In recent years, non-destructive and non-invasive methods for 3D plant reconstruction have gained increasing importance in plant phenotyping. Morphological traits reflect the physiological status of a plant and serve as key indicators for precision agriculture, crop protection, and food quality assessment. Accurate and efficient 3D modelling enables objective and repeatable monitoring of plant development and health, thus supporting data-driven decision-making in agricultural and food research. This study presents a novel, cost-effective, and flexible photogrammetric apparatus for the routine analysis of plant morphological traits under controlled laboratory conditions. Existing systems often rely on expensive instrumentation and provide limited adaptability, whereas the platform described here combines affordability with high precision and robustness. A key innovation is the use of a robotic arm to control an industrial RGB camera, providing substantial flexibility in image acquisition. This mobility ensures comprehensive coverage of plants of different sizes and architectures while minimising occlusions. Another distinctive feature is the implementation of an optimised parameter tweak in the photogrammetric pipeline, which markedly improves the reconstruction of thin and delicate plant parts such as leaves, petioles, and fine stems. In combination with optimised acquisition parameters, including an exposure time of 50 milliseconds, a tweak value of 0.9, and a camera-to-object distance of 16 centimetres, the system achieves consistent model fidelity across diverse plant structures. Efficiency was further enhanced through automation and an optimised scanning procedure. Comparative testing showed that using a larger number of camera positions with fewer frames per position improved throughput, with the best configuration consisting of three height levels and 40 frames each. These improvements reduced the processing time by 75%, decreasing the average scan duration from 8 min to only 2.7 min per plant, while maintaining accuracy and reliability. Overall, the developed apparatus constitutes a reliable and low-cost solution that integrates robotic-assisted flexibility, improved reconstruction through the parameter tweak, and markedly reduced scanning time. The combination of precision, affordability, and efficiency makes the system competitive with existing approaches and, due to its accessibility and detailed methodological description, provides a distinctive contribution to the phenotyping community.

Department of Biotechnology Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology University of Chemistry and Technology Prague Technická 5 Prague 6 166 28 Czech Republic

Department of Forensic Experts in Transportation Faculty of Transportation Sciences Czech Technical University Prague Horská 2040 3 Prague 2 128 03 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Hrzich J, Beck M, Bidinosti C, Henry C, Manawasinghe K, Tanino K. A low-cost photogrammetry system for 3D plant modeling and phenotyping. 2025.

An N, Palmer CM, Baker RL, Markelz RJC, Ta J, Covington MF, Maloof JN, Welch SM, Weinig C. Plant high-throughput phenotyping using photogrammetry and imaging techniques to measure leaf length and rosette area. Comput Electron Agric. 2016;127:376–94. DOI

Wang Y, Wen W, Wu S, Wang C, Yu Z, Guo X, Zhao C. Maize plant phenotyping: comparing 3D laser scanning, multi-view stereo reconstruction, and 3D digitizing estimates. Remote Sens. 2019;11:1–17.

Rahaman MM, Chen D, Gillani Z, Klukas C, Chen M. Advanced phenotyping and phenotype data analysis for the study of plant growth and development. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:1–15. PubMed DOI PMC

Rui Z, Zhang Z,Zhang M, Azizi A, Igathinathane C, Cen H, Vougioukas S, Li H, Zhang J, Jiang Y, Jiao X, Wang M, Ampatzidis Y, Oladele OI, Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti M, Radi R. High-throughput proximal ground crop phenotyping systems - A comprehensive review. Comput Electron Agric. 2024;224:1–22. DOI

Xie CQ, Yang C. A review on plant high-throughput phenotyping traits using UAV-based sensors. Comput Electron Agric. 2020;178:1–14. DOI

Dhondt S, Wuyts N, Inzé D. Cell to whole-plant phenotyping: the best is yet to come. Trends Plant Sci. 2013;18:433–44. PubMed DOI

Asaari MSM, Mertens S, Verbraeken L, Dhondt S, Inzé D, Bikram K, Scheunders P. Non-destructive analysis of plant physiological traits using hyperspectral imaging: A case study on drought stress, computers and electronics in agriculture. 195 (2022) 1–13.

