A modular, multi-functional (encompassing data acquisition, management, preprocessing, and transmission) sensing (MMFS) system based upon the Internet of Things (IoT) paradigm is discussed in this paper with the goal of continuous real-time, multi-sensor and multi-location monitoring of aircraft (including drones) structural performances during flight. According to industrial and system requirements, a microcontroller and four sensors (strain, acceleration, vibration, and temperature) were selected and integrated into the system. To enable the determination of potential in-flight failures and estimates of the remaining useful service life of the aircraft, resistance strain gauge networks, piezoelectric sensors for capturing structural vibrations and impact, accelerometers, and thermistors have been integrated into the MMFS system. Real flight tests with Evektor's Cobra VUT100i and SportStar RTC aircraft have been undertaken to demonstrate the features of recorded data and provide requirements for the MMFS functional design. Real flight test data were analysed, indicating that a sampling rate of 1000 Hz is necessary to balance representation of relevant features within the data and potential loss of quality in fatigue life estimation. The design and evaluation of the performance of a prototype (evaluated via representative stress/strain experiments using an Instron Hydraulic 250 kN machine within laboratories) are detailed in this paper.

Department of Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering Loughborough University Loughborough LE11 3TU UK

EVEKTOR spol s r o Letecká 1008 686 04 Kunovice Czech Republic

Wolfson School of Mechanical Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering Loughborough University Loughborough LE11 3TU UK

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Farrar C.R., Worden K. An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2007;365:303–315. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2006.1928. PubMed DOI

Svendsen B.T., Frøseth G.T., Øiseth O., Rønnquist A. A data-based structural health monitoring approach for damage detection in steel bridges using experimental data. J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 2022;12:101–115. doi: 10.1007/s13349-021-00530-8. DOI

Jia J., Li Y. Deep Learning for Structural Health Monitoring: Data, Algorithms, Applications, Challenges, and Trends. Sensors. 2023;23:8824. doi: 10.3390/s23218824. PubMed DOI PMC

Mishra M., Lourenço P.B., Ramana G.V. Structural health monitoring of civil engineering structures by using the internet of things: A review. J. Build. Eng. 2022;48:103954. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103954. DOI

Paipetis A.S., Matikas T.E., Aggelis D.G., Hemelrijck D.V., editors. Emerging Technologies in Non-Destructive Testing V. CRC Press; London, UK: 2012. DOI

Kolozis P., Karasavvas D., Royo J.M., Hernandez-Olivan J., Thalassinou-Lislevand V., Calvo-Echenique A., Koumoulos E. AI-Powered Structural Health Monitoring: Predicting Fatigue Damage in Aircraft Composites with Ultrasonic Guided Wave Inspections. Eng. Proc. 2025;90:86. doi: 10.3390/engproc2025090086. DOI

Berghout T. Military Training Aircraft Structural Health Monitoring Leveraging an Innovative Biologically Inspired Feedback Mechanism for Neural Networks. Machines. 2025;13:179. doi: 10.3390/machines13030179. DOI

Wu Y., Tang H.P., Mannion A., Voyle R., Xin Y. Using Machine Learning for Aerostructure Surface Damage Digital Reconstruction. Aerospace. 2025;12:72. doi: 10.3390/aerospace12010072. DOI

Bayomi N., Fernandez J.E. Eyes in the Sky: Drones Applications in the Built Environment under Climate Change Challenges. Drones. 2023;7:637. doi: 10.3390/drones7100637. DOI

Kabashkin I., Perekrestov V. Integrating big data and artificial intelligence in aircraft maintenance for enhanced efficiency and reliability. Transp. Res. Procedia. 2025;83:601–608. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2025.03.031. DOI

Wang Y., Hu S., Xiong T., Huang Y., Qiu L. Recent progress in aircraft smart skin for structural health monitoring. Struct. Health Monit. 2022;21:2453–2480. doi: 10.1177/14759217211056831. DOI

Bednarska K., Sobotka P., Woliński T.R., Zakręcka O., Pomianek W., Nocoń A., Lesiak P. Hybrid Fiber Optic Sensor Systems in Structural Health Monitoring in Aircraft Structures. Materials. 2020;13:2249. doi: 10.3390/ma13102249. PubMed DOI PMC

Reymer P., Leski A. Flight Loads Acquisition for PZL-130 Orlik TCII Full Scale Fatigue Test. Fatigue Aircr. Struct. 2011;2011:78–85. doi: 10.2478/v10164-010-0041-7. DOI

