, D. , Goda M., Hattingh L., Thorning S., Rowe M., and Howes L.. 2024. “Left Atrial Volume Index: A Predictor of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Following Direct Current Cardioversion ‐ A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” IJC Heart & Vasculature 51: 101364. 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101364. PubMed DOI PMC

Sanders, P. , Berenfeld O., Hocini M., et al. 2005. “Spectral Analysis Identifies Sites of High‐Frequency Activity Maintaining Atrial Fibrillation in Humans.” Circulation 112, no. 6: 789–797. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.517011. PubMed DOI

Tieleman, R. G. , Van Gelder I. C., Crijns H. J., et al. 1998. “Early Recurrences of Atrial Fibrillation After Electrical Cardioversion: A Result of Fibrillation‐Induced Electrical Remodeling of the Atria?” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 31, no. 1: 167–173. 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00455-5. PubMed DOI

Toufan, M. , Kazemi B., and Molazadeh N.. 2017. “The Significance of the Left Atrial Volume Index in Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Electrical Cardioversion.” Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research 9, no. 1: 54–59. 10.15171/jcvtr.2017.08. PubMed DOI PMC

Vikman, S. , Makikallio T. H., Yli‐Mayry S., Nurmi M., Airaksinen K. E., and Huikuri H. V.. 2003. “Heart Rate Variability and Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Electrical Cardioversion.” Annals of Medicine 35, no. 1: 36–42. 10.1080/07853890310004110. PubMed DOI

Xi, Q. , Sahakian A. V., Frohlich T. G., Ng J., and Swiryn S.. 2004. “Relationship Between Pattern of Occurrence of Atrial Fibrillation and Surface Electrocardiographic Fibrillatory Wave Characteristics.” Heart Rhythm 1, no. 6: 656–663. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.09.010. PubMed DOI

Yoshida, K. , Ulfarsson M., Oral H., et al. 2011. “Left Atrial Pressure and Dominant Frequency of Atrial Fibrillation in Humans.” Heart Rhythm 8, no. 2: 181–187. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.10.030. PubMed DOI PMC

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...