Cattivelli L, Rizza F, Badeck FW, Mazzucotelli E, Mastrangelo AM, Francia E, Mare C, Tondelli A, Stanca AM. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Res. 2008;105:1–14. DOI

Awlia M, Nigro A, Faikus J, Schmoeckel SM, Negrao S, Santelia D, Trtílek M, Tester M, Julkowska MM, Panzarová K. High-throughput non-destructive phenotyping of traits that contribute to salinity tolerance in PubMed DOI PMC

Ali O, Ramsubhag A, Jayaraman J. Biostimulantproperties of seaweed extracts in plants: implications towards sustainable crop production. Plants. 2021;10:1–27. PubMed DOI PMC

Mahusook SS, Rajathi FAA, Maharifa HNS, Sharmila R. Comparative study of agarophytes -

Wu YC, Zhou JY, Li CG, Ma Y. Antifungal and plant growth promotion activity of volatile organic compounds produced by PubMed DOI PMC

Pappalettere L, Bartolini S, Toffanin A. Auxin-producing bacteria used as microbial biostimulants improve the growth of tomato ( PubMed DOI PMC

Pellan L, Dieye CAT, Durand N, Fontana A, Strub C. Schorr-Galindo, biocontrol agents: toolbox for the screening of weapons against mycotoxigenic PubMed DOI PMC

Sible CN, Seebauer JR, Below FE. Plant biostimulants: A categorical review, their implications for row crop production, and relation to soil health indicators. Agronomy. 2021;11:1–20. DOI

Paulus S, Schumann H, Kuhlmann H, Leon J. High-precision laser scanning system for capturing 3D plant architecture and analysing growth of cereal plants. Biosyst Eng. 2014;121:1–11. DOI

Friedli M, Kirchgessner N, Grieder C, Liebisch F, Mannale M, Walter A. Terrestrial 3D laser scanning to track the increase in canopy height of both monocot and Dicot crop species under field conditions. Plant Methods. 2016;12:1–15. PubMed DOI PMC

Todo C, Ikeno H, Yamase K, Tanikawa T, Ohashi M, Dannoura M, Kimura T, Hirano Y. Reconstruction of conifer root systems mapped with point cloud data obtained by 3D laser scanning compared with manual measurement. Forests. 2021;12:1–17. DOI

Puliti S, Breidenbach J, Astrup R. Estimation of forest growing stock volume with UAV laser scanning data: can it be done without field data? Remote Sens. 2020;12:1–19. DOI

Dornbusch T, Lorrain S, Kuznetsov D, Fortier A, Liechti R, Xenarios I, Fankhauser C. Measuring the diurnal pattern of leaf hyponasty and growth in PubMed DOI

Šrollerů A, Potůčková M. Evaluating the applicability of high-density UAV lidar data for monitoring tundra grassland vegetation. Int J Remote Sens. 2024;46:1–36.

Ma ZY, Rayhana R, Feng K, Liu Z, Xiao GZ, Ruan YF, Sangha JS. A review on sensing technologies for high-throughput plant phenotyping. Ieee Open J Instrum Meas. 2022;1:1–22. DOI

Kazmi W, Foix S, Alenyà G. Plant leaf imaging using time of flight camera under sunlight, shadow and room conditions. in 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Robotic and Sensors Environments Proceedings. 2012.

