BACKGROUND: Inflammation is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Data from recent trials suggest that colchicine reduces the risk of cardiovascular events. METHODS: In this multicenter trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned patients who had myocardial infarction to receive either colchicine or placebo and either spironolactone or placebo. The results of the colchicine trial are reported here. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven coronary revascularization, evaluated in a time-to-event analysis. C-reactive protein was measured at 3 months in a subgroup of patients, and safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 7062 patients at 104 centers in 14 countries underwent randomization; at the time of analysis, the vital status was unknown for 45 patients (0.6%), and this information was most likely missing at random. A primary-outcome event occurred in 322 of 3528 patients (9.1%) in the colchicine group and 327 of 3534 patients (9.3%) in the placebo group over a median follow-up period of 3 years (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.16; P = 0.93). The incidence of individual components of the primary outcome appeared to be similar in the two groups. The least-squares mean difference in C-reactive protein levels between the colchicine group and the placebo group at 3 months, adjusted according to the baseline values, was -1.28 mg per liter (95% CI, -1.81 to -0.75). Diarrhea occurred in a higher percentage of patients with colchicine than with placebo (10.2% vs. 6.6%; P<0.001), but the incidence of serious infections did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who had myocardial infarction, treatment with colchicine, when started soon after myocardial infarction and continued for a median of 3 years, did not reduce the incidence of the composite primary outcome (death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven coronary revascularization). (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03048825.).

• MeSH
• C-reaktivní protein * analýza   MeSH
• cévní mozková příhoda prevence a kontrola   MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• infarkt myokardu * prevence a kontrola   mortalita   MeSH
• Kaplanův-Meierův odhad MeSH
• kolchicin * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• recidiva MeSH
• sekundární prevence MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• spironolakton terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

BACKGROUND: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have been shown to reduce mortality in patients after myocardial infarction with congestive heart failure. Whether routine use of spironolactone is beneficial after myocardial infarction is uncertain. METHODS: In this multicenter trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned patients with myocardial infarction who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention to receive either spironolactone or placebo and either colchicine or placebo. The results of the spironolactone trial are reported here. The two primary outcomes were a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or new or worsening heart failure, evaluated as the total number of events; and a composite of the first occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke, new or worsening heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: We enrolled 7062 patients at 104 centers in 14 countries; 3537 patients were assigned to receive spironolactone and 3525 to receive placebo. At the time of our analyses, the vital status was unknown for 45 patients (0.6%). For the first primary outcome, there were 183 events (1.7 per 100 patient-years) in the spironolactone group as compared with 220 events (2.1 per 100 patient-years) in the placebo group over a median follow-up period of 3 years (hazard ratio adjusted for competing risk of death from noncardiovascular causes, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 1.21; P = 0.51). With respect to the second primary outcome, an event occurred in 280 of 3537 patients (7.9%) in the spironolactone group and 294 of 3525 patients (8.3%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio adjusted for competing risk, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.13; P = 0.60). Serious adverse events were reported in 255 patients (7.2%) in the spironolactone group and 241 (6.8%) in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with myocardial infarction, spironolactone did not reduce the incidence of death from cardiovascular causes or new or worsening heart failure or the incidence of a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new or worsening heart failure. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03048825.).