Kim J.-H., Park Y., Kim Y.-Y., Shrestha P., Kim C.-G. Aircraft health and usage monitoring system for in-flight strain measurement of a wing structure. Smart Mater. Struct. 2015;24:105003. doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/24/10/105003. DOI

Swindell P., Doyle J., Roach D. Integration of structural health monitoring solutions onto commercial aircraft via the Federal Aviation Administration structural health monitoring research program; Proceedings of the AIP Conference Proceedings; Atlanta, GA, USA. 16 February 2017; DOI

Pfeiffer H., Wevers M. Aircraft Integrated Structural Health Assessment—Structural Health Monitoring and its implementation within the European project AISHA; Proceedings of the EU Project Meeting on Aircraft Integrated Structural Health Assessment (AISHA); Leuven, Belgium. 26 June 2007.

Tavares S.M.O., De Castro P.M.S.T. An overview of fatigue in aircraft structures. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 2017;40:1510–1529. doi: 10.1111/ffe.12631. DOI

Arena M., Viscardi M. Strain State Detection in Composite Structures: Review and New Challenges. J. Compos. Sci. 2020;4:60. doi: 10.3390/jcs4020060. DOI

Sause M.G.R., Jasiūnienė E., editors. Structural Health Monitoring Damage Detection Systems for Aerospace. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2021. Springer Aerospace Technology. DOI

Fu H., Sharif-Khodaei Z., Aliabadi M.H.F. An energy-efficient cyber-physical system for wireless on-board aircraft structural health monitoring. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2019;128:352–368. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.03.050. DOI

Sharif-Khodaei Z., Ghajari M., Aliabadi M.H. Impact Damage Detection in Composite Plates using a Self-diagnostic Electro-Mechanical Impedance-based Structural Health Monitoring System. J. Multiscale Model. 2015;6:1550013. doi: 10.1142/S1756973715500134. DOI

Zhu H., Gao K., Xia Y., Gao F., Weng S., Sun Y., Hu Q. Multi-rate data fusion for dynamic displacement measurement of beam-like supertall structures using acceleration and strain sensors. Struct. Health Monit. 2020;19:520–536. doi: 10.1177/1475921719857043. DOI

Lu A., Wang T., Kang S., Pang D. On the Relationship between Latitude and Altitude Temperature Effects; Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology; Wuhan, China. 4–5 July 2009; Wuhan, China: IEEE; 2009. pp. 55–58. DOI

Wang W.R., Zhang J.M., Ren X., Nie S. Research and Calibration Experiment of Characteristic Parameters of High Temperature Resistance Strain Gauges. Sens. Transducers. 2013;159:324–329.

Negri E., Fumagalli L., Macchi M. A Review of the Roles of Digital Twin in CPS-based Production Systems. Procedia Manuf. 2017;11:939–948. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.198. DOI

Singh M., Srivastava R., Fuenmayor E., Kuts V., Qiao Y., Murray N., Devine D. Applications of Digital Twin across Industries: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2022;12:5727. doi: 10.3390/app12115727. DOI

Tao F., Zhang H., Liu A., Nee A.Y.C. Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2019;15:2405–2415. doi: 10.1109/TII.2018.2873186. DOI

Sun Z., Jayasinghe S., Sidiq A., Shahrivar F., Mahmoodian M., Setunge S. Approach Towards the Development of Digital Twin for Structural Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructure: A Comprehensive Review. Sensors. 2024;25:59. doi: 10.3390/s25010059. PubMed DOI PMC

Parida L., Moharana S. Current status and future challenges of digital twins for structural health monitoring in civil infrastructures. Eng. Res. Express. 2024;6:022102. doi: 10.1088/2631-8695/ad4aea. DOI

Li X., Dong Y.-X., Xiang W. Developing a BIM based digital twin system for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2024;35:115117. doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/ad730f. DOI

Sakr M., Sadhu A. Recent progress and future outlook of digital twins in structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Smart Mater. Struct. 2024;33:033001. doi: 10.1088/1361-665X/ad2bd7. DOI

Wang Q., Huang B., Gao Y., Jiao C. Current Status and Prospects of Digital Twin Approaches in Structural Health Monitoring. Buildings. 2025;15:1021. doi: 10.3390/buildings15071021. DOI