Mairhofer S, Zappala S, Tracy SR, Sturrock C, Bennett M, Mooney SJ, Pridmore T. Rootrak: automated recovery of three-dimensional plant root architecture in soil from X-ray microcomputed tomography images using visual tracking. Plant Physiol. 2012;158:561–9. PubMed DOI PMC

Andújar D, Calle M, Fernández-Quintanilla C, Ribeiro Á, Dorado J. Three-dimensional modeling of weed plantsusing low-cost photogrammetry. Sensors. 2018;18:1–11. PubMed DOI PMC

Paulus S. Measuring crops in 3D: using geometry for plant phenotyping. Plant Methods. 2019;15:1–13. PubMed DOI PMC

Daviet B, Fernandez R, Cabrera-Bosquet L, Pradal C, Fournier C. Phenotrack3D: an automatic high-throughput phenotyping pipeline to track maize organs over time. Plant Methods. 2022;18:1–14. PubMed DOI PMC

Wu S, Wen W, Wang Y, Fan J, Wang C, Gou W, Guo X. MVS-pheno: A portable and low-cost phenotyping platform for maize shoots using multiview stereo 3D reconstruction. Plant Phenomics. 2020;2020:1–17. PubMed DOI PMC

Rossi R, Leolini C, Costafreda-Aumedes S, Leolini L, Bindi M, Zaldei A, Moriondo M. Performances evaluation of a low-cost platform for high-resolution plant phenotyping. Sensors. 2020;20:1–16. PubMed DOI PMC

Luhmann T. Precision potential of photogrammetric 6DOF pose Estimation with a single camera. Isprs J Photogrammetry Remote Sens. 2009;64:275–84. DOI

He W, Ye ZH, Li MS, Yan YL, Lu W, Xing GN. Extraction of soybean plant trait parameters based on SfM-MVS algorithm combined with GRNN. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1–16. PubMed DOI PMC

Rose JC, Paulus S, Kuhlmann H. Accuracy analysis of a multi-view stereo approach for phenotyping of tomato plants at the organ level. Sensors. 2015;15:9651–65. PubMed DOI PMC

Wen W, Wu S, Lu X, Liu X, Gu S, Guo X. Accurate and semantic 3D reconstruction of maize leaves. Comput Electron Agric. 2024;217:1–11. DOI

Krasic S, Pejic P. Comparative analysis of terrestrial semi-automatic and automatic photogrammetry in 3D modeling process. Nexus Netw J. 2014;16:273–83. DOI

Teshome FT, Bayabil HK, Hoogenboom G, Schaffer B, Singh A, Ampatzidis Y. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imaging and machine learning applications for plant phenotyping. Comput Electron Agric. 2023;212:1–15. DOI

Ivanov N, Boissard P, Chapron M, Andrieu B. Computer stereo plotting for 3D reconstruction of a maize canopy. Agric for Meteorol. 1995;75:85–102. DOI

Aguilar MA, Pozo JL, Aguilar FJ, García AM, Fernández I, Negreiros J. and J. Sánchez-Hermosilla. Application of close-range photogrammetry and digital photography analysis for the estimation of leaf area index in a greenhouse tomato culture. in ISPRS-Commission V Mid-Term Symposium on Close Range Image Measurement Technique. 2010. Newcastle upon Tyne, ENGLAND.

Zhu H, Dorner J, Rowland DL, Derksen RC, Ozkan HE. Spray penetration into peanut canopies with hydraulic nozzle tips. Biosyst Eng. 2004;87:275–83. DOI

Rui YK, Peng YF, Wang ZR, Shen JB. Stem perimeter, height and biomass of maize (

Fang SQ, Yan XL, Liao H. 3D reconstruction and dynamic modeling of root architecture in situ and its application to crop phosphorus research. Plant J. 2009;60:1096–108. PubMed DOI

Lopez LD, Shantharaj D, Liu L, Bais H, Yu J. Robust image-based 3D modeling of root architecture. 1 (2011) 1–10.

