- Publikační typ
- abstrakt z konference MeSH
- MeSH
- cílená molekulární terapie MeSH
- individualizovaná medicína MeSH
- nádory terapie MeSH
- Publikační typ
- úvodní články MeSH
PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) dramatically changed the prognosis of patients with NSCLC. Unfortunately, a reliable predictive biomarker is still missing. Commonly used biomarkers, such as PD-L1, MSI, or TMB, are not quite accurate in predicting ICI efficacy. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, we investigated the predictive role of erythrocytes, thrombocytes, innate and adaptive immune cells, complement proteins (C3, C4), and cytokines from peripheral blood of 224 patients with stage III/IV NSCLC treated with ICI alone (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and atezolizumab) or in combination (nivolumab + ipilimumab) with chemotherapy. These values were analyzed for associations with the response to the treatment and survival endpoints. RESULTS: Higher baseline Tregs, MPV, hemoglobin, and lower monocyte levels were associated with favorable PFS and OS. Moreover, increased baseline basophils and lower levels of C3 predicted significantly improved PFS. The levels of the baseline immature granulocytes, C3, and monocytes were significantly associated with the occurrence of partial regression at the first restaging. Multiple studied parameters (n = 9) were related to PFS benefit at the time of first restaging as compared to baseline values. In addition, PFS nonbenefit group showed a decrease in lymphocyte count after three months of therapy. The OS benefit was associated with higher levels of lymphocytes, erythrocytes, hemoglobin, MCV, and MPV, and a lower value of NLR after three months of treatment. CONCLUSION: Our work suggests that parameters from peripheral venous blood may be potential biomarkers in NSCLC patients on ICI. The baseline values of Tregs, C3, monocytes, and MPV are especially recommended for further investigation.
- MeSH
- antigeny CD274 MeSH
- biologické markery MeSH
- hemoglobiny terapeutické užití MeSH
- imunofenotypizace MeSH
- inhibitory kontrolních bodů terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory plic * MeSH
- nemalobuněčný karcinom plic * MeSH
- nivolumab terapeutické užití MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- protinádorové látky imunologicky aktivní * terapeutické užití MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
S příchodem imunoterapie v léčbě nemalobuněčného karcinomu plic došlo k prodloužení života velké části nemocných. Pokud organismus nemocného reaguje na léčebné impulsy a podaří se probudit protinádorovou imunitu, je to úspěch. V praxi jsme ale svědkem situací, kdy se to přes veškerou snahu nedaří podle našich plánů a nemocný neprofituje z této léčby. Stále existuje mnoho otázek, proč tomu tak je. Jednou z teorií, proč určitá skupina pacientů má z léčby prospěch, a jiná nikoli, je složení střevního mikrobiomu. Naše kazuistika dokládá krásnou léčebnou odpověď u nemocné s adenokarcinomem, která podstoupila fekální transplantaci. A po roce od diagnózy začínáme být optimisty.
The advent of immunotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer has prolonged the lives of a large proportion of patients. If the patient’s body responds to treatment and manages to activate anti-tumor immunity, it is considered a success. However, in practice, we often encounter situations where, despite our best efforts, things do not go as planned and the patient does not benefit from the treatment. Many questions remain as to why this is the case. One theory suggests that the composition of the gut microbiome may determine why certain groups of patients benefit while others do not. Our case report shows a significant treatment response in a patient with adenocarcinoma who underwent fecal transplantation. A year after diagnosis, we are becoming optimistic.