Qian C., Liu X., Ripley C., Qian M., Liang F., Yu W. Digital Twin—Cyber Replica of Physical Things: Architecture, Applications and Future Research Directions. Future Internet. 2022;14:64. doi: 10.3390/fi14020064. DOI

Lai X., Yang L., He X., Pang Y., Song X., Sun W. Digital twin-based structural health monitoring by combining measurement and computational data: An aircraft wing example. J. Manuf. Syst. 2023;69:76–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.06.006. DOI

Tuegel E. The Airframe Digital Twin: Some Challenges to Realization; Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference, 14th AIAA; Honolulu, HI, USA. 23–26 April 2012; Honolulu, HI, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2012. DOI

Yu J., Song Y., Tang D., Dai J. A Digital Twin approach based on nonparametric Bayesian network for complex system health monitoring. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021;58:293–304. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.07.005. DOI

Martins T., Infante V., Sousa L., Fonseca A., Antunes P.J., Moura A.M., Serrano B. Numerical and experimental study of aircraft structural health. Int. J. Fatigue. 2020;132:105348. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105348. DOI

AbdelRaheem M., Hassan M., Mohammed U.S., Nassr A.A. Design and implementation of a synchronized IoT-based structural health monitoring system. Internet Things. 2022;20:100639. doi: 10.1016/j.iot.2022.100639. DOI

Jamshed M.A., Ali K., Abbasi Q.H., Imran M.A., Ur-Rehman M. Challenges, Applications, and Future of Wireless Sensors in Internet of Things: A Review. IEEE Sens. J. 2022;22:5482–5494. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3148128. DOI

Vujic D. Wireless sensor networks applications in aircraft structural health monitoring. Istraz. Proj. Za Privredu. 2015;13:79–86. doi: 10.5937/jaes13-7388. DOI

Wang Y., Wang C., Pu W., Qiu L. A Large-Scale Sensing-Monitoring Integrated Aircraft Smart Skin with Ultralow Weight and Ultralow Power Consumption for Structural Health Monitoring. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2025;72:2130–2139. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2024.3423434. DOI

Borra P., Mullapudi M., Nerella H., Prakashchand L.K. Analyzing AWS Edge Computing Solutions to Enhance IoT Deployments. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol. 2024;13:8–12. doi: 10.35940/ijeat.F4519.13060824. DOI

Amazon Web Services, Inc. Guidance for Connected Aircraft Performing Over-the-Air Updates Using AWS Greengrass. [(accessed on 7 October 2025)]. Available online: https://aws.amazon.com/solutions/guidance/connected-aircraft-performing-over-the-air-updates-using-aws-greengrass/

STMicroelectronics AN2834: How to Get the Best ADC Accuracy in STM32 Microcontrollers. 2015. [(accessed on 29 July 2025)]. Available online: https://www.st.com/resource/en/application_note/an2834-how-to-get-the-best-adc-accuracy-in-stm32-microcontrollers-stmicroelectronics.pdf.

Khanchuea K., Siripokarpirom R. A Multi-Protocol IoT Gateway and WiFi/BLE Sensor Nodes for Smart Home and Building Automation: Design and Implementation; Proceedings of the 2019 10th International Conference of Information and Communication Technology for Embedded Systems (IC-ICTES); Bangkok, Thailand. 25–27 March 2019; Bangkok, Thailand: IEEE; 2019. pp. 1–6. DOI

Hu X., Olgun G., Assaad R.H. An intelligent BIM-enabled digital twin framework for real-time structural health monitoring using wireless IoT sensing, digital signal processing, and structural analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024;252:124204. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124204. DOI

STMicroelectronics B-L475E-IOT01A Discovery Kit for IoT Node, Low-Power Wireless, and Sensors. B-L475E-IOT01A. [(accessed on 29 July 2025)]. Available online: https://www.st.com/en/evaluation-tools/b-l475e-iot01a.html.

Analog Devices EVAL-ADXL356/EVAL-ADXL357 User Guide (Rev. A) 2023. [(accessed on 29 July 2025)]. Available online: https://www.analog.com/en/products/adxl356.html.

Elecrow Strain Gauge Module. [(accessed on 7 October 2025)]. elecrow.openhardware. Available online: https://www.elecrow.com/strain-gauge-module-p-735.html.

AGS-TECH Inc Coding System of Strain Gauges—AGS-TECH Version. [(accessed on 29 July 2025)]. Available online: https://www.elecrow.com/download/Coding%20System%20of%20Strain%20Gauges-AGS-TECH%20Version.pdf.

