Understanding the mechanisms that maintain the coexistence of plant species is critical to addressing the global biodiversity crisis. Increasing attention has been paid to interactions between plants and soil microbes (plant-soil feedback, PSF), which can not only promote plant coexistence by increasing stabilizing effects but also hinder it by generating competitive fitness differences. However, the predictive power of the PSF has been questioned in recent studies because estimates of microbially mediated coexistence have correlated poorly with the outcomes of plant interactions observed in the field. This discrepancy may be due to the approaches typically used in PSF research, such as measuring PSF effects on a single vital rate or using soil conditioned for a short time period and without considering abiotic contexts. Here, I examined the effects of soil inoculum with different training histories and training environments (with and without added nutrients) on germination, seedling survival, and biomass of four grassland species. I then examined whether predictions of microbially mediated coexistence of four species pairs were sensitive to the vital rate identity, conditioning history, and soil training environment. I found that conspecific inoculum trained for longer had increasingly positive and negative effects on germination and biomass, respectively, although the effects of inoculum history varied across species and training environments. Estimates of microbially mediated outcomes were directly related to the vital rate used: when based on biomass and seedling survival, all four pairs were predicted to coexist, but only two pairs could do so when based on germination due to much reduced or even negative stabilization. Although coexistence predictions were not significantly related to conditioning history (including the effects of both variable conditioning durations and combinations of conditioning species) or nutrient treatments, both factors had a significant effect on stabilization. These results suggest that predictions of microbially mediated coexistence may be biased when based on a single vital rate, such as plant growth. To obtain more realistic and accurate outcome estimates, PSF effects should be integrated across different life stages, considering the temporal and abiotic contexts of these effects specific to a focal study system.

Institute of Botany The Czech Academy of Sciences Průhonice Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Adler, P. B. , Ellner S. P., and Levine J. M.. 2010. “Coexistence of Perennial Plants: An Embarrassment of Niches.” Ecology Letters 13: 1019–1029. PubMed

Adler, P. B. , Smull D., Beard K. H., Choi R. T., Furniss T., Kulmatiski A., Meiners J. M., Tredennick A. T., and Veblen K. E.. 2018. “Competition and Coexistence in Plant Communities: Intraspecific Competition is Stronger Than Interspecific Competition.” Ecology Letters 21: 1319–1329. PubMed

Aldorfová, A. , Dostálek T., and Münzbergová Z.. 2022. “Effects of Soil Conditioning, Root and Shoot Litter Addition Interact to Determine the Intensity of Plant–Soil Feedback.” Oikos 2022: e09025.

Angert, A. L. , Huxman T. E., Chesson P., and Venable D. L.. 2009. “Functional Tradeoffs Determine Species Coexistence Via the Storage Effect.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 11641–11645. PubMed PMC

Beckman, N. G. , Dybzinski R., and Tilman D.. 2023. “Short‐Term Plant–Soil Feedback Experiment Fails to Predict Outcome of Competition Observed in Long‐Term Field Experiment.” Ecology 104: e3883. PubMed

Bever, J. D. 2003. “Soil Community Feedback and the Coexistence of Competitors: Conceptual Frameworks and Empirical Tests.” New Phytologist 157: 465–473. PubMed

Bever, J. D. , Westover K. M., and Antonovics J.. 1997. “Incorporating the Soil Community into Plant Population Dynamics: The Utility of the Feedback Approach.” Journal of Ecology 85: 561–573.

Busch, V. , Klaus V. H., Schäfer D., Prati D., Boch S., Müller J., Chisté M., et al. 2019. “Will I Stay or Will I Go? Plant Species‐Specific Response and Tolerance to High Land‐Use Intensity in Temperate Grassland Ecosystems.” Journal of Vegetation Science 30: 674–686.

Chesson, P. 2000. “Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 31: 343–366.

Chung, Y. A. , Monaco T. A., Taylor J. B., and Adler P. B.. 2023. “Do Plant–Soil Feedbacks Promote Coexistence in a Sagebrush Steppe?” Ecology 104: e4056. PubMed

Chytrý, M. , and Rafajová M.. 2003. “Czech National Phytosociological Database: Basic Statistics of the Available Vegetation‐Plot Data.” Preslia 75: 1–15.

Crawford, K. M. , Bauer J. T., Comita L. S., Eppinga M. B., Johnson D. J., Mangan S. A., Queenborough S. A., et al. 2019. “When and Where Plant‐Soil Feedback May Promote Plant Coexistence: A Meta‐Analysis.” Ecology Letters 22: 1274–1284. PubMed

Crawford, K. M. , and Knight T. M.. 2017. “Competition Overwhelms the Positive Plant‐Soil Feedback Generated by an Invasive Plant.” Oecologia 183: 211–220. PubMed

Crawley, M. J. 2007. The R Book. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

De Long, J. R. , Fry E. L., Veen G. F., and Kardol P.. 2019. “Why Are Plant–Soil Feedbacks So Unpredictable, and What to Do about It?” Functional Ecology 33: 118–128.

