Real-World Safety Data From the World Apheresis Association Registry for the Spectra Optia Apheresis System
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
41320906
PubMed Central
PMC12665877
DOI
10.1002/jca.70079
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- adverse events, patient safety, plasma exchange, red cell exchange, stem cell transplantation, therapeutic apheresis,
- MeSH
- bezpečnost pacientů * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- registrace * MeSH
- separace krevních složek * škodlivé účinky přístrojové vybavení metody MeSH
- výměna plazmy škodlivé účinky MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
In this study we analyzed 12 years of adverse events, (AE) data from the World Apheresis Association, (WAA) Registry specific to the Spectra Optia Apheresis System. We queried WAA Registry data, (2012-2023) on apheresis procedures performed exclusively on the Spectra Optia Apheresis System. We categorized AEs by severity, (mild, moderate, and severe), and ordered them by year. We then analyzed and presented AEs associated with the following variables: diagnosis, procedure type, vascular access, and replacement fluid type, and causes of procedural interruption. We identified 51 567 apheresis procedures specific to the Spectra Optia Apheresis System within the data set. AE rates from 2012 to 2023 for mild, moderate, and severe were 1.43%, 2.81%, and 0.21%, respectively. Procedures associated with the lowest AE rates include red blood cell exchange and therapeutic plasma exchange. The most common mild and moderate AEs include tingling and hypotension and AEs related to vascular access. The highest rates of mild and moderate AEs were associated with cellular collections. The highest rate of severe AEs was associated with the use of 3.5% albumin as replacement fluid. Other variables impacting patient safety are identified. AE rates could not be compared to the median length of procedure since this time variable is not currently collected in the Registry. This is the first device-specific analysis of the WAA Registry data, bringing prior safety reporting into even sharper focus. Device-specific safety analysis like this will help practitioners better understand potential safety concerns associated with a commonly used apheresis device, including various separation modalities and accessories, thus supporting improved procedure management.
Apheresis Center University Hospital Orebro Sweden
Apheresis Department Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Prague Czech Republic
Department for Pediatrics St Anna Kinderspital Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine Akershus University Hospital Lorenskog Norway
Department of Patient Access Terumo Blood and Cell Technologies Lakewood Colorado USA
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine Umea University Umea Sweden
School of Medicine University of Zagreb Zagreb Croatia
South African National Blood Service Johannesburg South Africa
The Northern Sweden Registry Center Region Vasterbotten Umea Sweden
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Connelly‐Smith L., Alquist C. R., Aqui N. A., et al., “Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice—Evidence‐Based Approach From the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Ninth Special Issue,” Journal of Clinical Apheresis 38, no. 2 (2023): 77–278, 10.1002/jca.22043. PubMed DOI
Millward B. L. and Hoeltge G. A., “The Historical Development of Automated Hemapheresis,” Journal of Clinical Apheresis 1, no. 1 (1982): 25–32, 10.1002/jca.2920010107. PubMed DOI
McLeod B. C., Sniecinski I., Ciavarella D., et al., “Frequency of Immediate Adverse Effects Associated With Therapeutic Apheresis,” Transfusion 39, no. 3 (1999): 282–288, 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39399219285.x. PubMed DOI
McLeod B. C., Price T. H., Owen H., et al., “Frequency of Immediate Adverse Effects Associated With Apheresis Donation,” Transfusion 38, no. 10 (1998): 938–943, 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.381098440858.x. PubMed DOI
Lopert P., Abdelrahman S., Graybill C. A., et al., “The Safety and Performance of the Spectra Optia Apheresis System Platelet Depletion Protocol in Patients With Elevated Platelet Counts,” Journal of Clinical Apheresis 37, no. 6 (2022): 544–552, 10.1002/jca.22009. PubMed DOI PMC
Pandey S. and Cottler‐Fox M., “Optia Continuous Mononuclear Collection (CMNC) System Is a Safe and Efficient System for Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells‐Apheresis (HPC‐a) Collection and Yields a Lower Product Hematocrit (HCT%) Than the COBE Spectra System: A Retrospective Study,” Journal of Clinical Apheresis 33, no. 4 (2018): 505–513, 10.1002/jca.21629. PubMed DOI
Klink A. and Rummler S., “Spectra Optia Apheresis System: Current Insights Into Clinical Risks and Benefits,” International Journal of Clinical Transfusion Medicine 2018 (2018): 33–40, 10.2147/IJCTM.S104333. DOI
Shemin D., Briggs D., and Greenan M., “Complications of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: A Prospective Study of 1,727 Procedures,” Journal of Clinical Apheresis 22, no. 5 (2007): 270–276, 10.1002/jca.20143. PubMed DOI
Kundrapu S., Datla S., Griffin V., and Maitta R. W., “Adverse Events During Apheresis: A 10‐Year Experience at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center,” Journal of Clinical Apheresis 34, no. 5 (2019): 528–536, 10.1002/jca.21706. PubMed DOI
Wong E. C. C., Webb J., and Pagano M. B., “The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Disease Registry: Past, Present and Future,” Transfusion and Apheresis Science 56, no. 6 (2017): 779–782, 10.1016/j.transci.2017.11.027. PubMed DOI
Boye‐Doe A., Brown E., Puri‐Sharma C., et al., “The Grndad Registry: Contemporary Natural History Data and an Analysis of Real‐World Patterns of Use and Limitations of Disease Modifying Therapy in Adults With SCD,” Blood 136, no. Supplement 1 (2020): 34–36, 10.1182/blood-2020-138895. DOI
Stegmayr B., Ptak J., and Wikstrom B., “World Apheresis Registry‐First Data Report. (Abstract 101),” Journal of Artificial Organs 27, no. 7 (2004): 589.