BACKGROUND: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are electric fields that disrupt processes critical for cancer cell survival, leading to immunogenic cell death and enhanced antitumour immune response. In preclinical models of non-small-cell lung cancer, TTFields amplified the effects of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. We report primary results from a pivotal study of TTFields therapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: This randomised, open-label, pivotal phase 3 study recruited patients at 130 sites in 19 countries. Participants were aged 22 years or older with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer progressing on or after platinum-based therapy, with squamous or non-squamous histology and ECOG performance status of 2 or less. Previous platinum-based therapy was required, but no restriction was placed on the number or type of previous lines of systemic therapy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to TTFields therapy and standard systemic therapy (investigator's choice of immune checkpoint inhibitor [nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab] or docetaxel) or standard therapy alone. Randomisation was performed centrally using variable blocked randomisation and an interactive voice-web response system, and was stratified by tumour histology, treatment, and region. Systemic therapies were dosed according to local practice guidelines. TTFields therapy (150 kHz) was delivered continuously to the thoracic region with the recommendation to achieve an average of at least 18 h/day device usage. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. The safety population included all patients who received any study therapy and were analysed according to the actual treatment received. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02973789. FINDINGS: Between Feb 13, 2017, and Nov 19, 2021, 276 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive TTFields therapy with standard therapy (n=137) or standard therapy alone (n=139). The median age was 64 years (IQR 59-70), 178 (64%) were male and 98 (36%) were female, 156 (57%) had non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, and 87 (32%) had received a previous immune checkpoint inhibitor. Median follow-up was 10·6 months (IQR 6·1-33·7) for patients receiving TTFields therapy with standard therapy, and 9·5 months (0·1-32·1) for patients receiving standard therapy. Overall survival was significantly longer with TTFields therapy and standard therapy than with standard therapy alone (median 13·2 months [95% CI 10·3-15·5] vs 9·9 months [8·1-11·5]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·74 [95% CI 0·56-0·98]; p=0·035). In the safety population (n=267), serious adverse events of any cause were reported in 70 (53%) of 133 patients receiving TTFields therapy plus standard therapy and 51 (38%) of 134 patients receiving standard therapy alone. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were leukopenia (37 [14%] of 267), pneumonia (28 [10%]), and anaemia (21 [8%]). TTFields therapy-related adverse events were reported in 95 (71%) of 133 patients; these were mostly (81 [85%]) grade 1-2 skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. There were three deaths related to standard therapy (two due to infections and one due to pulmonary haemorrhage) and no deaths related to TTFields therapy. INTERPRETATION: TTFields therapy added to standard therapy significantly improved overall survival compared with standard therapy alone in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after progression on platinum-based therapy without exacerbating systemic toxicities. These data suggest that TTFields therapy is efficacious in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and should be considered as a treatment option to manage the disease in this setting. FUNDING: Novocure.
- MeSH
- docetaxel MeSH
- inhibitory kontrolních bodů MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory plic * terapie MeSH
- nemalobuněčný karcinom plic * terapie MeSH
- nivolumab MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
The role of radiotherapy in borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC) remains controversial. In our study, we retrospectively evaluated 48 patients with BRPC (14; 29.2%) and LAPC (34; 70. 8%) who underwent 6-8 cycles of induction mFOLFIRINOX chemotherapy alone (23; 47.9%) or 4-6 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX followed by hypofractionated radiotherapy (up to the total dose of 39.9 Gy in 15 fractions) (25; 52.1%). Survival parameters were evaluated using the Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon Test and compared by using the long-rank test. The addition of radiotherapy was not associated with better survival (16.9 months for chemotherapy only versus 15.9 months for the combined therapy; p=0.486), as well as for both subgroups (13.5 months vs. 18.3 months; p=0.679) and (20.7 months vs. 13.8 months; p=0.425) for BRPC and LAPC, respectively. A higher resection rate was seen in the BRPC group compared to the LAPC group (43% vs. 17.6%, respectively). Our study revealed a significantly higher rate of lung metastases in patients after the combination therapy compared to those treated by chemotherapy only (19% vs. 0%, respectively; p=0.045). Such a borderline result, however, prevents us from drawing clear conclusions about whether this is an artifact caused by the low number of patients or whether radiotherapy leads to a selection of stem cells with a predilection to the generalization to the lungs.
Mitochondrially targeted anticancer drugs (mitocans) that disrupt the energy-producing systems of cancer are emerging as new potential therapeutics. Mitochondrially targeted tamoxifen (MitoTam), an inhibitor of mitochondrial respiration respiratory complex I, is a first-in-class mitocan that was tested in the phase I/Ib MitoTam-01 trial of patients with metastatic cancer. MitoTam exhibited a manageable safety profile and efficacy; among 37% (14/38) of responders, the efficacy was greatest in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with a clinical benefit rate of 83% (5/6) of patients. This can be explained by the preferential accumulation of MitoTam in the kidney tissue in preclinical studies. Here we report the mechanism of action and safety profile of MitoTam in a case series of RCC patients. All six patients were males with a median age of 69 years, who had previously received at least three lines of palliative systemic therapy and suffered progressive disease before starting MitoTam. We recorded stable disease in four, partial response in one, and progressive disease (PD) in one patient. The histological subtype matched clear cell RCC (ccRCC) in the five responders and claro-cellular carcinoma with sarcomatoid features in the non-responder. The number of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) was evaluated longitudinally to monitor disease dynamics. Beside the decreased number of CTCs after MitoTam administration, we observed a significant decrease of the mitochondrial network mass in enriched CTCs. Two patients had long-term clinical responses to MitoTam, of 50 and 36 weeks. Both patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events, not PD. Two patients who completed the trial in November 2019 and May 2020 are still alive without subsequent anticancer therapy. The toxicity of MitoTam increased with the dosage but was manageable. The efficacy of MitoTam in pretreated ccRCC patients is linked to the novel mechanism of action of this first-in-class mitochondrially targeted drug.
- Publikační typ
- kazuistiky MeSH