Dostál, P. 2023. “Fitness and Niche Differences Are both Important in Explaining Responses of Plant Diversity to Nutrient Addition.” Ecology 104: e4125. PubMed

Dostál, P. 2025a. “Predicting Microbially Mediated Plant Coexistence is Sensitive to Vital Rate Identity and Soil Conditioning History.” Dryad, Dataset. 10.5061/dryad.ngf1vhj76. DOI

Dostál, P. 2025b. “Long‐Term Effects of Host‐Specific Soil Microbiota on Plant Interactions.” Functional Ecology 39: 1220–1233.

Dostál, P. , Müllerová J., Pyšek P., Pergl J., and Klinerová T.. 2013. “The Impact of an Invasive Plant Changes over Time.” Ecology Letters 16: 1277–1284. PubMed

Dostálek, T. , Knappová J., and Münzbergová Z.. 2022. “The Role of Plant–Soil Feedback in Long‐Term Species Coexistence cannot be Predicted from its Effects on Plant Performance.” Annals of Botany 130: 535–546. PubMed PMC

Dudenhöffer, J. H. , Ebeling A., Klein A. M., and Wagg C.. 2018. “Beyond Biomass: Soil Feedbacks Are Transient over Plant Life Stages and Alter Fitness.” Journal of Ecology 106: 230–241.

Dudenhöffer, J. H. , Luecke N. C., and Crawford K. M.. 2022. “Changes in Precipitation Patterns Can Destabilize Plant Species Coexistence Via Changes in Plant–Soil Feedback.” Nature Ecology & Evolution 6: 546–554. PubMed

Godoy, O. , and Levine J. M.. 2014. “Phenology Effects on Invasion Success: Insights from Coupling Field Experiments to Coexistence Theory.” Ecology 95: 726–736. PubMed

Hannula, S. E. , Heinen R., Huberty M., Steinauer K., de Long J. R., Jongen R., and Bezemer T. M.. 2021. “Persistence of Plant‐Mediated Microbial Soil Legacy Effects in Soil and inside Roots.” Nature Communications 12: 5686. PubMed PMC

HilleRisLambers, J. , Adler P. B., Harpole W. S., Levine J. M., and Mayfield M. M.. 2012. “Rethinking Community Assembly through the Lens of Coexistence Theory.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 43: 227–248.

Johnson, N. C. , Graham J.‐H., and Smith F. A.. 1997. “Functioning of Mycorrhizal Associations along the Mutualism‐Parasitism Continuum.” New Phytologist 135: 575–586.

Kandlikar, G. S. 2024. “Quantifying Soil Microbial Effects on Plant Species Coexistence: A Conceptual Synthesis.” American Journal of Botany 111: e16316. PubMed

Kandlikar, G. S. , Johnson C. A., Yan X., Kraft N. J. B., and Levine J. M.. 2019. “Winning and Losing with Microbes: How Microbially Mediated Fitness Differences Influence Plant Diversity.” Ecology Letters 22: 1178–1191. PubMed

Kardol, P. , de Deyn G. B., Laliberté E., Mariotte P., and Hawkes C. V.. 2013. “Biotic Plant–Soil Feedbacks across Temporal Scales.” Journal of Ecology 101: 309–315.

Ke, P.‐J. , Kandlikar G., Ou S. X., Hsu G.‐C., Wan J., and Krishnadas M.. 2024. “Time Will Tell: The Temporal and Demographic Contexts of Plant–Soil Microbe Interactions.” Ecoevorxiv. 10.32942/X2PS5N. DOI

Ke, P.‐J. , and Levine J. M.. 2021. “The Temporal Dimension of Plant‐Soil Microbe Interactions: Mechanisms Promoting Feedback between Generations.” The American Naturalist 198: E80–E94. PubMed

Ke, P.‐J. , and Wan J.. 2020. “Effects of Soil Microbes on Plant Competition: A Perspective from Modern Coexistence Theory.” Ecological Monographs 90: e01391.

Ke, P.‐J. , Zee P. C., and Fukami T.. 2021. “Dynamic Plant–Soil Microbe Interactions: The Neglected Effect of Soil Conditioning Time.” New Phytologist 231: 1546–1558. PubMed

Kempel, A. , Rindisbacher A., Fischer M., and Allan E.. 2018. “Plant Soil Feedback Strength in Relation to Large‐Scale Plant Rarity and Phylogenetic Relatedness.” Ecology 99: 597–606. PubMed

Klinerová, T. , and Dostál P.. 2020. “Nutrient‐Demanding Species Face less Negative Competition and Plant–Soil Feedback Effects in a Nutrient‐Rich Environment.” New Phytologist 225: 1343–1354. PubMed

Klironomos, J. N. 2002. “Feedback with Soil Biota Contributes to Plant Rarity and Invasiveness in Communities.” Nature 417: 67–70. PubMed

Kulmatiski, A. , Beard K. H., Stevens J. R., and Cobbold S. M.. 2008. “Plant–Soil Feedbacks: A Meta‐Analytical Review.” Ecology Letters 11: 980–992. PubMed

Kuznetsova, A. , Brockhoff P. B., and Christensen R. H. B.. 2017. “lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models.” Journal of Statistical Software 82(13): 1–26.