• MeSH
• antagonisté mineralokortikoidních receptorů * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• cévní mozková příhoda mortalita   MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• infarkt myokardu * mortalita   farmakoterapie   MeSH
• Kaplanův-Meierův odhad MeSH
• kardiovaskulární nemoci mortalita   prevence a kontrola   MeSH
• koronární angioplastika MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• spironolakton * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• srdeční selhání * farmakoterapie   mortalita   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is the most prevalent cardiovascular risk factor, with several detrimental effects on the cardiovascular system. Contrasting results have been reported so far on its prognostic role in patients admitted for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Therefore, we investigated the impact of hypertension on short-term mortality in a large multicenter contemporary registry of STEMI patients, including patients treated during COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The ISACS-STEMI COVID-19 was a retrospective registry that included STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between March and June of 2019 and 2020 in 109 high-volume primary PCI centers from 4 continents. We collected data on baseline, clinical and procedural characteristics, in-hospital outcome and 30-day mortality. For this analysis patients were grouped according to history of hypertension at admission. RESULTS: A total of 16083 patients were assessed, including 8813 (54.8%) with history of hypertension. These patients were more often elderly, with a worse cardiovascular risk profile, but were less frequently active smoker. Some procedural differences were observed between the two groups, including lower rate of thrombectomy and use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors or cangrelor but more extensive coronary disease in patients with hypertension. Between patients with and without hypertension, there was no significant difference in SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Hypertensive patients had a significantly higher in-hospital and 30-day mortality, similarly observed in both pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 era, and confirmed after adjustment for main baseline differences and propensity score (in-hospital mortality: adjusted odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] =1.673 [1.389-2.014], P < 0.001; 30-day mortality: adjusted hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI] = 1.418 [1.230-1.636], P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This is one of the largest and contemporary study assessing the impact of hypertension in STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty, including also the COVID-19 pandemic period. Hypertension was independently associated with significantly higher rates of in-hospital and 30-day mortality.

• MeSH
• COVID-19 * komplikace   mortalita   MeSH
• hypertenze * komplikace   mortalita   MeSH
• infarkt myokardu s elevacemi ST úseků * mortalita   komplikace   terapie   MeSH
• koronární angioplastika * MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mortalita v nemocnicích MeSH
• registrace * MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• rizikové faktory MeSH
• SARS-CoV-2 MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH

AIMS: Among patients with cardiogenic shock, immediate initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) did not demonstrate any benefit at 30 days. The present study evaluated 1-year clinical outcomes of the Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the therapy of Cardiogenic Shock (ECMO-CS) trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ECMO-CS trial randomized 117 patients with severe or rapidly progressing cardiogenic shock to immediate initiation of ECMO or early conservative strategy. The primary endpoint for this analysis was 1-year all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included a composite of death, resuscitated cardiac arrest or implantation of another mechanical circulatory support device, duration of mechanical ventilation, and the length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays. In addition, an unplanned post-hoc subgroup analysis was performed. At 1 year, all-cause death occurred in 40 of 58 (69.0%) patients in the ECMO arm and in 40 of 59 (67.8%) in the early conservative arm (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-1.58; p = 0.93). The composite endpoint occurred in 43 (74.1%) patients in the ECMO group and in 47 (79.7%) patients in the early conservative group (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.55-1.25; p = 0.29). The durations of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay and hospital stay were comparable between groups. Significant interaction with treatment strategy and 1-year mortality was observed in subgroups according to baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) indicating lower mortality in the subgroup with low baseline MAP (<63 mmHg: HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.29-1.16; pinteraction = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with severe or rapidly progressing cardiogenic shock, immediate initiation of ECMO did not improve clinical outcomes at 1 year compared to the early conservative strategy. However, immediate ECMO initiation might be beneficial in patients with advanced haemodynamic compromise.

• MeSH
• časové faktory MeSH
• jednotky intenzivní péče MeSH
• kardiogenní šok * terapie   mortalita   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mimotělní membránová oxygenace * metody   MeSH
• míra přežití trendy   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• umělé dýchání metody   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

Autorka v príspevku uvádza kazuistiku pacienta s pokročilou granulomatózou s polyangitídou, ktorý bol privezený po úspešnej kardiopulmonálnej resuscitácii v rámci infarktu myokardu v ťažkom kardiogénnom šoku a vyžadoval umelú pľúcnu ventiláciu. Autorka sa snaží poukázať na závažnosť základného ochorenia, s ktorým sa v súčasnej dobe stretávame čoraz častejšie. Zároveň vyzdvihuje dôležitosť primárnej zdravotnej starostlivosti, ktorá prispieva k správnej diagnostike a liečbe ochorenia.