Stegmayr B., Newman E., Witt V., et al., “Using the World Apheresis Association Registry Helps to Improve the Treatment Quality of Therapeutic Apheresis,” Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy 48, no. 4 (2021): 234–239, 10.1159/000513123. PubMed DOI PMC
Vrielink H., Le Poole K., Stegmayr B., et al., “The World Apheresis Association Registry, 2023 Update,” Transfusion and Apheresis Science 62, no. 6 (2023): 103831, 10.1016/j.transci.2023.103831. PubMed DOI
Pulsipher M. A., Chitphakdithai P., Miller J. P., et al., “Adverse Events Among 2408 Unrelated Donors of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells: Results of a Prospective Trial From the National Marrow Donor Program,” Blood 113, no. 15 (2009): 3604–3611, 10.1182/blood-2008-08-175323. PubMed DOI PMC
Fernández‐Fournier M., Kerguelen A., Rodríguez de Rivera F. J., et al., “Therapeutic Plasma Exchange for Myasthenia Gravis, Guillain‐Barre Syndrome, and Other Immune‐Mediated Neurological Diseases, Over a 40‐Year Experience,” Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 22, no. 10 (2022): 897–903, 10.1080/14737175.2022.2147827. PubMed DOI
Norda R., Axelsson C. G., Axdorph U., et al., “Recognition of Intercenter Differences May Help Develop Best Practice,” Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis 12, no. 5 (2008): 347–354, 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2008.00608.x. PubMed DOI
Ahmetović‐Karić G., Ćatović‐Baralija E., and Sofo‐Hafizović A., “Characteristics of Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Collection Over a One‐Year Period,” Medicinski Glasnik (Zenica) 17, no. 2 (2020): 290–296, 10.17392/1171-20. PubMed DOI
Makroo R. N., Fadadu D., Agrawal S., and Chowdhry M., “Double Dose Plateletpheresis: A Savior to Shrinking Donor Pool and Platelet Inventory Management,” Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion 34, no. 4 (2018): 691–696, 10.1007/s12288-018-0920-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Sanderson F., Cauchois R., Berda‐Haddad Y., and Poullin P., “Automated Red Blood Cell Depletion: Results From a Validation Trial of the Fenwal Amicus New Red Blood Cell Depletion Program,” Journal of Clinical Apheresis 35, no. 4 (2020): 335–341, 10.1002/jca.21802. PubMed DOI
Rödl S., Marschitz I., Mache C. J., et al., “First Experience With the Prismaflex HF 20 Set in Four Infants,” International Journal of Artificial Organs 34, no. 1 (2011): 10–15, 10.5301/ijao.2011.6315. PubMed DOI
Webb T. N., Bell J., Griffin R., Dill L., Gurosky C., and Askenazi D., “Retrospective Analysis Comparing Complication Rates of Centrifuge vs Membrane‐Based Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in the Pediatric Population,” Journal of Clinical Apheresis 37, no. 3 (2022): 263–272, 10.1002/jca.21969. PubMed DOI
Tendulkar A. and Rajadhyaksha S. B., “Comparison of Plateletpheresis on Three Continuous Flow Cell Separators,” Asian Journal of Transfusion Science 3, no. 2 (2009): 73–77, 10.4103/0973-6247.53877. PubMed DOI PMC
Winters J. L., Burgstaler E. A., Gottschall J. L., et al., “A Multicenter Evaluation of a New Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Procedure,” Transfusion 53, no. 12 (2013): 3269–3278, 10.1111/trf.12189. PubMed DOI
Cid J., Molina J. M., Mustieles M. J., Periáñez M., and Lozano M., “Comparison of Plasma Exchange Procedures Using Three Apheresis Systems,” Transfusion 55, no. 5 (2015): 1001–1007, 10.1111/trf.12948. PubMed DOI