Lekberg, Y. , Bever J. D., Bunn R. A., Callaway R. M., Hart M. M., Kivlin S. N., Klironomos J., et al. 2018. “Relative Importance of Competition and Plant–Soil Feedback, their Synergy, Context Dependency and Implications for Coexistence.” Ecology Letters 21: 1268–1281. PubMed

Lenth, R. V. 2019. “Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, Aka Least‐Squares Means.” R Package Version 1(4): 1.

Lepinay, C. , Vondráková Z., Dostálek T., and Münzbergová Z.. 2018. “Duration of the Conditioning Phase Affects the Results of Plant‐Soil Feedback Experiments Via Soil Chemical Properties.” Oecologia 186: 459–470. PubMed

Levine, J. M. , and HilleRisLambers J.. 2009. “The Importance of Niches for the Maintenance of Species Diversity.” Nature 461: 254–257. PubMed

Mangan, S. A. , Schnitzer S. A., Herre E. A., Mack K. M. L., Valencia M. C., Sanchez E. I., and Bever J. D.. 2010. “Negative Plant‐Soil Feedback Predicts Tree‐Species Relative Abundance in a Tropical Forest.” Nature 466: 752–755. PubMed

Maron, J. L. , Marler M., Klironomos J. N., and Cleveland C. C.. 2011. “Soil Fungal Pathogens and the Relationship between Plant Diversity and Productivity.” Ecology Letters 14: 36–41. PubMed

McCarthy‐Neumann, S. , and Kobe R. K.. 2019. “Site Soil‐Fertility and Light Availability Influence Plant‐Soil Feedback.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7: 383.

Petermann, J. S. , Fergus A. J. F., Turnbull L. A., and Schmid B.. 2008. “Janzen‐Connell Effects Are Widespread and Strong Enough to Maintain Diversity in Grasslands.” Ecology 89: 2399–2406. PubMed

R Development Core Team . 2021. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Reinhart, K. O. 2012. “The Organization of Plant Communities: Negative Plant–Soil Feedbacks and Semiarid Grasslands.” Ecology 93: 2377–2385. PubMed

Reinhart, K. O. , Bauer J. T., McCarthy‐Neumann S., MacDougall A. S., Hierro J. L., Chiuffo M. C., Mangan S. A., et al. 2021. “Globally, Plant‐Soil Feedbacks Are Weak Predictors of Plant Abundance.” Ecology and Evolution 11: 1756–1768. PubMed PMC

Smith‐Ramesh, L. M. , and Reynolds H. L.. 2017. “The Next Frontier of Plant‐Soil Feedback Research: Unraveling Context Dependence across Biotic and Abiotic Gradients.” Journal of Vegetation Science 28: 484–494.

Stein, C. , and Mangan S. A.. 2020. “Soil Biota Increase the Likelihood for Coexistence among Competing Plant Species.” Ecology 101: e03147. PubMed

Tilman, D. 1982. Resource Competition and Community Structure. Monographs in Population Biology, Vol. 17. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. PubMed

Uricchio, L. H. , Daws S. C., Spear E. R., and Mordecai E. A.. 2019. “Priority Effects and Nonhierarchical Competition Shape Species Composition in a Complex Grassland Community.” The American Naturalist 193: 213–226. PubMed PMC

van der Putten, W. H. , Bardgett R. D., Bever J. D., Bezemer T. M., Casper B. B., Fukami T., Kardol P., et al. 2013. “Plant‐Soil Feedbacks: The Past, the Present and Future Challenges.” Journal of Ecology 101: 265–276.

van der Putten, W. H. , Bradford M. A., Pernilla Brinkman E., van de Voorde T. F. J., and Veen G. F.. 2016. “Where, When and How Plant–Soil Feedback Matters in a Changing World.” Functional Ecology 30: 1109–1121.

Van Dyke, M. N. , Levine J. M., and Kraft N. J. B.. 2022. “Small Rainfall Changes Drive Substantial Changes in Plant Coexistence.” Nature 611: 507–511. PubMed

Wubs, E. R. J. , and Bezemer T. M.. 2018. “Temporal Carry‐over Effects in Sequential Plant–Soil Feedbacks.” Oikos 127: 220–229.

Yan, X. , Levine J. M., and Kandlikar G. S.. 2022. “A Quantitative Synthesis of Soil Microbial Effects on Plant Species Coexistence.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119: e2122088119. PubMed PMC