JavaScript NENÍ povolen !

* Zobrazit nápovědu

20 záznamů v Medvik Filtry

Článek online

Defect-diaphragmatic ratio: a new parameter for assessment of defect size in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Pediatric surgery international. 2012 ; 28 (10) : 971-6.

Pediatr Surg Int
ISSN 1437-9813
Medvik
Zdroj

AIM: The aim of our study is to introduce a new objective method of perioperative evaluation of the size of diaphragmatic defect to enable comparison of results among various centres and methods used for diaphragmatic reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective observational study of neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and respiratory distress within 24 h of birth operated on from January 2009 to December 2011. Weight, length, thoracic shape and the diameters of diaphragmatic defect were measured. To determine the relative size of the defect, a defect-diaphragmatic ratio (DDR = defect area:diaphragm area × 100) was calculated. The measured and calculated data were subsequently compared between Gore-Tex patch group (GT) and primary repair group (PR). Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with CDH were admitted during study period. The overall survival rate was 79 % (37/47). Preoperative stabilization was achieved in 85 % (40/47). Survival of operated neonates was 93 % (37/40). Diaphragmatic reconstruction with Gore-Tex patch was used in 7 neonates (17 %), and primary repair in 33 (83 %). Mortality in Gore-Tex group was 29 %; mortality in primary repair group was 3 %. Data of anthropometric measurement were complete in 34 children (5 GT and 29 PR). Significant differences were found between GT group and PR group in the size of diaphragmatic defect with the transverse and sagittal diameters of defect (48.0 ± 5.7 vs. 30.1 ± 5.9, P < 0.00061; 34.0 ± 12.5 vs. 16.0 ± 7.3, P < 0.0022) and DDR (18.29 ± 4.60 vs. 5.77 ± 3.28, P < 0.0005), respectively. CONCLUSION: The value of DDR as an objective criterion of the extent of diaphragmatic defect was confirmed by the close correlation between DDR and feasibility of primary repair in the study group. This objective assessment of defect size may improve comparing various surgical techniques and results of different centres, and thus facilitates sharing experience with management of neonates with CDH.

MeSH
bránice chirurgie MeSH
brániční hernie diagnóza mortalita chirurgie MeSH
chirurgické síťky * MeSH
lidé MeSH
míra přežití trendy MeSH
následné studie MeSH
novorozenec MeSH
prospektivní studie MeSH
stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
vrozená brániční kýla MeSH
výsledek terapie MeSH
zákroky plastické chirurgie metody MeSH
Check Tag
lidé MeSH
mužské pohlaví MeSH
novorozenec MeSH
Publikační typ
časopisecké články MeSH
práce podpořená grantem MeSH
srovnávací studie MeSH
Geografické názvy
Česká republika MeSH

Článek online

Large diaphragmatic defect: are skeletal deformities preventable?

Pediatric surgery international. 2011 ; 27 (12) : 1343-1349. [pub] 20110920

Pediatr Surg Int
ISSN 1437-9813
Medvik
Zdroj

PURPOSE: The aim of study was to compare growth, nutritional status and incidence of chest wall deformities and scoliosis in survivors of large congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) defect (Gore-Tex patch reconstruction) with survivors with smaller defects and primary reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropometric study of 53 children who underwent CDH repair in neonatal period was carried out. Weight, height, and skin-fold thickness were measured, scoliosis and chest wall deformity were evaluated. Body mass index (BMI) and thoracic index (TI) were calculated using standard rules. The measured data were compared with national population standard with the use of standard deviation score (SDS). According to the type of diaphragmatic reconstruction, the patients were divided into two groups [Gore-Tex patch (10) versus primary repair (43)]. Student t test and Fisher exact tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Pectus excavatum was found in 25 (47%) patients, poor posture in 33% and significant scoliosis in 5%. Compared with the population norm, CDH children had a significantly lower body height SDS (mean -0.39, p < 0.05), weight SDS (mean -0.75, p < 0.001), BMI (mean SDS -0.68, p < 0.001) and lower TI (mean SDS -0.62, p < 0.01). Gore-Tex versus primary repair group significantly differed in incidence of pectus excavatum and BMI (PE: p = 0.027, BMI SDS: p = 0.016). A majority of anthropometric parameters (weight, height, thoracic index, and thorax circumference) and incidence of scoliosis and poor posture in children after Gore-Tex patch reconstruction did not significantly differ from children after primary repair. CONCLUSION: The differences in some anthropometric parameters (weight, BMI, and TI) and in the skeletal deformity suggest that the CDH not only disturbs normal lung growth, but also seems to have implications on some other aspects of somatic development. Whether these changes could be related to the type of diaphragmatic reconstruction or rather to the size of the defect remains uncertain.