Texas Instruments LM35 Precision Centigrade Temperature Sensors. 2020. [(accessed on 29 July 2025)]. Available online: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm35.pdf.

Chassaing R. Digital Signal Processing and Applications with the TMS320C6713 and TMS320C6416 DSK. 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2008. (Wiley Series in Topics in Digital Signal Processing).

Zelenika S., Hadas Z., Bader S., Becker T., Gljušćić P., Hlinka J., Janak L., Kamenar E., Ksica F., Kyratsi T., et al. Energy Harvesting Technologies for Structural Health Monitoring of Airplane Components—A Review. Sensors. 2020;20:6685. doi: 10.3390/s20226685. PubMed DOI PMC

Masabi S.N., Fu H., Theodossiades S. A bistable rotary-translational energy harvester from ultra-low-frequency motions for self-powered wireless sensing. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. 2023;56:024001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aca4de. DOI

Texas Instruments BQ25505: Ultra Low Power Boost Converter with Battery Management for Energy Harvester Applications. 2021. [(accessed on 29 July 2025)]. Available online: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/bq25505.pdf.

Liu Y.-H., Chen J.-H., Huang J.-W. A review of maximum power point tracking techniques for use in partially shaded conditions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015;41:436–453. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.038. DOI

STMicroelectronics Getting Started with ADC—Stm32mcu. [(accessed on 7 October 2025)]. Available online: https://wiki.st.com/stm32mcu/wiki/Getting_started_with_ADC.

Alshayeb M., Mumtaz H., Mahmood S., Niazi M. Improving the Security of UML Sequence Diagram Using Genetic Algorithm. IEEE Access. 2020;8:62738–62761. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2981742. DOI

STMicroelectronics Stm32l4_Peripheral_Usart. [(accessed on 29 July 2025)]. Available online: https://www.st.com/resource/en/product_training/stm32l4_peripheral_usart.pdf.

Yan P., Liu X., Wu S., Sun F., Zhao Q., Wang Y. Pixelated Carrier Phase-Shifting Shearography Using Spatiotemporal Low-Pass Filtering Algorithm. Sensors. 2019;19:5185. doi: 10.3390/s19235185. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhao N., Wei J., Long Z., Yang C., Bi J., Wan Z., Dong S. An Integrated Method for Tunnel Health Monitoring Data Analysis and Early Warning: Savitzky–Golay Smoothing and Wavelet Transform Denoising Processing. Sensors. 2023;23:7460. doi: 10.3390/s23177460. PubMed DOI PMC

Hassani S., Dackermann U. A Systematic Review of Advanced Sensor Technologies for Non-Destructive Testing and Structural Health Monitoring. Sensors. 2023;23:2204. doi: 10.3390/s23042204. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhou Y., Ma Z., Fu L. A Review of Key Signal Processing Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring: Highlighting Non-Parametric Time-Frequency Analysis, Adaptive Decomposition, and Deconvolution. Engineering. 2025;18:318. doi: 10.3390/a18060318. DOI

Zordan D., Martinez B., Vilajosana I., Rossi M. To Compress or Not To Compress: Processing vs Transmission Tradeoffs for Energy Constrained Sensor Networking. arXiv. 2012 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1206.2129.1206.2129 DOI

Costa D.G., Guedes L.A. A Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)-Based Energy-Efficient Selective Retransmission Mechanism for Wireless Image Sensor Networks. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2012;1:3–35. doi: 10.3390/jsan1010003. DOI

Addison P.S. Wavelet transforms and the ECG: A review. Physiol. Meas. 2005;26:R155–R199. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/26/5/R01. PubMed DOI

Pacheco J., Benitez V.H., Pérez G., Brau A. Wavelet-Based Computational Intelligence for Real-Time Anomaly Detection and Fault Isolation in Embedded Systems. Machines. 2024;12:664. doi: 10.3390/machines12090664. DOI

Gosala B., Dindayal Kapgate P., Jain P., Nath Chaurasia R., Gupta M. Wavelet transforms for feature engineering in EEG data processing: An application on Schizophrenia. Biomed. Signal Process. Control. 2023;85:104811. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104811. DOI

Ghaleb F.A., Kamat M.B., Salleh M., Rohani M.F., Abd Razak S. Two-stage motion artefact reduction algorithm for electrocardiogram using weighted adaptive noise cancelling and recursive Hampel filter. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0207176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207176. PubMed DOI PMC