The author presents a case study of a patient with advanced granulomatosis with polyangiitis, who was admitted after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation due to myocardial infarction in severe cardiogenic shock and required mechanical ventilation. The author aims to high light the severity of the underlying disease, which is being encountered increasingly often in contemporary practice. At the same time, the author emphasizes the importance of primary healthcare in contributing to the accurate diagnosis and treatment of the disease

• MeSH
• granulomatóza s polyangiitidou diagnostické zobrazování   etiologie   klasifikace   patofyziologie   terapie   MeSH
• infarkt myokardu ošetřování   terapie   MeSH
• kardiogenní šok MeSH
• ošetřovatelská péče o pacienty v kritickém stavu MeSH
• péče o pacienty v kritickém stavu MeSH
• plicní ventilace MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Publikační typ
• kazuistiky MeSH

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to analyse the role of conservative treatment and regional differences in 30-day hospital mortality for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients in the Czech Republic. METHODS: Using administrative data from Czech health insurance companies for 2018-2020, we employed a probit model to examine factors influencing mortality across 13 complex cardiovascular centres, calculating average marginal effects to ensure interpretable results. RESULTS: Conservative treatment was associated with a 4.7 percentage point increase in 30-day mortality compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment (95% CI: 3.6-5.7). This effect varied significantly across different types of AMI and healthcare providers, with regional variations in mortality ranging from 0 to 4.3 percentage points relative to the best-performing centre. CONCLUSIONS: Higher proportions of conservative treatment significantly contribute to increased 30-day mortality in complex cardiovascular centres. The persistent regional variations after controlling for patient characteristics suggest the need for standardized treatment protocols and improved data collection systems to reduce disparities in outcomes.

• MeSH
• infarkt myokardu * mortalita   terapie   MeSH
• konzervativní terapie * statistika a číselné údaje   mortalita   MeSH
• koronární angioplastika statistika a číselné údaje   mortalita   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mortalita v nemocnicích * trendy   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Geografické názvy
• Česká republika MeSH

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy can be accompanied by dynamic obstruction in the left ventricular outflow tract and acute apical ballooning, which are among the very rare causes of cardiogenic shock. This condition requires a specific treatment approach that in many ways differs from the treatment of other causes of cardiogenic shock. We present a case and our treatment strategy (including extracorporeal life support) for refractory cardiogenic shock in a patient with previously undiagnosed hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

• MeSH
• echokardiografie MeSH
• elektrokardiografie MeSH
• hypertrofická kardiomyopatie * komplikace   diagnóza   terapie   MeSH
• kardiogenní šok * terapie   etiologie   diagnóza   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• takotsubo kardiomyopatie komplikace   diagnóza   terapie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• kazuistiky MeSH

Česká republika patří mezi země s vysokou prevalencí kardiovaskulárních onemocnění. Arteriální hypertenze je jejich nejvýznamnějším ovlivnitelným rizikovým faktorem. V České republice postihuje zhruba 40 % dospělé populace. Cílových hodnot krevního tlaku, respektive redukce celkového kardiovaskulárního rizika, však stále většina léčených nedosahuje. Aktuální doporučené postupy pro management vysokého krevního tlaku a arteriální hypertenze nově doporučují jako cílový krevní tlak u většiny hypertoniků hodnoty 120-129 mmHg systolického krevního tlaku do tří měsíců od počátku léčby. Zlatým standardem léčby zůstávají fixní kombinace antihypertenziv. Právě jejich daleko širší využívání v běžné denní praxi může být cestou k dosažení cílových hodnot krevního tlaku u většiny hypertoniků. První volbou by u většiny pacientů měla být fixní dvojkombinace nízké dávky inhibitoru RAAS (renin­‐angiotenzin­‐aldosteronového systému) a blokátoru kalciového kanálu nebo nethiazidového diuretika. V případě nedosažení cílových hodnot krevního tlaku do tří měsíců je indikováno nasazení fixní trojkombinace inhibitoru RAAS, blokátoru kalciového kanálu a nethiazidového diuretika. Tato fixní trojkombinace vede k dosažení cílových hodno krevního tlaku u více než 90 % hypertoniků. Prezentovaná kazuistika ukazuje možnosti využití fixní trojkombinační léčby.

