Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) is a rare syndrome characterized by an increased incidence of cancer. It is caused by biallelic germline mutations in one of the four mismatch repair genes (MMR) genes: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2. Accurate diagnosis accompanied by a proper molecular genetic examination plays a crucial role in cancer management and also has implications for other family members. In this report, we share the impact of the diagnosis and challenges during the clinical management of two brothers with CMMRD from a non-consanguineous family harbouring compound heterozygous variants in the PMS2 gene. Both brothers presented with different phenotypic manifestations and cancer spectrum. Treatment involving immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly contributed to prolonged survival in both patients affected by lethal gliomas. The uniform hypermutation also allowed immune-directed treatment using nivolumab for the B-cell lymphoma, thereby limiting the intensive chemotherapy exposure in this young patient who remains at risk for subsequent malignancies.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG) are frequently driven by genetic alterations in the RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase (RAS/MAPK) pathway yet show unexplained variability in their clinical outcome. To address this, we characterized a cohort of >1,000 clinically annotated pLGG. Eighty-four percent of cases harbored a driver alteration, while those without an identified alteration also often exhibited upregulation of the RAS/MAPK pathway. pLGG could be broadly classified based on their alteration type. Rearrangement-driven tumors were diagnosed at a younger age, enriched for WHO grade I histology, infrequently progressed, and rarely resulted in death as compared with SNV-driven tumors. Further sub-classification of clinical-molecular correlates stratified pLGG into risk categories. These data highlight the biological and clinical differences between pLGG subtypes and opens avenues for future treatment refinement.
- MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- fúzní onkogenní proteiny genetika MeSH
- genová přestavba * MeSH
- gliom klasifikace genetika patologie MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mitogenem aktivované proteinkinasy genetika MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mutace * MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery genetika MeSH
- nádory mozku klasifikace genetika patologie MeSH
- neurofibromin 1 genetika MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- protoonkogenní proteiny B-raf genetika MeSH
- ras proteiny genetika MeSH
- regulace genové exprese u nádorů * MeSH
- stanovení celkové genové exprese MeSH
- variabilita počtu kopií segmentů DNA * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
The nature of cancer control is changing, with an increasing emphasis, fuelled by public and political demand, on prevention, early diagnosis, and patient experience during and after treatment. At the same time, primary care is increasingly promoted, by governments and health funders worldwide, as the preferred setting for most health care for reasons of increasing need, to stabilise health-care costs, and to accommodate patient preference for care close to home. It is timely, then, to consider how this expanding role for primary care can work for cancer control, which has long been dominated by highly technical interventions centred on treatment, and in which the contribution of primary care has been largely perceived as marginal. In this Commission, expert opinion from primary care and public health professionals with academic and clinical cancer expertise—from epidemiologists, psychologists, policy makers, and cancer specialists—has contributed to a detailed consideration of the evidence for cancer control provided in primary care and community care settings. Ranging from primary prevention to end-of-life care, the scope for new models of care is explored, and the actions needed to effect change are outlined. The strengths of primary care—its continuous, coordinated, and comprehensive care for individuals and families—are particularly evident in prevention and diagnosis, in shared follow-up and survivorship care, and in end-of-life care. A strong theme of integration of care runs throughout, and its elements (clinical, vertical, and functional) and the tools needed for integrated working are described in detail. All of this change, as it evolves, will need to be underpinned by new research and by continuing and shared multiprofessional development.