Vanderborght J, Couvreur V, Meunier F, Schnepf A, Vereecken H, Bouda M, Javaux M. From hydraulic root architecture models to macroscopic representations of root hydraulics in soil water flow and land surface models. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2021;25:4835–60. DOI

Junker A, Muraya MM, Weigelt-Fischer K, Arana-Ceballos F, Klukas C, Melchinger AE, Meyer RC, Riewe D, Altmann T. Optimizing experimental procedures for quantitative evaluation of crop plant performance in high throughput phenotyping systems. Front Plant Sci. 2015;5:1–21. PubMed DOI PMC

Gu W, Wen W, Wu S, Zheng C, Lu X, Chang W, Xiao P. Guo, 3D reconstruction of wheat plants by integrating point cloud data and virtual design optimization. Agriculture. 2024;14:1–20. DOI

Martinez-Guanter J, Ribeiro Á, Peteinatos GG, Pérez-Ruiz M, Gerhards R, Bengochea-Guevara JM, Machleb J, Andújar D. Low-cost three-dimensional modeling of crop plants. Sensors. 2019;19:1–14. PubMed DOI PMC

Paulus S, Behmann J, Mahlein AK, Plumer L, Kuhlmann H. Low-cost 3D systems: suitable tools for plant phenotyping. Sensors. 2014;14:3001–18. PubMed DOI PMC

Mach J, Krauz L, Páta P, Halecky M. Development of low-cost multifunctional robotic apparatus for high-throughput plant phenotyping. Smart Agricultural Technol. 2024;9:1–17. DOI

Metashape Python Reference Release 2.2.0. 2024; Available from: https://www.agisoft.com/pdf/metashape_python_api_2_2_0.pdf

How to improve the modeling of thin objects in Metashape. 2024; Available from: https://agisoft.freshdesk.com/support/solutions/articles/31000163220-how-to-improve-the-modeling-of-thin-objects-in-metashape

Lu X, Ono E, Lu S, Zhang Y, Teng P, Aono M, Shimizu Y, Hosoi F, Omasa K. Reconstruction method and optimum range of camera-shooting angle for 3D plant modeling using a multi-camera photography system. Plant Methods. 2020;16:1–16. PubMed DOI PMC

Teng X, Zhou G, Wu Y, Huang C, Dong W, Xu S. Three-dimensional reconstruction method of rapeseed plants in the whole growth period using an RGB-D camera. Sensors. 2021;21:1–20. PubMed DOI PMC

Bobkowska K, Burdziakowski P, Szulwic J, Zielinska-Dabkowska KM. Seven different lighting conditions in photogrammetric studies of a 3D urban mock-up. Energies. 2021;14:1–27. DOI

Kolecki J, Kuras P, Pastucha E, Pyka K, Sierka M. Calibration of industrial cameras for aerial photogrammetric mapping. Remote Sens. 2020;12:1–21. DOI

Li D, Xu L, Tang X-s, Sun S, Cai X, Zhang P. 3D imaging of greenhouse plants with an inexpensive binocular stereo vision system. Remote Sens. 2017;9:1–27.

Nguyen TT, Slaughter DC, Max N, Maloof JN, Sinha N. Structured light-based 3D reconstruction system for plants. Sensors. 2015;15:18587–612. PubMed DOI PMC

Gibbs JA, Pound MP, French AP, Wells DM, Murchie EH, Pridmore TP. Active vision and surface reconstruction for 3D plant shoot modelling. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf. 2020;17:1907–17. PubMed DOI

Pepe M, Costantino D. Techniques, tools, platforms, and algorithms in close range photogrammetry in Building 3D model and 2D representation of objects and complex architectures. Comput-Aided Des Appl. 2020;18:42–65. DOI

An N, Welch SM, Markelz RJC, Baker RL, Palmer CM, Ta J, Maloof JN, Weinig C. Quantifying time-series of leaf morphology using 2D and 3D photogrammetry methods for high-throughput plant phenotyping. Comput Electron Agric. 2017;135:222–32. DOI

Dandrifosse S, Bouvry A, Leemans V, Dumont B, Mercatoris B. Imaging wheat canopy through stereo vision: overcoming the challenges of the laboratory to field transition for morphological features extraction. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1–15. PubMed DOI PMC