The Czech Republic is one of the countries with a high prevalence of cardiovascular diseases. Arterial hypertension is the most important risk factor. Hypertension pre­valence in the Czech Republic is approximately 40% of the adult population. However, target blood pressure values or reduction of overall cardiovascular risk are still not achieved by the majority of those treated. The current guidelines for managing high blood pressure and arterial hypertension now recommend a target blood pressure of 120 - 129 mmHg systolic blood pressure within three months of starting treatment for most hypertensive patients. Fixed combinations of antihypertensive drugs remain the gold standard of treatment. It is their much wider use in everyday practice that may be the route to achieving target blood pressure values in most hypertensives. The first choice for most patients should be a fixed two-dose combination of a low-dose RAAS (renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system) inhibitor and a calcium channel blocker or non-thiazide diuretic. If target blood pressure values are not achieved within three months, a fixed triple combination of RAAS inhibitor, calcium channel blocker, and non-thiazide diuretic is indicated. This fixed triple combination leads to achieving target blood pressure values in more than 90% of hypertensive patients. The presented case report demonstrates the potential of fixed triple combination therapy.

• MeSH
• antihypertenziva aplikace a dávkování   farmakologie   MeSH
• fixní kombinace léků MeSH
• hypertenze * farmakoterapie   komplikace   prevence a kontrola   MeSH
• infarkt myokardu s elevacemi ST úseků * diagnóza   etiologie   farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• kardiovaskulární látky aplikace a dávkování   farmakologie   MeSH
• kardiovaskulární nemoci prevence a kontrola   MeSH
• krevní tlak účinky léků   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• kazuistiky MeSH

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hernia is a rare condition characterized by the protrusion of lung tissue through a chest wall defect. Trauma and thoracic surgery are the most common causes of acquired lung hernias. We present an unusual case of (sequential) bilateral lung herniation with parenchymal infarction after bilateral lobar lung transplantation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year-old female, wait-listed as high-urgency candidate, with a body mass index (BMI) of 29 kg/m2 underwent a bilateral lobar lung transplantation for pulmonary fibrosis through a clamshell thoracotomy approach. Due to a size mismatch, stapler resection of the segment 3 and the middle lobe of the right lung, as well as an upper left lobectomy was required. The chest was closed with 3 braided non-absorbable pericostal sutures on each side. Sternal osteosynthesis was performed with a titanium sternal splint along with 7 self-tapping screws with a length of 18 mm. On the posttransplant day (PTD) 18, patient's clinical condition deteriorated. Physical examination didn't reveal any palpable subcutaneous chest resistance. However, a computed tomography (CT) scan showed a herniation of the segment 6 of the right lung. During acute surgical revision, perioperative finding revealed posterior pericostal suture failure. Therefore, a stapler resection was performed due to the infarction of the herniated segment. On the PTD 36, herniation of the left lung parenchyma was detected by acute CT scan. The protruding vital parenchyma was surgically repositioned without necessity of resection. Two posterior pericostal sutures were broken, and distal part of sternal splint detached. Thoracotomy was closed using 5 braided non-absorbable sutures. Sternum was re-osteosynthesized with the STRATOSTM system. After 3 months of intensive postoperative care, the patient was transferred to the rehabilitation department. She was discharged on the PTD 99. After 20 months of follow-up, lung function remains stable without the need for oxygen support. CONCLUSION: Clamshell incision remains ultimate approach in thoracic surgery. However, pulmonary herniation after clamshell thoracotomy is a rare complication and may manifest as acute respiratory distress syndrome with an inflammatory response. In these cases, CT scan should be always considered, even if no palpable pathology of chest is present.

• MeSH
• hernie * etiologie   MeSH
• infarkt etiologie   chirurgie   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• operace kýly metody   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• plíce diagnostické zobrazování   MeSH
• plicní nemoci chirurgie   etiologie   MeSH
• počítačová rentgenová tomografie MeSH
• pooperační komplikace chirurgie   MeSH
• torakotomie * metody   MeSH
• transplantace plic * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• kazuistiky MeSH

