BACKGROUND: Two phylogenetic lineages of influenza B virus coexist and circulate in the human population (B/Yamagata and B/Victoria) but only one B-strain is included in each seasonal vaccine. Mismatch regularly occurs between the recommended and circulating B-strain. Inclusion of both lineages in vaccines may offer better protection against influenza. METHODS: This study (NCT00714285) assessed the immunogenicity and safety of two candidate quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIV) containing two A- and two B-strains (one from each lineage) in adults (18-60 years). Subjects were randomized and stratified by age to receive either QIV (non-adjuvanted or low-dose adjuvanted [LD QIV-AS]) or trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV, non-adjuvanted or low-dose adjuvanted [LD TIV-AS]), N = 105 in all treatment groups. The study evaluated the statistical non-inferiority of the immunological response elicited by QIV and LD QIV-AS versus TIV and LD TIV-AS and the statistical superiority of the response elicited by the quadrivalent vaccines against the B-strain (B/Jiangsu) not included in the TIV. RESULTS: Pre-defined non-inferiority and superiority criteria were reached for both QIVs compared to the TIVs. On Day 21 in all vaccine groups SCRs were ≥54.8%, SPRs ≥88.5% and SCFs ≥5.4 for the A strains and B strain included in all vaccines (B/Malaysia). This fulfilled the European (CHMP) and the US (CBER) licensing criteria for the assessment of influenza vaccines in adults (CHMP criteria: SCR > 40%, SPR > 70%, SCF > 2; CBER criteria: LL of 95% CI for SPR ≥ 70% or SCR ≥ 40%). Only the QIVs met the CHMP and CBER criteria for the B/Jiangsu strain. In the QIV and LD-QIV-AS groups, the SCFs were 9.1 and 8.1, respectively and the SPRs were 98.1% and 95.2%, whereas for the TIV and LD-TIV-AS groups, the SCFs were 2.3 and 2.5, respectively, and the SPRs were 75.0% and 63.8%, with the LLs of the 95% CI <70% for SPR and <40% for SCR. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of a fourth strain did not impact the immune response elicited by the three original strains contained in the TIV. A clear immunological benefit was seen with the QIV formulation for the second B-strain, indicating that quadrivalent vaccines could provide broader protection against influenza. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00714285.

• MeSH
• analýza rozptylu MeSH
• chřipka lidská imunologie   prevence a kontrola   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• neutralizační testy MeSH
• protilátky virové krev   MeSH
• testy inhibice hemaglutinace MeSH
• vakcíny proti chřipce aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   imunologie   MeSH
• virus chřipky A imunologie   MeSH
• virus chřipky B imunologie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• protilátky virové MeSH
• vakcíny proti chřipce MeSH

BACKGROUND: Preparedness for an H5N1 influenza pre-pandemic requires effective and well-tolerated emergency vaccination strategies that provide both pandemic strain-specific and heterologous protection. OBJECTIVES: This was a pivotal study for the regulatory approval process for a candidate MF59-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine. Its goals were to identify the preferred primary 2-dose vaccination schedule in adults and to assess whether the vaccine met European Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) licensure criteria. METHODS: Healthy volunteers aged 18 to 60 years received 1 of 4 randomized schedules in which the 2 doses of vaccine were separated by a 1-, 2-, 3-, or 6-week interval. Three blood samples (~20 mL(-1)) were obtained from each subject: the first sample, immediately before administration of the first dose of vaccine; the second, immediately before administration of the second dose; and the third, 21 days after administration of the second dose. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI), microneutralization (MN), and single radial hemolysis (SRH) were assayed after each dose. Immunogenicity was assessed based on the CHMP licensure criteria for annual influenza vaccines (number of seroconversions or significant increase in HI titer >40%; mean geometric increase >2.5; and proportion of subjects achieving an HI titer ≥40 or SRH titer >25 mm(2) should be >70% [seroprotection]). Subjects recorded all adverse events occurring within 7 days of vaccine administration; information on any serious adverse events was collected throughout the study (duration, 202 days). RESULTS: All study participants (N = 240) were white, with a mean age of 33 years and a mean body mass index of 24.6 kg/m(2). Equal numbers of men and women were assigned to each vaccination schedule. The CHMP criterion for seroprotection was achieved when the 2 doses of vaccine were separated by 2 (76%), 3 (72%), and 6 (79%) weeks; similar results were obtained on MN and SRH analysis. On the SRH analysis, the candidate vaccine showed a heterologous immune response to the H5N1/turkey/Turkey/1/05 (NIBRG-23; clade 2) influenza antigen. The vaccine met 2 of the 3 European licensure criteria, with seroconversion rates of 69% and 65% in the groups assigned to a 2- and 3-week interval between doses, respectively, and geometric mean ratios of 4.3 and 4.5. There were no serious adverse events related to vaccination. The most common adverse events reported within 7 days of the first and second doses of vaccine were mild to moderate injection-site pain (63%-73% and 34%-48%, respectively) and fatigue (25%-30% and 13%-24%). CONCLUSIONS: Two 7.5-μg doses of MF59-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine given 2, 3, or 6 weeks apart afforded H5N1-specific immunity and met the CHMP licensure criterion for seroprotection in these healthy volunteers. Clinically relevant levels of heterologous immunity were observed when the 2 doses of vaccine were administered either 2 or 3 weeks apart; however, the licensure criterion for seroprotection was not met in this case.

• MeSH
• adjuvancia imunologická aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• chřipka lidská prevence a kontrola   virologie   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• hemaglutinace účinky léků   MeSH
• hemolýza účinky léků   MeSH
• imunologická paměť účinky léků   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• polysorbáty aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• protilátky virové krev   MeSH
• rozvrh dávkování léků MeSH
• sekundární imunizace MeSH
• skvalen aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   imunologie   MeSH
• testy inhibice hemaglutinace MeSH
• vakcíny proti chřipce * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   imunologie   MeSH
• virus chřipky A, podtyp H5N1 imunologie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• adjuvancia imunologická MeSH
• MF59 oil emulsion MeSH Prohlížeč
• polysorbáty MeSH
• protilátky virové MeSH
• skvalen MeSH
• vakcíny proti chřipce * MeSH