Surmen H. Photogrammetry for 3D reconstruction of objects: effects of geometry, texture and Photographing. Image Anal Stereology. 2023;42:51–63. DOI

Conn A, Pedmale UV, Chory J, Navlakha S. High-resolution laser scanning reveals plant architectures that reflect universal network design principles. Cell Syst. 2017;5:53–65. PubMed DOI

Bisson-Larrivée A, LeMoine J-B. Photogrammetry and the impact of camera placement and angular intervals between images on model reconstruction. Digit Appl Archaeol Cult Herit. 2022;26:1–12.

Rossi R, Costafreda-Aumedes S, Leolini L, Leolini C, Bindi M, Moriondo M. Implementation of an algorithm for automated phenotyping through plant 3D-modeling: A practical application on the early detection of water stress. Comput Electron Agric. 2022;197:1–15. DOI

Rangelov D, Waanders S, Waanders K, Keulen Mv. and R. Miltchev. 3D reconstruction techniques and the impact of lighting conditions on reconstruction quality: A comprehensive review. In preprints. Preprints; 2025.

Wu K, Tan J, Liu C. A novel approach to obtain optimal exposure for 3D shape reconstruction of high dynamic range objects. Meas Sci Technol. 2021;32:1–16. DOI

Biskup B, Scharr H, Schurr U, Rascher U. A stereo imaging system for measuring structural parameters of plant canopies. Plant Cell Environ. 2007;30:1299–308. PubMed DOI

Tancik M, Casser V, Yan X, Pradhan S, Mildenhall B, Srinivasan P, Barron J, Kretzschmar H. Block-nerf: scalable large scene neural view synthesis. 2022. 8238–48.

Liu C-S, Lin J-J, Chen B-R. A novel 3D scanning technique for reflective metal surface based on HDR-like image from Pseudo exposure image fusion method. Opt Lasers Eng. 2023;168:1–10. DOI

Franke J, Koutecký T, Koutný D. Comparison of sublimation 3D scanning sprays in terms of their effect on the resulting 3d scan, thickness, and sublimation time. Materials. 2023;16:1–15. PubMed DOI PMC

Mendřický R. Impact of applied anti-reflective material on accuracy of optical 3D digitisation. Mater Sci Forum. 2018;919:335–44. DOI

De Paolis LT, De Luca V, Gatto C, D’Errico G, Paladini GI. Photogrammetric 3D reconstruction of small objects for a real-time fruition. Augmented reality, virtual reality, and computer graphics. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020.

Doan T-N, Nguyen CV. A low-cost digital 3D insect scanner. Inform Process Agric. 2024;11:337–55.

Ströbel B, Schmelzle S, Blüthgen N, Heethoff M. An automated device for the digitization and 3D modelling of insects, combining extended-depth-of-field and all-side multi-view imaging. Zookeys. (2018) 1–27. PubMed PMC

Wu S, Wen W, Gou W, Lu X, Zhang W, Zheng C, Xiang Z, Chen L, Guo X. A miniaturized phenotyping platform for individual plants using multi-view stereo 3D reconstruction, frontiers in plant science. 13–2022 (2022) 1–19. PubMed PMC

Roshan TR, Jafari M, Golami M, Kazemi M. Evaluating geometric measurement accuracy based on 3D model reconstruction of nursery tomato plants by Agisoft photoscan software. Comput Electron Agric. 2024;221:1–14. DOI

Bernotas G, Scorza LCT, Hansen MF, Hales IJ, Halliday KJ, Smith LN, Smith ML, McCormick AJ. A photometric stereo-based 3D imaging system using computer vision and deep learning for tracking plant growth. Gigascience. 2019;8:1–15. PubMed DOI PMC

Wang JZ, Zhang Y, Gu RR. Research status and prospects on plant canopy structure measurement using visual sensors based on three-dimensional reconstruction. Agriculture-Basel. 2020;10:1–27.