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ACVDs), a condition characterised by lipid accumulation in arterial walls, which is often exacerbated by chronic inflammation disorders, is the major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Colchicine, with its first medicinal use in ancient Egypt, is an inexpensive drug with anti-inflammatory properties. However, its role in primary prevention of ACVDs in the general population remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical benefits and harms of colchicine as primary prevention of cardiovascular outcomes in the general population. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Heart Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations), Ovid Embase, Web of Science, and LILACS. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP for ongoing and unpublished studies. We also scanned the reference lists of relevant included studies, reviews, meta-analyses, and health technology reports to identify additional studies. There were no limitations on language, date of publication, or study setting. The search results were updated on 31 May 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in any setting, recruiting adults without pre-existing cardiovascular disease. We included trials that compared colchicine versus placebo, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, immunomodulating drugs, or usual care. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and adverse events. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two or more review authors independently selected studies, extracted data, and performed risk of bias and GRADE assessments. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 15 RCTs (1721 participants randomised; 1412 participants analysed) with follow-up periods ranging from 4 to 728 weeks. The intervention was oral colchicine compared with placebo, immunomodulating drugs, or usual care or no treatment. Due to biases and imprecision, the evidence was very uncertain for all outcomes. All trials but one had a high risk of bias. Five out of seven meta-analyses included fewer than six trials (71.4%). The objectives of the review were to assess cardiovascular outcomes in the general population, but many of the included trials focused on liver disease. Colchicine compared to placebo Colchicine may reduce all-cause mortality compared to placebo in primary prevention, but the evidence is very uncertain (risk ratio (RR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to 0.91; 6 studies, 463 participants; very low-certainty evidence; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 11, 95% CI 6 to 67). Colchicine may result in little to no difference in non-fatal myocardial infarction, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.82; 1 study, 100 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Colchicine may not reduce the incidence of stroke, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 2.43, 95% CI 0.67 to 8.86; 1 study, 100 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Regarding adverse events, colchicine may increase the incidence of diarrhoea (RR 3.99, 95% CI 1.44 to 11.06; 8 studies, 605 participants; very low-certainty evidence; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 10, 95% CI 6 to 17), and may have little to no effect on neurological outcomes such as seizure or mental confusion (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.66; 2 studies, 155 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. The effect of colchicine on cardiovascular mortality is also very uncertain (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.03 to 62.43; 2 studies, 160 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Colchicine may not reduce post-cardiac procedure atrial fibrillation, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.19; 1 study, 100 participants). We found no trials reporting on pericardial effusion, peripheral artery disease, heart failure, or unstable angina. Colchicine compared to methotrexate (immunomodulating drug) Colchicine may result in little to no difference in all-cause mortality compared to methotrexate, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.51; 1 study, 85 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We found no trials reporting other cardiovascular outcomes or adverse events for this comparison. Colchicine compared to usual care or no treatment The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of colchicine compared with usual care on all-cause mortality in primary prevention (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.27; 2 studies, 729 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Regarding adverse events, colchicine may increase the incidence of diarrhoea compared to usual care, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 3.32, 95% CI 1.56 to 7.03; 2 studies, 729 participants; very low-certainty evidence; NNTH 18, 95% CI 12 to 42). No trials reported other cardiovascular outcomes for this comparison. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This Cochrane review evaluated the clinical benefits and harms of using colchicine for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in the general population. Comparisons were made against placebo, immunomodulating medications, or usual care or no treatment. However, the certainty of the evidence for the predefined outcomes was very low, highlighting the pressing need for high-quality, rigorous studies to ascertain colchicine's clinical impact definitively. We identified numerous biases and inaccuracies in the included studies, limiting their generalisability and precluding a conclusive determination of colchicine's efficacy in preventing cardiovascular events. The existing evidence regarding colchicine's potential cardiovascular benefits or harms for primary prevention is inconclusive owing to the limitations inherent in the current studies. More robust clinical trials are needed to bridge this evidence gap effectively.

• MeSH
• antiflogistika nesteroidní terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• antiflogistika terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• cévní mozková příhoda prevence a kontrola   mortalita   MeSH
• infarkt myokardu * prevence a kontrola   mortalita   epidemiologie   MeSH
• kardiovaskulární nemoci * prevence a kontrola   mortalita   MeSH
• kolchicin * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• příčina smrti MeSH
• primární prevence * metody   MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma * MeSH
• zkreslení výsledků (epidemiologie) MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• metaanalýza MeSH
• přehledy MeSH
• systematický přehled MeSH